These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Bond Offer: 25B (Closed) , 9% Interest, 1 Month Recurring

Author
Aina Sasaki
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#1 - 2012-04-09 01:16:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Aina Sasaki
Yeargh.... here be a bond offer from me! :o

General Information:

Bond Size: 25 Billion ISK
Bond Increments: 50 Million ISK
Interest Rate: 9%
Collateral: None
Start Date: April 10th, 2012
Duration: 1 Month Recurring

What is the bond for?

I plan to use the money from this bond to expand upon my existing station trading and investment activities.

Details:

The Bond cycle begins on the 10th of the month. From this point until the 25th, anyone who chooses to sign up for the bond will receive 9% interest at the end of the one month cycle on the 10th of the next month. Anyone who signs up after the 25th will not receive interest until the next cycle. From the 1st of the next month until the 8th, investors may contact me to let me know if they wish to either extend their bond for another month or to cash out. Investors also are able to pull out of this bond at any time, but doing so before the end of that bond's cycle will result in a forfeit of their interest payment.

Also, for the sake of simplicity, I would like it if investments into this bond were made in increments of 50 Million each (50M, 100M, 150M, etc etc)

Risks:

Making a profit should not be a problem in the slightest. Although I no doubt still have things to learn in regards to trading and other aspects of the market, I have rapidly expanded my ISK-making capabilities and show no signs of slowing down. Being Wardecced might happen to Aina since she is in a pvp corp, but it is my alts, and not Aina, who make my ISK. Therefore, a pvp wardec will not have any real effect on my abilities to make profits. I can pay to play with PLEX with ease, so real world money is also not an issue.

In the event that I did suddenly have to leave the game or decided to cancel this bond offer for any reason, I would promptly return everyone's investments immediately plus 9% interest.


If you are interested in this offer, please post in this thread and/or send me an evemail. The list of investors, as well as the dates that they will receive interest, will be tracked below. If you have any questions, comments, or concerns, please post them in this thread. :)

Aina Sasaki

- Rei

Bunnehrawr Rawr
Doomheim
#2 - 2012-04-09 04:15:41 UTC
I'm probably going to seem the baddykin here, but i believe 10 bil for your first bond seems abit.. optimistic Smile

Espically with no collateral =<

Sorry to be the sad panda of the group
Aina Sasaki
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2012-04-09 04:39:47 UTC
Bunnehrawr Rawr wrote:
I'm probably going to seem the baddykin here, but i believe 10 bil for your first bond seems abit.. optimistic Smile

Espically with no collateral =<

Sorry to be the sad panda of the group


10 Billion is the hopeful full size of this Bond. If it ends up being short of that due to a lack of willing investors, then so be it. :)

- Rei

Jake Andarius
Andarius Trading Corp.
#4 - 2012-04-09 05:12:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Jake Andarius
You posted a 1 billion bond offer March 20th, and I responded that your claim of making 2 billion in two weeks from 250 million was very dubious. You were unable to secure any investors for that bond and decided to close it.

Your current bond has the same problems as before: you are a very new character claiming to very successful at trading, but you have not been audited to confirm this. Now there is another problem: you have increased your bond offer from 1 billion to 10 billion. This large of a first time offer from a new character is not going to attract any investors; that is plain and simple fact.

If you are serious about getting a bond, I suggest you decrease the amount to 1 billion and have an audit of your account to confirm your ability to trade. If your audit demonstrates that you have been able to make 6 billion in one month from 250 million, then I believe you would be able to fill a reasonably sized bond.
Aina Sasaki
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#5 - 2012-04-09 06:06:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Aina Sasaki
Jake Andarius wrote:
You posted a 1 billion bond offer March 20th, and I responded that your claim of making 2 billion in two weeks from 250 million was very dubious. You were unable to secure any investors for that bond and decided to close it.

Your current bond has the same problems as before: you are a very new character claiming to very successful at trading, but you have not been audited to confirm this. Now there is another problem: you have increased your bond offer from 1 billion to 10 billion. This large of a first time offer from a new character is not going to attract any investors; that is plain and simple fact.

If you are serious about getting a bond, I suggest you decrease the amount to 1 billion and have an audit of your account to confirm your ability to trade. If your audit demonstrates that you have been able to make 6 billion in one month from 250 million, then I believe you would be able to fill a reasonably sized bond.


Yeah, I remember that. It was disappointing. Funny thing is my growth slowed down quite alot since then. Still good, but... not as good. :(

The difference this time is that I have about 6 billion in minerals invested on my alt. That is, technically, collateral. I just would prefer not to use it due to the volatile nature of the mineral market right now. If I put those minerals up for collateral at their current price, I could potentially be losing ISK if that mineral ended up going higher in price than I would price it at for use as collateral. See the problem?

I'm all ears for a solution.

