These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Ships & Modules

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Why does everyone hate the Drake?

Author
Mfume Apocal
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#81 - 2012-04-23 03:27:50 UTC  |  Edited by: Mfume Apocal
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
The fact that Abaddon pilot can't hit it with arties doesn't make this fit "dumb as hell".


Arties hit MWDing Drakes perfectly fine.

It doesn't have the EHP of a brick Drake, it sacrifices the utility of the standard PDU Drake and under TQ conditions a nano-Drake outruns it forever.
Barbie D0ll
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#82 - 2012-04-23 07:29:48 UTC
the drake is easy to use, logi friendly, low sp requirement, hard to screw up, good in fleets (the counterpart of the hurricane), shines with high SP (which allow other fittings that curb stomp everything stupid enough to get in range, just like the hurricane), and its cheap, and easily replaceable
Raptors Mole
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#83 - 2012-04-23 09:52:48 UTC
Ref: The alleged proposed changes to the Drake;


Make the drake faster and drop its tank for more DPS?

Make the Harbi faster? (God knows it needs something)

Reduce Myrms drone bandwidth for more speed and up turret DPS?

Leave Cane alone?

Yay! We can all fly the Dra-Cane-Myrmi-Harb. We can all be the same.


Well Done CCP - now thats what I call balancing!


The Drake is what it is - Caldari thru and thru. It ain't broke/overpowered. It doesn't need a major makeover.

On the other hand, is a spider AAAAAAAAAaaaaaaaaaargh!

Raptors
Jorma Morkkis
State War Academy
Caldari State
#84 - 2012-04-23 10:03:55 UTC
Mfume Apocal wrote:
Arties hit MWDing Drakes perfectly fine.


If Drake is flying directly towards you or away from you. Or it's afk and has velocity of 0m/s, it does help.
Dheeradj Nurgle
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#85 - 2012-04-23 11:26:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Dheeradj Nurgle
FT Diomedes wrote:


The Drake is a superb Level 2 and 3 mission boat. Probably nothing better out there for that purpose.



As much as I love the Drake, I disagree, With proper skills the Brutix has a better tank, and can do a lot more damage. The same is true for the Dominix vs Raven. The Dominix can have a larger tank, with more DPS from drones alone.

The drake is a lot more mobile, while the Galante droneboats just sit there, laughing when they take a shot head on.


Quote:
Long and short of it: fly the Drake and don't give a damn what other people think.


Agreed 100%, and it applies to every ship you want to fly. It's how you fly your ship, not how others see it.
FT Diomedes
The Graduates
#86 - 2012-04-23 13:12:47 UTC
Mfume Apocal wrote:
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
The fact that Abaddon pilot can't hit it with arties doesn't make this fit "dumb as hell".


Arties hit MWDing Drakes perfectly fine.



I saw this first hand myself yesterday. My alt's Drake made it home safe and sound, but several did not.

CCP should add more NPC 0.0 space to open it up and liven things up: the Stepping Stones project.

FT Diomedes
The Graduates
#87 - 2012-04-23 13:16:32 UTC
Dheeradj Nurgle wrote:
FT Diomedes wrote:


The Drake is a superb Level 2 and 3 mission boat. Probably nothing better out there for that purpose.



As much as I love the Drake, I disagree, With proper skills the Brutix has a better tank, and can do a lot more damage. The same is true for the Dominix vs Raven. The Dominix can have a larger tank, with more DPS from drones alone.

The drake is a lot more mobile, while the Galante droneboats just sit there, laughing when they take a shot head on.




If a player has proper skills, he probably shouldn't be wasting them in Level 2 or Level 3 missions (unless he is blitzing them to open up Level 4 standings). The fact that a low SP player can do well in a Drake is precisely the thing that makes it attractive in those low level missions.

CCP should add more NPC 0.0 space to open it up and liven things up: the Stepping Stones project.

