These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

New dev blog: Changes to War Mechanics

First post First post
Author
Dream Five
Renegade Pleasure Androids
#641 - 2012-04-11 07:55:03 UTC
Argus Sorn wrote:


Bring SoniClover before us and make him answer for these crimes!

We demand SoniClover!

:O)

Argus


Wardec him - so that he has to quit CCP every evening and then rejoin in the morning every time he commutes to work. The HR will love it.
Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers
Brotherhood of Spacers
#642 - 2012-04-11 21:25:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Argus Sorn
Dream Five wrote:
Argus Sorn wrote:


Bring SoniClover before us and make him answer for these crimes!

We demand SoniClover!

:O)

Argus


Wardec him - so that he has to quit CCP every evening and then rejoin in the morning every time he commutes to work. The HR will love it.



I would, but I heard CCP just hired all of their alts, and formed an alliance with EVE University, RVB and Goonswarm in order to make me pay 15 billion isk a week to wardec them.

;o)

Sorn
Loridia Jade
Ghost Operations Tactical Unit
#643 - 2012-04-11 22:39:25 UTC
I've been a fairly neutral Player to Eve, which is to say I enjoy the PvE aspects as well as the PvP ones. I heard about some of the proposed changes in game and had to come see for myself. A lot of what I read I thought was pretty sweet, but I can clearly see where the major flaws are as many posts in this thread have highlighted. The main arguements of cost and being forced into a War people don't want. Heh, leave it to CCP to **** off both sides at the same time! Clearly there's things that are very wrong, and they are Blatantly Wrong... Really makes one curious if there was a Biased thought process here. What cracks me up, in reading the arguements in this thread... The PvPers seemed focused on a proper fix to work for all parties, allowing for possible War control changes to give the "Defender" a way out through Attrition; while all the Carebears just argueto place an even greater block to ever getting Wardecced in the first place, as if the Astronomical cost Hike wasn't absurdly enough to deter wars altogether anyway. It amazes me that right or wrong how people selfishly and stubbornly make a stand... Even in the face of ruining a great Spaceship Game. To you sorry saps... Shame on you. To you CCP, this is a big task you're taking on... You better not stay or grow more ignorant (as being portrayed with a lack of communication), for the wolves will certainly be upon you. As one Dev at FanFest noted "We skim the forums and read enough to get the jist of it and move on." maybe that's ok for some Forums, but I think this Topic and the Life of Eve demands more Attention than what has so far been provided.

~~~~~~~~~~~~ Show with the Hand, Deliver with the Mouth, Steal with the Eyes; Tempt fate not, for therein lay a dark surprise.

Indahmawar Fazmarai
#644 - 2012-04-12 06:54:59 UTC
Loridia Jade wrote:
I've been a fairly neutral Player to Eve, which is to say I enjoy the PvE aspects as well as the PvP ones. I heard about some of the proposed changes in game and had to come see for myself. A lot of what I read I thought was pretty sweet, but I can clearly see where the major flaws are as many posts in this thread have highlighted. The main arguements of cost and being forced into a War people don't want. Heh, leave it to CCP to **** off both sides at the same time! Clearly there's things that are very wrong, and they are Blatantly Wrong... Really makes one curious if there was a Biased thought process here. What cracks me up, in reading the arguements in this thread... The PvPers seemed focused on a proper fix to work for all parties, allowing for possible War control changes to give the "Defender" a way out through Attrition; while all the Carebears just argueto place an even greater block to ever getting Wardecced in the first place, as if the Astronomical cost Hike wasn't absurdly enough to deter wars altogether anyway. It amazes me that right or wrong how people selfishly and stubbornly make a stand... Even in the face of ruining a great Spaceship Game. To you sorry saps... Shame on you. To you CCP, this is a big task you're taking on... You better not stay or grow more ignorant (as being portrayed with a lack of communication), for the wolves will certainly be upon you. As one Dev at FanFest noted "We skim the forums and read enough to get the jist of it and move on." maybe that's ok for some Forums, but I think this Topic and the Life of Eve demands more Attention than what has so far been provided.


Hey, listen to what the CSM has to say:

Alekseyev Karrde wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
BTW, someone asked this:

If i am in a miner corp and someone wardecs us solely to prevent us from playing the game, how exactly can we avoid being at war and keep playing w/o surrendering to blackmail or dismantling our corporation?


I'm a smartass with an answer: You shouldn't and soon you won't be able to.

Being war dec'd IS playing the game. If you would like to return to your normal activity, surrender, fend the attackers off, hire someone to fend them off for you, or ride it out.


