These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

New Sov System
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Commander Vilcian
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#21 - 2012-04-15 11:18:43 UTC
Ai Shun wrote:
SOV should apply to high, low and null-sec. The corporation / alliance owning it should determine the security status. And even the Empire corporations will need to fight to hold their territory and enforce it.


Bring on the wall!
masternerdguy
Doomheim
#22 - 2012-04-15 16:15:57 UTC
Ptraci wrote:
Can't really expect anything else from a care-bear I guess.

No, OP, just - no. How about you quit trying to ninja rat in nullsec and join an alliance? How about when you are in said alliance you stop being a fricken care-bear ratting during CTA's and other alliance ops, and pay attention to YOUR sov? Then you will realize just how much activity there is in null-sec.


I love people who comment on people they know nothing about. I've lived in nullsec many times and was always there for CTAs. I live in lo sec these days, however.

Things are only impossible until they are not.
Alski
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#23 - 2012-04-15 16:32:16 UTC
This would most certainly do nothing whatsoever to encourage botting.
masternerdguy
Doomheim
#24 - 2012-04-15 16:32:44 UTC
Alski wrote:
This would most certainly do nothing whatsoever to encourage botting.


Botting is against the EULA.

Things are only impossible until they are not.
Dr Silkworth
#25 - 2012-04-15 16:40:13 UTC
eliminate sov in its entirety. and bring on 50 incursions a day and boost the penalties they bring to ratting and make some new ones for harvest activities.
Vyl Vit
#26 - 2012-04-15 19:58:14 UTC
I can see why your name isn't "MasterMINDguy"

Paradise is like where you are right now, only much, much better.
Serene Repose
#27 - 2012-04-16 13:51:02 UTC
Vyl Vit wrote:
I can see why your name isn't "MasterMINDguy"

That wasn't nice.

We must accommodate the idiocracy.
Klandi
Consortium of stella Technologies
#28 - 2012-04-16 14:00:49 UTC
Question for you

Do you see this also stretching to the NPC corps? Concord wishing to retain SOV has to do ratting .... LOL
I would like to know how it doesn't seem possible for an alliance to put up two stations in the same system in null sec...

I am aware of my own ignorance and have checked my emotional quotient - thanks for asking
Vyktor Abyss
Abyss Research
#29 - 2012-04-16 14:06:00 UTC
This thread boils down to:

Mister Nerd - One of the biggest fail posters on Faction Warfare in Warefare subforum, turns his gaze on Null and failposts about that now in the General Disco.

Good work.
masternerdguy
Doomheim
#30 - 2012-04-16 15:13:06 UTC
Klandi wrote:
Question for you

Do you see this also stretching to the NPC corps? Concord wishing to retain SOV has to do ratting .... LOL
I would like to know how it doesn't seem possible for an alliance to put up two stations in the same system in null sec...



Nobody cares about NPC corps.

Things are only impossible until they are not.
Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
#31 - 2012-04-16 15:16:48 UTC
Im glad that people like masternerdguy exists, they make other people's ideas seem much more sane. Like alot of mine are.

Dust 514's CPM 1 Iron Wolf Saber Eve mail me about Dust 514 issues.
Bucksnorticus
Third Shift Industries
#32 - 2012-04-16 16:38:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Bucksnorticus
I've always thought a change to the empire Security Status would be nice. High Sec systems that sit vacant for days or hardly traveled would have their status dropped, while hi population systems would have their sec status raised. Of course this wouldnt effect Null but maybe get the high sec carebears to move around.
Sasha Azala
Doomheim
#33 - 2012-04-16 16:45:35 UTC
Ghoest wrote:
This is completely stupid idea - worthy of masternedguy





^ This
Ban Bindy
Bindy Brothers Pottery Association
True Reign
#34 - 2012-04-16 16:47:57 UTC
These are several of the worst ideas ever recorded on the forum. Go Eve players. You get dumber by the minute.
Averyia
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#35 - 2012-04-16 17:15:34 UTC
Why does the OP want to turn all alliances into carebear alliances (not that most of them aren't)? Why would we require carebearing?

All warfare is based on deception and logistics. Battles and soldiers are secondary priorities.
Welsige
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#36 - 2012-04-16 17:18:37 UTC
So... if I understand correctly.... an alliance will end having to DEFEND the system rats themselves to keep SOV - yes lets defend the npc pirates! - , and on the other hand the enemy will have to figth rats instead of fighting other players over SOV?

God, stupidity can allways reach higher marks.

Yeah, tie pvp performance to pve results, totally makes sense.

[b]~ 10.058 ~

Free The Mittani[/b]
Previous page12