These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

People under something like I don't know 30, shouldn't have slaves.

Author
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#21 - 2012-04-05 13:05:09 UTC
Manwe Todako wrote:
There is no discussion, people. To enslave another human is an abomination to God. God has not nor needs to call any people to enslave another. Slavery is not Godly and those who enslave others are disobeying God. Those who oppose slavery need to stop the soft peddle arguments. Take for instance the whole point of this thread in dividing slave holders into two groups: those who mistreat their slaves and those who don't. The truth? Every slave is mistreated by virtue of being a slave. Slavery is mistreatment.


I will probably repeat myself, but : even for enslaved criminal prisonners ? If yes, I do not follow your logic.
Manwe Todako
Disciples of Ston
#22 - 2012-04-05 13:35:34 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:
Manwe Todako wrote:
There is no discussion, people. To enslave another human is an abomination to God. God has not nor needs to call any people to enslave another. Slavery is not Godly and those who enslave others are disobeying God. Those who oppose slavery need to stop the soft peddle arguments. Take for instance the whole point of this thread in dividing slave holders into two groups: those who mistreat their slaves and those who don't. The truth? Every slave is mistreated by virtue of being a slave. Slavery is mistreatment.


I will probably repeat myself, but : even for enslaved criminal prisonners ? If yes, I do not follow your logic.


Are we really doing this again? Are we really trying to equate the criminal prisoner with the slave? Is that an argument to continue slavery? Criminals go to prison in a just society. Would you have it otherwise? Please leave that argument in the grave where it belongs. Every free society has a criminal justice system whereby those who violate the inalienable rights of others are penalized and reformed.

SANKOFA

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#23 - 2012-04-05 13:35:55 UTC
Repentence Tyrathlion wrote:
Garreck wrote:
The fundamental concept has merrit. Certain equipment requires a license or permit to operate/own; basic fundamentals of ownership and responsibility should be demonstrated. Slave ownership is at least as heady a responsibility as, say, operating a pod interface.


Wholeheartedly agreed.

Mistreatment of slaves is one topic guaranteed to make me spit venom. Is it really so easy to forget that a slave is a person, too? In the State, improper conduct towards employees has consequences; an employer in the Federation who does something wrong faces both the media and the legal system; but here, nothing. I think it's fair to say that the lack of oversight is responsible for a huge amount of slave abuse - and thus a pretty large slice of the bad rep of the Empire in the cluster.


Do you have evidence of this "huge amount of slave abuse?"

Dolce et decorum est pro Imperium mori

Repentence Tyrathlion
Tyrathlion Interstellar
#24 - 2012-04-05 13:41:01 UTC
Manwe Todako wrote:
There is no discussion, people. To enslave another human is an abomination to God. God has not nor needs to call any people to enslave another. Slavery is not Godly and those who enslave others are disobeying God. Those who oppose slavery need to stop the soft peddle arguments. Take for instance the whole point of this thread in dividing slave holders into two groups: those who mistreat their slaves and those who don't. The truth? Every slave is mistreated by virtue of being a slave. Slavery is mistreatment.

Those who brutalize their slaves should be immediately punished. Those who do not, should take next step and emancipate their slaves.


You lost me at 'abomination to God'.

I'm fully aware that the initial reasoning, and for many, continued justification for slavery was for religious purposes, but to my cynical eye, it holds progressively less water - particularly here in the Kingdom, where it doesn't take much digging beneath the surface to find a culture somewhat more secular than it might at first appear.

But if you're going to start bringing up religious justification for emancipation, then we might as well stop right here, because it'll turn into a 'my beliefs are better than yours' argument, and if you recall, that led (among other things) to the annexation of Matari space.