I absolutely love it. So concise, so much to the point: being harrassed is part of the game.

Game, set and match. See you in next MMO. Lol
Xorv
Questionable Acquisitions
#645 - 2012-04-12 08:53:54 UTC
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:

I absolutely love it. So concise, so much to the point: being harrassed is part of the game.

Game, set and match. See you in next MMO. Lol


Hopefully not! At least not if you bother to take the time to read and comprehend what the game is about before playing it.
Darek Castigatus
Immortalis Inc.
Shadow Cartel
#646 - 2012-04-12 09:09:06 UTC
Xorv wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:

I absolutely love it. So concise, so much to the point: being harrassed is part of the game.

Game, set and match. See you in next MMO. Lol


Hopefully not! At least not if you bother to take the time to read and comprehend what the game is about before playing it.


Exactly, to me that question reads like being asked 'how do i ignore this game feature i dont like because it inconviniences me' ,I think alexseyev was right to answer the way he did, you shouldnt be able to just ignore features that apply to the area of the game you chose to play in.

Pirates - The Invisible Fist of Darwin

you're welcome

Dream Five
Renegade Pleasure Androids
#647 - 2012-04-12 09:29:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Dream Five
I actually secretly hope they implement it in the most abusive way possible and a ton of people quit and EVE dies because of it so i can quit too :)
Retar Aveymone
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#648 - 2012-04-12 15:24:10 UTC
Goonswarm appreciates all of the best people to wardec self-identifying in this thread.

See you all in inferno!
Loridia Jade
Ghost Operations Tactical Unit
#649 - 2012-04-12 17:28:05 UTC
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
Loridia Jade wrote:
I've been a fairly neutral Player to Eve, which is to say I enjoy the PvE aspects as well as the PvP ones. I heard about some of the proposed changes in game and had to come see for myself. A lot of what I read I thought was pretty sweet, but I can clearly see where the major flaws are as many posts in this thread have highlighted.  The main arguements of cost and being forced into a War people don't want. Heh, leave it to CCP to **** off both sides at the same time!  Clearly there's things that are very wrong, and they are Blatantly Wrong... Really makes one curious if there was a Biased thought process here. What cracks me up, in reading the arguements in this thread... The PvPers seemed focused on a proper fix to work for all parties, allowing for possible War control changes to give the "Defender" a way out through Attrition; while all the Carebears just argueto place an even greater block to ever getting Wardecced in the first place, as if the Astronomical cost Hike wasn't absurdly enough to deter wars altogether anyway.  It amazes me that right or wrong how people selfishly and stubbornly make a stand... Even in the face of ruining a great Spaceship Game. To you sorry saps... Shame on you. To you CCP, this is a big task you're taking on... You better not stay or grow more ignorant (as being portrayed with a lack of communication), for the wolves will certainly be upon you. As one Dev at FanFest noted "We skim the forums and read enough to get the jist of it and move on."  maybe that's ok for some Forums, but I think this Topic and the Life of Eve demands more Attention than what has so far been provided.


Hey, listen to what the CSM has to say:

Alekseyev Karrde wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
BTW, someone asked this:

If i am in a miner corp and someone wardecs us solely to prevent us from playing the game, how exactly can we avoid being at war and keep playing w/o surrendering to blackmail or dismantling our corporation?


I'm a smartass with an answer: You shouldn't and soon you won't be able to.  

Being war dec'd IS playing the game.  If you would like to return to your normal activity, surrender, fend the attackers off, hire someone to fend them off for you, or ride it out.


I absolutely love it. So concise, so much to the point: being harrassed is part of the game.

Game, set and match. See you in next MMO. Lol


Yep, he's absolutely Right. Eve is Cold and Relentless... It's a Fraking Space Game... That's what we've All dreamt about since we first saw Star Trek, Star Wars, Bladerunner, Battlestar Galactica, SG1, etc. Tell me in which of those movies/shows was a Carebear the main, or hell, a supporting Character?  Guess you could Argue Uncle Owen and Aunt Beru in Star Wars Ep 4, but look at what happened to them! Stormtroopers shot them up into chard corpses! At least in space your corpse won't smell. The War Engine is what drives Eve and all of us are Fuel to burn for it!  Only difference among us is the Type of fuel you are: Low grade, mid, hich octane, or a workhorse Diesel? How long will you last until you burn out? And if your desire is to never be fuel for the engine then what good are you? Surely, you'll never be missed, moochers never are. Farewell to you sir.

