These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

Inferno - Where are the acutal Features?

Author
MotherMoon
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#41 - 2012-04-06 22:59:17 UTC
supersexysucker wrote:
What you expect, ccps trailers are BS and so are the notes and everything else... they likely saw the troll vid of what it COULD be... and are like... O ****... this EXP sucks balls like almost every other one.


yeah! eve was better when there was only 2 expansions!
They all sucked only two of them were useful at all!
/sarcasm

http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1206/scimi.jpg

MotherMoon
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#42 - 2012-04-06 23:09:33 UTC
Lapine Davion wrote:
Tobiaz wrote:
Alxea wrote:
They also talk about ring mining.


I thought that was for the winter expansion or even further down the track.


Yeah, that was the Winter 2012 expansion.


So now we are complaining that CCP wants to make only one big expansion a year, with a smaller expansion in the summer?

I thought everyone was mad at CCP for making two big expansions a year and not delivering? didn't we fight to get just one large expansion a year? Most mmos only one expansion every 2-3 years, I'm ok with only 1 expansion of content every year. I try to consider each other expansion a fun extra bag of bug fixes and balancing.

yes you hear me, i WANT A BALANCE EXPANSION ONE A YEAR, followed by a large feature expansion, which will have a whole year of work into the planning instead of 6 months.

I know most features are being worked on for 2 years, but they usually only choose which features should be ready and polished 4-6 months in advance. By planning out 9-12 months in advance we'll get bigger, less buggy expansions. Which monthly patches of work they finish that is balance or seeding related.

IN other words if Inferno only has war dec changes, missles, and new minmatar and ammar V3d, that would be enough. I'm happy they won't rush out a bunch of unfinished content anymore.

I'd even be happy if eve only had 1 expansion every 2 years, with balancing and tweak only in the meantime, with a giant 2 years of work expansion, massive addition to the game.

http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1206/scimi.jpg

MotherMoon
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#43 - 2012-04-06 23:15:47 UTC
Pak Narhoo wrote:
Kurai Okala wrote:
I've watched several fanfests over the years and many (if not most) of the concepts the devs talk about there never make it into the game (fleet formations, player-owned establisments, atmospheric flight, comet mining, etc etc)

Adding to that... worthwhile PI, with libraries creating skill books, actual PvP with your neighbors, pollution, population control, yeah it was going to be freaking awesome = click-click-click. Only excitement you have now is when you PI in low or null.

So I agree, I believe it when it hits TQ.


Don't forget, all of this for is for the Dust154 beta. IT's going to interact with eve directly. That's a HUGE feature, even it has been made mostly by a different team other than eve online. The new PI system is usable in DUST on the PS3, from what it sounds like they are mostly throw away the current PI system.

Which was a terrible idea in the 1st place. Making a feature 2-3 years before the other half is released.... we all knew it was going to get the axe when dust came out. And that's a good thing. Weneed population control, and land to fight over.

How can you have conflict if as many players as possible can be building on a planet?

http://dl.eve-files.com/media/1206/scimi.jpg

MICH00000
Jovian Gaurdians
#44 - 2012-04-07 02:16:36 UTC
Excited for the new bomber models, that and everything else. Pirate
Garibaldi Sinatra
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#45 - 2012-04-07 02:24:27 UTC
+1 Give us some game content please CCP

**Conquering Eve Online One Pint at a time. **(Excuse my bad spelling and or grammar ive never really valued such things especially when everyone knows what im saying regardless)

Skydell
Bad Girl Posse
#46 - 2012-04-07 02:24:37 UTC
We got shiny new Noob ships.

You thought they did that for no reason at all?
Pertuabo Enkidgan
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#47 - 2012-04-07 03:26:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Pertuabo Enkidgan
Give me a link to the inferno page please, I can't find it anywhere on the website

nevermind got it, still had to do unnecessary digging o_o though
Surge Roth
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#48 - 2012-04-07 05:05:43 UTC
Gogela wrote:
WarDec Overhaul - This is big for eve and will change the empire experience for sure. No more dec shields - can demand ransoms via the mechanic - can hire merc corps to defend via the mechanic - penalty charge and extra long timer to drop corp during war plus it's on your characters record - cost of dec based on size of target in terms of pilots

Crimewatch - New aggression mechanics game-wide. Can turn in officer and commander tags to up your sec status (from -10 to +5) - 2 levels of high sec crime: misdemeanors (anyone can shoot you but no police or CONCORD) and felon (CONCORDDOKKEN). Can flippers and looters flagged as misdemeanors now.

