These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

New dev blog: Team Security - Now with 100% more Anti-RMT

First post First post First post
Author
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#261 - 2012-04-03 22:46:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
How long till Chribba and Grendell get both banned for having contracted RMTed supercapitals with their 3rd party services?

They transacted so many it's statistically impossible not one of them came from RMT yet they have the same tools I have (that is ZERO) to make sure who you deal with is not tied to RMT.

If the RMT checks will only kick in for past February transactions, what will insure them (and me) about our 3rd party service not falling in a RMT pitfall? Or shall they have to stop being THE 3rd party services of EvE because it's the only way to not get banned?
CCP Sreegs
CCP Retirement Home
#262 - 2012-04-03 22:47:34 UTC
Florestan Bronstein wrote:
Jita Alt666 wrote:
CCP Sreegs wrote:

To be fair you can't do anything with ETCs in game. All of the trading happens outside of the game on the website.


Which is completely outside of Sreegs scope.

not really

the problem is that ever since CCP started sending newbies "PLEX are a great way to get ISK, buy some now!" emails, RMT sites have put the direct sale of ISK on the backburner and are instead emphasizing the sale of PLEX in their advertisements - because now everybody knows that buying PLEX to get some ISK is legit.... Roll

Back in the day the division was easy - GTCs are legit and everything else is bad RMT.
There was no way a RMT site could have gotten their fingers on working GTCs without CCP seeing their cut.

Now CCP sells PLEX which is good.
And RMT sites sell PLEX which is bad.

Every time CCP advertises PLEX as legal RMT, "bad" RMT sites profit because they sell the very same product as CCP (which was not possible with GTCs) and the "... but only if you buy it from eveonline.com" gets swept under the rug.

Anyone wanting to combat RMT has to deal with this issue sooner or later - and while Sreegs cannot solve it on his own (guess bizdev are happy that they can sell 2 PLEX for more $$ than 1 GTC and won't let go off that easily) he should at least be very aware of the problem.

If he himself has lost track of legal vs illegal RMT, how is he supposed to prevent Joe Rookie from stumbling into the same trap?
Oh but he isn't supposed to prevent that? his job only involves technical detection means and infrequent appeals to the playerbase to please change their behavior? he doesn't care about anything outside that narrow field of vision?

well, you only solve a problem on the scale of RMT in EVE by taking a coordinated & holistic approach across departments.
Not by saying "oh but this is the job of game design", "and this is due to business development", "and that's the work of GMs", ...
If that is the case then get game design, Business Development and GMs on one table and solve the problem together.

CCP Sreegs will always end up as the spokesperson and player contact for any sort of bad behavior, no matter whether he thinks it falls into his responsibility or not.

edit: directionless post lacks direction, I'm too tired to write concisely but I hope the gist of it is clear


Just to make sure we're clear unless the post comes from me in this thread or another blue poster it is conjecture and should be treated as such. I really don't need players answering questions about things they don't know anything about, least of all what my job responsibilities are.

"Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012

Amanda Humphries
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#263 - 2012-04-03 22:48:19 UTC
First of all, a big thumbs up to the CCP security team. This has been a long time coming and I'm sure this will have huge impacts on the quality of the game.

Secondly, I'm not sure if this has been looked into, but perhaps there should be a feature implemented where you have to approve of someone giving you isk before it goes into your wallet. This will prevent the tactic of sending RMT'd isk to your enemies and reduce the workload on the security team.

CCP Sreegs
CCP Retirement Home
#264 - 2012-04-03 22:49:13 UTC
Allataria wrote:
Screegs,

Does ISBoxer count as a botting program to get banned? Someone was saying that that particular program was allowed by EVE but I can't see how any third party program that runs the game for you would be allowed. Please confirm?


I won't say it's ok but people have said certain GMs have. I'm not banning for it today and given the way the subject has been communicated we'll send out an announcement before we do.

"Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012

Ganthrithor
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#265 - 2012-04-03 22:51:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Ganthrithor
Ugh this forum is literally the worst (or the best, depending on how you see it)-- press post, no posting happens.