~~~~~~~~~~~~ Show with the Hand, Deliver with the Mouth, Steal with the Eyes; Tempt fate not, for therein lay a dark surprise.

Argus Sorn
Star Frontiers
Brotherhood of Spacers
#650 - 2012-04-12 17:55:11 UTC
Loridia Jade wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
Loridia Jade wrote:
I've been a fairly neutral Player to Eve, which is to say I enjoy the PvE aspects as well as the PvP ones. I heard about some of the proposed changes in game and had to come see for myself. A lot of what I read I thought was pretty sweet, but I can clearly see where the major flaws are as many posts in this thread have highlighted.  The main arguements of cost and being forced into a War people don't want. Heh, leave it to CCP to **** off both sides at the same time!  Clearly there's things that are very wrong, and they are Blatantly Wrong... Really makes one curious if there was a Biased thought process here. What cracks me up, in reading the arguements in this thread... The PvPers seemed focused on a proper fix to work for all parties, allowing for possible War control changes to give the "Defender" a way out through Attrition; while all the Carebears just argueto place an even greater block to ever getting Wardecced in the first place, as if the Astronomical cost Hike wasn't absurdly enough to deter wars altogether anyway.  It amazes me that right or wrong how people selfishly and stubbornly make a stand... Even in the face of ruining a great Spaceship Game. To you sorry saps... Shame on you. To you CCP, this is a big task you're taking on... You better not stay or grow more ignorant (as being portrayed with a lack of communication), for the wolves will certainly be upon you. As one Dev at FanFest noted "We skim the forums and read enough to get the jist of it and move on."  maybe that's ok for some Forums, but I think this Topic and the Life of Eve demands more Attention than what has so far been provided.


Hey, listen to what the CSM has to say:

Alekseyev Karrde wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
BTW, someone asked this:

If i am in a miner corp and someone wardecs us solely to prevent us from playing the game, how exactly can we avoid being at war and keep playing w/o surrendering to blackmail or dismantling our corporation?


I'm a smartass with an answer: You shouldn't and soon you won't be able to.  

Being war dec'd IS playing the game.  If you would like to return to your normal activity, surrender, fend the attackers off, hire someone to fend them off for you, or ride it out.


I absolutely love it. So concise, so much to the point: being harrassed is part of the game.

Game, set and match. See you in next MMO. Lol


Yep, he's absolutely Right. Eve is Cold and Relentless... It's a Fraking Space Game... That's what we've All dreamt about since we first saw Star Trek, Star Wars, Bladerunner, Battlestar Galactica, SG1, etc. Tell me in which of those movies/shows was a Carebear the main, or hell, a supporting Character?  Guess you could Argue Uncle Owen and Aunt Beru in Star Wars Ep 4, but look at what happened to them! Stormtroopers shot them up into chard corpses! At least in space your corpse won't smell. The War Engine is what drives Eve and all of us are Fuel to burn for it!  Only difference among us is the Type of fuel you are: Low grade, mid, hich octane, or a workhorse Diesel? How long will you last until you burn out? And if your desire is to never be fuel for the engine then what good are you? Surely, you'll never be missed, moochers never are. Farewell to you sir.



EVE is HARD.

Good thing there are folks out there who are willing to make it a little less hard. Make friends. Far more satisfying than making the game easier.

As for devs and the forums. I thought the devs were being told to be more engaged in the forums. This thread is worthy of a reply, especially given the fact it is, for the most part, not filled with "I hate you CCP, I quit" rhetoric, but clear valid arguments regarding a flaw in the new system.

