These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Scarlet Letters and Botters

First post First post First post
Author
Muestereate
Minions LLC
#361 - 2012-03-28 23:58:10 UTC
An option to flag them as reported and then mapping them could provide all the targeting info needed. False reporting could be problem and increase CCP workload. maybe three flags. suspected bot, reported bot and verified bot, visible on map
Herping yourDerp
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#362 - 2012-03-29 00:07:58 UTC
why are you protecting bots in any way? many other MMOs deal with bots and RMTs much more effectivly then in eve it seems.

in ace online you cheat or hack a GM forces you to spawn and be insta killed for a few hours then perma bans you and your IP address usually letting everyone in the cheat know(lol)

silk road online makes huge "hey you got banned" lists on their forums


if you cheat in any way(botting is cheating) you should no longer be protected by the EULA or terms of use in any way.


also as i might have said before, i like knowing about stuff in the games i care about if most bots are from russia, or asia, or england, or w/e and most are from X alliance i like to know just to know.
Mariner6
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#363 - 2012-03-29 00:09:29 UTC
CCP has just made it very clear that the issue of banning and such "disciplining" of accounts is supposed to be private and not discussed with the gaming community as a whole. The exception has been this Mittani business.

CCP's words: CCP's banning of the Mittani

So if CCP wants to follow their own EULA, then by putting a "scarlet letter" on people would be a fairly automatic tag saying "look at some point this guy was banned for botting." Not a good idea CCP. What's next a scarlet letter for suicide gankers? A scarlet letter on the Mittani? I mean, where does it stop. So CCP wants to grief players now also?

You all already have a system to id and ban bots with 3 strikes and your out. Good to go.

Now get to fixing my drone boats!
Oxylan
Blood Fanatics
#364 - 2012-03-29 02:37:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Oxylan
I dont understand whole idea (named and shame but still not baned) so you want give to booters chance for play withaut ban and by this way allow boots to mining ore - ice and interfere isk to market? i dont understand ... This sound like we allow booters to delivery ore and minerals to market by booting way ... oh come on i cant understand.

I dont think boots care about name and shame... Ban them at last some warings, if they ignore warnings, prema bans.

If it bleed we can kill it.

cyennajewelz
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#365 - 2012-03-29 03:01:42 UTC
Chokichi Ozuwara wrote:
CCP Sreegs wrote:
But I could argue that there are plenty of other deterrents in place. This one has the additional negative of also providing a disincentive for turning into a Good Guy, which is something we've been trying to prevent.

This is a pipe dream, and you guys keep protecting and trying to reform criminals are doing it at the expense of existing players and future participants in Eve as well.

You know what Facebook does when they take action? No appeal.

Google? No appeal.

The evidence needs to be solid, but if someone is botting, they need to be thrown out of the game because they are potentially ruining the experience for thousands of other players (butterfly effect and all that jazz).


+1 10characters
NurofenMiner
Durin's Folk
#366 - 2012-03-29 03:04:29 UTC
I would love to see Name, shame, and permanent account ban. If you have absolute evidence that the person is using a botting program. or Macro deemed outside of the EULA.

Reason : To verify that CCP is taking an aggressive stance against such behavior.
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#367 - 2012-03-29 07:14:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
Herping yourDerp wrote:
why are you protecting bots in any way? many other MMOs deal with bots and RMTs much more effectivly then in eve it seems.

in ace online you cheat or hack a GM forces you to spawn and be insta killed for a few hours then perma bans you and your IP address usually letting everyone in the cheat know(lol)

silk road online makes huge "hey you got banned" lists on their forums

if you cheat in any way(botting is cheating) you should no longer be protected by the EULA or terms of use in any way.

also as i might have said before, i like knowing about stuff in the games i care about if most bots are from russia, or asia, or england, or w/e and most are from X alliance i like to know just to know.


Bots in other games are much technologically easier to detect. Evidence is evidence.
Depending on game, the bots must use one or more of: certain APIs, the game is much more dynamic so OCR reading is almost impossible, must use DLL injection, many players are constantly around (no secluded 0.0 pockets), the "NAPS" don't exist beyond maybe guild level, the "style" of hotkeys usage may be profiled much easier, some games implement Punkbuster or house made similar software.
Last but not least, the other games usually come with heavily customizable UI, it's incredibly difficult to make a bot adapting to that variety. Only professional RMTers will accept to keep the bland default UI, this helps weeding out the "casuals" (the kind CCP would want to "rescue") from the professionals.

EvE is extremely vulnerable as it's the opposite of many factors above, CCP have to resort using heuristics and manual investigation in less than super blatant cases. This makes the process less reliable, expecially detecting who is the university student botting for his PLEX vs the RMT lords.

