These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

I hope no goons line in Arizona

First post
Author
Vyl Vit
#41 - 2012-04-04 00:52:04 UTC
Sobach wrote:
Vyl Vit wrote:
Au contraire mon ami. Au contraire. There is a thing called "offending morals". You can be arrested for offending someone's morals. All you have to do is call a cop. What you cite smacks of talking bad about your mother in a bar, taking a swing at someone and the cops arrest you both. Though, someone calling you bad names can't legally be responded to (no matter how you wish it were different) by punching them in the nose, had you called a cop and declared your morals were offended, you'd see something quite different.

Bullying? I can't believe you haven't heard of "Stand Your Ground Laws." You really need to get some air.

Nothing like Mom's Basement Lawyers.


Where do you live? I'd like to know so I'll never set foot in that place. Also, would like to see the actual "offending moral" statute you're talking about, assuming you're living in a western nation. There are so many things wrong with even the idea of such a law I don't know where to begin.

Also, do I get to call the cops on you because your post have offended my morals?

Of course you get to call the cops. These laws were enacted to deal with nasty old demonstrators who get out of hand. Go up to a cop and call him a *mortarforker*, the real set of words there. What I can't believe is you're unaware these sorts of laws exist. There's a long country mile between what you've heard, and what's in those big thick books. People have ideas about their world that don't match up to the realities.

Where do I live? I live in a place where if I'm afraid of you I can shoot you. There's ten other places like this and seven more with such laws being passed as we toss meaningless text back and forth. The U.S. hasn't been the land of free speech ever. The facts of all this make much more interesting reading than any sci fi book.

I'm not going to do your research for you. If it actually interests you, you'll find a way. "Look it up for me and copy/paste it in here so I can say something derogatory about it." Not only is that an ungentlemanly request, it's rather lazy. "You do the work. I'll beat my chest and bray."

Paradise is like where you are right now, only much, much better.

Brock Nelson
#42 - 2012-04-04 00:53:24 UTC
What we need to do is pool our money and fly the trololol guy to come and perform for the state congress.

Signature removed, CCP Phantom

Vyl Vit
#43 - 2012-04-04 01:07:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Vyl Vit
Pyrus Octavius wrote:
Vyl Vit wrote:
Pyrus Octavius wrote:
If this is true, and it is not itself some sort of troll, then I could not see how this could be prosecuted without being subjected to appeal. Trolling in itself is subjective, and in a fine line case, would cause difficulties in the distinction of being properly interpreted, because everyone's tastes are different. What some people find distasteful others don't. The EvE community itself is a test case for the different attitudes towards whats offensive and what's not. I could see this ending up in the Supreme Court, and eventually being over turned due to constitutional issues.
Trolling wasn't mentioned in the bill. It's in the headline. A guy spray painting fascist symbols on a synogogue wouldn't find it objectionable. The ones offended would. Guess who the courts listen to? The EVE community isn't a dichotomy of real society. And, if you think this Supreme Court would overturn a law like this, you don't know THIS Supreme Court.

There's a lot of wishful thinking going on here. RE: another post. No lawyer worth his salt would bother taking a "trolling on the internet" case. And, as I said before, if you think the country you're in has no laws like this, you're very mistaken.


I think you misunderstand. I meant the poster was trolling with the article, not that the article explicitly is a troll.

What you are speaking about in terms of the fascist symbols constitutes a hate crime. So society in general has found this to be objectionable. I think your argument here is a fallacy because the two scenarios don't equate at all. As for the EvE not being a dichotomy, you are right. Because a dichotomy would indicate there are only two equal view points to this scenario. There are not two equal view points to this scenario, and that is because this community is a slice of many different societies consisting of different socioeconomic, cultural, and spiritual differences. With that, you can bet you will find a plethora of different view points on the enforceability of this lame law, which if you have read through the thread already this has been clearly stated. I do believe a Constitutional Lawyer will have a field day with this, and be able to convince the Supreme Court there is a 1st amendment right to being an asshat... not matter how much they don't like it.

People like to make Constitutional issues out of what they see are outrages. Constitutional attorneys are a bit more circumspect about what they'd undertake. The odds of someone who's subject to the law in question being able to fund a fight "all the way to the Surpreme Court" are slim to none. My point was the word "Trolling" isn't in the law. It's in the headline. The leap of logic that then places it into the law itself is the same sort of "reasoning" this thread is rapt with. It's the same sort of reasoning you get at a bar with the bartender, and some guy. Everyone speaks with such surity. Nobody's got a clue.

Thanks for making my point that EVE isn't a dichotomy. I thought I said that already. It isn't a representative slice of society either...I think you said THAT already. I do not agree there's a "plethora" of views here. I think the views are rather limited and predictable for the most part, with occassional flashes of brilliance. However the views of enforcing a law such as this would in all likelihood be those held by people who don't game at all. In fact, any jury would likely be peopled by folks who think how people in EVE behave shouldn't be allowed at anytime on any level. EVE players are far from any majority except in EVE.

