These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Predictions on "Incursion Iteration" coming in Pre-Inferno Patch

Author
Ammzi
Dreddit
Test Alliance Please Ignore
#141 - 2012-03-31 03:34:19 UTC
*grins*
Oooh, I see a bright future for incursions given it's all done properly.
It is one cause I have fought for so long and sacrificed so much on.

Woo \o/!
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#142 - 2012-03-31 03:41:24 UTC  |  Edited by: DarthNefarius
Simi Kusoni wrote:
If you believe nano ribbons or escalation items are "isk faucets" then I strongly advise that you biomass immediately.



If you believe nano ribbons or escalation items are not "income faucets" like I said ( not ISK faucets dumbarse learn to read & quote correctly ) then I strongly advise that you biomass immediately.
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
#143 - 2012-03-31 03:53:01 UTC
DarthNefarius wrote:
If you believe nano ribbons or escalation items are not "income faucets" like I said ( not ISK faucets dumbarse learn to read & quote correctly ) then I strongly advise that you biomass immediately.

You sir, are and idiot. lrn2terminology, do not make up your own.

Ribbons and deadspace loot prices are decided by supply and demand, hence not a faucet in terms of income. Their price is controlled by availability and demand for the items, as opposed to set ISK rewards like bounties and incursion payouts.

And if they are such an enormous and easily acquired resource, why not farm them yourself? Perhaps because going in to low sec or wormholes would involve risk you are unwilling to face, when ISK is available in a free flowing stream that requires considerably less effort?

As I said, low sec and null sec operations require logistics and some in game experience. Wormholes involve considerable risk. In comparison incursions pay out more, for less work and less risk.

[center]"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"  -MXZF[/center]

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#144 - 2012-03-31 03:54:13 UTC
Ammzi wrote:
*grins*
Oooh, I see a bright future for incursions given it's all done properly.
It is one cause I have fought for so long and sacrificed so much on.

Woo \o/!


lol Done properly Roll
Don't forget the sacrificial lambs you threw under the bus with your alts to your cause involuntarily Amzi/Krissada Roll
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#145 - 2012-03-31 04:08:21 UTC  |  Edited by: DarthNefarius
Simi Kusoni wrote:
DarthNefarius wrote:
If you believe nano ribbons or escalation items are not "income faucets" like I said ( not ISK faucets dumbarse learn to read & quote correctly ) then I strongly advise that you biomass immediately.

You sir, are and idiot. lrn2terminology, do not make up your own.

Ribbons and deadspace loot prices are decided by supply and demand, hence not a faucet in terms of income..


They are items that appear out of 'nowhere' (from NPC's ) just like ISK does and are gains ( income )
FYI the value of ISK also is largely decided by supply & demand.

Another thing which I glanced over is that the blue loot from sleeper sites is a ISK faucet which currently brings the same amount of ISK into Eve as Incursions does. WH's there fore have 2 faucets a materials faucet & a ISK faucet
Incursions have a LP component which at least is a ISK sink which WH's lack totally
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
#146 - 2012-03-31 04:18:18 UTC
So you honestly can't see the difference between, say, mining veldspar and receiving set bounties/payouts in pure ISK? Lol gtfo.

[center]"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"  -MXZF[/center]

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#147 - 2012-03-31 04:25:55 UTC  |  Edited by: DarthNefarius
Simi Kusoni wrote:
So you honestly can't see the difference between, say, mining veldspar and receiving set bounties/payouts in pure ISK? Lol gtfo.


So you are honestly telling me that mining does not produce income in the form of minerals? lol of course there are differences & your conclusions that I don't understand them are unfounded in your zeal to protect your golden goose.
At least I'm not trying to say Incursions are not something they are which you seem to be with sleeper incomes
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
#148 - 2012-03-31 04:34:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Simi Kusoni
DarthNefarius wrote:
Simi Kusoni wrote:
So you honestly can't see the difference between, say, mining veldspar and receiving set bounties/payouts in pure ISK? Lol gtfo.


So you are honestly telling me that mining does not produce income in the form of minerals? lol of course there are differences & your conclusions that I don't understand them are unfounded in your zeal to protect your golden goose.
At least I'm not trying to say Incursions are not something they are which you seem to be with sleeper incomes

What golden goose? I don't even PvE any more, ISK isn't exactly a concern for me but for what its worth I live in syndicate. If you believe this region to be some kind of gold mine i strongly recommend you come down here and run a few sites some time.

And if youcant understand the difference between market goods and isk faucets i suggest you do a little back ground research. I cannot be bothered to explain it to you, especially when in typing on my phone.

[center]"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"  -MXZF[/center]

DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#149 - 2012-03-31 04:55:08 UTC
Simi Kusoni wrote:

And if youcant understand the difference between market goods and isk faucets i suggest you do a little back ground research. I cannot be bothered to explain it to you, especially when in typing on my phone.