Therefore CCP - who want to deal in a fair way - takes the prudent path.
In a costs - benefits analysis, it's smarter to leave a couple bots uncatched or mildly banning some innocents vs immediate and direct public execution on a stake of whoever triggers a suspicious behavior.

Just look at the last days threads. They are hysteria and vengeance and hate induced, when all what was needed were calls for EULA enforcing / bringing up a case.
Avila Cracko
#368 - 2012-03-31 13:59:30 UTC
@ CCP Sreegs

We would like your thoughts on all this.

truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth.

Nephilius
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#369 - 2012-03-31 14:10:00 UTC
Terminal Insanity wrote:
Name and Shame. Do it!

Bot/Macros are fairly predictable, and once you observe them in action it becomes reasonably easy to gank them. If you identify botters, it would make vigilante justice easier, and players would know who to keep an eye on. I bet many of them are repeat offenders.

It would also act as a deterrent. Getting your account permanently marked as a 'cheater/botter' would allow us to avoid trading with those who have obtained their isk illegitimately.

It would also be useful for recruitment screening, helping to keep our corps bot-free.


I can't say it better than this fine gentleman here, so I'm gonna quote him.

Do it CCP.
"If."
Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient
Electus Matari
#370 - 2012-03-31 14:10:55 UTC
Probably been mentioned already, but as NRDS the ability to set them red without having to duplicate the intel effort would be nice.
Wodensun
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#371 - 2012-03-31 14:18:01 UTC
While some of the ideas put forward are really good you have to keep in mind the botting scene and how it works.

These Scarlet letters will only force them to create bots that are much harder to detect which will turn this into a arms race, see Vxers VS the anti virus industry. As long as people do RMT there will be a incentive for these guys to continue and since it involves real mony you can bet your ass they will respond by evolving their tactics to counter what CCP is doing and these guys are /VERY/ creative coders.

Do not give me likes them 101 likes arent a accident...

Darod Zyree
Doomheim
#372 - 2012-03-31 14:28:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Darod Zyree
CCP Sreegs wrote:
Ohh Yeah wrote:
CCP Sreegs wrote:

Being familiar with how things work you know I'd just make a corp and publish the info using some really cool API app. :(

I agree with the spirit but the devil is in the implementation.


I don't mean that CEOs should be able to pop open someone's info and see their strikes.

I mean that when a player puts in their application to a corporation, the server checks for strikes, and if strikes exist, they are mentioned as a warning in the application management interface for the corp CEO/Directors.

The only time that a marked player would be standing on the gallows in the rain like Hester Prynne is when they put in their application to a specific corporation.

I'm not familiar with the current API, but I don't believe any fancy API apps currently allow you to see strikes against an account, so I assume that information is not publicly available.

If you you get what I'm saying.

Edit:


CCP Sreegs wrote:

So the flag would only be available upon application and not just generally to all CEOs? I may have missed that and this intrigues me.



Yeah, that's exactly the idea.


Yeah this now makes a buttload (sorry for the foul language) more sense. BUT LET'S NOT STOP HERE FOLKS



Hello, if it has not been mentioned already:
- Being able to see if someone was flagged for botting at some point in time during an application to ones corporation is important, but i would also like to see if anyone currently in my corporation has been flagged while being in my corporation.

People going on a leave for a few weeks is no exception. "Yeah I'll be on vacation for a month or so but will be back after that" (read: person has gotten 1st or 2nd strike banning term)
Padme Amidala Naberrie
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#373 - 2012-03-31 14:58:30 UTC  |  Edited by: Padme Amidala Naberrie
I would like to add my approval to naming and shaming botters.

RMT, as we are seeing from what is happening with PL today, is a curse on this game and botting is one of the major ways this is implemented.

So name them, shame them and let us gank them! :)

PAN

EDIT: It would be great if we could tie in the named and shamed botters to Hulkageddon by prioritising macro miners for ganking. Blink
bornaa
GRiD.
#374 - 2012-03-31 15:51:53 UTC
We want names...
We want to know with who we are dealing with.
[Yes, I'm an Amateur](http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hRa-69uBmIw&feature=relmfu)
Heredom
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#375 - 2012-03-31 16:06:20 UTC
CCP Sreegs wrote:
Hello wonderful Internet Spaceship Pilots!!!!!

Though not all of you have seen my presentation last Friday at this point I have some time to kill so I'd like to get this conversation started that I not only promised, but that I'm really looking forward to.

In some of my past dev blogs and conversations with players it's been mentioned by a number of you that you'd like botters identified publicly. As you will eventually see from my presentation once it's posted, I'm not entirely convinced that this has any real tangible benefit to you as a player in any respect other than as a tool to implement the metagame.

I'm also not convinced that it's a worthless pursuit so what I'd like to see from you, the players, is a discussion regarding how you feel about this and I'm hoping to see some really cool ideas.