Your dream of a Supreme Court battle over the Constitutionality of restricting behavior and speech in EVE (specifically) is unlikely to be shared by those who live in the real world. The amount of cases the SC refuses to hear is rather HUGE. If you want to get laughed out of a lawyer's office, run and tell him you've got a Constitutional issue with how you're being treated in EVE by some media law action. "Uh...right..." It has nothing to do with right or wrong, legal or illegal, Constitutional or no...it has to do with what people consider to be significant, or worth the trouble to bother with.

Paradise is like where you are right now, only much, much better.

Sobach
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#44 - 2012-04-04 01:26:08 UTC
Vyl Vit wrote:
Of course you get to call the cops. These laws were enacted to deal with nasty old demonstrators who get out of hand. Go up to a cop and call him a *mortarforker*, the real set of words there. What I can't believe is you're unaware these sorts of laws exist. There's a long country mile between what you've heard, and what's in those big thick books. People have ideas about their world that don't match up to the realities.


Ok, perhaps I should've made myself more clear, where are the places where such laws are even enforced? there are literally thousands of laws across the states that are so hilariously outdated but are never formally repealed, that simply gets left on the book, ignored and are never enforced.

And yea, you can flip the cop the finger, call him a mofo, and he just might find something to stick you with to harass you, but certainly not with a "oh noes he offended me!" charge, which will just get laughed out of the prosecutor's office.


Vyl Vit wrote:
Where do I live? I live in a place where if I'm afraid of you I can shoot you. There's ten other places like this and seven more with such laws being passed as we toss meaningless text back and forth. The U.S. hasn't been the land of free speech ever. The facts of all this make much more interesting reading than any sci fi book.


and it's people like you who gives the rest of us responsible gun owners a bad name, just like that idiot Zimmerman. Stand-Your-Ground law is not meant to be used as a Lol-I'll-shoot-whoever-I-Want law.


Vyl Vit wrote:
I'm not going to do your research for you. If it actually interests you, you'll find a way. "Look it up for me and copy/paste it in here so I can say something derogatory about it." Not only is that an ungentlemanly request, it's rather lazy. "You do the work. I'll beat my chest and bray."


I've looked, and frankly there's nothing I see that would suggest it's anything other than old statutes that are simply no longer enforced, for good reason.
Mr Epeen
It's All About Me
#45 - 2012-04-04 01:30:38 UTC
Vyl Vit wrote:
No lawyer worth his salt would bother taking a "trolling on the internet" case.


In the U.S.? LOL! They'll be lining up for it.

Not only that, they'll be hiring agents to get them on all the talk shows as well.

Christ, U.S. law schools churn out lawyers like a flock of sheep churns out ****. You think not every single one of them dreams of getting a high profile case like that?

Mr Epeen Cool
Azriel Geist
Pure Victory
#46 - 2012-04-04 02:12:46 UTC
Another fine example of legislating at a problem instead of fixing the problem, because you know that's hard and stuff. Instead, they can punitively ruin some people's lives and make more money.

One more reason to steer clear of Arizona.
Tarn Kugisa
Kugisa Dynamics
#47 - 2012-04-04 02:14:33 UTC
Why is Arizona so goddamn backwards?

Be polite. Be efficient. Have a plan to troll everyone you meet - KuroVolt

Mathias Hex
#48 - 2012-04-04 02:29:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Mathias Hex
Peter Raptor wrote:
US is turning into a Police State, TSA frisking babies and grannies for weapons of mass destruction, I hope I never set foot in that place.


I know! Who cares if a baby is strapped and has a diaper full of heroin, leave the kid alone it's just a phase...

EDIT: ^ her-o-in, smack, brown sleeping powder, hey man give me a bump WTF ever drugs are bad mmkay. grass is ok I guess. My only prob with USA laws is the damn DOT regulations. THC should not be tested for!!!

I recall one night in a nightclub called the matrix, there I was... Mother of god there I am! Holy f**k.

Chokichi Ozuwara
Perkone
Caldari State
#49 - 2012-04-04 02:33:27 UTC
Botleten wrote:
I wouldn't be too worried about it, even if I did live in Arizona. The wording of the law sets it up for failure because the language includes "annoy or offend", both of which can't be outlawed due to that little detail known as the first amendment. Any dimwit lawyer looking for a buck and some publicity could get this law shot down so fast it'd make your head spin.

Yeah, because we all know the US government follows the intent and letter of the Constitution, amirite?

Tears will be shed and pants will need to be changed all round.