- Rei

Salarc
SalCorp
#6 - 2012-04-09 06:23:59 UTC
Aina Sasaki wrote:

I just would prefer not to use it due to the volatile nature of the mineral market right now. If I put those minerals up for collateral at their current price (or slightly above it for my own protection), I could potentially be losing ISK if that mineral ended up going higher in price than I would price it at for use as collateral. See the problem?


"(or slightly above it for my own protection)"
^lol
Good luck with your loan
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#7 - 2012-04-09 11:03:49 UTC
Salarc wrote:
Aina Sasaki wrote:

I just would prefer not to use it due to the volatile nature of the mineral market right now. If I put those minerals up for collateral at their current price (or slightly above it for my own protection), I could potentially be losing ISK if that mineral ended up going higher in price than I would price it at for use as collateral. See the problem?


"(or slightly above it for my own protection)"
^lol
Good luck with your loan


Not empty quoting.
Aina Sasaki
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2012-04-10 01:34:53 UTC
This Bond Offer is now active and accepting investments.

As a special bonus, I am going to increase the interest rates paid out to investors for the first month. Investors that choose to sign up for this bond, but then choose to withdraw after the first month, will receive 10% instead of 7% interest. Investors that choose to extend their part in this bond into the next month will receive 15% interest instead of 10%. After the first month is over, the interest rates will revert to the original 7% for withdrawing at the end of the month and 10% for those who choose to extend into the next month.

- Rei

Lindy Nagundu
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#9 - 2012-04-10 22:52:05 UTC  |  Edited by: Lindy Nagundu
On the subject of being TRUSTWORTHY

I wanted to put in a word about the trustworthiness of Aina Sasaki. I am a director in the corp that Aina recently left. Aina had complete access to the corp wallet and never abused that privilege even though Aina was unhappy with the ceo and another director at the time of leaving. I believe this speaks volumes.
Aina Sasaki
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#10 - 2012-04-11 18:06:37 UTC
Thanks Lindy. :)

Also, bump.

- Rei

Johnny Frecko
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#11 - 2012-04-11 19:12:01 UTC
i think you don't know what collateral means.

If you put those Minerals for collateral, you don't lose them, the third party doesn't sell them unless for default.
I doubt anyone would accept large stocks of minerals in todays market situation for the very same reasons you mentioned.
It's an investment, But it can backfire.
(probaby won't, but long live the speculations).


Bottom line, even if those minerals were worth 10B, and you used them as collateral, And their prices would rise to 25B, At the end of the month you still get your minerals back.
Unless you plan on running in the first place, and just want to unload your poorly invested 6B tritanium.

btw, for collateral, It's around 85% or 80% of market value, or in other terms, the bond should be 110-115% collaterlized.
There are people who can get over 10B uncollaterlized. You're not one of them

Johnny
Aina Sasaki
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#12 - 2012-04-11 21:40:15 UTC
Johnny Frecko wrote:
i think you don't know what collateral means.

If you put those Minerals for collateral, you don't lose them, the third party doesn't sell them unless for default.
I doubt anyone would accept large stocks of minerals in todays market situation for the very same reasons you mentioned.
It's an investment, But it can backfire.
(probaby won't, but long live the speculations).


Bottom line, even if those minerals were worth 10B, and you used them as collateral, And their prices would rise to 25B, At the end of the month you still get your minerals back.
Unless you plan on running in the first place, and just want to unload your poorly invested 6B tritanium.

btw, for collateral, It's around 85% or 80% of market value, or in other terms, the bond should be 110-115% collaterlized.
There are people who can get over 10B uncollaterlized. You're not one of them

Johnny


No, I do know what collateral means.

I know full well that it is a third party that holds them, and that is, in part, what makes me uneasy about putting minerals there. Why? Because of how volatile mineral prices are, any day now could be the right moment for me to sell them off. If they are held in collateral, I won't have access to them, and therefore could miss out on the opportunity to sell them, and so potentially costing billions in profits. Worse, if the price ends up going backwards, I might actually end up losing money on that collateral at the end of the day. While not an irrecoverable disaster, it would still suck. Yet without meaningful collateral, this loan business is a tad difficult. :/

I sent someone a message hoping to try to find a way out of that problem, but I have yet to hear back from them.

And... it's not Tritanium. You might have figured that out for yourself if you read recent forum posts of mine. I do believe I said something like Tritanium didn't seem like the best investment idea to me because of how damn common it is. Now with the blog entry that scrap metal will still be dropping off NPC rats, I think I was right. :)

As for this bond itself, truth be told I set it's height at 10B so that it could steadily grow into that. I am no fool. I never expected to fill a 10B bond in the first month, or perhaps even the second month. But... you never know. :)

- Rei

Lauren Hellfury
Super Happy Awesome Fun Times
#13 - 2012-04-11 21:55:19 UTC
would like pledge 20b

Help rid New Eden of T2 BPOs: ** https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=62797 **The Full Pocket Aggro blog:  http://fullpocketaggro.blogspot.com/ **Now showing: **Margin Trading Scams

Jake Andarius
Andarius Trading Corp.
#14 - 2012-04-11 22:59:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Jake Andarius
Aina Sasaki wrote:
As for this bond itself, truth be told I set it's height at 10B so that it could steadily grow into that. I am no fool. I never expected to fill a 10B bond in the first month, or perhaps even the second month. But... you never know. :)


Even if someone thought you were trustworthy enough to invest 1b into, they would not invest 1b into this offer. They see your statement to borrow 10b as a hazard to their investment of 1b. If they trust you with 1b, that means that they want to make sure your outstanding public debts from all parties are at or below 1b.