These are radical (for CCP) changes that haven't been touched really since this game was made. I think it's going to give the game a much needed shakeup... I mean these are foundational mechanics of the game!


They better follow through with the misdemeanors. The tears it will create will be glorious
Denidil
Cascades Mountain Operatives
#49 - 2012-04-07 05:06:58 UTC
Roime wrote:
But a new player also makes more ISK from mining, no?



^^ exactly

i made my first ooh.. 1.4mil isk mining all night in a navitas (i **** you not.. lol)


i made my first 500mil selling faction loot off pirates who were camping YMP<-->Kari bridge..... three weeks after the above.

Tedium and difficulty are not the same thing, if you don't realize this then STFU about game design.

Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#50 - 2012-04-07 05:22:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Tippia
Actual features, afaik:

· Wardec revamp.
· Corp and personal history revamp
· Missile graphics revamp.
· Crimewatch revamp.
· Amarr / Mintmatar V3
· Mining made meaningful

…and maybe some of the UI revamp as well (unified item management and all that).
Lapine Davion
Outer Ring Applied Logistics
#51 - 2012-04-07 05:27:22 UTC
The actual Inferno features were right here, all along.

*points to your heart*

[b]Don't worry about posting with your main!  Post with your brain! "Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity."[/b]

Tedrizze
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#52 - 2012-04-08 18:57:18 UTC
Irisa Selenia wrote:
I want the expansion from that april fool's video.

Or maybe that volcanic sulfur has done too much brain damage?


do you have a link for that video? cant find it :( What?
Coolsmoke
State War Academy
Caldari State
#53 - 2012-04-08 19:11:43 UTC
I read all of this.

Nerf = Feature.

And other stuff.



Well.
masternerdguy
Doomheim
#54 - 2012-04-08 19:12:09 UTC
Coolsmoke wrote:
I read all of this.

Nerf = Feature.

And other stuff.



Well.


Indeed.

Things are only impossible until they are not.

Dbars Grinding
Dark Venture Corporation
Kitchen Sinkhole
#55 - 2012-04-08 21:31:43 UTC
id make expansions free also if they were nothing but fixes.

I have more space likes than you. 

Vaal Erit
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#56 - 2012-04-08 21:40:18 UTC
CCP dun tricked us again. Promising a war themed expansion and then focusing 100% on minerals. It still a war expansion, just a war on rocks. Sad face.
Jessie-A Tassik
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#57 - 2012-04-08 21:56:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Jessie-A Tassik
Nova Fox wrote:

Blizzard said it themselves, customizable addons was the worst thing they ever done because its forcing players that 'addons' are required to play the game and that those with addons will always have an advantage over those who don't.


Who said that?

Was it the team that made WoW a game with millions of subscribers?

Or was it the team which put a gun to the cash cow's head and pulled the trigger?

If it's the group that though Giant Talking Pandas were a great idea... then you need to pay more attention to who you are listening to.
Zverofaust
Ascetic Virtues
#58 - 2012-04-09 00:06:10 UTC
While I am appalled at the OP's badpoasting I do agree Inferno seems to be the sorriest excuse yet for an actual "expansion" and hardly even qualifies for a +.1 to Crucible's current version. The list of features are by and large a list of gameplay tweaks and feature removals.
Large Collidable Object
morons.
#59 - 2012-04-09 00:18:49 UTC
At the current speed , Eve needs at least three more bugfixing/balancing expansions after neglecting the game for almost three years.

They could just speed up the process by simply nerfing projectiles of course.
You know... [morons.](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4gjOx65yD5A)
Holy One
Privat Party
#60 - 2012-04-09 00:22:00 UTC
Quote:
I've been playing Eve for a bit over 3 1/2 years. What I like to do is run missions and make isk to buy shiny new fancy ships to run more missions in.


legit quote from legit 'player'

:)

Previous page123