These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Why all the hate for miners?

Author
THE L0CK
Denying You Access
#21 - 2012-04-17 16:20:32 UTC
Lyron-Baktos wrote:
Sutskop wrote:
1. It's a PVP game, and they are not playing the game like I think it should be played.
2. It's boring as hell, so whoever does it is a pathetic gamer and should go back to Solitaire.

I think it's mainly about those two. No, that is not my opinion.


Ahhh, so because someone doesn't play the game the way you think it should be played, they are pathetic?Roll

OP, this is a person that you should ignore as I described in my first post.



Ignore him all you want, he's still going to pew pew your mining barge. I'm sure you'll find it hard to ignore the little pretty splosion's

Do you smell what the Lock's cooking?

Hortense Sledgemallet
Doomheim
#22 - 2012-04-17 16:24:20 UTC
And there's a nice reference to the character face that was just mentioned.
Lol
Kairos Antilles
Doomheim
#23 - 2012-04-17 16:41:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Kairos Antilles
Sutskop wrote:
...and they are not playing the game like I think it should be played.



A sandbox that must conform to anyone's preconceived notions is no longer a sandbox.
THE L0CK
Denying You Access
#24 - 2012-04-17 16:58:28 UTC
Kairos Antilles wrote:
Sutskop wrote:
...and they are not playing the game like I think it should be played.



A sandbox that must conform to anyone's preconceived notions is no longer a sandbox.



He didn't say you had to conform to anything, he only said that you are not playing the game he thinks it should be played, in his opinion.

Do you smell what the Lock's cooking?

Kairos Antilles
Doomheim
#25 - 2012-04-17 17:39:36 UTC
THE L0CK wrote:
Kairos Antilles wrote:
Sutskop wrote:
...and they are not playing the game like I think it should be played.



A sandbox that must conform to anyone's preconceived notions is no longer a sandbox.



He didn't say you had to conform to anything, he only said that you are not playing the game he thinks it should be played, in his opinion.



I did not say he did. But there are those who would, and "they are not playing the game like *I* think it should be played" is often their calling card.
Barbara Nichole
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#26 - 2012-04-17 17:50:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Barbara Nichole
Don't be fooled into believing there is only one reason people pick on "carebears".. The careless bears can be just as tearful over loss as the most careful empire dweller - and if not for isk generating activities they would not have anything to fight with unless they bought all their isk by purchasing Plex.. sure some may do this .. but certainly not all.

My point is they would not attack the relatively defenseless miners in high sec if they didn't think it was fun.. heck, most of the time it's probably not fun for most of them .. so to solve the unfun aspect some groups have attempted to excite more folk about attacking miners in high sec by hosting event competitions and offering prizes.

Other players demonize all high sec miners by the (largely false) claim that most high sec miners are bots. Demonizing those you wish to hurt is a time honored sabre rattling tactic and a way of mitigating any possible guilty feelings.

PVPers will cringe at my suggestion that they are "roll playing" - but many do just that... making up all manner of weird sceneios (declaring "JIhad") by which they can explain their bend toward suicide ganking of the defenseless.. whether they want to admit it or not roll play happens as often among pvpers as carebears.

Lastly, don't underestimate the financial benefit that killing off competition provides; if you have a stockpile of minerals stored in Jita and wait for the right moment to sell you can beef up your earnings by reducing the supply temporarily.. There is also some speculation that some sponsers of hulk ganking events actually spend their time before the event purchasing cheap hulks or just manufacturing them in preperation for the thousands of hulk "buyers" about to be created.

The bottom line is there are many of people with many various play styles in this sandbox called EVE. You are not going to be able to change that anymore than you'll be able to convince real life wackos they are wrong. don't try. Just adapt and and enjoy.

  - remove the cloaked from local; free intel is the real problem, not  "afk" cloaking -

[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG]

David Cedarbridge
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#27 - 2012-04-17 22:03:31 UTC  |  Edited by: David Cedarbridge
Barbara Nichole wrote:
The bottom line is there are many of people with many various play styles in this sandbox called EVE. You are not going to be able to change that anymore than you'll be able to convince real life wackos they are wrong. don't try. Just adapt and and enjoy.