SoniClover, where are you?


Sorn
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#651 - 2012-04-12 18:17:08 UTC
Retar Aveymone wrote:
Goonswarm appreciates all of the best people to wardec self-identifying in this thread.

See you all in inferno!

If goonswarm is going to start declaring wars on people in highsec I'll make a list of targets for you.
Dream Five
Renegade Pleasure Androids
#652 - 2012-04-12 18:45:01 UTC
Vimsy Vortis wrote:
Retar Aveymone wrote:
Goonswarm appreciates all of the best people to wardec self-identifying in this thread.

See you all in inferno!

If goonswarm is going to start declaring wars on people in highsec I'll make a list of targets for you.


I'd so LOL if goonswarm wasted one of their 3 wardecs on my corp.
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#653 - 2012-04-12 19:15:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Vimsy Vortis
Alliances don't have a limit bro.

Way to understand war mechanics.
Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#654 - 2012-04-12 19:20:52 UTC
Darek Castigatus wrote:
Xorv wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:

I absolutely love it. So concise, so much to the point: being harrassed is part of the game.

Game, set and match. See you in next MMO. Lol


Hopefully not! At least not if you bother to take the time to read and comprehend what the game is about before playing it.


Exactly, to me that question reads like being asked 'how do i ignore this game feature i dont like because it inconviniences me' ,I think alexseyev was right to answer the way he did, you shouldnt be able to just ignore features that apply to the area of the game you chose to play in.

If your ability to defend yourself or funds to surrender/hire help are becoming exhausted faster than can be replenished then what is you recourse? If the answer similarly is there is none because "it's part of the game" then Indahmawar's conclusion is pretty much correct. It has nothing to do with ignoring a feature and everything to do with being hindered from enjoying the game at which point one must ask, "Why am I spending money and/or wasting time and effort on this?" Nothing wrong with saying this game isn't for me. Especially THIS game sometimes.

Retar Aveymone
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#655 - 2012-04-12 19:21:37 UTC
Vimsy Vortis wrote:
Retar Aveymone wrote:
Goonswarm appreciates all of the best people to wardec self-identifying in this thread.

See you all in inferno!

If goonswarm is going to start declaring wars on people in highsec I'll make a list of targets for you.

Sure! I think we'll be looking for the Indahmawar-like corps who will squeal in outrage and agony delightfully.
Vimsy Vortis
Shoulda Checked Local
Break-A-Wish Foundation
#656 - 2012-04-12 19:35:28 UTC
3 man tax evasion corps like that are a dime a dozen, that list would be very long. But I'm sure the outcome would be funny.
Dream Five
Renegade Pleasure Androids
#657 - 2012-04-12 19:43:36 UTC
Vimsy Vortis wrote:
Alliances don't have a limit bro.

Way to understand war mechanics.


Whoops :) That's giga skewed then. Wardec cost should be a function of a sum of member count of aggressor + defender.
Indahmawar Fazmarai
#658 - 2012-04-12 19:55:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Indahmawar Fazmarai
Loridia Jade wrote:
Yep, he's absolutely Right. Eve is Cold and Relentless... It's a Fraking Space Game... That's what we've All dreamt about since we first saw Star Trek, Star Wars, Bladerunner, Battlestar Galactica, SG1, etc. Tell me in which of those movies/shows was a Carebear the main, or hell, a supporting Character?  Guess you could Argue Uncle Owen and Aunt Beru in Star Wars Ep 4, but look at what happened to them! Stormtroopers shot them up into chard corpses! At least in space your corpse won't smell. The War Engine is what drives Eve and all of us are Fuel to burn for it!  Only difference among us is the Type of fuel you are: Low grade, mid, hich octane, or a workhorse Diesel? How long will you last until you burn out? And if your desire is to never be fuel for the engine then what good are you? Surely, you'll never be missed, moochers never are. Farewell to you sir.


