These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Dear DUST 514 Beta Testers

First post
Author
MotherMoon
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#81 - 2012-04-21 20:26:53 UTC
Celebris Nexterra wrote:
Stitcher wrote:
Din Tempre wrote:
A month or two might not seem like a lot, but some of us have been following dust for years.

You seem to be assuming that I haven't. Believe me, I have. And believe me, I want to get an email inviting me to play the beta as much as you.

Unlike you, I haven't translated my enthusiasm into a sense of entitlement and bratty impatience. The Beta is a testing tool, and an important one that's there to iron out kinks in the game before it's released. It's not a zarking reward scheme.

Astonishingly, one of the most important demographics that CCP will be wanting to get feedback on DUST from are people who aren't already emotionally invested in EVE Online, and who haven't been waiting patiently for DUST for a couple of years. The people who can give it a reasonably fair and unbiased opinion rather than fangasming all over it, in other words.

Being a paying EVE customer is ALREADY giving you privileged access in the form of Mordu's Private Trials and Fanfest beta keys. It's just not giving you immediate, right-this-second privileged access which is what you and so many other people seem to want.

Cultivate some patience. you've already waited a couple of years - what's another month going to harm you?


Actually, it's the complete opposite. I have been following DUST since its inception and that first highly vague trailer, since before basically any information had been released about it. I have since followed all announcements about it and all videos posted of gameplay. You suggest that our experience with EVE and attention to DUST's ongoing development biases our opinion in a way that would hurt the validity of the beta, but I say nay. The fact that we know how EVE works, how sov mechanics work, how FiS mechanics work, and that we know the purpose for DUST, means we would have more applicable questions/suggestions. If we see something in DUST that could potentially break game balance for FiS, we could call that out, because we know how FiS works. Random people don't. Additionally, I won't have a "fangasm" over DUST unless it's actually as good as it's been hyped up to be, as good as I expect it to be. My expectations aren't lower because I've followed DUST for 2 years, they're higher. Much higher.

And you said "Being a paying EVE customer is ALREADY giving you privileged access..." That's exactly the point. We (and myself in particular) signed up for that closed beta minutes after the devblog was posted with the link, and the vast majority of us didn't get into the beta. No one is claiming more of a sense of entitlement than that. We didn't start that; CCP did when they offered (possible) closed beta keys exclusively to EVE players with that first devblog. It's more of being let down than feeling entitled.


/Thread

http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1206/scimi.jpg

UnknownHuman
Interstellar-Enterprises
#82 - 2012-04-21 23:59:28 UTC
The good news is; by the sounds on the videos of those who leaked Dust, they seem to rather enjoy themselves with a pre-fanfest version of the game.

I think it is safe to say a good chunk of those testers do not play Eve Online.

That being said, this is an Eve Online forum and not a Dust 514 forum. So the message isn't properly addressed to the SONY testers since I don't think they'd come here just to read about the NDA.

I think it is sweet of the core Eve players to point out in the comments on youtube to remind those of the NDA. Now please give the keys to those worthy of it!

So lets not focus on what CCP may or may not have done wrong here and focus on why the Eve community is awesome!

Kaplaa!


-Unk
Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#83 - 2012-04-22 01:50:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Stitcher
Celebris Nexterra wrote:
Actually, it's the complete opposite. I have been following DUST since its inception and that first highly vague trailer, since before basically any information had been released about it... I have since followed all announcements about it and all videos posted of gameplay.


You mean Torfi's "TotalHellDeath" video from that Fanfest Keynote speech? Yeah, I was in the front row.

Here's the thing. trying to demonstrate that you have the biggest fanboy hardon for DUST is infantile, not impressive. A lot of people have been following this thing from the moment the first breadcrumbs were thrown. You're not unique in your enthusiasm, nor does being the BIGGEST DUST FAN EVAR entitle you to special treatment.

Quote:
You suggest that our experience with EVE and attention to DUST's ongoing development biases our opinion in a way that would hurt the validity of the beta, but I say nay. The fact that we know how EVE works, how sov mechanics work, how FiS mechanics work, and that we know the purpose for DUST, means we would have more applicable questions/suggestions.


You're missing the point. They don't yet need feedback on sov mechanics and how the game impacts FiS right now. I guarantee you that those are among the things to which they've given the most serious thought, in fact. Us EVE veterans are, at the moment, less likely to have valuable feedback for them next to the feedback from the much, MUCH larger target audience of people who are not EVE veterans.