Tobiaz
Spacerats
#88 - 2012-04-23 17:07:32 UTC
Drakes take a long time to die, and 'real' PvP-ers don't like it when things take a long time to die.

Operation WRITE DOWN ALL THE THINGS!!!  Check out the list at http://bit.ly/wdatt Collecting and compiling all fixes and ideas for EVE. Looking for more editors!

Misanthra
Alternative Enterprises
#89 - 2012-04-23 20:30:30 UTC
Tobiaz wrote:
Drakes take a long time to die, and 'real' PvP-ers don't like it when things take a long time to die.



lot of ftruth to that lol.

Flew and flown agaisnt drakes. Tank is its main feature imo. And why its not liked. Takes a while to kill. Fleet level makes it unliked as you actually have to primary them to drop em fast. And it can be done, I have been 3 shotted, well the volleys hit so I saw 3 massive dips in tank to be more accurate, by a good pirmary call out....km list of shooters read like the same ones I got in bs' lol.

Skirmish style its not liked, imo, becasue if you don't bring the proper dps it basically goes on and on till the other guy gridns the tank down or gets bored and burns out to break point and gtfo since he knows he's jsut burning ammo on a semi-lost cause lol.


If proposed drake change go through, be interesting to see how this "nerfs" the drake . Part of me is thinking the ROF will still make this ship hated. Just hated for more gank instead of tank. While not the same as winmatar ac round spewing its still better than what she has now. Fleet or skirmish....this should be an actual improvement. Worth the lost tank imo.


Sjugar
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#90 - 2012-04-23 22:20:30 UTC
The reason I hate drakes is that our FCs make us fly them for so many hours.

In large scale fleet engagements, for subcaps it's only drakes, maelstroms, bombers and sniper t3s that are effective. The rest just gets volleyed of the field.
Tobiaz
Spacerats
#91 - 2012-04-24 07:32:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Tobiaz
Misanthra wrote:
Tobiaz wrote:
Drakes take a long time to die, and 'real' PvP-ers don't like it when things take a long time to die.



lot of ftruth to that lol.

Flew and flown agaisnt drakes. Tank is its main feature imo. And why its not liked. Takes a while to kill. Fleet level makes it unliked as you actually have to primary them to drop em fast. And it can be done, I have been 3 shotted, well the volleys hit so I saw 3 massive dips in tank to be more accurate, by a good pirmary call out....km list of shooters read like the same ones I got in bs' lol.

Skirmish style its not liked, imo, becasue if you don't bring the proper dps it basically goes on and on till the other guy gridns the tank down or gets bored and burns out to break point and gtfo since he knows he's jsut burning ammo on a semi-lost cause lol.


If proposed drake change go through, be interesting to see how this "nerfs" the drake . Part of me is thinking the ROF will still make this ship hated. Just hated for more gank instead of tank. While not the same as winmatar ac round spewing its still better than what she has now. Fleet or skirmish....this should be an actual improvement. Worth the lost tank imo.



In view of the very good upcoming Tiercide, I think CCP should keep their hands of the Drake. With it's low DPS and massive signature the Drake already is quite balanced, and this is shown by the fact that Tr3 BC have taken over a lot of the BC-spots in fleets.

The uber-tanky Drake was a very good role-defined ship. Giving it a tank-nerf and dps-boost just puts it back in the area of general usefulness area that is ruled by 'flavour of the day' of the highest tier, doing a 180 degree turn on what Tiercide is supposed to achieve.

Besides, giving a ROF boost to a ship wielding 7 missile launchers, the most lag-heavy weapons in this game?
OMG CCP what the hell are you thinking?!

Operation WRITE DOWN ALL THE THINGS!!!  Check out the list at http://bit.ly/wdatt Collecting and compiling all fixes and ideas for EVE. Looking for more editors!

