These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Training/Dueling charges and ammo

Author
Mathieollo
Ind Inc
#1 - 2012-04-18 09:37:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Mathieollo
i think it would be nice if ammo/charges were added that are meant to be used in non kill pvp duels or training/etc, basically they would be simply identical to the current charges and ammo ingame except with one difference, completely unable to deplete the structure of a ship.

that way you could more easily duel or spar or train or however you like to call it with friends using the same (functionally, except for structure depletion removed) ammo types, with the same damage type and stats as the real lethal ones without the risk of either person losing a ship due to a very bad miss match (say one person does a lot more damage than expected and accidentally destroys his opponents ship for example) or other reasons without unintentional losses being possible beyond repair charges.

i think it would be useful to have as you could have safe duels and such as well as tournaments with zero possibility of either player losing a ship, or you could test your newly devised fitting against a corp mate you know has a very good fitting and more easily get a decent idea of how well you did.

anyway, thanks for reading this thread, let me know what you think.

Math
betoli
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#2 - 2012-04-18 09:43:42 UTC
Mathieollo wrote:
i think it would be nice if ammo/charges were added that are meant to be used in non kill pvp duels or training/etc, basically they would be simply identical to the current charges and ammo ingame except with one difference, completely unable to deplete the structure of a ship.

that way you could more easily duel or spar or train or however you like to call it with friends using the same (functionally, except for structure depletion removed) ammo types, with the same damage type and stats as the real lethal ones without the risk of either person losing a ship due to a very bad miss match (say one person does a lot more damage than expected and accidentally destroys his opponents ship for example) or other reasons without unintentional losses being possible beyond repair charges.


lol :-)
Mathieollo
Ind Inc
#3 - 2012-04-18 09:44:44 UTC
not sure what to make of that.
Jint Hikaru
OffWorld Exploration Inc
#4 - 2012-04-18 10:01:04 UTC
Mathieollo wrote:
not sure what to make of that.


I would suggest searching for other similar ideas about safe / practice pvp.....

This may have saved you from the iminent flamefest......

Jint Hikaru - Miner / Salvager / Explorer / SpaceBum In the beginning the Universe was created. This has made a lot of people very angry and been widely regarded as a bad move.

Danika Princip
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#5 - 2012-04-18 10:20:54 UTC
Mathieollo wrote:
i think it would be nice if ammo/charges were added that are meant to be used in non kill pvp duels or training/etc, basically they would be simply identical to the current charges and ammo ingame except with one difference, completely unable to deplete the structure of a ship.

that way you could more easily duel or spar or train or however you like to call it with friends using the same (functionally, except for structure depletion removed) ammo types, with the same damage type and stats as the real lethal ones without the risk of either person losing a ship due to a very bad miss match (say one person does a lot more damage than expected and accidentally destroys his opponents ship for example) or other reasons without unintentional losses being possible beyond repair charges.

i think it would be useful to have as you could have safe duels and such as well as tournaments with zero possibility of either player losing a ship, or you could test your newly devised fitting against a corp mate you know has a very good fitting and more easily get a decent idea of how well you did.

anyway, thanks for reading this thread, let me know what you think.

Math



Nope.
Schmata Bastanold
In Boobiez We Trust
#6 - 2012-04-18 10:28:16 UTC
We need that magic ammo ASAP because "to the hull" agreement with your corpie is too much work.

Invalid signature format

Mathieollo
Ind Inc
#7 - 2012-04-18 12:05:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Mathieollo
Jint Hikaru wrote:
Mathieollo wrote:
not sure what to make of that.


I would suggest searching for other similar ideas about safe / practice pvp.....

This may have saved you from the iminent flamefest......


yeah i saw the arenas discussion, what about it?

also, way to welcome people to the community, not a surprise though, eve is one of the best games of all time for rewarding pointless dickery.

Schmata Bastanold wrote:
We need that magic ammo ASAP because "to the hull" agreement with your corpie is too much work.


also, way to assume everyone is an armor or hull tank, that's ignorance, flames, wow, this is getting better by the second.
Schmata Bastanold
In Boobiez We Trust
#8 - 2012-04-18 12:08:01 UTC
Mathieollo wrote:
also, way to welcome people to the community, not a surprise though, eve is one of the best games of all time for rewarding pointless dickery.


So why do you play, again?

Invalid signature format

Mathieollo
Ind Inc
#9 - 2012-04-18 12:09:43 UTC
the rewarding of pointless dickery, like everyone else.
Schmata Bastanold
In Boobiez We Trust
#10 - 2012-04-18 12:20:11 UTC
Mathieollo wrote:
the rewarding of pointless dickery, like everyone else.


So you complain about thing that is a reason for you to play? Clever.

Invalid signature format

Mathieollo
Ind Inc
#11 - 2012-04-18 12:33:45 UTC
i know that parts of the game world are lawless yes, i didn't think the forums were as well however, now would you mind removing your flames from this thread until and when you have something constructive and non-offensive to add?
Schmata Bastanold
In Boobiez We Trust
#12 - 2012-04-18 12:39:08 UTC
Mathieollo wrote:
i know that parts of the game world are lawless yes, i didn't think the forums were as well however, now would you mind removing your flames from this thread until and when you have something constructive and non-offensive to add?