Sure, CCP will almost certainly want to hear the veterans' opinions on the things you mentioned. But what they want and need most at the moment is to know whether or not somebody with no prior experience of EVE Online can pick up the game and get their bearings quickly because if their New Player Experience isn't up to scratch then that's the first priority to get fixed.

For example, you are familiar with the idea of a skill having a maximum of five levels. Somebody completely new to the setting won't be, and CCP will want to know, among other things, whether or not that maximum is made clear enough to avoid people getting confused and complaining about not being able to skill up.

Quote:
And you said "Being a paying EVE customer is ALREADY giving you privileged access..." That's exactly the point. We (and myself in particular) signed up for that closed beta minutes after the devblog was posted with the link, and the vast majority of us didn't get into the beta.


"And myself in particular?" Okay, I'll come back to that in a second, but before I do... Have you never heard of the word "yet" before? You are not in the beta YET.

YET.

Quote:
yet (/yet/)
Adverb:
Up until the present or an unspecified or implied time; by now or then: "I haven't left yet".


Quote:
No one is claiming more of a sense of entitlement than that.


Remember that "and myself in particular" bit? As if you're somehow the magical princess snowflake pony and CCP should be worshipping you and combing your mane?

"Oh, it's okay. I don't have a sense of entitlement. I just want my nice gift RIGHT NOW. I'm owed it because I am more excited for DUST than you are."

Let me tell you what you're actually entitled to:

The service you are buying from CCP is access to Tranquility and play time in EVE Online. that's it. That's all your money is good for, and all they're legally obliged to give you under the terms of the contract between company and customer. Things like anniversary handouts, beta keys, fanfest goodies and so on? they're gifts. Perks. bonuses. CCP being nice and giving us stuff that we didn't actually pay for because they're good people like that.

And you're throwing a tantrum because you weren't the first kid to sit on Santa's lap this year.


Let me be perfectly clear: YOU HAVE NOT BEEN LET DOWN.

Sure, if the game actually goes to full release without any EVE player ever getting into the beta, THEN we'll have been let down. THEN it would be reasonable to complain.

Right now what's happening is that the first wave of the beta has started, you weren't lucky enough to get in on it, and so you're raging. Can't you see how childish that is?

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Dilaro thagriin
Doomheim
#84 - 2012-04-22 02:28:01 UTC
Hehaw Jimbojohnson wrote:
Seriously? Why would you send out beta keys to random Playstation Plus members, most of which have probably never heard of EVE, if there is an NDA in place? You really think most console gamers are going to read/expect an NDA for a game they likely got a random invite to that they neither requested nor expected?



Right.... i see your mistake...

you're asking CCP to answer for something done by SOE ...


you understand of course that, in essence, that's like asking microsoft to explain why your linux installation is not working the way you want it to?

you have an issue with how Sony handled giving out these beta keys, TAKE IT UP WITH SONY... it's not like CCP sent them out.

Yeesh. Give navigator and co a break guys. Sony messed up. to cover things from CCP's end, navigator made a post on this forum to reach the number of eve subscribers who may be affected by this. it was not only prudent but right for him to have done so.

while i haven't checked, i'm sure that a simillar message has been put on the DUST forums, and probably on the Beta forum itself.

quit whining. wait for your turn to join the beta, and in the meantime keep playing the games that are already released, whether they be console, mac or PC.

oh, and stitcher... +1 lol
Valkerias
Society of Friends
#85 - 2012-04-22 12:21:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Valkerias
Stitcher wrote:
Getting mad because a promise made to you was broken and then YOU were yelled at because someone else is breaking the toy YOU were promised is childish. GROW UP AND QUIT WHINING, YEESH!


Umm, OK. Seriously, I couldn't care less about DUST. I am no fan of FPS games, but when a company makes promises to its subscribers, note: "Go to fanfest, get the key become the FIRST to beta test" and then we find out that the subcontracted company, SONY, is seemingly, NOT honoring its agreements and giving out keys to 5000 random people while NOT honoring the fanfest keys is bad enough.

To then come onto the EVE forums and start shaking the BAN HAMMER at the player base, which didn't even get the keys, because of the actions of SONY players/ execs, is really beyond the pale.

It's getting harder and harder to actually promote this company to others.

"The tax on custom offices in concord space will be DOUBLED" means "the costs will explode exponentially because we are now adding market value to the calculations." (In other words, DOUBLE means "multiplied by whatever number we feel like.")

"Pos fuels should be converted into blocks in about a week, traditional fuels will no longer work after this" means "keep traditional fuels in the towers for up to a month while we work everything out."

I could go on, but I trust you get the point.

It's not about "ME PLAY EVE! GIVE ME MOAR STUFF! RAAARRRGGGG!"

