These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Banks. We need them.

Author
Jake Andarius
Andarius Trading Corp.
#281 - 2012-04-09 14:59:53 UTC  |  Edited by: Jake Andarius
Herping yourDerp wrote:
problem with NPC banks is they will either
A give interest, thus being an isk faucet
B give no interest and be worthless
C give something ( loyalty points or something) and become a huge advantage for rich folk to just farm the stuff.


Siren Pavonis wrote:
Some here have mentioned NPC banks. This doesn't seem like a very good idea to me. While NPC banks would probably indeed be trusted, an NPC bank is by definition somewhat of a robot. How can a robot determine what the risks are corporation X will (not) pay back its loans? No way it can.


The consensus on the first page of this thread was that NPC banks add nothing of value to the game. This thread is largely concerned with the difficulties of player-run banks.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#282 - 2012-04-09 15:21:01 UTC
The consensus on the first page of this thread was that NPC banks add nothing of value to the game. This thread is largely concerned with the difficulties of player-run banks.[/quote]

Main problem ATM is not that they have difficulties. Difficulties can ALWAYS be overcome. It's just that it's too much menial work for little reward.
Jake Andarius
Andarius Trading Corp.
#283 - 2012-04-09 15:24:30 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Main problem ATM is not that they have difficulties. Difficulties can ALWAYS be overcome. It's just that it's too much menial work for little reward.


I am guessing you are not referring to deposit/withdrawals, since that is largely automated. Do you mean the menial work of a team of people investing all that ISK and getting little personal return from it?
Siren Pavonis
Children of KirShara
#284 - 2012-04-09 16:43:12 UTC
Adunh Slavy wrote:
It occurred to me a new possibility with some sort of "loan mechanic" in Eve. The suspect flag. Late on a payment? Suspect flag gets turned on until you are no longer in default. Now everyone can take a shot at you.

Still lots of room for meta game manipulation and biomass games, but does open up possibilities.


That would make it unlikely for a single individual to scam a bank, but this would in no way prevent a bank failure if a group decided to rip off the bank. Making someone a kill target doesn't get the money back.
Barakach
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#285 - 2012-04-09 16:51:29 UTC
It could be something similar to a corp wallet. Then maybe the "bank" can set min/max transaction sizes min/max account sizes, daily withdraw/deposit caps. Stuff like this.

Allow the bank to make use of a percentage those funds, possibly modifiable via a new skill.

We don't need a chequing account, we need a savings account. We need an easy way for the account hold to deposit and withdraw.
Adunh Slavy
#286 - 2012-04-09 16:52:45 UTC
Siren Pavonis wrote:

That would make it unlikely for a single individual to scam a bank, but this would in no way prevent a bank failure if a group decided to rip off the bank. Making someone a kill target doesn't get the money back.


All quite true. Doesn't mean it can be expanded out to an alliance level and the issue of bonds and such things. I'd refer to an older thread about bonds that I did months ago if I weren't too lazy to go look it up.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Siren Pavonis
Children of KirShara
#287 - 2012-04-10 15:40:48 UTC
Adunh Slavy wrote:
Siren Pavonis wrote:

That would make it unlikely for a single individual to scam a bank, but this would in no way prevent a bank failure if a group decided to rip off the bank. Making someone a kill target doesn't get the money back.


All quite true. Doesn't mean it can be expanded out to an alliance level and the issue of bonds and such things. I'd refer to an older thread about bonds that I did months ago if I weren't too lazy to go look it up.


An alliance-wide flag? Wow. That would be something. That would actually give tremendous power to banks, something that wouldn't be exactly fair from a competition point of view. But I'm guessing you' re not proposing that anyway. On the other hand, several ... ahum... well-known alliances would probably try to scam banks on a big scale if they got the chance to do so. Alternatively, you could in theory set up a kind of New-Eden-wide arbitration board (who's members are corps) who could hold a 'trial' against a corp/alliance that scammed a financial institution; and who's members than all wardec this corp/alliance if the verdict is 'guilty'. However, the practical matters of such an arbitration board would be rather difficult - I don't imagine many corps joining, as there needs to be some-kind of advantage for corps to join.