To call gankers "wackos" seems to only really work if what they are doing is irrational. If, in any of the situations you already listed and others not included, they stand to gain something from what they do then it would be clear that what they are doing is very obviously rational.

I keep holding out this thought that eventually miners and other industrialists (I, myself, am an industrialist) will come to understand that PVP is not limited in EVE to flying combat ships and shooting things. My products compete on a larger market with all other products of similar type and cost on the market. If somebody buys your product they have no need to buy mine. I make no profit because you already made it. Naturally, the rational solution is to either modify my production or pricing to compete (Market PVP) or to get rid of the problem (buyouts- market pvp, shoot the competition or steal their stuff - pew pew pvp.)

The moment that anything you do influences my income, we have entered into a PVP zone. If you mine, you affect my costs as a producer. You also influence the prices of the other miners. It would be more irrational for those other miners to "live and let live" instead of taking advantage of every chance to beat you in the pvp arena you are both already part of.
Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#28 - 2012-04-17 23:24:29 UTC
David Cedarbridge wrote:
I keep holding out this thought that eventually miners and other industrialists (I, myself, am an industrialist) will come to understand that PVP is not limited in EVE to flying combat ships and shooting things. My products compete on a larger market with all other products of similar type and cost on the market. If somebody buys your product they have no need to buy mine. I make no profit because you already made it. Naturally, the rational solution is to either modify my production or pricing to compete (Market PVP) or to get rid of the problem (buyouts- market pvp, shoot the competition or steal their stuff - pew pew pvp.)

The moment that anything you do influences my income, we have entered into a PVP zone. If you mine, you affect my costs as a producer. You also influence the prices of the other miners. It would be more irrational for those other miners to "live and let live" instead of taking advantage of every chance to beat you in the pvp arena you are both already part of.

I, too, love seeing hte beautiful 0.01 isk pileups in the market.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Alavaria Fera
GoonWaffe
#29 - 2012-04-17 23:27:17 UTC
Barbara Nichole wrote:
There is also some speculation that some sponsers of hulk ganking events actually spend their time before the event purchasing cheap hulks or just manufacturing them in preperation for the thousands of hulk "buyers" about to be created.

Oh, it's pretty much been announced outright by some, I think so you don't have to be careful about qualifying that statement.

Because people will still have to buy hulks unless they, too, prepurchase em.

Triggered by: Wars of Sovless Agression, Bending the Knee, Twisting the Knife, Eating Sov Wheaties, Bombless Bombers, Fizzlesov, Interceptor Fleets, Running Away, GhostTime Vuln, Renters, Bombs, Bubbles ?

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#30 - 2012-04-18 00:20:25 UTC
Sutskop wrote:
1. It's a PVP game, and they are not playing the game like I think it should be played.



WHEN will it ever enter your tiny skulls that EVE is a SANDBOX and was never designed nor intended to be an exclusively PvP game. A Dangerous Sandbox.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#31 - 2012-04-18 00:24:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Krixtal Icefluxor
David Cedarbridge wrote:


To call gankers "wackos" seems to only really work if what they are doing is irrational. Naturally, the rational solution is to either modify my production or pricing to compete (Market PVP) or to get rid of the problem (buyouts- market pvp, shoot the competition or steal their stuff - pew pew pvp.)




Suicide-Ganking of Miners is not Competitive PvP. It is much more akin to a Terrorist Attack.

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Krixtal Icefluxor
INLAND EMPIRE Galactic
#32 - 2012-04-18 00:26:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Krixtal Icefluxor
Bernie Nator wrote:
I don't hate miners. In fact, I'm pretty fond of the way they don't check d-scan.



Are you absolutely 100% SURE about that ? Cool

"He has mounted his hind-legs, and blown crass vapidities through the bowel of his neck."  - Ambrose Bierce on Oscar Wilde's Lecture in San Francisco 1882

Barbara Nichole
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#33 - 2012-04-19 01:36:21 UTC
David Cedarbridge wrote:
Barbara Nichole wrote:
The bottom line is there are many of people with many various play styles in this sandbox called EVE. You are not going to be able to change that anymore than you'll be able to convince real life wackos they are wrong. don't try. Just adapt and and enjoy.