It's "Hey! You said one thing, and are doing something else, and now you're yelling at US about it!"
Peter Powers
Terrorists of Dimensions
#86 - 2012-04-22 12:55:39 UTC
this might be a stupid question but - i received a beta key during fanfest, but i still have no clue where to enter it - where do i enter it?

3rdPartyEve.net - your catalogue for 3rd party applications

Mashie Saldana
V0LTA
WE FORM V0LTA
#87 - 2012-04-22 13:30:07 UTC
Peter Powers wrote:
this might be a stupid question but - i received a beta key during fanfest, but i still have no clue where to enter it - where do i enter it?

The instruction is written on the piece of paper with the key. However the FanFest trial isn't open for another week or so which is why the webpage only showing a coming soon™ banner for now.

The NDA breaching people mentioned in this thread are using the Sony distributed keys so completely different.
Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#88 - 2012-04-22 16:46:31 UTC  |  Edited by: Stitcher
What Valkerias said I wrote:
Getting mad because a promise made to you was broken and then YOU were yelled at because someone else is breaking the toy YOU were promised is childish. GROW UP AND QUIT WHINING, YEESH!


What I actually wrote:



If you can find me a legitimate definition of the term "broken promise" which allows for a promise to have been broken before it's due to be honoured, I will personally buy you sixty PLEX*. The ACTUAL promise is that we'll be getting our access to DUST sometime during the next few weeks. See update 2 in this linked article.

*Comment intended as rhetoric and does not constitute an actual offer.


And... "breaking"? Seriously? We're not talking about a pretty glitter fairy doll here that your little sister decided to give an impromptu haircut here. How the hell can it be broken by somebody getting to play a version that's actually an older build than the one at Fanfest before you get to come along and try out a more up-to-date version?


And let's look at your whole "CCP ARE DISHONEST AND WE HATES THEM PRECIOUS!" thing.

Valkerias wrote:
"The tax on custom offices in concord space will be DOUBLED" means "the costs will explode exponentially because we are now adding market value to the calculations." (In other words, DOUBLE means "multiplied by whatever number we feel like.")


Did you maybe miss the part where customs offices outside of highsec are now player-owned, thereby to a degree taking control over what PI commodities cost on the market OUT of CCP's hands?

Valkerias wrote:
"Pos fuels should be converted into blocks in about a week, traditional fuels will no longer work after this" means "keep traditional fuels in the towers for up to a month while we work everything out."


...Are you really objecting to the fact that CCP took a sensible precaution to AVOID screwing up?

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Firnas
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#89 - 2012-04-22 17:16:45 UTC
I believe the lady on the first page noted that the game is probably DOA anyway, because some video had gotten 8 views?

I don't care enough about DUST to go find the video and confirm her hypothesis, but I will remind you guys this......

You are getting pretty excited about a console shooter. Those things have a shelflife of about 6 months at most. Really. You might want to check yourself before you wreck yourself..... emotionally when DUST flops like a dead whale at a Maori whaling ceremony.

Honestly though, DUST is as bad an idea as Ambulation was. Just divorce yourself from it emotionally, and remember to undock your spaceship, and everything will be ok.
Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#90 - 2012-04-22 18:06:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Stitcher
Firnas wrote:
You are getting pretty excited about a console shooter. Those things have a shelflife of about 6 months at most.


Counterstrike, Team Fortress 2, Quake 3 Arena and Planetside spring to mind as exceptions to your rule. TF2 and Planetside especially can draw parallels to DUST, in that both have character persistence, though only one was a formal MMOFPS.

Don't think of DUST as a console shooter. think of it as a first-person perspective sandbox MMO. The big reason that console shooters fail is that after a while a new FOTM comes along, the servers start to become empty and it stops being worth playing the game.

I may be wrong, but I personally think that the added persistence and sandbox aspects of DUST, plus the fact that it's plugged in to EVE, is going to make a hell of a difference.

Firnas wrote:
Honestly though, DUST is as bad an idea as Ambulation was. Just divorce yourself from it emotionally, and remember to undock your spaceship, and everything will be ok.


WiS isn't even a finished feature yet, and I personally actually quite like it so far, minimal functionality though it may have.

Was Trinity a bad idea, or a waste of development resources? No. EVE needs to expand in order to thrive, and it's this sort of attitude which is the main reason I'm not raking in billions from running a casino in Jita by now. If it's not FiS then a lot of people just don't want to know. It must be horrible to be so short-sighted.

