These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Player Features and Ideas Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Friendly pvp?

Author
Sloppyslug
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1 - 2012-04-12 16:08:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Sloppyslug
Hello everyone, I will try and keep this short and sweet.

Almost everyone loves pvp in eve, it is one of the most interesting parts of eve, this has been backed up more by what has been shown at fanfest. But pvp at its current stage you are limited to the confines of your age, be it SP, numbers, ISK, friends, or experience.

So how about a mainstream eve gladiator arena/set tournament matches. A lot like the alliance tournaments or fanfest tournaments but for everyone in eve on a regular basis, at their own different confined stages "SP, numbers, ISK, or friends".


  • There can be different types of tournaments eg the normal alliance tournament style, or T3 tournaments or even t1 frig tournaments. It can move onto different game types/modes like capture the bunker, destroy the other teams bunker etc.

  • This will allow people at all different levels to pvp, and can be justified with the sandbox feel with it being a tournament held by the factions. An eve ranking system could be implemented to this also, like battleclinic.

  • If fully implemented things such as bets can start being put on teams.


Any comments or suggestion are welcome :). The only problem I can see with this is it may kill lowsec (more).
KuaFu
Doomheim
#2 - 2012-04-12 16:10:26 UTC
Set up a frig tourny then? it's not hard to do.

I've done one before when I used to work for a publication and was a great success.
Sloppyslug
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2012-04-12 16:13:48 UTC
Yeah but I mean more a game controlled tournament, not an easily breached or intruded set agreement.
mxzf
Shovel Bros
#4 - 2012-04-12 16:14:05 UTC  |  Edited by: mxzf
KuaFu wrote:
Set up a frig tourny then? it's not hard to do.

I've done one before when I used to work for a publication and was a great success.


This. If you want it to happen, just do it, there's nothing at all stopping you.

Edit: And it doesn't need to be controlled by the game. If you take it out of the players' hands then it's no longer part of the sandbox. The regulation should be the organizer blacklisting people who don't follow the rules, that's all you need.
Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
#5 - 2012-04-12 16:18:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Robert Caldera
Sloppyslug wrote:
Yeah but I mean more a game controlled tournament, not an easily breached or intruded set agreement.


intrusion is part of eve, everywhere.

I dont want eve full of s*itty tournaments just for the sole purpose of breaking the sandbox.

You still can disqualify intruders not playing according to your rules/terms of the tournament.

Do not support the idea.
Sloppyslug
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2012-04-12 16:19:51 UTC
mxzf wrote:
KuaFu wrote:
Set up a frig tourny then? it's not hard to do.

I've done one before when I used to work for a publication and was a great success.


This. If you want it to happen, just do it, there's nothing at all stopping you.

Edit: And it doesn't need to be controlled by the game. If you take it out of the players' hands then it's no longer part of the sandbox. The regulation should be the organizer blacklisting people who don't follow the rules, that's all you need.



I guess I was not clear on what I was saying I did not explicitly say that only was there to be frig tournaments, it is a push forward with current tournaments just with more modes and more accessibility for players. Even carrier tournaments could be implemented, and the different modes I listed. A bit of code just needs to look through ship types and numbers or modules for each, it would not be hard to code.

Set tournaments have been documented throughout history part of any society, and if you don't say the world is a sandbox I do not see where you are coming from.
Sloppyslug
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#7 - 2012-04-12 16:22:01 UTC
Robert Caldera wrote:
Sloppyslug wrote:
Yeah but I mean more a game controlled tournament, not an easily breached or intruded set agreement.


intrusion is part of eve, everywhere.

I dont want eve full of s*itty tournaments just for the sole purpose of breaking the sandbox.

You still can disqualify intruders not playing according to your rules/terms of the tournament.

Do not support the idea.


Set tournaments have been documented throughout history part of any society, and if you don't say the world is a sandbox I do not see where you are coming from.
ShahFluffers
Ice Fire Warriors
#8 - 2012-04-12 16:52:04 UTC
If you looked more closely at the skill system you'd realize that more SP =/= better player/PvPer.