Still, I'd prefer punishments to be in the form of financial punishments, as this is mostly a financial matter in the first place. Having said that, any bank that feels it needs to take revenge can of course put a bounty on someone's head, or hire mercenaries to kill that person.
Adunh Slavy
#288 - 2012-04-10 15:56:09 UTC
Siren Pavonis wrote:
Adunh Slavy wrote:
Siren Pavonis wrote:

That would make it unlikely for a single individual to scam a bank, but this would in no way prevent a bank failure if a group decided to rip off the bank. Making someone a kill target doesn't get the money back.


All quite true. Doesn't mean it can be expanded out to an alliance level and the issue of bonds and such things. I'd refer to an older thread about bonds that I did months ago if I weren't too lazy to go look it up.


An alliance-wide flag? Wow. That would be something. That would actually give tremendous power to banks, something that wouldn't be exactly fair from a competition point of view. But I'm guessing you' re not proposing that anyway. On the other hand, several ... ahum... well-known alliances would probably try to scam banks on a big scale if they got the chance to do so.


My idea was not banks, so much as bonds. A corp or alliance would sell bonds to anyone, and if they were in default, then the bond holder alliances/corps or individuals had kill rights on that entire alliance until the bond issuing group was no longer in default. In my idea, there was no "bank", just bonds.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#289 - 2012-04-10 16:06:22 UTC
It's all already possible today, by smartly using contracts and with a controlled maximum risk.

Does not mean it'd be worth doing though.
Cedo Nulli
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#290 - 2012-04-10 17:53:10 UTC
Banks ... We dont need em.


(Your isk is allready in a virtual bank account ... Player run banks would be there only for making isk by offering you risk of loosing it all in a blaze of C&P glory)
Wyke Mossari
Staner Industries
#291 - 2012-04-10 20:11:05 UTC
Hexxx wrote:
"...As the increased money supply wasn‘t increasing trade to the same degree, the result was a lower velocity of money. An important factor in this was probably the absence of a trusted banking sector, which could offer interest and distribute the unused ISK to those in need of funds..." - CCP Recurve, Dev Blog: Price Indices – February 2012
http://community.eveonline.com/devblog.asp?a=blog&nbid=9115



A year ago I pointed out that despite the rising money supply the Eve Economy was actually deflating, I called it the Liquidity Trap.
Dror Roidcrusher
Balls of Megacyte
#292 - 2012-04-10 21:56:02 UTC
EVE has never had a bank comparable to RL and never will because the players are douchebags who can't be trusted with the creation of isk based on IOUs by other douchebags. If a bunch of dudes privately created their own currency (corp shares can be used for this), it could work within their happy little system, but that's pretty much it.

CCP will not let players near the creation of ISK.

Nice 15 pages.
Siren Pavonis
Children of KirShara
#293 - 2012-04-11 19:28:10 UTC
Adunh Slavy wrote:

My idea was not banks, so much as bonds. A corp or alliance would sell bonds to anyone, and if they were in default, then the bond holder alliances/corps or individuals had kill rights on that entire alliance until the bond issuing group was no longer in default. In my idea, there was no "bank", just bonds.



Hmm.... that's actually quite an interesting idea indeed.


Cedo Nulli wrote:

Banks ... We dont need em.