Manwe, I'm not unsympathetic to your cause, but please, find some other justification. And while you're at it, explain to me how destroying Amarrian and Khanid society at its very foundations will be good for anyone - including the slaves. The whole reason I don't believe in mass, immediate emancipation is that I firmly believe that it'll do more harm than good. And no, I don't mean to their souls or any of that crap. No religious conversion attempted by force is worth a damn.
Repentence Tyrathlion
Tyrathlion Interstellar
#25 - 2012-04-05 13:42:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Repentence Tyrathlion
Rodj Blake wrote:
Repentence Tyrathlion wrote:
Garreck wrote:
The fundamental concept has merrit. Certain equipment requires a license or permit to operate/own; basic fundamentals of ownership and responsibility should be demonstrated. Slave ownership is at least as heady a responsibility as, say, operating a pod interface.


Wholeheartedly agreed.

Mistreatment of slaves is one topic guaranteed to make me spit venom. Is it really so easy to forget that a slave is a person, too? In the State, improper conduct towards employees has consequences; an employer in the Federation who does something wrong faces both the media and the legal system; but here, nothing. I think it's fair to say that the lack of oversight is responsible for a huge amount of slave abuse - and thus a pretty large slice of the bad rep of the Empire in the cluster.


Do you have evidence of this "huge amount of slave abuse?"


You misunderstand. 'A huge amount of the abuse of slaves', not 'a huge amount of abuse to slaves'. I'll stay out of the arguments about numbers, thanks.
Manwe Todako
Disciples of Ston
#26 - 2012-04-05 14:28:13 UTC
Repentence Tyrathlion wrote:

Manwe, I'm not unsympathetic to your cause, but please, find some other justification. And while you're at it, explain to me how destroying Amarrian and Khanid society at its very foundations will be good for anyone - including the slaves. The whole reason I don't believe in mass, immediate emancipation is that I firmly believe that it'll do more harm than good. And no, I don't mean to their souls or any of that crap. No religious conversion attempted by force is worth a damn.


Your criticism is appreciated and presses an important issue. I believe Secular humanism and Religious humanism lead us to the same end point; the dignifying of all human persons. I will leave my own religious justifications at the door from now on and focus on the common humanistic end of freedom for all.

Restitution is a long, long, long process whereby the offending party commits all the time, resources and energy to right the wrong they have committed. The expense of restitution is in proportion to the wrong committed. Slave holding nations have enslaved billions over centuries. Restitution must involve a massive amount of time and expense to right this wrong.

Step One: The Empress et.al. need to declare slavery to be wrong (This will necessarily involve theological reformation)
Step Two: Immediate emancipation of all slaves (This is a declarative act followed by enforcement)
Step Three: Matriculation of those emancipated (This step will take decades to accomplish and will involve the commitment of massive resources, cooperation between the Republic, Empire, State, Kingdom, Federation. Matriculation is the process whereby those freed are brought into society in such a way that they are able to function as self-determined individuals and communities. The injustice of slavery is enormous; restitution must be equally enormous. And yes, the society and culture built on slavery must become a society and culture fundamentally reformed, and the end of this will be good for all. It must cease to be the culture it once was. A universal humanistic end must be embraced via religious humanism and/or secular humanism. Every slave holder must be required to spend the resources and time to see that those they once enslaved are enable to live free. The infrastructures of the combined nations of this cluster are far sufficient to accomplish this task if turned from greed and toward justice.

Is this an unattainable idealism? No. But, it is not easily attainable. Now the beginning has to be the speaking of three simple and direct words. SLAVERY IS WRONG!

SANKOFA

Dilaro thagriin
Doomheim
#27 - 2012-04-05 14:44:12 UTC
Rodj Blake wrote:

Do you have evidence of this "huge amount of slave abuse?"