First of my posts was my answer, you agree to go only to the hull and case closed. Implementing rubber bullets is pointless.

Invalid signature format

Mathieollo
Ind Inc
#13 - 2012-04-18 12:45:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Mathieollo
are you really that stupid?

as i said above, not everyone is an armor or structure tank and the duel may be far more outmatched than either participant can anticipate, also it would prevent people from griefing pvp tournaments, they could force the requirement to use the non hull ammo to join and not be able to kill the loser whether they want to or not.
Schmata Bastanold
In Boobiez We Trust
#14 - 2012-04-18 12:55:17 UTC
Mathieollo wrote:
are you really that stupid?

as i said above, not everyone is an armor or structure tank and the duel may be far more outmatched than either participant can anticipate, also it would prevent people from griefing pvp tournaments, they could force the requirement to use the non hull ammo to join and not be able to kill the loser whether they want to or not.


Have you ever actually participate in a duel with your corpie to test your fit? You don't check new rifter fit against arty thrasher that will alpha you outside of range of your guns, you go versus another frig and against skills of your opponent (not only in game skills, player's skills and experience matter even more).

As of griefing in pvp tournaments usually rewards for winning are far more valuable than ship you fly. Also griefing implies not wanted aggression, participation in pvp tournament is a clear statement that you agree with aggro other participants will bring upon you.

Your ammo would serve only one purpose: fluffing your ego in "duels" that would involve zero risk of losing ship.

Invalid signature format

Velicitia
XS Tech
#15 - 2012-04-18 13:11:56 UTC
you know, there is always SISI...

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

Mathieollo
Ind Inc
#16 - 2012-04-18 13:13:12 UTC
and you have a problem with that? you have a problem with being able to test your fitting against anyone with no risk of losing a ship or SP? seriously? why? you got issues man.

you're just not making any sense at all no matter how many different ways i try to wrap my head around this phallacy of logic you're created for yourself.

how does that upset you? i can test a fitting? that means i can kill you easier? nope, not directly, it means i can more easily test my fitting and therefore more easily min max it more effectively and therefore possibly achieve a better fitting and possibly develop one appropriate to counter others fittings, i'll give you that being able to test just how effective you can be in pvp on a whim though and i mean this when i say no offense intended but, what's wrong with that?

i mean, i understand it's not easy to estimate how well you should be able to do against other players, but does it have to be locked and barred behind iron clad gates with razorblades on the doorknob?

that's the only explanation that makes sense to me anyway.

as for pvp tournaments, why do you assume the rewards are always the motivation? maybe i saw an advertisement can and got talked into it but didn't really want to participate, hell maybe i want to pod a specific competitor for some reason as well.
Tchulen
Trumpets and Bookmarks
#17 - 2012-04-18 13:20:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Tchulen
@OP

Firstly, welcome to the EvE forums. Not everyone will give you **** answers but most will.

Secondly, might I respectfully suggest that for the purpose of self-preservation you use the search function to research your ideas prior to posting them please?

This will serve two purposes: 1) It'll stop your blood boiling from all the flames directed your way & 2) It'll mean that people who read this forum ad nauseum won't have to read the same thing they read quite as often.

You wouldn't believe how many people post the same things, occasionally attempting to package them differently thinking that people won't notice. However, they always do and the OP just seems like even more of a fool.

Just as an example I would avoid posting:

a) ]AFK cloaking blah blah

b) Buying/swapping/respeccing skill points

c) Training zones/ammo

d) New ships (unless you find a role which isn't currently filled)

e) Anything that completely protects you from others.


Just trying to give you a heads up.

EDIT - Just to answer the question of why not, it's work for the devs that could be better spent elsewhere and unnecessary DB overhead (needing to duplicate ALL ammo and charge types). For all the time this game has been in existence the players have tested their fits without blowing up their friends (mostly). EvE isn't safe. Any attempt to make it safe in any way will receive mass resistance from the majority of the players and therefore is incredibly unlikely to be taken up by CCP. All this and the fact that CCP have stated that they have no intention of doing so makes these threads completely pointless.
Velicitia
XS Tech
#18 - 2012-04-18 13:25:00 UTC
Mathieollo wrote:
and you have a problem with that? you have a problem with being able to test your fitting against anyone with no risk of losing a ship or SP? seriously? why? you got issues man.


only time I've ever lost a ship in a lol duel (i.e. "hey, help me test my tank" with a corpie), said corpie replaced the ship and fittings for me.
Unless you're ******* around in Strat. Cruisers, there is ZERO (0) chance of losing SP.

If you want "zero risk" duels, go log into Sisi. 100 isk ships/modules of any size you could want (sans stuff that needs to be built/looted from plexes -- i.e. faction/officer). do a little insurance fraud and you can have as many ships to throw away as you want.