Only a certain amount of skills affect any one ship, weapon, mod, and/or rig at any given time (e.g. I have the skill Large Hybrid Turret at level 5... it does not affect the skill Small Hybrid Turret at all) and all skills cap out at 5.
If a newbie were to train up his/her "core skills" and then some frigate-centric skills (which takes no more than 2, MAYBE 3 months)... he/she is going to be JUST as capable (character skillwise at least) as a 5 year veteran in a Frig on Frig battle.


With that out of the way... Not Supported. I dislike "instancing" in any way, shape, or form.
Robert Caldera
Caldera Trading and Investment
#9 - 2012-04-12 16:54:35 UTC
Sloppyslug wrote:

Set tournaments have been documented throughout history part of any society, and if you don't say the world is a sandbox I do not see where you are coming from.


noone stops you setting a tournament.
Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
#10 - 2012-04-12 16:57:17 UTC
Sloppyslug wrote:

Set tournaments have been documented throughout history part of any society, and if you don't say the world is a sandbox I do not see where you are coming from.


If two cowboys are having a shootout in the lawless wild west, there is no magical force field in the world that prevents a third from coming in and shooting them both while their backs are turned. We don't need such a force field in Eve either.

Organize your own tournament in hisec and you can have free policing. Conduct it at a safe spot to discourage neutrals from interfering. Do it in an unpopulated system to have better control over the presence of gang boosters.

Solve your own problems, don't ask CCP to do it for you.

Accidentally The Whole Frigate - For-newbies blog (currently on pause)

Rimase
#11 - 2012-04-12 17:02:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Rimase
(contribution)
Have Faction Warfare Militia be the friendly meta-game we all want it to be.

- Free limited ship reimbursements. (must not effect economy!)
- Free 'militarized station' services.
- Discount clones, maybe?

(additionally)
Like how Sansha's Nation alerts the whole universe, highlighted on Map, Militia could work the same!!!!!!!!
This will concentrate Militia populations. Mass fun meta-game PvP!

- Most activity within several solarsystems: Solarsystem War alert (24 hours free Militia services here).
- Most activity within few constellations: Constellation War alert (1 week free Militia services here).
  • MAXIMUM SOLARSYSTEM ALERTS : 20 ?
  • MAXIMUM CONSTELLATION ALERTS: 6+ ?

  • Inactive Constellation alert will attract Incursion!
  • MAXIMUM CONSTELLATION INCURSIONS: CCP decide.
  • .

    Looking to join Caldari Faction Warfare corporation!

    Sloppyslug
    The Scope
    Gallente Federation
    #12 - 2012-04-12 17:04:39 UTC
    Petrus Blackshell wrote:
    Sloppyslug wrote:

    Set tournaments have been documented throughout history part of any society, and if you don't say the world is a sandbox I do not see where you are coming from.


    If two cowboys are having a shootout in the lawless wild west, there is no magical force field in the world that prevents a third from coming in and shooting them both while their backs are turned. We don't need such a force field in Eve either.

    Organize your own tournament in hisec and you can have free policing. Conduct it at a safe spot to discourage neutrals from interfering. Do it in an unpopulated system to have better control over the presence of gang boosters.

    Solve your own problems, don't ask CCP to do it for you.


    This does not allow for the different PVP modes, does not allow ranking, and I was more refering to Roman Gladiator set tournaments, or even looking at modern UFC or boxing, is a set fight with rules. Low sec/Null sec can be used for anything other than it, just like less developed countries :D.

    Can also give militia a chance to have a tournament style from each faction.
    Nikk Narrel
    Moonlit Bonsai
    #13 - 2012-04-12 17:05:48 UTC
    Robert Caldera wrote:
    Sloppyslug wrote:

    Set tournaments have been documented throughout history part of any society, and if you don't say the world is a sandbox I do not see where you are coming from.


    noone stops you setting a tournament.

    I think she is trying to do something with official backing and support. Your described event is akin to some guys getting together a game in a vacant lot, as opposed to her sanctioned official game.

    I think she want's security, and government backing.
    Even at the olympics, you can get someone desperate enough to attack participants... but professional forces are present to minimize this risk, and act as a deterrent.

    The sandbox is still intact, the governments of the 4 races, and or concord, just need to be set up to act as security.

