These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Assembly Hall

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

[Proposal] Multiple Accounts, Why? A Solution to CSM Vote Stacking, and other problems.

Author
Captain Jean-Luc Picard
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#1 - 2012-03-31 22:42:32 UTC
Hello all and this is my first proposal and hopefully a good one in the CSM Assembly Hall, my name is Calvin Cook and I propose something that may completely fix the "CSM Vote Stacking" problems of people voting for a Candidate with Multiple Accounts!

I propose to change the way accounts and multiple characters on accounts work.

Currently an account may have a maximum of 3 characters, and only one of those characters may actively train at once. This effectively makes multiple characters useless for reasons other than: A) Alt Posting on Forums and B) Anonymous Grief and/or Shade Tactics in-game, I may be leaving a few reasons out but for the most part this is what the 2nd and 3rd character slots are being used for.

I propose that new accounts have only ONE character slot, and that you may add additional character slots that increase your monthly fee, and all characters on your account may actively train skills. I believe this would help the multiple account voting problem we currently have, aswell as make multiple active alts much more convenient. I am aware that this would not extinguish the multiple account voting problem, but I believe it would lessen it.

An additional option would to allow customers/players to pay for individual characters on their account, and if you don't want to keep paying for certain characters, that character on your account gets "frozen" because that SPECIFIC characters subscription has run out. This would allow for "individual PLEXing."

A quick example:

Account with 1 Character, $15.00/mo.
Account with 2 Characters, $30.00/mo. both characters on account may actively train skills.
Account with 5 Characters, $75.00/mo. all characters on accounts may actively train skills.

Please tell me what you think, EVE Community!
mxzf
Shovel Bros
#2 - 2012-04-01 00:38:02 UTC
Just because you only use one char on your account doesn't mean no one uses them for anything except voting or anonymous posting. There are many valid uses for characters. Stuff like different specialized characters to keep clone costs down, PI, price checking, holding alts, trying out other areas of the game (like a FW alt if your main has good standings), spy alts, and many other uses. Don't try and break other people's use of the game just because you aren't using something.
Righty Macgee
Point Precision
Recursion
#3 - 2012-04-01 04:06:28 UTC
I also use my other 2 slots on my accounts for cyno alts and trading toons.



But this is not the pointl, you will never get rid of the multi-account per person volting in the CSM, unless CCP changes the rules for volting. People will always have more then one account as CCP restricts you to be only able to log into one pilot at a time, many players like to multi-box you wont be able to do this on one account.



People should be able to vote for each of their accounts as the more active accounts they have, the greater the interest in the game they have. Just becuase you own a 100 shares in a coumpany doesnt mean your vote at the AGM is only counted once, it is counted for all the shares you have. Otherwise you would have the minority share holders dictating what the majority do.
Uronksur Suth
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#4 - 2012-04-01 04:45:53 UTC
Righty Macgee wrote:


People should be able to vote for each of their accounts as the more active accounts they have, the greater the interest in the game they have. Just becuase you own a 100 shares in a coumpany doesnt mean your vote at the AGM is only counted once, it is counted for all the shares you have. Otherwise you would have the minority share holders dictating what the majority do.


So the people who cannot afford multiple accounts and a system for multiboxing should have fewer votes than those who can? That doesn't seem like a good idea to me, personally.
Malcanis
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#5 - 2012-04-01 09:17:31 UTC
Captain Jean-Luc Picard wrote:
Hello all and this is my first proposal and hopefully a good one in the CSM Assembly Hall, my name is Calvin Cook and I propose something that may completely fix the "CSM Vote Stacking" problems of people voting for a Candidate with Multiple Accounts!

I propose to change the way accounts and multiple characters on accounts work.

Currently an account may have a maximum of 3 characters, and only one of those characters may actively train at once. This effectively makes multiple characters useless for reasons other than: A) Alt Posting on Forums and B) Anonymous Grief and/or Shade Tactics in-game, I may be leaving a few reasons out...


Hi, I have 2 accounts, each with 1 character with ~90M SP, 1 with ~30M SP and 1 with ~1M SP.

You can rest assurred that I didn't train 30M SP into those secondary alts for no reason.

So yes, you may indeed "be leaving a few reasons out".

"Just remember later that I warned against any change to jump ranges or fatigue. You earned whats coming."

Grath Telkin, 11.10.2016

Captain Jean-Luc Picard
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#6 - 2012-04-01 09:18:14 UTC
There are easy work arounds to this "I still use those 2 character slot" issues.

A: Account comes with 1 Active slot and 2 Non-Active slots, and additional Active Slots may be purchased.

As for Multi-Boxing: A sub-account system could be put in place to allow multiple Active Characters to be online at once on the same account.

I do not think that people who have multiple accounts should be able to multiple vote, I have multiple accounts yet I only voted for The Mittani with ONE of my accounts. I stand true to my belief.
Danika Princip
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#7 - 2012-04-01 11:20:14 UTC
Captain Jean-Luc Picard wrote:
There are easy work arounds to this "I still use those 2 character slot" issues.

A: Account comes with 1 Active slot and 2 Non-Active slots, and additional Active Slots may be purchased.

As for Multi-Boxing: A sub-account system could be put in place to allow multiple Active Characters to be online at once on the same account.

I do not think that people who have multiple accounts should be able to multiple vote, I have multiple accounts yet I only voted for The Mittani with ONE of my accounts. I stand true to my belief.