(Your isk is allready in a virtual bank account ... Player run banks would be there only for making isk by offering you risk of loosing it all in a blaze of C&P glory)


You're only looking at one side of a bank - the 'front' door common to all ppl in RL. You're forgetting a very important aspect of banks: corporate loans (or the 'backdoor'). How do you think an RL bank can give you interest on your account? It uses your money to give out a loan to a company, which then pays interest over that loan, part of which is then used as your very own interest on your savings account. Without these loans, many companies would not be able to exist, and hence this would be bad for the economy. Hence, having a trusted banking sector in EVE might be good for the EVE economy.
Dror Roidcrusher
Balls of Megacyte
#294 - 2012-04-11 21:21:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Dror Roidcrusher
Siren Pavonis wrote:
You're forgetting a very important aspect of banks
/--
It uses your money to give out a loan to a company

It seems you too are forgetting a very important aspect of banks.
It uses the act of writing a number into a balance sheet to give out a loan to a company, "your money" has nothing to do with it. It's a great system and good for the economy as you correctly point out, but you can't let douchebag players in a computer game with no ultimate consequences near currency creation.
Jake Andarius
Andarius Trading Corp.
#295 - 2012-04-11 21:33:38 UTC
Dror Roidcrusher wrote:
EVE has never had a bank comparable to RL and never will because the players are douchebags who can't be trusted with the creation of isk based on IOUs by other douchebags...CCP will not let players near the creation of ISK.


Dror Roidcrusher wrote:
It seems you too are forgetting a very important aspect of banks.
It uses the act of writing a number into a balance sheet to give out a loan to a company, "your money" has nothing to do with it. It's a great system and good for the economy as you correctly point out, but you can't let douchebag players in a computer game with no ultimate consequences near currency creation.


You seem to have the false impression that private commercial banks have the ability to create money.
Dror Roidcrusher
Balls of Megacyte
#296 - 2012-04-11 21:37:14 UTC
I do have that impression, but it is not false.
Jake Andarius
Andarius Trading Corp.
#297 - 2012-04-11 21:37:58 UTC
Dror Roidcrusher wrote:
I do have that impression, but it is not false.


Big smile
Dror Roidcrusher
Balls of Megacyte
#298 - 2012-04-11 21:41:46 UTC
"Your money" in the bank is a liability of the bank (to pay you the amount).
A loan to a company creates a new deposit, that deposit is also liability of the bank (in return, the bank gets an IOU from the company to pay back the bank over time).
It is impossible to say your deposit (which is also a liability of the bank) somehow becomes another liability.


sorry if it disappoints you but this is operational reality in modern times
Jake Andarius
Andarius Trading Corp.
#299 - 2012-04-11 21:52:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Jake Andarius
Dror Roidcrusher wrote:
"Your money" in the bank is a liability of the bank (to pay you the amount).
A loan to a company creates a new deposit, that deposit is also liability of the bank (in return, the bank gets an IOU from the company to pay back the bank over time).
It is impossible to say your deposit (which is also a liability of the bank) somehow becomes another liability.


Your example of a bank loaning out its deposits fails to demonstrate how it has created money.

(Minor correction: When a bank loans out money to an individual, that loan becomes an asset of the bank, not a liability. Liabilities are obligations to pay someone else. In a loan, the borrower has a liability, the loaner has an asset. So, the bank has liabilities on its balance sheet from deposits, and it has assets on its balance sheet from loans.)
Dror Roidcrusher
Balls of Megacyte
#300 - 2012-04-11 22:11:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Dror Roidcrusher
My example has nothing to do with loaning out a deposit. A car pool loans its 'deposits' out, an actual bank doesn't need to.

A deposit is a liability of a bank.
You have a deposit of 5000 ISK in the bank.
This means that on your demand, the bank must pay you 5000 ISK.

Or maybe imagine this: you took a loan from a bank for 5000 ISK. The reality is that now your account somehow has 5000 ISK. (It was created as a counterbalance to you signing the IOU to pay the bank back over time. They found your credit good enough and thus created the money. You have a liability to them, and they have one to you).

If this 5000 ISK on your account was not a liability of the bank (to pay you), how would you go about using this money? Say you for whichever reason need to pay me 1000 ISK. What are you going to pay me with, your liability to pay the bank? No, you will make it so that the bank adds 1000 ISK to my account (and i can get it on demand, sounds like a liability lolololol), leaving you with 4000.