These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

An end to loans?

Author
Jas Dor
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#1 - 2012-04-03 18:32:41 UTC
According to the most recent devblog giving a loan to an RMTer can result in both loss of isk and banning. I'm guessing what happened here is Player A gives loan to player B, Account C (with tainted isk) is used to repay player A. Result, CCP takes away all the isk Player A got from player B through account C and gives player A, revokes player A's character transfer privileges and gives player A a (presumably temporary ban).

So that means either one of two things:
1. Loans will have to go through the forums and be publically posted to avoid CCP issues or;
2. Public posting won't provide any protection, greatly increasing the risks in getting involved in the player loan market.
David Forge
GameOn Inc.
#2 - 2012-04-03 18:45:07 UTC
I'm fairly certain that CCP will be implementing this in a way that gives players the benefit of the doubt. In other words there would have to be reasonable suspicion that Person B knew they were dealing with an RMTer.
Lauren Hellfury
Super Happy Awesome Fun Times
#3 - 2012-04-03 19:00:49 UTC
You're an idiot.

The "loan" is just an attempt to disguise the fact that they are providing the Isk Sellers with the ISK to SELL. It's not a loan, both sides know that. It works both ways too.

1) I purchase isk from dodgyeveisk.com and their in-game teller totallynotan rmtalt sends me some isk with the reason of "200B loan @ 3% for 90 days" or whatever.

2) I plunder my bot accounts for large piles of isk and because of leet connections get on the bat-phone to the owner of dodgyeveisk.com to sell him some Isk because I need another container of cheetohs. I also use the "this is totally a loan and not a dodgy rmt transfer" reason.


THAT is what they are talking about. The goings on in here are quite irrelevent.

Help rid New Eden of T2 BPOs: ** https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=62797 **The Full Pocket Aggro blog:  http://fullpocketaggro.blogspot.com/ **Now showing: **Margin Trading Scams

Shar Tegral
#4 - 2012-04-03 19:37:15 UTC
Lauren Hellfury wrote:
The goings on in here are quite irrelevent.

I dunno. There are a number of loans here that get funded by relative unknowns to relative unknowns for no apparent reason. Then you don't here if was paid or ran off with, just silence. I think it would be naive to think that it has not happened via here a couple of times.
Lauren Hellfury
Super Happy Awesome Fun Times
#5 - 2012-04-03 19:42:37 UTC
Whilst that is true, I would still doubt that CCP are going to be looking in here for anything suspicious.

Help rid New Eden of T2 BPOs: ** https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=62797 **The Full Pocket Aggro blog:  http://fullpocketaggro.blogspot.com/ **Now showing: **Margin Trading Scams

Shar Tegral
#6 - 2012-04-03 20:10:10 UTC
Lauren Hellfury wrote:
Whilst that is true, I would still doubt that CCP are going to be looking in here for anything suspicious.
.. or exculpatory.

See, it is not for suspicion to be created here. CCP has means to track things and will find culprits without using this forum. However what about those whore are unknowingly culpable? While this is speculative I do not doubt that it could, and probably will, happen.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#7 - 2012-04-03 22:05:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
Lauren Hellfury wrote:
Whilst that is true, I would still doubt that CCP are going to be looking in here for anything suspicious.


Anybody recalls the Cosmoray case?

He was trusted. SUPER trusted.
He was upstanding. SUPER upstanding. Not even winking at pirates or something like Bad Bobby did.
He posted everything here in public and on the forums.

Yet he tangentially ended up trading something with an RMTer (without knowing it).

At the same time one alt of mine held collateral with his alt, in a corp of his. That was actually a favor of him to me: a relatively unknown new 3rd party guy being accepted into the super trusted MD guy collateral holding corp with collateral voting powers.

CCP rained HELL on everyone around and probably this is the inner reason why Cosmoray later on scammed. They probably confiscated him ISK or whatever.

This just to say how easy is to stay out of "anything suspicious".

He was one of the "I need 100B => everybody throws him ISK in 10 minutes" guys, known, official, everything.
Yet it was not enough.

And I have more cases and I have litigated with completely blind and deaf CCP customer service so much, that was another of the reasons I quit EvE about 1 year ago.