If you continually try to tell me that there are no other faucets besides pure ISK in this game ( ie nano ribbons, moon goo, loot drops, NPC buy orders, minerals & alloys ) then you are a mental midget or just blinded in trying to prove I don't know what. And like what's been said over & over again the hugest ISK faucet is bounties... you want to tackle inflation either it has to be taken down a notch or ISK sinks need to be created ( I've made a few suggestions to sinks I wish others would try to put out thier ideas too instead of crying about the other guys way of making money.)
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
Ren Oren
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#150 - 2012-03-31 05:01:10 UTC
DarthNefarius is a walking example as to why incursions need to be nerfed ASAP

Or you should at least know how supply and demand works before you do them

SELLING A GOOD ON THE MARKET IS DIFFERENT FROM HAVING ISK RAIN ON YOU
Markus Reese
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#151 - 2012-03-31 05:15:10 UTC  |  Edited by: Markus Reese
I want two things in incursions. Also, I want to be very clear where I am coming from on this. I am not some isolated nullsec person.

Edit: sorry, but code errors meant I had to take links out of the chat.

I flew expensive full fit command ships during live events for all risk, zero isk.
http://i529.photobucket.com/albums/dd332/KwKiller/Eve%20Online%20Screenshots/Theswarm.jpg

I lead + 200 man fleets in the incursion events that occured
http://i529.photobucket.com/albums/dd332/KwKiller/Eve%20Online%20Screenshots/Slavecomes.jpgbiggest

I was part of the first Incursion fleets in the start of 2009 before anybody could learn the mechanics and bust them.
http://i529.photobucket.com/albums/dd332/KwKiller/Eve%20Online%20Screenshots/20110129014250.jpg
I want that exciting PvE back.

Back then, vanguards werent the best isk. Those of us who formed up to hit the assault and HQ got rich, and we didn't have mega fit faction fleets to fight the revenant. We lost ships, we only were able to muster one united fleet after much trying, and it was good times all around. I WANT THEM FIXED!

Changing the reward isnt the way. That only solves the farmer issue. But if people who are not part of the leet farming groups want to try, the risk will massively outweigh the reward. We need fleets back to fits how we used to run them.

First off, the time it takes. People have specific fits to clear vanguards fast.

You can have npc belt rats be randomized, but you cannot randomize the freaking spawns in an incursion?

I mean really, if people had to general fit, they would take longer to clear again. Combined with the current reward, it is back to a proper risk reward for all.

Second! Get people into the big sites! As you regain control of systems, slow down the rate of spawns!

I mean, how hard can it be a variable to plug in. You have a % control, that affects resists, so why not a respawn timer. Respawn after [Time] * %% / 10.

Solved. As control gains are made, if you want to make any decent isk, get the arses to the bigger sites. Possibly some more fixing to the bigger sites if that one is still busted from like back in the day.

To quote Lfod Shi

The ratting itself is PvE. Getting away with it is PvP.

Zircon Dasher
#152 - 2012-03-31 06:11:18 UTC
Simi Kusoni wrote:
Yes, there was a time. When I first came to Eve high sec was low profit, and in order to make reasonable amounts of ISK I was forced to risk my ship belt ratting in null. This created logistical issues in transporting loot, moving PvE ships rendered them vulnerable to gate camps and every now and then interceptor/AF gangs would jump in, blitz the anoms and find me before I warped out.


There is no difference in game mechanics between null and highsec. If someone has the means and desire to violence you, they will. The only difference is your perception of who is a threat and who is not. You assume that the nuetral in 0.0 will violence you while the nuetral in highsec will not.

As to your losses, it seems to me that was a consequence of ignorance, lack of proper prevention methods, or inattention. Even so, your death was not a function of PVE. It was a function of undocking.

Quote:
So artificial restraints designed to prevent or inhibit player versus player combat have no impact on player versus player combat... gotcha.


There are no artificial restraints that prevent you from shooting someone. SInce shooting others is not prevented, then it merely means that a player is unwilling to shoot another player given the consequences. Let me put this in a way you might understand:

An AFK cloaker in your 0.0 home system does not prevent you from undocking and mining/ratting. If the AFK cloaker inhibits anyone from doing these activities, it is not the cloakers doing. Rather, it is entirely on the shoulders of the players who are unwilling to undock in said circumstance.

Besides, it isn't like there are not ways to shoot people without getting GCC.

Quote:
Now I just JC to high sec


You pine for the good ol days when PVE had risk, and then JC to the place you complain has no risk? By far this is my favorite part.

Nerfing High-sec is never the answer. It is the question. The answer is 'YES'.

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
#153 - 2012-03-31 13:32:21 UTC
Zircon Dasher wrote:
There is no difference in game mechanics between null and highsec. If someone has the means and desire to violence you, they will. The only difference is your perception of who is a threat and who is not. You assume that the nuetral in 0.0 will violence you while the nuetral in highsec will not.

As to your losses, it seems to me that was a consequence of ignorance, lack of proper prevention methods, or inattention. Even so, your death was not a function of PVE. It was a function of undocking.

Sorry to inform you, but having to suicide your ships to "PvP", and killing your targets in a single shot, is not "PvP". And I'm pretty sure concord constitutes a difference in game mechanics.

