These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Assembly Hall

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Proposal] Bouncing boobies.
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Oberlyn Oahl
Doomheim
#121 - 2012-04-03 20:14:51 UTC
I support greater fidelity in the representation of inertia.
Psichotic
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#122 - 2012-04-04 02:19:11 UTC
This could break the entire game! The sky could fall right on top of our heads. What's more, it is impossible - like everything else.

So what? I want.

+1 for more fun.
Vertisce Soritenshi
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#123 - 2012-04-04 12:59:43 UTC
It is rather slow going but this thread is getting the love as each day goes by. I figure if they can take the time to make sleeve tattoos then they can probably do the same for some additional "ambulation". Seriously...one of these days they will come out and say...

"We set jiggle from =0 to =1 and now breasts have ambulation.".

Bounties for all! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2279821#post2279821
Ila Dace
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#124 - 2012-04-05 21:41:56 UTC
Vertisce Soritenshi wrote:
It is rather slow going but this thread is getting the love as each day goes by. I figure if they can take the time to make sleeve tattoos then they can probably do the same for some additional "ambulation". Seriously...one of these days they will come out and say...

"We set jiggle from =0 to =1 and now breasts have ambulation.".

To be sure, I'd not want my breasts to get up and go places without me, but surrender to the laws of physics just a bit, yes.

If House played Eve: http://i.imgur.com/y7ShT.jpg

But in purple, I'm stunning!
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#125 - 2012-04-05 22:26:57 UTC
This should be CCPs number one priority for avatar based gameplay.
Valerie Tessel
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#126 - 2012-04-07 01:23:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Valerie Tessel
Vimsy Vortis wrote:
This should be CCPs number one priority for avatar based gameplay.

Gameplay Shocked

That's a whole different genre from internet space ships. I'd not be opposed to "gameplay" per se. I'd settle for the bounce, though.

Tactical destroyers... I'll take a dozen Gallente, please.
Vertisce Soritenshi
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#127 - 2012-04-13 13:08:28 UTC
I will argue that this would also add an element of distraction for female players when shooting people in the face becomes a reality in WiS.

But in all seriousness this is purely for that bit of added immersion in the game.

Bounties for all! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2279821#post2279821
Ila Gant
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#128 - 2012-04-20 00:59:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Ila Gant
Also need an applause emote...
Nionn Achren
Lazy Old Logistics Associates
#129 - 2012-04-24 21:25:50 UTC
WARNING: Excess of bounce may cause pain in your back...

Or maybe my head is twisted...

Objects in mirror are closer than they appear...
Valkyrie D'ark
Armed Resistance Movement
#130 - 2012-04-29 08:33:05 UTC
Well.. surprisingly enough you haven't been paying attention to boobies as much. If you did you'd notice that they actually do move and the character breathes. They rise and fall with breathing. You can even see it on full body view
Valerie Tessel
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#131 - 2012-04-29 19:55:13 UTC
Valkyrie D'ark wrote:
Well.. surprisingly enough you haven't been paying attention to boobies as much. If you did you'd notice that they actually do move and the character breathes. They rise and fall with breathing. You can even see it on full body view

True, but they don't bounce one bit when you walk, or during idle animations when the characters looks over her shoulder. We're looking for that little bit of added realism.

Tactical destroyers... I'll take a dozen Gallente, please.
Corian Teranos
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#132 - 2012-04-30 15:06:35 UTC
NO the incarna engine is already sluggish without overburdening it with realistic breast mechanics. imagine a station full of bouncing boobs and now imagine the Computers Chipset Screaming in agony at the additional physics load on top of the already inefficient station rendering engine
Vertisce Soritenshi
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#133 - 2012-04-30 15:13:47 UTC
Corian Teranos wrote:
NO the incarna engine is already sluggish without overburdening it with realistic breast mechanics. imagine a station full of bouncing boobs and now imagine the Computers Chipset Screaming in agony at the additional physics load on top of the already inefficient station rendering engine

How is it sluggish? Works perfectly fine on my rig. I even get 60 fps+ while in station. You sure it isn't just your PC that is the problem?

Also...a couple of extra bones per character with physics would not cause the issues you are concerned with. If it did then they wouldn't bother with making hair move at all.

Bounties for all! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2279821#post2279821
Blastfizzle
The Chosen 0nes
#134 - 2012-05-02 09:12:12 UTC
You had me at 'bouncing boobies'.

+1
Aerich e'Kieron
Peace.Keepers
Federation Front Line
#135 - 2012-05-02 14:20:56 UTC
Ew, breasts. -1

Unless they change the editor so I can have a cute looking guy.
Nariya Kentaya
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#136 - 2012-05-04 01:54:57 UTC
Corian Teranos wrote:
NO the incarna engine is already sluggish without overburdening it with realistic breast mechanics. imagine a station full of bouncing boobs and now imagine the Computers Chipset Screaming in agony at the additional physics load on top of the already inefficient station rendering engine

hoenstly, i know plenty fo games with similar engines to carbon, and they ahev VERY nice boob physics (and by nice, i eman realistic, instead of WTF-japan levels of bouncage) and they ran fine on my 5 year old computer (i ahev a enw computer now).

so yeah,w e need bouncing boobies, makes characters look weird when their bodies behave like robots.
Katsumi Shimazu
Star F-ckers INC.
#137 - 2012-05-04 14:51:51 UTC
wow, this many people still have CQ turned on?? ^^
Arduemont
Rotten Legion
#138 - 2012-05-04 18:22:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Arduemont
Is this thread still going on? I honestly don't understand why.

I haven't read anything past the first page, because I don't need to.
I don't want CCP wasting their time with this crap.

"In the age of information, ignorance is a choice." www.stateofwar.co.nf
Vertisce Soritenshi
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#139 - 2012-05-04 19:05:26 UTC
Arduemont wrote:
Is this thread still going on? I honestly don't understand why.

I haven't read anything past the first page, because I don't need to.
I don't want CCP wasting their time with this crap.

Apparently your opinion isn't the only one out there. Some people actually like WiS and what it can be and realize that it would improve EVE. Some of those people also seem to want some added realism as well.

I say it's a good thing you aren't the only person with an opinion in this world.

As to the topic. I started playing Tera on release. Fun game but more notably the breasts on females do move and it is not over done. It was actually done rather well. Thankfully my wifes character isn't made of granite and actually has some flow to it.

Bounties for all! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2279821#post2279821
Teycha
Not going Away
#140 - 2012-05-05 18:08:04 UTC
Silent Lamb wrote:

EDIT: oh yeah, forgot to mention that the ships we fly in this game don't even have crews. we're in pods that allow us to control the entire ship thus negating the need for a crew.


Wrong.

The ships have crews we as the pod pilot merely control the ship in a more efficient manner.

To refresh your memory go read Jovian Wetgrave.