To call gankers "wackos" seems to only really work if what they are doing is irrational. If, in any of the situations you already listed and others not included, they stand to gain something from what they do then it would be clear that what they are doing is very obviously rational..



You need to read what I wrote over again.. I never called gankers "wackos" (lol, if the shoe fits though...) but you are right there are many ways to work PVP in EVE.

  - remove the cloaked from local; free intel is the real problem, not  "afk" cloaking -

[IMG]http://i12.photobucket.com/albums/a208/DawnFrostbringer/consultsig.jpg[/IMG]

Dorn Val
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#34 - 2012-04-19 07:01:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Dorn Val
Immortis Vexx wrote:
Most of the official points have been displayed here but I can think of one more. Hating miners gives people the excuse to kill them. There is a class of PVPr out there that knows that they can't hang with the big boys so they have to pick on the cripples.


^This. I'd also add that they bring their friends along (in the form of Orca alts, or in the case of high sec griefers remote rep alts) because they can't pick on the cripple without help...

Funny how Eve Online is a sandbox game, meaning that it is what you choose to make of it, and yet some folks think that unless you're playing their way you're doing it wrong. Stunned that someone working on their doctoral thesis hasn't studied the various sociopaths in this game...

Edit: Yes, Eve Online is a game. Yes, it's just space pixels. But when you invest time in any activity the things that you obtain from that investment have intrinsic value. Although I only get pissed off, at myself, when I lose a ship to a stupid mistake I can understand the peeps who go mental when someone suicide ganks their mining barge. I can also understand the peeps that get off on doing the ganking, just don't understand how they can rationalize what they are doing by saying "it's just a game". I'd have a lot more respect for them if they'd just come out and say "I like picking on peeps that can't fight back". At least it's honest...

Second Edit: For a group of peeps who seem to thrive on tears they sure do cry a lot when CCP does something to make beating up the cripples harder...

I'll just leave this here. W space is the same as null (so you're consenting to PVP just by being there) and at any time a corpie or his could have decloaked and powned me...

Sandbox: An enclosed area filled with sand for children engaged in open-ended, unstructured, imaginative play. Also a place for cats to urinate and defecate...

Sutskop
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#35 - 2012-04-19 09:56:08 UTC
Dorn Val wrote:

I'll just leave this here. W space is the same as null (so you're consenting to PVP just by being there) and at any time a corpie or his could have decloaked and powned me...


Excuse me. How is killing a Retriever in nullsec any different to killing a Hulk in hisec from the perspective of killing the cripples?
Vaal Erit
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#36 - 2012-04-19 10:52:38 UTC
Because it's like I'm jaws and the little hulks are the dumb teenagers swimming around in deep water. Dun na dun na dun na dun na dun na dun na dun na

They also fly really expensive ships and fit them so badly that they are asking, no demanding that I gank them. I really don't want to gank them but they act like complete jerks and morons and don't bother to protect themselves. One time I was flying around high sec and this guy kept posting his deadpace inty fit while sitting 0 m/s and Darwin appeared to me and ordered that I gank him immediately.
Dorn Val
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#37 - 2012-04-19 12:14:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Dorn Val
Sutskop wrote:
Dorn Val wrote:

I'll just leave this here. W space is the same as null (so you're consenting to PVP just by being there) and at any time a corpie or his could have decloaked and powned me...


Excuse me. How is killing a Retriever in nullsec any different to killing a Hulk in hisec from the perspective of killing the cripples?


Because in high sec there is the expectation that you can operate in relative safety -an illusion I know, but the expectation is there. So the miner doesn't expect to get ganked. You also know who's in local so in the case of can flipping you can gauge how much, if any, backup the victim has. Your only risk in high sec is really from Concord, but you know that already. You are also immune to podding unless someone wants to take a huge security hit.

In W space no one shows up in local unless they are stupid enough to chat in it (always a mistake). So you have no idea who's in system unless they are on grid and uncloaked. At any point someone could have decloaked and taken me out while I was headed straight for the target on a bombing run (wouldn't have to be someone in the victim's corp either). I took as much risk decloaking as the miner did sitting in that grav site, especially since it's easy to lose a pod in null sec.