And for what it's worth my losses are few and far between, I have close calls in my T2 transport on occasion when I'm moving low value goods but for the most part everything of value I move either by carrier or with an obsessive system of scouts. I said earlier in this thread I believe logistics too easy and null to be too safe, but that is a separate issue and one CCP does appear to be working on.

Zircon Dasher wrote:
There are no artificial restraints that prevent you from shooting someone. SInce shooting others is not prevented, then it merely means that a player is unwilling to shoot another player given the consequences. Let me put this in a way you might understand:

An AFK cloaker in your 0.0 home system does not prevent you from undocking and mining/ratting. If the AFK cloaker inhibits anyone from doing these activities, it is not the cloakers doing. Rather, it is entirely on the shoulders of the players who are unwilling to undock in said circumstance.

No artificial rules preventing me from shooting someone? You mean like concord, faction police and sec status? If you think suicide ganking is the future of Eve online, and that it should be height of player versus player competition in terms of ISK generation, then your vision of the game is quite simply so far apart from mine there likely can be no compromise or reconciliation.

Zircon Dasher wrote:
Besides, it isn't like there are not ways to shoot people without getting GCC.

The few decent tricks in regards to aggression were removed and "patched" at the behest of incursion bear tears.

Zircon Dasher wrote:
You pine for the good ol days when PVE had risk, and then JC to the place you complain has no risk? By far this is my favorite part.

Actually I don't really PvE any more, I ran incursions for a time because they made the largest amount of ISK for me for the smallest amount of effort. I stopped running them due to boredom, if you look at this character's contract history you can get a rough idea of what I did afterward.

Now I very rarely PvE at all, I do not need the ISK and quite simply it is boring. As I said earlier, PvE in this game outside of wormholes has mostly just become instanced grinding. This is not the sand box style game play CCP has traded on in the past, and it aggravates a lot of players with good reason.

Not to mention the fact that PvE in Eve does not any longer fit the "Eve is hard" motto CCP so often spout.

[center]"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"  -MXZF[/center]

Abim Starkiller
Doomheim
#154 - 2012-03-31 13:55:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Abim Starkiller
New feature

Pirates -10 become friendly with sansha . They can gain access to new warp gates / worm holes in 0.0 that send them into a active high sec incursion. They would become immune to concord while in a incursion. If the pirates clear the high sec'ers out of the incursion a worm hole would open to transport them back to 0.0.

Or

any system with a active incursion becomes low sec until the incursion is over.




Level 4 nerf.

concord do not enter level 4 missions to save mission runners from ganker's.



mining anti gank buff.

Hulks gain 2 mid slots and a crap ton on power grid and cpu.




pvp buff

Reduce the amount of mods destroyed when a ship is popped.

----------------------------------------------------------


new feature

Frozen corpse can be salvaged- one random implant has a chance be looted.
Zircon Dasher
#155 - 2012-04-04 22:05:39 UTC
And the winners are......

http://community.eveonline.com/en/inferno/features/

Vanguards take longer.
Assualts are shorter.
Vanguards got an ISK nerf.

Nerfing High-sec is never the answer. It is the question. The answer is 'YES'.

Simi Kusoni
HelloKittyFanclub
#156 - 2012-04-04 22:11:35 UTC
Zircon Dasher wrote:
And the winners are......

http://community.eveonline.com/en/inferno/features/

Vanguards take longer.
Assualts are shorter.
Vanguards got an ISK nerf.

long live CCP.

[center]"I don't troll, I just give overly blunt responses that annoy people who are wrong but don't want to admit it. It's not my fault that people have sensitive feelings"  -MXZF[/center]

Tyberius Franklin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#157 - 2012-04-04 22:38:39 UTC
Slightly off topic, but did I miss something (FF video, blog, etc) that would have hinted on the removal of meta 0 loot at this time?
Gogela
Epic Ganking Time
CODE.
#158 - 2012-04-04 22:41:44 UTC
I guess Aliens.

Definitely Aliens. It will be like finding the invading fleet from "Independence Day" except they will have neuts and webs.

You read it here first! Big smile

Signatures should be used responsibly...

Zircon Dasher
#159 - 2012-04-04 22:42:37 UTC
Tyberius Franklin wrote:
Slightly off topic, but did I miss something (FF video, blog, etc) that would have hinted on the removal of meta 0 loot at this time?


Nothing in the videos I saw. Or, at least, no hint that did not require a fair amount of tinfoil.



I need more tinfoil.

Nerfing High-sec is never the answer. It is the question. The answer is 'YES'.

Zircon Dasher
#160 - 2012-04-04 22:44:24 UTC
Gogela wrote:
I guess Aliens.

Definitely Aliens. It will be like finding the invading fleet from "Independence Day" except they will have neuts and webs.

You read it here first! Big smile


Are you trying to imply I am Will Smith just because I am black?


You, sir, are a racist.

Nerfing High-sec is never the answer. It is the question. The answer is 'YES'.