IMHO, EVE's PvP is a game for pussies afraid of the consequences of bullying.
Xorv
Questionable Acquisitions
#659 - 2012-04-12 21:35:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Xorv
Tyberius Franklin wrote:

If your ability to defend yourself or funds to surrender/hire help are becoming exhausted faster than can be replenished then what is you recourse? If the answer similarly is there is none because "it's part of the game" then Indahmawar's conclusion is pretty much correct. It has nothing to do with ignoring a feature and everything to do with being hindered from enjoying the game at which point one must ask, "Why am I spending money and/or wasting time and effort on this?" Nothing wrong with saying this game isn't for me. Especially THIS game sometimes.


There's always choices or at least they're ought to be, but yes sometimes there's no recourse to a desirable outcome. That's what separates posters on these issues, not PvP vs PvE, but acceptance of the Sandbox game model, the desire for infinite possibilities including failure. Game's like WoW don't really have an losers, they don't let you fail. A good Sandbox MMORPG has to have the possibility of failure, or there being losers. It's what makes the game exciting and challenging vs stale and predictable. I've been at the receiving end of losing in these games like in Shadowbane where my Clan (corp) and alliance got zerged off the server, we made a fight of it, but really we had no chance and knew it. However, that still ranks as one of the most memorable gaming experiences I've had. In some ways it definitely sucked seeing the city you built razed to the ground, but ultimately I had a good time. There needs to be an investment in the game and the real possibility of loss, and sadly some gamers here just don't get that and likely never will.

And before someone says well that's fine for you, but we just want to do our own thing and be left alone.. or words to that effect. You're either part of a gaming world like this or you're not. There's no middle ground, by allowing you to PvE and PvP on the markets but be immune from combat PvP your asking to have the cake and eat it, to affect other player's gameplay but demanding immunity from others affecting your own.


Saying "this game isn't for me" would be the most sensible thing Indahmawar ever posted on these forums. There is indeed nothing wrong with that.
None ofthe Above
#660 - 2012-04-13 00:29:29 UTC
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
Loridia Jade wrote:
I've been a fairly neutral Player to Eve, which is to say I enjoy the PvE aspects as well as the PvP ones. I heard about some of the proposed changes in game and had to come see for myself. A lot of what I read I thought was pretty sweet, but I can clearly see where the major flaws are as many posts in this thread have highlighted. The main arguements of cost and being forced into a War people don't want. Heh, leave it to CCP to **** off both sides at the same time! Clearly there's things that are very wrong, and they are Blatantly Wrong... Really makes one curious if there was a Biased thought process here. What cracks me up, in reading the arguements in this thread... The PvPers seemed focused on a proper fix to work for all parties, allowing for possible War control changes to give the "Defender" a way out through Attrition; while all the Carebears just argueto place an even greater block to ever getting Wardecced in the first place, as if the Astronomical cost Hike wasn't absurdly enough to deter wars altogether anyway. It amazes me that right or wrong how people selfishly and stubbornly make a stand... Even in the face of ruining a great Spaceship Game. To you sorry saps... Shame on you. To you CCP, this is a big task you're taking on... You better not stay or grow more ignorant (as being portrayed with a lack of communication), for the wolves will certainly be upon you. As one Dev at FanFest noted "We skim the forums and read enough to get the jist of it and move on." maybe that's ok for some Forums, but I think this Topic and the Life of Eve demands more Attention than what has so far been provided.


Hey, listen to what the CSM has to say:

Alekseyev Karrde wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
BTW, someone asked this:

If i am in a miner corp and someone wardecs us solely to prevent us from playing the game, how exactly can we avoid being at war and keep playing w/o surrendering to blackmail or dismantling our corporation?


I'm a smartass with an answer: You shouldn't and soon you won't be able to.

Being war dec'd IS playing the game. If you would like to return to your normal activity, surrender, fend the attackers off, hire someone to fend them off for you, or ride it out.


I absolutely love it. So concise, so much to the point: being harrassed is part of the game.

Game, set and match. See you in next MMO. Lol


I think its time to realize that, while we want to preserve the PVP nature of EVE, HTFU is not really an answer to an obvious imbalance.

There is a difference between being a pathological carebear that is probably in the wrong game and someone who doesn't want to see institutionalized persistent harassment as a game mechanic.

There is got to be a way to fix wardecs so that isn't just pay to grief. What's proposed has some valid improvements, but also takes away some current protections. Mission not accomplished, IMHO.

The only end-game content in EVE Online is the crap that makes you rage quit.