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Ibeau Renoir
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#91 - 2012-04-22 18:42:01 UTC
Stitcher wrote:
Firnas wrote:
You are getting pretty excited about a console shooter. Those things have a shelflife of about 6 months at most.

Counterstrike, Team Fortress 2, Quake 3 Arena and Planetside spring to mind as exceptions to your rule.

Counter-Strike and Planetside are console shooters now?

Ceci n'est pas un sig.

Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#92 - 2012-04-22 19:23:57 UTC
no, but they illustrate the point nicely. Shooters on PC have very frequently had similar longevity problems.

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders

Synthmilk
The United Peoples of Synth
#93 - 2012-04-22 19:46:30 UTC
Valkerias wrote:
"Go to fanfest, get the key become the FIRST to beta test"


I have attempted for about ten minutes to hunt down a news article, dev blog, or advert regarding Fanfest that makes a claim close to that, and I can't find any.

Please direct me to where CCP made that promise.

Ibeau Renoir wrote:
Stitcher wrote:

Counterstrike, Team Fortress 2, Quake 3 Arena and Planetside spring to mind as exceptions to your rule.

Counter-Strike and Planetside are console shooters now?


Counter-Strike is on Xbox 360 and PS3, Stitcher appears to be mistaken about Planetside being on consoles though there was a time Sony implied Planetside 2 would be on the PS3 as well as PC. So as a response to Firnas, her claim is false as her proof is false, an FPS on a console can remain popular for a long time.


I don't know why people are crying about CCP putting this reminder up on the EVE Online forums. It's just a reminder to any EVE players who may have gotten into the group currently beta testing DUST, no harm in covering all the bases.
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
#94 - 2012-04-22 21:32:14 UTC
Synthmilk wrote:
Valkerias wrote:
"Go to fanfest, get the key become the FIRST to beta test"


I have attempted for about ten minutes to hunt down a news article, dev blog, or advert regarding Fanfest that makes a claim close to that, and I can't find any.

Please direct me to where CCP made that promise.

Ibeau Renoir wrote:
Stitcher wrote:

Counterstrike, Team Fortress 2, Quake 3 Arena and Planetside spring to mind as exceptions to your rule.

Counter-Strike and Planetside are console shooters now?


Counter-Strike is on Xbox 360 and PS3, Stitcher appears to be mistaken about Planetside being on consoles though there was a time Sony implied Planetside 2 would be on the PS3 as well as PC. So as a response to Firnas, her claim is false as her proof is false, an FPS on a console can remain popular for a long time.


I don't know why people are crying about CCP putting this reminder up on the EVE Online forums. It's just a reminder to any EVE players who may have gotten into the group currently beta testing DUST, no harm in covering all the bases.



You forgot TF2.
Skilfer Azizora
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#95 - 2012-04-22 21:51:55 UTC
I'm sorry, but I knew this was going to happen as soon as the PSN got in, which is why I expected them to be the very last people let in. Oh well, I guess it's clean-up time now.
Ibeau Renoir
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#96 - 2012-04-23 00:34:23 UTC
Synthmilk wrote:
Counter-Strike is on Xbox 360 and PS3

Ah, didn't know that. I knew TF2 was though.

Ceci n'est pas un sig.

cApAc aMaRu
Burning Sword
#97 - 2012-04-23 07:38:51 UTC
DUST made me want to get a PS3, but now I'm scared I'll be banned for excitement.
Gordon Fell
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#98 - 2012-04-23 12:59:49 UTC
Dear CCP,

Get me an invite, I'll shut up, promise.

Thanks.
Ghoest
#99 - 2012-04-23 13:22:32 UTC
@ CCP

You invited members of an organization,with a professed dedication to destroying your other game, to a beta.
An organization which has made tangible efforts to carry out its goal both IRL and in game.

Now you are crying that people arent following your rules for being in beta.


Seriously CCP - are you this dumb or is it pretend?

Wherever You Went - Here You Are

Stitcher
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#100 - 2012-04-23 13:52:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Stitcher
Ghoest...

A) CCP didn't hand out the beta keys that have thus far been involved with breaches the NDA, Sony did.

B) You really need to learn the difference between "crying" and "reminding of a legal obligation". It's not like they're eating a pint of Ben and Jerry's while listening to Christina Aguilera and telling each other that people are big stupid mean doo-doo heads.

They're pointing out that if you're in the beta, that means that you have agreed to and signed an internationally legally binding document and that failure to honour that document will have appropriate consequences.

and AFAIK, "tangible efforts to destroy" something don't usually involve eager and active participation.


(once again, this forum demonstrates how we desperately need a "dislike" button)

AKA Hambone

Author of The Deathworlders