Good for you.

I have six cyno/PI/trade/RVB alts. I use them all. I suppose you'd take four of them away from me?

Do you not think the sub account system might complicate things a little? Or compromise account security? (Lose one account, lose literally everything, rather than just 1/3) And how about spying? Your system would remove it entirely.

In short, No. CSM voting isn't worth screwing up every other aspect of EVE.
Banderlei Shiiba
SSAP KG
#8 - 2012-04-01 11:37:06 UTC
An overly complicated, player-punishing solution to a problem that isn't even a problem?

Eve-O forums, ladies and gentleman!
Dyvim Slorm
Coven of the Morrigan
#9 - 2012-04-01 12:47:03 UTC
Mostly use mine as cyno alts.

Anyway, there's a good argument that says if I pay for 3 accounts then why shouldn't I have 3 votes.
Drake Draconis
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#10 - 2012-04-01 16:46:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Drake Draconis
Yes...lets break the game in the name of "fair voting for CSM"...great idea.


Not.Roll

================ STOP THE EVEMAIL SPAM! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=78152

Captain Jean-Luc Picard
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#11 - 2012-04-01 19:31:12 UTC
Dyvim Slorm wrote:
Mostly use mine as cyno alts.

Anyway, there's a good argument that says if I pay for 3 accounts then why shouldn't I have 3 votes.



Best arguement so far.
Sephiroth CloneIIV
Brothers of Tyr
Goonswarm Federation
#12 - 2012-04-01 22:59:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Sephiroth Clone VII
just because you are too dumb to use alts don't mean others need to follow.

here are a list of important things alts can do on same account

1. be ceo or in corp that main is not (hold on to that special name, main runs one corp, and is in alliance executor)
2. cyno alts
3. differently trained chars, one industry, one low sp pvp, one massive sp pvp/pve.
4. jita price checker
5. trade alt (trading is a skill that you don't need to be logged in to make isk and using more alts means more orders).
6. Supercap char, or alt to hold on to one (because being locked in a ship realy dampers paying the rest of the game on the same char)
7. anything else that is much less important
8. planetary interaction (even lower SP to max than trading, and can multi-char with it)

If you pay the game like a pro, yes you need alts. if all you do is run level 4s in empire then by all means biomass alts, or shitpost with them.
Tess La'Coil
Messerschmitt Vertrieb und Logistik
#13 - 2012-04-02 08:56:29 UTC  |  Edited by: Tess La'Coil
Uronksur Suth wrote:
Righty Macgee wrote:


People should be able to vote for each of their accounts as the more active accounts they have, the greater the interest in the game they have. Just because you own a 100 shares in a company doesn't mean your vote at the AGM is only counted once, it is counted for all the shares you have. Otherwise you would have the minority share holders dictating what the majority do.


So the people who cannot afford multiple accounts and a system for multiboxing should have fewer votes than those who can? That doesn't seem like a good idea to me, personally.


"cannot afford multiple accounts" you mean people who have more IRL cash, so can pay for more accounts?

You're thinking in the wrong direction and assuming everyone pays for their accounts with RL cash.
The truth in the matter is actually that most efficient players actually don't pay for their accounts with RL cash. They make enough isk in game to pay for the account(s) with PLEX which they buy off the ingame market for isk. Which in return, was seeded by folks that prefer to pay some extra cash not to have to grind/trade/PvE/scam for isk.

If you really want to try to limit the amount of votes someone has in EVE to the amount of actual players I think you've got a tremendous problem.

Also, anyone can make isk to pay for their accounts in-game. Be it though trade/mining/PvE/scamming. So "people who cannot afford multiple accounts" is not really a valid issue. I guess time to play the game and not being bright enough to play the game is a limiting factor.. but strangely I still feel that EVE is already a game for the brighter soles than some of its competitors so I don't think that's really an issue.

Any game I know allows votes per account. Why would EVE be different? Do you really think everyone in goons has 100 accounts? If I'm not mistaken EVE already limits the accounts that are allowed to vote had to be active for about 6months prior to the CSM voting... if you think people are just making bogus accounts to generate an extra vote I can tell you you're wrong.
Someone once said I was a muppet. If that's so, I'm quite sure the Swedish Chef is my brother. 
FloppieTheBanjoClown
Arcana Imperii Ltd.
#14 - 2012-04-02 15:04:48 UTC
Uronksur Suth wrote:
So the people who cannot afford multiple accounts and a system for multiboxing should have fewer votes than those who can?


Yes. As I stated it elsewhere:

FloppieTheBanjoClown wrote:
The CSM represents the subscriber base, not the player base. If I pay $150 a month for 10 accounts (I don't) then I represent a larger portion of CCP's income and it's in their best interest for me to have more representation.

Instead of thinking of it as a democracy, think of it as owning shares in a company. If I own 10% of the shares, I get 10% of the votes when board members are chosen. I get more votes because I've invested more money into the system and I (and the company) have more to lose if things don't go in my interest.

Founding member of the Belligerent Undesirables movement.

Cyprus Black
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#15 - 2012-04-02 21:19:48 UTC
Purchasing multiple accounts for the purpose of vote padding seems a bit far fetched. However alliance CEOs strongly "urging" members to vote for them is far more likely.

But that's the way it goes in EvE. You will never see fair democratic election in EvE in the same way you will never see a fair democratic election in Somalia.

Summary of EvEs last four expansions: http://imgur.com/ZL5SM33