Crellion
Nano Rhinos
PURPLE HELMETED WARRIORS
#92 - 2012-04-24 11:45:06 UTC
Tobiaz wrote:
Misanthra wrote:
Tobiaz wrote:
Drakes take a long time to die, and 'real' PvP-ers don't like it when things take a long time to die.



lot of ftruth to that lol.

Flew and flown agaisnt drakes. Tank is its main feature imo. And why its not liked. Takes a while to kill. Fleet level makes it unliked as you actually have to primary them to drop em fast. And it can be done, I have been 3 shotted, well the volleys hit so I saw 3 massive dips in tank to be more accurate, by a good pirmary call out....km list of shooters read like the same ones I got in bs' lol.

Skirmish style its not liked, imo, becasue if you don't bring the proper dps it basically goes on and on till the other guy gridns the tank down or gets bored and burns out to break point and gtfo since he knows he's jsut burning ammo on a semi-lost cause lol.


If proposed drake change go through, be interesting to see how this "nerfs" the drake . Part of me is thinking the ROF will still make this ship hated. Just hated for more gank instead of tank. While not the same as winmatar ac round spewing its still better than what she has now. Fleet or skirmish....this should be an actual improvement. Worth the lost tank imo.



In view of the very good upcoming Tiercide, I think CCP should keep their hands of the Drake. With it's low DPS and massive signature the Drake already is quite balanced, and this is shown by the fact that Tr3 BC have taken over a lot of the BC-spots in fleets.

The uber-tanky Drake was a very good role-defined ship. Giving it a tank-nerf and dps-boost just puts it back in the area of general usefulness area that is ruled by 'flavour of the day' of the highest tier, doing a 180 degree turn on what Tiercide is supposed to achieve.

Besides, giving a ROF boost to a ship wielding 7 missile launchers, the most lag-heavy weapons in this game?
OMG CCP what the hell are you thinking?!


So they are giving Draeks a rof bonus? Dunno bout pvp (though I know I might now try one again for small gang) but for pve this is a bit OTT...
Sunviking
Doomheim
#93 - 2012-04-24 14:01:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Sunviking
The reason why I don't use the Drake anymore is because it's DPS is the poorest of the Tier 2 Battlecruisers.

EFT comparison:
Hurricane: 787DPS with 6 Autocannons + 2 HAM launchers, 3 x Gyros, 1 x BCS.
Myrmidon: 878DPS with 6 Blasters + 3 x damage mods and Drones (Kinetic + Thermal + selectable drone damage types).
Harbinger: 671DPS with Pulses and 3 x damage mods (even mix of EM + Thermal damage).
Drake: 578DPS with HAMs and 3 x damage mods (only with Kinetic damage).
FEROX: 606 DPS with 6 Blasters and 1 HAM Launcher, 3 x Mag Field Stabs.


Weapons above are unheated, all skills at lvl 5, no implants.

I actually really want a Hurricane and a Myrmidon now. Drake is balanced too much towards tank, not gank. Even a Blaster Ferox outdamages it.

Looking at the above, the Drake is pretty rubbish. Tengu only performs well because it has an obscene RoF bonus.

Caldari ships in general lack the DPS and application of DPS to perform well in PvP.
Gypsio III
Questionable Ethics.
Ministry of Inappropriate Footwork
#94 - 2012-04-24 16:51:57 UTC
Sunviking, are you a refugee from 2007?
Studley Goodfk
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#95 - 2012-04-24 18:30:02 UTC
I am back to the game after a year away. Unfortunately, I sold off my old character and gave away most of my assets when I left, thinking I would not be back, so am starting from scratch again.

My old main was a full on Minmatar with over 50k skill points when I auctioned it and I am fairly confident that I knew my way around most of the game. Coming back there is only one route I even remotely considered to get back into action quickly, and that involves the Drake!!