The amount aside, my central concern with your bond requests is that you have not taken the opportunity to secure an audit to verify your trading claims. You have presented yourself very well (aside from the large amount), but you made some very questionable claims about your trading capability that have the ability to make or break you depending on if they are verified or not. At this point, you have done nothing to verify those claims to potential investors.
Aina Sasaki
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#15 - 2012-04-11 23:24:12 UTC  |  Edited by: Aina Sasaki
Jake Andarius wrote:
Stuff


Actually I did try to get an audit. That is still pending though. I'll let Vaerah address that if she really wants to. At the moment however, that audit isn't going anywhere and there is nothing I can do to push it forward. Frankly I'm not even sure if it would make a difference here anyway.

On another note, you keep bringing up how my ISK growth is "questionable" or "suspicious" because it went much faster than average for a relatively new player. Has it occurred to you that Eve isn't my first MMO? Or that this is not the first time i've set myself upon the goal of making fair amounts of in-game currency?

Eve does not have a monopoly on market players. ;)

- Rei

Jake Andarius
Andarius Trading Corp.
#16 - 2012-04-11 23:34:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Jake Andarius
Aina Sasaki wrote:
On another note, you keep bringing up how my ISK growth is "questionable" or "suspicious" because it went much faster than average for a relatively new player. Has it occurred to you that Eve isn't my first MMO? Or that this is not the first time i've set myself upon the goal of making fair amounts of in-game currency?


I never said it was impossible that you were particularly capable in trading. I continue to emphasize that it is questionable because it is abnormal and, without proof and considering how common scams are in EVE, it is more reasonable to assume that the claims are fabricated in order to get investments. In addition, I continue to bring it up because you would get investments on a reasonably sized bond if you had an audit to confirm those claims. If you are a scammer, you definitely would not get an audit. If you are telling the truth, you would presumably want to get an audit done to verify your claims.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#17 - 2012-04-11 23:34:53 UTC
About the audit I said that it's useless to get an audit when the investment is too aggressive and the reaction to collateral was so harsh.

The audit is already running and for free.

The audit will end when you'll produce an offer that the investors will accept "pending audit". That day will mean that you have done all the steps to propose yourself and the audit will be just the cherry on the pie.
Aina Sasaki
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#18 - 2012-04-12 00:15:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Aina Sasaki
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
About the audit I said that it's useless to get an audit when the investment is too aggressive and the reaction to collateral was so harsh.

The audit is already running and for free.

The audit will end when you'll produce an offer that the investors will accept "pending audit". That day will mean that you have done all the steps to propose yourself and the audit will be just the cherry on the pie.


I don't know where a "harsh reaction" to collateral popped up, but it wasn't from me as far as I can recall. What I do remember is sending you a fairly lengthy Evemail detailing what was on my mind in regards to that issue. Perhaps I should paste that mail here so others can read it?

Also, I am not sure if I understand what you mean by "the audit is already running and for free," since I gave you no API keys (you didn't ask for them) and you gave no indication that you were willing to perform an audit.

- Rei

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#19 - 2012-04-12 00:35:03 UTC
Aina Sasaki wrote:
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
About the audit I said that it's useless to get an audit when the investment is too aggressive and the reaction to collateral was so harsh.

The audit is already running and for free.

The audit will end when you'll produce an offer that the investors will accept "pending audit". That day will mean that you have done all the steps to propose yourself and the audit will be just the cherry on the pie.


I don't know where a "harsh reaction" to collateral popped up, but it wasn't from me as far as I can recall. What I do remember is sending you a fairly lengthy Evemail detailing what was on my mind in regards to that issue. Perhaps I should paste that mail here so others can read it?

Also, I am not sure if I understand what you mean by "the audit is already running and for free," since I gave you no API keys (you didn't ask for them) and you gave no indication that you were willing to perform an audit.


Do whatever you want.

Also, you are indeed being audited, you should figure out how, why and by whom.
Aina Sasaki
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2012-04-12 00:37:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Aina Sasaki
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Do whatever you want.

Also, you are indeed being audited, you should figure out how, why and by whom.


I'm getting the distinct impression that I have upset you somehow. Is that so, or am I just reading too much into your words here?

- Rei

123Next pageLast page