They give us the promise of a sandbox but not the tools to defend ourself, not the tools to deal with certified clean investees and then they officially state (see the Security Devblog for specific answers to me about it) it's our burden to deal with clean people.


Just imagine this: Chribba being banned and purple letter flagged because he SURELY has dealt with some RMTed supercapital in the past, he transacted too many of them to not have statistically ended in such a case.
Shar Tegral
#8 - 2012-04-03 22:20:00 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
And I have more cases and I have litigated with completely blind and deaf CCP customer service so much, that was another of the reasons I quit EvE about 1 year ago.

They give us the promise of a sandbox but not the tools to defend ourself, not the tools to deal with certified clean investees and then they officially state (see the Security Devblog for specific answers to me about it) it's our burden to deal with clean people.


Just imagine this: Chribba being banned and purple letter flagged because he SURELY has dealt with some RMTed supercapital in the past, he transacted too many of them to not have statistically ended in such a case.

I made a similar argument here.
Lady Godwynn
Lady Godwynn Corporation
#9 - 2012-04-03 22:23:42 UTC  |  Edited by: Lady Godwynn
CCP has on many occasions stated that loans and other forms of out of game arrangements are not
officially a part of their game and that they do not have to take them into consideration regarding actions
they take regarding the game.

To me, a relatively new player of the game, it seems pretty clear that you loan isk to strangers, provide collateral
holding services to strangers, run a bank, or in any other way accept large amounts of isk from people you don't
know - means that you do so at your own risk.

Just the way I read the party manifesto

Yours
Lady Godwynn
cuoredipietra famedoro
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#10 - 2012-04-03 22:44:28 UTC
Lady Godwynn wrote:
CCP has on many occasions stated that loans and other forms of out of game arrangements are not
officially a part of their game and that they do not have to take them into consideration regarding actions
they take regarding the game.


this is CCP mistake and should be addressed by either

> by giving us tools to defend from RMTs
> implement game mechanics to what MDers do everyday as metagame (loans, shares, bonds & the like)

Fact is they will have to address this issues sooner or later... in fact:

as long as the game goes on and old toons keep playing, they become richer and richer up to the point where investesting ISK into other's ventures becomes the most effective way to grow the ingame capital.

For example: if you were to had 1 Trillion ISK, would you still consider T2 or capital production an efficient use of *all* your ISK? I doubt the ROI would be interesting. On the other side, investing on other's ventures could land better ROI.

Caeci caecos ducentes 

Lady Godwynn
Lady Godwynn Corporation
#11 - 2012-04-03 23:06:08 UTC
I couldn't find a link referencing what I said above, but CCP Sreegs just posted this in his thread:

https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1072271#post1072271

CCP Sreegs wrote:

"My job isn't to secure the loans your corporation is making outside of the game mechanics. That is your risk and always will be.

:edit: and always has been"


So, until CCP changes that stance, should you still provide loans?


Yours
Lady Godwynn
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#12 - 2012-04-03 23:13:06 UTC
This is my reply:


When I will be banned just because I did what people on the Market Discussion forum do since years (EvE finance) or because I did what Chribba does (holding ships and collateral for third parties) or just because I got paid with RMT money for a BPO I sold (notice, no loan here), then at least I'll be able to wait for the unban and then link these posts as a "hey I was right" reminder.

Meager consolation, eh?



Re read this: Chribba can be banned too and then who in hell will provide his SECURE service?

Also, you sell a BPO, get paid RMTed money, you get banned. Then after 1+ months of screaming with the most sordid customer service except EA's, you get unbanned but you lost the BPO and the ISK. And you lost your POS, which went offline and got ransacked.
Nub Sauce
State War Academy
Caldari State
#13 - 2012-04-03 23:34:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Nub Sauce
From the sound of things, banning people who have simply received dirty isk isn't the plan. Why would they bother subtracting the isk and putting people into the negative if they're just going to up and ban the account?

Clearly there is a line drawn somewhere where certain offenses get you banned and others just bring the wrath to your wallet.

My guess:

Sell isk via RMT: Banned
Buy isk via RMT: Wallet gets negged for the amount of isk illegally gained.
Receive isk from someone who purchased it via RMT: I'm not sure, this probably depends on if they suspect that you're involved or were just selling some goods via a contract or something and are actually innocent.