My aim is to blitz through missions ASAP to get to Lvl 3s in order to get he ISK rolling in enough to finance the step to Lvl 4s. I already swarmed through the Lvl 1s and am in the thick of Lvl 2s using an assault missile Caracal. I already have the skills for the Drake fit I aim to use for Lvl 3+ but just don't have the ISK to buy it yet!! :)

As previously mentioned, there is no other ship that is so easy to train for and so simple to fly, yet to be so safe. Boring? God, yes!

Once I am into Lvl 4s then I will branch out and get back into the ships I love (Minmatar all the way!!!!!). I know it is a longer training route for PvP, but it is a much quicker way to get back into the thick of things. Having quick, disposable capital is much better for the long game, and I quite enjoy being the scout/tackle. Hehe. And besides, the shield and basic drone skills are equally useful for the ships I like to fly anyway.
Zyress
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#96 - 2012-04-24 20:49:01 UTC
I'd call it over kill for lvl 2's a caracal or for that matter a Kestrel can do lvl 2's, they hate on the Drake because its a very good ship when in a massed fleet, but that can be said of a lot of ships , the Drake is just cheaper and easier to train to an acceptable performance level than most of those other ships. With the new tier 3 Battlecuisers though I think the classic Drake Blob is out ranged so that should not be as big a problem untill they extend its range again with the upcoming rebalance that will increase its missile speed.
Zyress
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#97 - 2012-04-24 21:03:56 UTC  |  Edited by: Zyress
Jorma Morkkis wrote:
Sigurd Sig Hansen wrote:
If everyone hates the Drake so bad CCP is nerfing it, shouldnt the Tengu be next?


No, CCP buffs Drake. They have already plans for Tengu. Currently Tengu is better than Caldari T2 cruisers. It shouldn't be that way.


The Tengu is fine, its a T3 cruiser which is supposed to be customizable to fill a lot of different roles. It shouldn't fill them better than a T2 which is specialized for the role, but it just so happens that the Nighthawk, and the Cerberus suck. It is not better than a Falcon or Rook in their roles.
Sunviking
Doomheim
#98 - 2012-04-24 21:18:53 UTC
Gypsio III wrote:
Sunviking, are you a refugee from 2007?


I honestly have absolutely no idea what you are talking about... I've only been playing this game for 2 years.

What happened in 2007? Around that time I was playing Civilisation 4.
Mfume Apocal
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#99 - 2012-04-25 00:36:37 UTC
Sunviking wrote:
I honestly have absolutely no idea what you are talking about... I've only been playing this game for 2 years.

What happened in 2007? Around that time I was playing Civilisation 4.


Your analysis of the Drake is... dated.
FT Diomedes
The Graduates
#100 - 2012-04-25 01:03:21 UTC
Sunviking wrote:
The reason why I don't use the Drake anymore is because it's DPS is the poorest of the Tier 2 Battlecruisers.

EFT comparison:
Hurricane: 787DPS with 6 Autocannons + 2 HAM launchers, 3 x Gyros, 1 x BCS.
Myrmidon: 878DPS with 6 Blasters + 3 x damage mods and Drones (Kinetic + Thermal + selectable drone damage types).
Harbinger: 671DPS with Pulses and 3 x damage mods (even mix of EM + Thermal damage).
Drake: 578DPS with HAMs and 3 x damage mods (only with Kinetic damage).
FEROX: 606 DPS with 6 Blasters and 1 HAM Launcher, 3 x Mag Field Stabs.


Weapons above are unheated, all skills at lvl 5, no implants.

I actually really want a Hurricane and a Myrmidon now. Drake is balanced too much towards tank, not gank. Even a Blaster Ferox outdamages it.

Looking at the above, the Drake is pretty rubbish. Tengu only performs well because it has an obscene RoF bonus.

Caldari ships in general lack the DPS and application of DPS to perform well in PvP.


The HML Drake vastly outperforms all those ships in application of DPS. Paper DPS is meaningless.

CCP should add more NPC 0.0 space to open it up and liven things up: the Stepping Stones project.