Mathieollo wrote:

how does that upset you? i can test a fitting? that means i can kill you easier? nope, not directly, it means i can more easily test my fitting and therefore more easily min max it more effectively and therefore possibly achieve a better fitting and possibly develop one appropriate to counter others fittings, i'll give you that being able to test just how effective you can be in pvp on a whim though and i mean this when i say no offense intended but, what's wrong with that?


lol ammo (what you're looking for) would give you zero ability to test a fitting.
I mean, seriously -- you're "perfectly" tanked against a thrasher with lolammo ... now you DIAF to a thrasher with real ammo, and QQ here that it's not fair because the lolammo has a different damage profile than real ammo.

Again, go to Sisi if you want to "freely" replace ships.

Mathieollo wrote:
i mean, i understand it's not easy to estimate how well you should be able to do against other players, but does it have to be locked and barred behind iron clad gates with razorblades on the doorknob?

obviously you're using the wrong door here...


Mathieollo wrote:
as for pvp tournaments, ... maybe i want to pod a specific competitor for some reason as well.

Welcome to EVE Twisted

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

Mathieollo
Ind Inc
#19 - 2012-04-18 13:32:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Mathieollo
Velicitia wrote:
Mathieollo wrote:
and you have a problem with that? you have a problem with being able to test your fitting against anyone with no risk of losing a ship or SP? seriously? why? you got issues man.


only time I've ever lost a ship in a lol duel (i.e. "hey, help me test my tank" with a corpie), said corpie replaced the ship and fittings for me.
Unless you're ******* around in Strat. Cruisers, there is ZERO (0) chance of losing SP.

If you want "zero risk" duels, go log into Sisi. 100 isk ships/modules of any size you could want (sans stuff that needs to be built/looted from plexes -- i.e. faction/officer). do a little insurance fraud and you can have as many ships to throw away as you want.

Mathieollo wrote:

how does that upset you? i can test a fitting? that means i can kill you easier? nope, not directly, it means i can more easily test my fitting and therefore more easily min max it more effectively and therefore possibly achieve a better fitting and possibly develop one appropriate to counter others fittings, i'll give you that being able to test just how effective you can be in pvp on a whim though and i mean this when i say no offense intended but, what's wrong with that?


lol ammo (what you're looking for) would give you zero ability to test a fitting.
I mean, seriously -- you're "perfectly" tanked against a thrasher with lolammo ... now you DIAF to a thrasher with real ammo, and QQ here that it's not fair because the lolammo has a different damage profile than real ammo.

Again, go to Sisi if you want to "freely" replace ships.

Mathieollo wrote:
i mean, i understand it's not easy to estimate how well you should be able to do against other players, but does it have to be locked and barred behind iron clad gates with razorblades on the doorknob?

obviously you're using the wrong door here...


Mathieollo wrote:
as for pvp tournaments, ... maybe i want to pod a specific competitor for some reason as well.

Welcome to EVE Twisted



wow... finally some real replies, both from the same person, but thanks all the same.

1&2: fair enough and thanks for the info about SISI.

3. how so? i mean, sure some people hull tank but.... can you explain in more detail? i'm not understanding here, only change i suggested was not being able to destroy structure, so... sure against structure tanks it's a badly thought out suggestion, but against the rest it would be identical except zero hull damage, how is that "zero ability to test a fitting"?

4. i sure hope so, assumptions are typically wrong even when they are educated guesses and i admit that was a bit borderline of a train of thought i had going there but... it makes sense still, pvpers don't want pve players to be able to effectively build pvp without minimal participation in it, but... is it really that scary that anyone could build a pvp effective fitting without a lot of trial and error or SISI?

5. it's happened, he wasn't specifically targeted, but the web and warp scrambler did confuse him until his pod blew up, i got expelled from ever participating again and the judges claimed i lost, satisfactory outcome for me to be honest.
Velicitia
XS Tech
#20 - 2012-04-18 14:18:03 UTC
Mathieollo wrote:

3. how so? i mean, sure some people hull tank but.... can you explain in more detail? i'm not understanding here, only change i suggested was not being able to destroy structure, so... sure against structure tanks it's a badly thought out suggestion, but against the rest it would be identical except zero hull damage, how is that "zero ability to test a fitting"?

Missed that part then. However, not taking hull damage will only give you (at best) about 66% of the story in terms of survivability. I mean, you need to know how long you can hull tank something so that your fleetmates can arrive...


Mathieollo wrote:
4. i sure hope so, assumptions are typically wrong even when they are educated guesses and i admit that was a bit borderline of a train of thought i had going there but... it makes sense still, pvpers don't want pve players to be able to effectively build pvp without minimal participation in it, but... is it really that scary that anyone could build a pvp effective fitting without a lot of trial and error or SISI?

No, you can build good PvP fits on TQ. You're the one wanting "safety" from getting exploded though, and as stated, Sisi lets you do really stupid things with no risk (up to capitals, not sure if you can get supers ... haven't bothered to check though).

Mathieollo wrote:
5. it's happened, he wasn't specifically targeted, but the web and warp scrambler did confuse him until his pod blew up, i got expelled from ever participating again and the judges claimed i lost, satisfactory outcome for me to be honest.
hehehe Blink

One of the bitter points of a good bittervet is the realisation that all those SP don't really do much, and that the newbie is having much more fun with what little he has. - Tippia

12Next page