Granted I was shooting at a ship that was unarmed, but I did it not knowing the outcome. Considering my ship fittings and implants I could have easily lost the isk war on that attack. There's also the chance that a fight is going to escalate. In high sec you're going after PVE players who probably won't war deck you. In W space there's no need for a war deck -all they have to do is break out their big toys and jump into our system. The level of risk is completely different between null and high sec.

Edit: Forgot to mention that we had scanned down their entire system and had ganked one of their players in that exact same grav a few hours earlier -we actually had a bookmark for the exact spot that they kept warping to. All totaled they lost four mining barges simply because they didn't put a cloaked ship on the wormhole to our system (so they could hear the worm hole activate) and they kept warping to the exact same spot to mine. Some peeps learn the hard way...

Sandbox: An enclosed area filled with sand for children engaged in open-ended, unstructured, imaginative play. Also a place for cats to urinate and defecate...

Dorn Val
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#38 - 2012-04-19 12:15:43 UTC
Vaal Erit wrote:
...One time I was flying around high sec and this guy kept posting his deadpace inty fit while sitting 0 m/s and Darwin appeared to me and ordered that I gank him immediately.


Point. Sometimes peeps beg to get ganked, and by doing so you are providing a valuable service Pirate

Sandbox: An enclosed area filled with sand for children engaged in open-ended, unstructured, imaginative play. Also a place for cats to urinate and defecate...

Sutskop
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#39 - 2012-04-19 12:57:14 UTC
Dorn Val wrote:

Because in high sec there is the expectation that you can operate in relative safety -an illusion I know, but the expectation is there. So the miner doesn't expect to get ganked. You also know who's in local so in the case of can flipping you can gauge how much, if any, backup the victim has. Your only risk in high sec is really from Concord, but you know that already. You are also immune to podding unless someone wants to take a huge security hit.

Which means you are NOT immune :-)
Other risks for the ganker include bad range/tracking after warping in, more tank than expected, crappy loot/salvage drop, etc. It's not just Concord. And in hisec the loss of your ship is guaranteed, whereas in nullsec you most probably survive.
From this perspective I'd say the hisec gank is even riskier.

Does the (false!) impression of total safety in hisec change anything about the risk for the ganker? I think not.
Was your kill less risky because the Retriever was dumb enough to go back to the mining site?
Or, to get back to the original statement: Does it require more balls to fight in a 300 man nullsec blob than to sologank a Hulk?
silens vesica
Corsair Cartel
#40 - 2012-04-19 13:24:46 UTC
MIkhail Illiad wrote:
OK I'm confused, I don't mine myself but reading through the forums there seems to be a hell of a lot of unwarranted hatred towards miners and industrialists.

I was thinking on this as I was extracting my pod from deep in syndicate space last night. Maybe it was the self-rage for falling into a really mediocre gate trap, or maybe it was the exhaustion, but I started thinking down some paths I hadn't followed previously.

I suspect that at least to a degree, the rage against miners and industrialists is policy more than it is pleasure. I know - crazy, right? P Hear me out.

What do Goons, and all the other deep-space alliances do, in addition to blowing up everyone who isn't blue? They mine, and they do industry - build ships and the stuff that goes on ships. What is their greatest source of competition? the mindless, shapeless, undirected mass of hi-sec miners and industrialists. Alliance mining and development is far more directed than its hi-sec counterpart, but it can't easily compete with the sheer numbers. How do you fix that? You blow 'em up.

Oh, sure, there could be competition on the grounds of cost and efficiency, but if you've got lots of guns, and lot of people who like USING those guns, why bother? Just gank the hell out of 'em! It's fun, it supports industrial policy, and indirectly at least makes alliances more profitable.

Ganking will never erase the competition, but it can keep it pruned back enough to make a workable fiscal edge.

Add to that that lots of folks will see the ganking, and not care about policy - they'll just copy what the cool kids are doing.


Or maybe I was so tired I was halucinating.

Tell someone you love them today, because life is short. But scream it at them in Esperanto, because life is also terrifying and confusing.

Didn't vote? Then you voted for NulBloc