If I'm forced to frame it as a question I'd like answered I think I'd frame it as "What would you, the player, stand to benefit from being able to identify which characters had ever been caught botting, whether or not they were still engaging in this activity?"

Please try to stay on topic. If this thread gets garbaged (Sarah Palin License to invent words) then we'll clean it but I'd rather we just stick to the topic and provide some really good input personally.

DISCUSS!

:)

Done, signature edited with perfection!...

Sirion Fujiwara
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#376 - 2012-03-31 16:09:22 UTC

Make them 'Flashy Scarlet' on my overview and in Local channel.
Increase their signature radius by 1000% for a year.
Make Concord look the other way when I pod them.

Possibly add bounties. At least then the phenomenon of botting ends up benefitting more people.... P
Heredom
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#377 - 2012-03-31 16:17:46 UTC
CCP Sreegs wrote:

"What would you, the player, stand to benefit from being able to identify which characters had ever been caught botting, whether or not they were still engaging in this activity?"

DISCUSS!

:)


Flag them, and give the sandbox capabilities of healing itself like an organic entity.

1st strike- Botter get flagged and Concord puts bounty (isk AND LPs) on toon, relaying intel of its whereabouts. Players hunt botter, receive ISK and LPs. Botter gets its Skills reset to the same level of a new playes, account Assets are taken by Concord, toon remains flagged for 6 months and part of a "Concord Penal Recovery Services" NPC for the same period. If during that time nothing happens, toon is released to become a normal player.

2nd strike- Same as first with escalation to direct associates (toons that received isk/asset transfer, including via bounties placed by botting toon and direct associate), group SP reset, 1 year in "Concord Penal Recovery Services".

3rd strike- Biomass

Done, signature edited with perfection!...

Hroya
#378 - 2012-03-31 16:26:48 UTC
I dont believe in redemption for botters. Burn them to hell and let them rot in the **** they dug themselves in.

It is up to CCP to change the gameplay that lets people able to bot their way through it.
Those people knowingly and willfully decided to not play the game as it was intended to.

If you want to redeem yourself then change your ways in your next game. GTFO, i (and maybe others aswell) dont want your kind here.
Botting should be a zero tolerance policy, not a source of endless resources thrown against it in order to hopefully keep that precious accaunt active. All the resources put into this endevour would be better spend on actuall gameplay/content/fixes.

You go your corridor but.

Padme Amidala Naberrie
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#379 - 2012-03-31 16:31:30 UTC
Hroya wrote:
I dont believe in redemption for botters. Burn them to hell and let them rot in the **** they dug themselves in.

It is up to CCP to change the gameplay that lets people able to bot their way through it.
Those people knowingly and willfully decided to not play the game as it was intended to.

If you want to redeem yourself then change your ways in your next game. GTFO, i (and maybe others aswell) dont want your kind here.
Botting should be a zero tolerance policy, not a source of endless resources thrown against it in order to hopefully keep that precious accaunt active. All the resources put into this endevour would be better spend on actuall gameplay/content/fixes.



True but it would also be great fun for those of us that want to to be able to make the life of botters - be they macro miners, ratters or other botters - non-viable because they would be ganked every time they undocked.

PAN
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#380 - 2012-03-31 16:42:36 UTC
Darod Zyree wrote:
People going on a leave for a few weeks is no exception. "Yeah I'll be on vacation for a month or so but will be back after that" (read: person has gotten 1st or 2nd strike banning term)


How can they tell you they'll take 1 month vacation? It's not like CCP sends them a perfumed letter with a "tomorrow we ban you" message P


Heredom wrote:
CCP Sreegs wrote:

"What would you, the player, stand to benefit from being able to identify which characters had ever been caught botting, whether or not they were still engaging in this activity?"

DISCUSS!

:)


Flag them, and give the sandbox capabilities of healing itself like an organic entity.

1st strike- Botter get flagged and Concord puts bounty (isk AND LPs) on toon, relaying intel of its whereabouts. Players hunt botter, receive ISK and LPs. Botter gets its Skills reset to the same level of a new playes, account Assets are taken by Concord, toon remains flagged for 6 months and part of a "Concord Penal Recovery Services" NPC for the same period. If during that time nothing happens, toon is released to become a normal player.

2nd strike- Same as first with escalation to direct associates (toons that received isk/asset transfer, including via bounties placed by botting toon and direct associate), group SP reset, 1 year in "Concord Penal Recovery Services".

3rd strike- Biomass



Your and many other suggestions are just contrary of CCP banning politic.

With your approach, nobody would ever care to keep playing those super-mega hammered-made-useless characters.

You may as well setup a "1 strike => perma ban" and be done with it.


In that case, I'll be there laughing hard when you'll get randomly picked by an heuristics algorithm and you'll taste your own medicine.