    I am thinking, if the cyno jam is removed for cap level events, some major alliance might still attempt to create an intergalactic incident...
    Robert Caldera
    Caldera Trading and Investment
    #14 - 2012-04-12 17:11:33 UTC
    if they add a substantial cost to this kind of tournament, I would agree.
    So lets say 500 mil for such one would be ok, otherwise eve will get flooded with tournaments for easy security.
    Not liking at all.
    mxzf
    Shovel Bros
    #15 - 2012-04-12 17:20:14 UTC
    Nikk Narrel wrote:
    Robert Caldera wrote:
    Sloppyslug wrote:

    Set tournaments have been documented throughout history part of any society, and if you don't say the world is a sandbox I do not see where you are coming from.


    noone stops you setting a tournament.

    I think she is trying to do something with official backing and support. Your described event is akin to some guys getting together a game in a vacant lot, as opposed to her sanctioned official game.

    I think she want's security, and government backing.
    Even at the olympics, you can get someone desperate enough to attack participants... but professional forces are present to minimize this risk, and act as a deterrent.

    The sandbox is still intact, the governments of the 4 races, and or concord, just need to be set up to act as security.

    I am thinking, if the cyno jam is removed for cap level events, some major alliance might still attempt to create an intergalactic incident...


    CCP already hosts a yearly 'Olympics' in the form of the AT (and they do it every year, not every 4/8 years (depending on how you look at it) like the Olympics).

    However, if you look around, the VAST majority of sports games year-round are run by non-government organizations who have their own scoring systems, security (if they feel the need), rules, penalties for stepping out of line, etc. We're suggesting that if the OP wants to get a tournament together, he should organize one, the same way all of the major RL sports organizations did back when they were beginning.

    If you get a reputation for running games well, getting rid of troublemakers (get some people to be 'security' with alpha Thrashers/Tornados if need be), and keeping everything running smoothly and well, then you'll eventually build up a reputation for yourself. Become respectable enough and do things well and people will respond to it and it can become a strongly built system where people won't try to cheat because they want good fights.

    This is the kind of thing that a sandbox game is all about, letting the players get together and make stuff happen.

    But if you're just trying to say "I'm too lazy to try and run something like this, CCP do it for me", then get over yourself and shut up.
    Petrus Blackshell
    Rifterlings
    #16 - 2012-04-12 17:20:21 UTC
    Sloppyslug wrote:
    PVP modes

    What? There are PvP modes?
    Sloppyslug wrote:
    ranking

    Killmails and spreadsheets.
    Sloppyslug wrote:
    I was more refering to Roman Gladiator set tournaments, or even looking at modern UFC or boxing, is a set fight with rules.

    Nothing stops a boxer from concealing a knife in his glove other than the threat of disqualification, which as contest organizer you can already wield.

    And, so far as "organized tournaments" go, look at how CCP's officially sanctioned, organized, and very restricted alliance tournament ended up: with doctored matches because of the metagame. Chaos reigns in Eve. Learn to rein it in and you can achieve your objective, but new features and shoehorned instanced areas are not a solution that will be implemented, nor one you can count on even if it is.

    Accidentally The Whole Frigate - For-newbies blog (currently on pause)

    ShahFluffers
    Ice Fire Warriors
    #17 - 2012-04-12 17:30:51 UTC
    Sloppyslug wrote:
    Petrus Blackshell wrote:
    Organize your own tournament in hisec and you can have free policing. Conduct it at a safe spot to discourage neutrals from interfering. Do it in an unpopulated system to have better control over the presence of gang boosters.

    Solve your own problems, don't ask CCP to do it for you.

    This does not allow for the different PVP modes,

    Define "PvP modes" please. Because the way I see it... in ship on ship combat things are pretty simple: "you stick the pointy end into the other guy" however you can. Market PvP is trying to underbid your competitors while still making a decent profit. Hell... sometimes it's buying OUT the market and reselling everything at stupid prices.

    Sloppyslug wrote:
    does not allow ranking,

    Killboards.

    Sloppyslug wrote:
    and I was more refering to Roman Gladiator set tournaments, or even looking at modern UFC or boxing, is a set fight with rules. Low sec/Null sec can be used for anything other than it, just like less developed countries :D.