Is there any info posted on this somewhere? I didn't see any specifics in the video that cover this. There must be more to it than just banning if they are bothering to seize assets and isk. Why bother hitting their wallet if they can never log in again?

Edit:
Of course, I could totally off and the buyers also get banned then the isk, wherever it has ended up, gets subtracted from someone's wallet. But then, that seems odd since it could easily be penalizing completely innocent players who legitmately sold something they worked hard to build/obtain in the first place.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#14 - 2012-04-03 23:44:27 UTC
Read the latest security blog.
Darth Tickles
Doomheim
#15 - 2012-04-03 23:57:46 UTC
Yes, the needs of ten nerds playing make-believe spaceships finance should outweigh efforts to save the entire game from botting and rmt.

1) Nothing has actually happened.
2) If you don't feel safe enough and worry something might happen, stop doing it.

Nobody cares about this ridiculous and infinitesimal subculture that has developed here, and nobody ever will.

Actually, everyone who cares should unsub in protest.

Shar Tegral
#16 - 2012-04-04 00:07:27 UTC
You know I felt bad for Iceland when the UK froze bank assets by calling them terrorists. After all, it was ridiculous however it was part of the legal mechanics so, using Sreegs mentality, it was okay.

I haven't run a bond in a long time and after this I'm not holding any collateral for anyone. Also I really need to not be any alliance or corporation either. Scratch the market as well. Once guilt by association is guaranteed the massive multi-player part has been gutted from MMO.

Yes, it is an extremely unlikely possibility for this to happen. However I have no doubt that someone will specifically engage in RMT, on a disposable account, for the sole purpose of tainting the account of an enemy. Sounds like pure idiocy, but we've already got that in bucket loads.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#17 - 2012-04-04 00:08:52 UTC
Darth Tickles wrote:
Yes, the needs of ten nerds playing make-believe spaceships finance should outweigh efforts to save the entire game from botting and rmt.

1) Nothing has actually happened.
2) If you don't feel safe enough and worry something might happen, stop doing it.

Nobody cares about this ridiculous and infinitesimal subculture that has developed here, and nobody ever will.

Actually, everyone who cares should unsub in protest.



While I appreciate the enthusiastic optimism of your reply, it does not address the fact that all those tasked at reimbursing ships (see Goonswarm reimburser post in the security thread) and everybody who sells something could be affected. There's more than ten nerds in EvE who sell capital BPOs and similar.
Nub Sauce
State War Academy
Caldari State
#18 - 2012-04-04 00:10:52 UTC
I read the latest info. It seems my first guess is pretty close.

As for dealing in loans with an RMTer, if there will be banning/punishment it sounds like it'll be a case by case basis. I bet it all depends on if they believe you are part of the RMT ring or an innocent person giving someone a loan.
Darth Tickles
Doomheim
#19 - 2012-04-04 00:20:30 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
While I appreciate the enthusiastic optimism of your reply, it does not address the fact that all those tasked at reimbursing ships (see Goonswarm reimburser post in the security thread) and everybody who sells something could be affected. There's more than ten nerds in EvE who sell capital BPOs and similar.


ROFL

I'm sure there is great concern that alliance SRPs will be used as a cover for RMT...80m at a time...all within one alliance.

Get a grip.

The issue is that a "loan system" is actually a VERY good cover for people transferring huge sums of ISK between nominal strangers for nothing in return.

Again, nothing has actually happened, and if you're truly concerned about getting falsely flagged for dealing with RMTers, then stop exchanging huge sums of ISK with strangers. Very simple.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#20 - 2012-04-04 00:23:34 UTC
Nub Sauce wrote:
I read the latest info. It seems my first guess is pretty close.

As for dealing in loans with an RMTer, if there will be banning/punishment it sounds like it'll be a case by case basis. I bet it all depends on if they believe you are part of the RMT ring or an innocent person giving someone a loan.


Yeah but they don't send you a nice mail stating you are under investigation.
They downright ban you for weeks FIRST, and then you can try to bring in your case, then escalate it (the first level GMs are usually useless) and blah blah, while your subscription money is ticking, while your corporation is collapsing, while your structures are offlining...

If you end up proving you were legit (I don't know how, I don't think there are any ways to prove your innocence) you still keep all the losses.
123Next page