Vyl Vit
#50 - 2012-04-04 06:36:56 UTC
Mr Epeen wrote:
Vyl Vit wrote:
No lawyer worth his salt would bother taking a "trolling on the internet" case.


In the U.S.? LOL! They'll be lining up for it.

Not only that, they'll be hiring agents to get them on all the talk shows as well.

Christ, U.S. law schools churn out lawyers like a flock of sheep churns out ****. You think not every single one of them dreams of getting a high profile case like that?

Mr Epeen Cool

I see you're into urban myth.

Paradise is like where you are right now, only much, much better.

Vyl Vit
#51 - 2012-04-04 06:41:26 UTC
Sobach wrote:
Vyl Vit wrote:
Of course you get to call the cops. These laws were enacted to deal with nasty old demonstrators who get out of hand. Go up to a cop and call him a *mortarforker*, the real set of words there. What I can't believe is you're unaware these sorts of laws exist. There's a long country mile between what you've heard, and what's in those big thick books. People have ideas about their world that don't match up to the realities.


Ok, perhaps I should've made myself more clear, where are the places where such laws are even enforced? there are literally thousands of laws across the states that are so hilariously outdated but are never formally repealed, that simply gets left on the book, ignored and are never enforced.

And yea, you can flip the cop the finger, call him a mofo, and he just might find something to stick you with to harass you, but certainly not with a "oh noes he offended me!" charge, which will just get laughed out of the prosecutor's office.


Vyl Vit wrote:
Where do I live? I live in a place where if I'm afraid of you I can shoot you. There's ten other places like this and seven more with such laws being passed as we toss meaningless text back and forth. The U.S. hasn't been the land of free speech ever. The facts of all this make much more interesting reading than any sci fi book.


and it's people like you who gives the rest of us responsible gun owners a bad name, just like that idiot Zimmerman. Stand-Your-Ground law is not meant to be used as a Lol-I'll-shoot-whoever-I-Want law.


Vyl Vit wrote:
I'm not going to do your research for you. If it actually interests you, you'll find a way. "Look it up for me and copy/paste it in here so I can say something derogatory about it." Not only is that an ungentlemanly request, it's rather lazy. "You do the work. I'll beat my chest and bray."


I've looked, and frankly there's nothing I see that would suggest it's anything other than old statutes that are simply no longer enforced, for good reason.

Ummm...I don't own a gun. Never have. Never will. You're saying "enforced" a lot now. That's a different matter. The murder statue in Texas wasn't enforced when Kennedy was murdered. So...that's a horse of a different color. Why, there's a boatload of immigration laws that haven't been enforced for decades, come to think of it.

And, you gun owners give yourselves a bad name. The law Zimmy is hiding behind is an NRA creation. They're trying to go nationwide with it. You can mischaracterize it as "shoot who[m]ever I want" but...the term was "afraid". Thomas Jefferson said for this democracy to work it requires an educated voting public. Odd, eh?



Paradise is like where you are right now, only much, much better.

Sobach
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#52 - 2012-04-04 07:24:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Sobach
Vyl Vit wrote:
Ummm...I don't own a gun. Never have. Never will.


/shrug, you brought the subject up

Vyl Vit wrote:
You're saying "enforced" a lot now. That's a different matter. The murder statue in Texas wasn't enforced when Kennedy was murdered. So...that's a horse of a different color. Why, there's a boatload of immigration laws that haven't been enforced for decades, come to think of it.


lol, I take this as an admission that your so-called "offending moral" laws are indeed one of those outdated statutes that are no longer enforced. And no, it's not a different matter, as you explicitly said that people can still be arrested for offending other's morals. I'd love to see you try to actually call a cop for that, and the look on the cop's face when you try to explain your morals were offended.

Vyl Vit wrote:
And, you gun owners give yourselves a bad name. The law Zimmy is hiding behind is an NRA creation. They're trying to go nationwide with it. You can mischaracterize it as "shoot who[m]ever I want" but...the term was "afraid".


There's nothing inherently wrong with stand-your-ground laws, it's the specific wordings, and lack thereof, that made the FL law so worthless. It IS practically shoot-whomever-you-want as was applied in that case, as the law literally can't prevent people to go out, shoot someone when nobody is around, and then claim self defense because you were "afraid". It effectively shifted the burden of proof of an affirmative defense onto the prosecution. Overall it's a good idea, but in this case horrible execution.


Vyl Vit wrote:
Thomas Jefferson said for this democracy to work it requires an educated voting public. Odd, eh?