Anyway, tl;dp: Given that RMTers will lie about why they want ISK, and prospective loans are usually evaluated based on the loanee's ability to repay the loan (their wealth, repayment track record, etc), how the hell are we supposed to magically know who is and who isn't an RMTer when we go to loan people ISK?

Serious question. I'm part of an alliance of 5k plus players (you may have heard of it). We have a whole sub-forum dedicated to player contracts (largely loans). I have a pile of spacebux of my own and loan some of that out to people periodically based on whether or not I think that person can and will pay me back. How is this supposed to continue to be a thing if you can find yourself permabanned not for botting or RMTing but merely for loaning isk to ONE CHARACTER of someone who does RMT (which could involve any of the accounts that person has on the books, including characters that may or may not be in your alliance at all)?
CCP Sreegs
CCP Retirement Home
#266 - 2012-04-03 22:52:09 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
How long till Chribba and Grendell get both banned for having contracted RMTed supercapitals with their 3rd party services?

They transacted so many it's statistically impossible not one of them came from RMT yet they have the same tools I have (that is ZERO) to make sure who you deal with is not tied to RMT.


I guess they can petition when it happens just like everyone else. (it hasn't happened)

"Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012

CCP Sreegs
CCP Retirement Home
#267 - 2012-04-03 22:53:11 UTC
Amanda Humphries wrote:
First of all, a big thumbs up to the CCP security team. This has been a long time coming and I'm sure this will have huge impacts on the quality of the game.

Secondly, I'm not sure if this has been looked into, but perhaps there should be a feature implemented where you have to approve of someone giving you isk before it goes into your wallet. This will prevent the tactic of sending RMT'd isk to your enemies and reduce the workload on the security team.



It doesn't change anything from our perspective. You'd in a worst case scenario be out the isk you received.

"Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012

CCP Sreegs
CCP Retirement Home
#268 - 2012-04-03 22:54:02 UTC  |  Edited by: CCP Sreegs
Ganthrithor wrote:
Ugh this forum is literally the worst (or the best, depending on how you see it)-- press post, no posting happens.

Anyway, tl;dp: Given that RMTers will lie about why they want ISK, and perspective loans are usually evaluated based on the loanee's ability to repay the loan (their wealth, repayment track record, etc), how the hell are we supposed to magically know who is and who isn't an RMTer when we go to loan people ISK?

Serious question. I'm part of an alliance of 5k plus players (you may have heard of it). We have a whole sub-forum dedicated to player contracts (largely loans). I have a pile of spacebux of my own and loan some of that out to people periodically based on whether or not I think that person can and will pay me back. How is this supposed to continue to be a thing if you can find yourself permabanned not for botting or RMTing but merely for loaning isk to ONE CHARACTER of someone who does RMT (which could involve any of the accounts that person has on the books, including characters that may or may not be in your alliance at all)?


My job isn't to secure the loans your corporation is making outside of the game mechanics. That is your risk and always will be.

:edit: and always has been

"Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012

Ganthrithor
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#269 - 2012-04-03 22:56:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Ganthrithor
You can't seriously expect people to KNOW whether or not someone is involved in RMT in a game full of anonymous sociopaths.

Just cyan.

e: For clarification, is it loaning to anyone involved in RMT that will get you f##ked or just ISK sellers? I imagine there are exponentially fewer sellers than buyers.
CCP Sreegs
CCP Retirement Home
#270 - 2012-04-03 22:59:55 UTC
Ganthrithor wrote:
You can't seriously expect people to KNOW whether or not someone is involved in RMT in a game full of anonymous sociopaths.

Just cyan.


I don't disagree. We also don't support loan systems. This is why if I'm correct you have a subforum as you stated for loans and the punishment for defaulting on said loan is player justice not an in-game action from CCP. We didn't design a loan system. Maybe it's something we should do, maybe not, the point is that yourself and others are making a big to-do about

A) Something that we haven't had to do anything about yet because nobody's been snagged wrongly to date
B) Something that is a player-run mechanic.

I can't provide validation around something we didn't create.

"Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012

Alx Warlord
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#271 - 2012-04-03 23:00:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Alx Warlord
This means less cheaters, more plex in the market, reduced plex isk value, and a better game for those who play to pay.

Good job CCP!

Now, removing some greefing mechanisms, and things that allow easier botting, like warp and cloak and stays cloaked until treat is gone And the AFK Cloaking, by adding a cloak hunter ship would be good!
CCP Sreegs
CCP Retirement Home
#272 - 2012-04-03 23:01:08 UTC  |  Edited by: CCP Sreegs
Ganthrithor wrote:
You can't seriously expect people to KNOW whether or not someone is involved in RMT in a game full of anonymous sociopaths.

Just cyan.

e: For clarification, is it loaning to anyone involved in RMT that will get you f##ked or just ISK sellers? I imagine there are exponentially fewer sellers than buyers.


Your risk as it stands today would be that you'd be supplying a seller who would then sell what you loaned them. Buyers simply have the isk removed and only the isk that was given them by the seller.

:edit: either way it seems you're out money because you made a bad loan?

"Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#273 - 2012-04-03 23:01:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
CCP Sreegs wrote:


My job isn't to secure the loans your corporation is making outside of the game mechanics. That is your risk and always will be.

:edit: and always has been


Sending ISK to somebody and (hopefully) have it back + interests after 30 days IS inside game mechanics.

Else why can we send ISK to somebody else?

With your reasoning ANY ISK exchange can be with a RMTer and subject to ban.

And you guess what?

They get ban, no ability to post. No ability to petition but use a craptastic ancient general contact form that is used by thousands guys sending spam or asking for general EvE info.

After WEEKS of being daily stolen subscription money a GM replies them that their logs show nothing and closes the petition. They can reopen a new petition and escalate it and get a "the former GM was right, now GTFO" reply. Be happy, now they will have purple letter, unsellable account and be shunned by everybody and no single way to ever be heard again.

Sure this is not your concern, but it's us who have to bear with this bullsht even in tangential cases.


Edit: sorry for peeing on your best thread, if I knew of anybody in CCP who'd CARE to listen to concerns I'd harass them. But alas, there's only a rubber wall to keep us muppet- ehm customers shut.
CCP Sreegs
CCP Retirement Home
#274 - 2012-04-03 23:04:25 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
CCP Sreegs wrote:


My job isn't to secure the loans your corporation is making outside of the game mechanics. That is your risk and always will be.

:edit: and always has been


Sending ISK to somebody and (hopefully) have it back + interests after 30 days IS inside game mechanics.

Else why can we send ISK to somebody else?

With your reasoning ANY ISK exchange can be with a RMTer and subject to ban.

And you guess what?

They get ban, no ability to post. No ability to petition but use a craptastic ancient general contact form that is used by thousands guys sending spam or asking for general EvE info.

After WEEKS of being daily stolen subscription money a GM replies them that their logs show nothing and closes the petition. They can reopen a new petition and escalate it and get a "the former GM was right, now GTFO" reply. Be happy, now they will have purple letter, unsellable account and be shunned by everybody and no single way to ever be heard again.

Sure this is not your concern, but it's us who have to bear with this bullsht even in tangential cases.


Giving isk to someone is in the game mechanics yes. Getting it back with interest based on some predetermined condition is not. That is what a loan is. A deposit box is not a loan system. We didn't build a loan system and nothing you're lamenting has occurred based on anything my team has done. Nor do I even see it as conceivable at this point but don't let that stop you from making 100 more posts on the subject in this thread. :)

"Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012

Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#275 - 2012-04-03 23:07:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
CCP Sreegs wrote:

Giving isk to someone is in the game mechanics yes. Getting it back with interest based on some predetermined condition is not. That is what a loan is. A deposit box is not a loan system. We didn't build a loan system and nothing you're lamenting has occurred based on anything my team has done. Nor do I even see it as conceivable at this point but don't let that stop you from making 100 more posts on the subject in this thread. :)


When I will be banned just because I did what people on the Market Discussion forum do since years (EvE finance) or because I did what Chribba does (holding ships and collateral for third parties) or just because I got paid with RMT money for a BPO I sold (notice, no loan here), then at least I'll be able to wait for the unban and then link these posts as a "hey I was right" reminder.