    In low and null-sec, the rules are enforced by who has the bigger gun. You want a tournament where people follow "rules"... get big guns and MAKE them follow the rules.
    Otherwise, just have "Gentlemen agreements" and arrange 1v1s (the way RvB does).

    Sloppyslug wrote:
    Can also give militia a chance to have a tournament style from each faction.

    All is fair in love and war. I actually enjoy it when my enemies bring a big ol gang of guys with Falcon support... and then my guys and I just drunkenly fly into the meatgrinder. It makes things interesting.
    Robert Saint
    The Grumpy Dogs
    #18 - 2012-04-23 19:59:38 UTC
    This is a sore subject for forum posters, but a much needed part of this game.

    PVP means different things to different players. Lose the Sandbox logic (since sand must be in a box to be contained), it doesn't exist complelely open anyway.

    We Need a "PVP LITE" system period. Why PVP pros are scared of this I have no idea, other than they like to gank and that's their fun zone. Otherwise, let civil people play PVP as well. People who won't throw the monopoly ship at you once they win.

    I'm all for the OP's post and hope CCP will see a bit of PVE/PVP mix in the future. Where you can fight another player without fighting his gang of friends as well.

    Leontyne Gaterau
    The Scope
    Gallente Federation
    #19 - 2012-04-23 21:15:57 UTC
    I like most of the people I shoot :3
    Petrus Blackshell
    Rifterlings
    #20 - 2012-04-23 21:36:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Petrus Blackshell
    Robert Saint wrote:
    We Need a "PVP LITE" system period. Why PVP pros are scared of this I have no idea

    We do not need a "PvP Lite" system. Imbalance is inherent in Eve combat, and has always been. When you take a gang of 10 Drakes out, you do so in the knowledge that you might run into 1 Hurricane, 10 Hurricanes, or 50 Hurricanes. You do your best to find the former, avoid the latter, and handle the middle one properly.

    "PvP Lite" would allow you to automatically pick engagements "of your own size" that are balanced by some weird arcane system that can probably be gamed. That means that, when people look for PvP, they will have to pick between:

    1. Current "sandbox" PvP system. Hunting for and fighting an unknown enemy that has a chance a) to be a hunter himself, b) to not be found/show up, or c) to be a trap.
    2. "PvP Lite" system. Fighting someone who (by arbitrary balancing rules) supposedly cannot utterly overpower or outsmart you.


    Most people would pick (2). Why? Because "fair fights" are notoriously easy to game. Some examples:

    Alliance Tournament. How many gimmicky fits and gang formations were present there that would never ever work in a sandbox environment? How many ship fittings were in use that were only popular because that ship cost too few "points"? How many arbitrary rules (like "maximum 2 logistics") had to be enforced to prevent weird auto-win gang setups? How many times more would these issues be magnified if matches like those were open to everyone?

    The same people romping about in Drake blobs now would be setting up "meta" gimmicky gang setups to be "pro pvpers" by winning all of these "fair" fights.

    FW complexes. This is another example of ham-fisted "fair" fights. You're a newbie in a Rifter wanting to capture this complex? Here, have a Slicer or a Dramiel that comes in to try to gank you. No, your friend in his Claw can't come help, because T2 frigates are arbitrarily not allowed since they're "too powerful" (but the Dramiel isn't).

    1v1s. Sure, let's have a Merlin vs Rifter fight. Little do you know that my Merlin has faction fittings, a deadspace shield booster, I have a Crystal implant set and am popping a Blue Pill, and have my neutral Tengu alt in system boosting my shield resistances and shield boosters. That is a totally fair fight.



    There is no "fair" in Eve. Assuming competence on both sides, if you're in a fight where you didn't have an ace up your sleeve, or your opponent already knew your whole hand, then you're about to lose horribly. Learning to deal with that is a large part of PvPing. An arena or "PvP lite" cheapens and dilutes all of that, and makes the already-too-sparse PvP population even sparser.


    Edit: I can't believe I explained that yet again. Sigh...

    Accidentally The Whole Frigate - For-newbies blog (currently on pause)

    12Next page