Indeed, and you're demonstrating your intelligence wonderfully by skating around issues and misdirection when you get called out on it, bravo.
Jonuts
The Arrow Project
#53 - 2012-04-04 08:23:55 UTC
I absolutely love how vague this law is. Doesn't have a chance in hell to stand up in a court of law, thank god! OMG! I said "Thank God", and I'm almost certain that would annoy or offend someone, somewhere. I'm totally a criminal in Arizona! I can understand what they're trying to get at, but really, their state legislature is made up of ******* idiots. This is pretty much the equivilent of saying "5 people drowned last year. So we outlawed all liquids".
Prince Kobol
#54 - 2012-04-04 08:32:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Prince Kobol
You can already be arrested for inciting to riot, any form of racist abuse in the UK on Twitter, facebook, email etc.

So for exmaple if you posted a comment on twitter calling somebody a black b**tard you can be arrested for it.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#55 - 2012-04-04 08:41:20 UTC
Ghoest wrote:
http://games.yahoo.com/blogs/plugged-in/arizona-bill-could-criminalize-internet-trolling-184547052.html

I hope none of us live there really.



I hope all the non-goons who sent threats to **** The Mittani's wife and kill his dog live there.

Funny how no one here is getting outraged about that.

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Katarina Reid
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#56 - 2012-04-04 08:51:32 UTC
"It is unlawful for any person, with intent to terrify, intimidate, threaten, harass, annoy or offend, to use ANY ELECTRONIC OR DIGITAL DEVICE and use any obscene, lewd or profane language or suggest any lewd or lascivious act, or threaten to inflict physical harm to the person or property of any person."

Annoy someone really 6months jail for annoying lol
Memrox
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#57 - 2012-04-04 08:53:26 UTC
End of the internetz is nigh.
Joran Dravius
Doomheim
#58 - 2012-04-04 10:31:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Joran Dravius
Ghoest wrote:
http://games.yahoo.com/blogs/plugged-in/arizona-bill-could-criminalize-internet-trolling-184547052.html

I hope none of us live there really.

Oh no, words! We're all ****** now! Save us Arizona!

Jonuts wrote:
I absolutely love how vague this law is. Doesn't have a chance in hell to stand up in a court of law, thank god! OMG! I said "Thank God", and I'm almost certain that would annoy or offend someone, somewhere. I'm totally a criminal in Arizona! I can understand what they're trying to get at, but really, their state legislature is made up of ******* idiots. This is pretty much the equivilent of saying "5 people drowned last year. So we outlawed all liquids".

If you think something that vague and ridiculous wouldn't pass you clearly don't live in the US. Our government is batshit insane.
Astenion
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#59 - 2012-04-04 10:34:52 UTC
Twulf wrote:
Ai Shun wrote:
That type of nonsense makes me so glad I do not live in the United States of America.


Yea because living in the United States of America is "hard". Living here is the great and anyone that says other wise is either too lazy or too stupid to understand how great the US is.

I was borne and raised in Detroit, MI as a fat white kid. Growing up is not hard people, its called life. Ever had a gun put in your face because you have cool looking shoes and someone at school wants them? I might be a bit racist but I am "normal" as an adult if normal is working, having a house, cars and toys for the weekend, friends and family.

How can words hurt you? So what if someone is mean to you or does not like you? Put your head down, do what you go to do and move on with your life. Its not easy but who said it was easy?

Do you think bullying stops when you leave school? Yea right, dickheads are everywhere, end of story. Let's put this silly nonsense to rest and get back to internet spaceships and pew pew.

Life is too short to worry about stupid bully ****, have fun, live it your way and die, that is all that is required. That is what I have learned in 30 years on this planet with you other assholes.


And that's exactly what's wrong with the US: you think it's "normal" to have the threat of a gun shoved in your face on a daily basis.

You're right, the US IS a nice place to live if you have a shallow and materialistic personality. I left the US for this exact reason. Americans equate convenience with quality of life. Americans live in a hypothetical and theoretical world where the reality oftentimes differs greatly from said hypotheses and theories. Sure, we spout these catch-phrases like bleating sheep but in reality they mean nothing to the majority of Americans.

The fact of the matter is that the daily life in the US doesn't stand up to the principles on which it is based. People love to spout about how "free" you are when what they're really talking about is how cheap everything is. Americans like America because they can buy things, not because of it having such a great quality of life over other countries. You love the US because of Wal-Mart and convenience stores and cheap Ford Mustangs, not because it's such a great place to live. You think it's a great place to live BECAUSE of these things. If you had ever lived anywhere else in the world with a high quality of life for the entire population, you would see this.

If you want to be entertained constantly and need to constantly distract yourself from reality, the US is the place to be. If you want to live in reality where you can enjoy life without having to make at least six figures per year, then move to Europe.

I'm American, btw.
Astenion
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#60 - 2012-04-04 10:45:49 UTC
Peter Raptor wrote:
US is turning into a Police State, TSA frisking babies and grannies for weapons of mass destruction, I hope I never set foot in that place.


Yes, as if Europe doesn't already have similar laws in place. It's not enforced that much, but it's there and it's just as ridiculous.