Slavery

Specifically the 'methods of control' section.
Vultirnus
Hedion University
Amarr Empire
#28 - 2012-04-05 16:35:51 UTC
I don't see why everyone gets so up in arms about Amarrian slaves. A number of respectable nations were conquered as part of the reclaiming by the Empire, who quickly accepted Amarrian culture and were thus able to obtain Amarr citizenship. Those who continually are forced into slavery are doing so by choice. Simply submit to our ways and you too can achieve your freedom.

http://voicevvvoid.wordpress.com/

Rodj Blake
PIE Inc.
Khimi Harar
#29 - 2012-04-05 16:37:05 UTC
Dilaro thagriin wrote:
Rodj Blake wrote:

Do you have evidence of this "huge amount of slave abuse?"


Slavery

Specifically the 'methods of control' section.


I think that most civilised societies punish transgression.

Punishment for misconduct is not abuse.

Dolce et decorum est pro Imperium mori

Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#30 - 2012-04-05 17:40:03 UTC
Manwe Todako wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:
Manwe Todako wrote:
There is no discussion, people. To enslave another human is an abomination to God. God has not nor needs to call any people to enslave another. Slavery is not Godly and those who enslave others are disobeying God. Those who oppose slavery need to stop the soft peddle arguments. Take for instance the whole point of this thread in dividing slave holders into two groups: those who mistreat their slaves and those who don't. The truth? Every slave is mistreated by virtue of being a slave. Slavery is mistreatment.


I will probably repeat myself, but : even for enslaved criminal prisonners ? If yes, I do not follow your logic.


Are we really doing this again? Are we really trying to equate the criminal prisoner with the slave? Is that an argument to continue slavery? Criminals go to prison in a just society. Would you have it otherwise? Please leave that argument in the grave where it belongs. Every free society has a criminal justice system whereby those who violate the inalienable rights of others are penalized and reformed.


And yet, you continue to confuse everything as the ignorant you are. This has never been about an argument to continue slavery, this is about you mixing together people enslaved or put in prison with the other slaves.

What is the difference between an enslaved criminal and a prisonner ? The former surely works for the society, while it is not always the case for the latter that often rots in his own cell, and costs as much as money as the former.

But I assumed that you conveniently forgot about that part when your disciples started to free every slave they met ? Or did they turned a blind eye on all the possible criminals that they actually released free in the wilderness ? What kind of humanitarian work do you do again ?
Gosakumori Noh
Coven of One
#31 - 2012-04-05 23:55:47 UTC
Manwe Todako wrote:
Those who brutalize their slaves should be immediately punished. Those who do not, should take next step and emancipate their slaves.


What would the poor things do? Drink themselves into pot bellies and lethargy? It would be a travesty!
Manwe Todako
Disciples of Ston
#32 - 2012-04-06 02:51:48 UTC
I find it very sad that so many people of the tribes, once they become capsuleers, feel so threatened when confronted by the truth of slavery. How do they manifest that fear? Usually name-calling. Worse, many capsuleers have grown so fat off of the status quo of continued war and continued slavery, that to give anything other than lip service to abolition is too great a threat

I have watched the discussion on this forum and on the com channels. Pilots seldom are willing to risk significant disagreement with their cherished social circles. Instead, the discussion goes on and on in the same circles and little is done other than a lot of hand wringing. Objection after objection is made as to the impracticality of pressing for abolition. "Oh, we can't free the slaves, some of them might be criminals." On it goes. Those who dare make the status-quo uncomfortable by regularly reminding the community of the evil of slavery are attacked and vilified. Where is the Vherokior, Brutor, Sebiestor, etc capsuleer pilot? If you are not offending someone by your anti-slavery efforts, your efforts are likely too small. Get off your dainty, ecto-plasm soaked butt and do something.

As for Ms. Farel's accusations; they are made in ignorance and fear. Ms. Farel is too afraid to lose her club status with those on both sides of the fence to take any kind of real stand. So what is left for her other than to vilify those who are actually doing something and not just talking. Is your social circle more important that your tribe brothers and sisters still in slavery, Ms. Farel of the Brutor tribe?