Meager consolation, eh?
CCP Sreegs
CCP Retirement Home
#276 - 2012-04-03 23:09:17 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
CCP Sreegs wrote:

Giving isk to someone is in the game mechanics yes. Getting it back with interest based on some predetermined condition is not. That is what a loan is. A deposit box is not a loan system. We didn't build a loan system and nothing you're lamenting has occurred based on anything my team has done. Nor do I even see it as conceivable at this point but don't let that stop you from making 100 more posts on the subject in this thread. :)


When I will be banned just because I did what people on the Market Discussion forum do since years (EvE finance) or because I did what Chribba does (holding ships and collateral for third parties) or just because I got paid with RMT money for a BPO I sold (notice, no loan here), then at least I'll be able to wait for the unban and then link these posts as a "hey I was right" reminder.

Meager consolation, eh?


If it will make you feel better if that happens I'll either say you were right or you'll have been caught doing something bad.

"Sreegs has juuust edged out Soundwave as my favourite dev." - Meita Way 2012

CCP Loktofeit
C C P
C C P Alliance
#277 - 2012-04-03 23:10:47 UTC
InVictus Kell wrote:
From the dev post:

" Buy PLEX, don't be a space butt "


nice, reads like a good 'ol fashion political slogan or old war bond ad from WWII.


http://community.eveonline.com/bitmaps/newsletters/vol032/plexNewEden.jpg
Just Alter
Futures Abstractions
#278 - 2012-04-03 23:11:46 UTC
Great job Sreegs!

I'm amused by your resilience in dealing with these whiners...

Dont cheat= you'll be alright.

Afraid about loans/reimbursement/something else= stop doing till it will be safe again; maybe you could do it till now just because of bots,rmters :)
DeODokktor
Dark Templars
The Fonz Presidium
#279 - 2012-04-03 23:15:20 UTC
CCP Sreegs wrote:

My job isn't to secure the loans your corporation is making outside of the game mechanics. That is your risk and always will be.

:edit: and always has been



The game doesnt have mechanics in place for loans, hence the need for us to go about it outside the mechanics.
We have the omlett now, give us the eggs.

Of course, it's not your area, it's not the area of anyone else either, it falls into that "make a suggestion and if it is good for combat we'll take it to an internal board and think about it" group.

Your not the one to push for this change, but you are the one who will have to deal with the fact that trading/sharing/loaning does take place in eve because there are missing mechanisms. If your all about detecting bots then I would go with ya in saying that my argument is moot. If your going to focus on RMT then it's not moot.

I think a few people are just looking for you to say that your not going to screw them over because they have helped out (or been helped out) indirectly by someone who has,does, or will take part in RMT.

I for one was once banned because a RMT'er was giving out free stuff in amarr, Opening trade windows and putting stuff in them and clicking Okay. You see a 300m item in a trade window with a green check and you are inclinded to accept it, a GM banned me (and a lot of other people) and gave me a warning that I should never for the rest of my eve life accept anything for less than what it's worth. To this day I can say that I think he was an Idiot when it comes to how he viewed that (my ban was undone, but going by his view if I purchase something on market for 10% of it's value I should be banned). Devs have often taken their own ideas and ran (leaped) into something without themselves knowing all of the mechanics in play. Sure, you cant outline every situation, but knowing that corps or alliances could be destroyed by Botters/RMT'ers in your group is going to be really offputting.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#280 - 2012-04-03 23:15:51 UTC
Just Alter wrote:
Great job Sreegs!

I'm amused by your resilience in dealing with these whiners...

Dont cheat= you'll be alright.

Afraid about loans/reimbursement/something else= stop doing till it will be safe again; maybe you could do it till now just because of bots,rmters :)


Quite sure Goonswarm are going to be able to stop reimbursing ships for 5000 players with the snap of a finger.