As for freeing criminals, you speak out of turn. The Disciples know the difference between the slave and the slaver and the militant and the soldier. Your criticism is false.

SANKOFA

Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient
Electus Matari
#33 - 2012-04-06 08:03:02 UTC
You move in the wrong circles, Todako.

Also, some of us care less about offending slavers in public than about liberating the slaves. Why should we provoke people who can and will make our operations that much harder?
Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#34 - 2012-04-06 11:18:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Lyn Farel
Manwe Todako wrote:
Usually name-calling.


Petty slander. This was not about name-calling, or if you really want to consider it name-calling, so be it. But it remains a fact before all : you are an ignorant, Mr Ston.

And one things is worse than ignorance : to content oneself in ignorance.

Manwe Todako wrote:
"Oh, we can't free the slaves, some of them might be criminals." On it goes.


Caricatures and hyperboles will not make your point any more valid.

Manwe Todako wrote:
As for freeing criminals, you speak out of turn. The Disciples know the difference between the slave and the slaver and the militant and the soldier. Your criticism is false.


Irrelevant. You may know the difference between a slave and a slaver, but you obviously do not seem to know the differences between your slaves.

Manwe Todako wrote:
As for Ms. Farel's accusations; they are made in ignorance and fear. Ms. Farel is too afraid to lose her club status with those on both sides of the fence to take any kind of real stand. So what is left for her other than to vilify those who are actually doing something and not just talking. Is your social circle more important that your tribe brothers and sisters still in slavery, Ms. Farel of the Brutor tribe?


Fear ? You speak again out of ignorance. You can ask PIE Inc and Ms Vitalia about my beliefs on the concept of God and how it turned out when I was still in the Amarr Militia. You can ask Ms Surionen that I consider part of my small social circle how I sometimes tell her how I disagree on a few things. Actually, you can ask that to almost anyone I know. I speak my mind when I have to.

You can also dig up in my old records and see that I freed exactly 713 slaves owned by my own House when I took up the sucession - Ms Sakura Imoru can testify for that. And it may not be to the scale of what your organisation deal with daily, but at least I triaged them before and made sure that all the ones enslaved for criminal acts in the Empire were kept enslaved and transfered elsewhere. Slavery abolition may not be my primary and daily occupation, but at least I know what I am dealing with.
Manwe Todako
Disciples of Ston
#35 - 2012-04-06 12:44:09 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:
Slavery abolition may not be my primary and daily occupation, .


Perhaps it should be. What are you presently doing that is more important?

SANKOFA

Lyn Farel
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#36 - 2012-04-06 18:57:38 UTC
Manwe Todako wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:
Slavery abolition may not be my primary and daily occupation, .


Perhaps it should be. What are you presently doing that is more important?


Science. I also repel pirate threats and Sansha incursions, that are one of the source of the homeless and people you rescue as you may know. I look at the bigger picture. And, of course, to everyone their own field of expertise, where they are the most needed.

Also, thank you for having ignored all my points.
Gosakumori Noh
Coven of One
#37 - 2012-04-06 19:08:28 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:
Also, thank you for having ignored all my points.


I predict! .... he will do so again.
Manwe Todako
Disciples of Ston
#38 - 2012-04-06 19:24:01 UTC
Lyn Farel wrote:

Also, thank you for having ignored all my points.


Start making points instead of excuses and you won't be ignored.

SANKOFA

Gosakumori Noh
Coven of One
#39 - 2012-04-06 20:51:46 UTC
Manwe Todako wrote:
Lyn Farel wrote:

Also, thank you for having ignored all my points.


Start making points instead of excuses and you won't be ignored.


My prescient powers are truly frightening.
Aranakas
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#40 - 2012-04-06 21:00:07 UTC
Minmatar below the age of 30 shouldn't have freedom, as they are a brutish and warmongering people and must be taught proper ideals before they are allowed to become a full citizen within society.

Aranakas CEO of Green Anarchy Green vs Green