These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

My Apology

First post First post
Author
Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient
Electus Matari
#4661 - 2012-03-31 08:33:21 UTC
I absolutely do not condone real-life threats - I do not even condone bashing an individual player in order to make them feel like ****, even when they deserve it.

That said, you have to wonder at the Goons. Did you guys really think that if you spend years encouraging people to be meaner and meaner to each other, to the point where you publish people's evemails where they speak of being RL suicidal, you suddenly get to be surprised and indignant when someone goes further than you think is acceptable? Yes, it is unacceptable that someone is threatened in RL for the game. But you have yourself continuously encouraged a playing style the purpose of which is to make people feel like **** for real, and you have never explicitly spoken of the limits you set to that. People are people; if you build a culture that celebrates bringing out the worse in them, they will go further than you'd like.

I hope you think about that internally: how can you keep on encouraging the play-style you prefer while making sure people you encourage will know where your limits go. Because, unfortunately, what is self-evident to you will not be self-evident to everyone, and you have thousands of people in your organization and thousands more listening to what you say the game should be like. If you keep on encouraging a culture where there is competition about who can make someone cry the most, these things will happen again and again. It might not be your fault - obviously it is no one's fault in the end but the person's who makes the threat - but it is partly a result of the culture you encourage. And you cannot change the people, but you can change how you talk to them.
Grant Wyberious
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#4662 - 2012-03-31 08:35:39 UTC  |  Edited by: Grant Wyberious
Elsebeth Rhiannon wrote:
I absolutely do not condone real-life threats - I do not even condone bashing an individual player in order to make them feel like ****, even when they deserve it.

That said, you have to wonder at the Goons. Did you guys really think that if you spend years encouraging people to be meaner and meaner to each other, to the point where you publish people's evemails where they speak of being RL suicidal, you suddenly get to be surprised and indignant when someone goes further than you think is acceptable? Yes, it is unacceptable that someone is threatened in RL for the game. But you have yourself continuously encouraged a playing style the purpose of which is to make people feel like **** for real, and you have never explicitly spoken of the limits you set to that. People are people; if you build a culture that celebrates bringing out the worse in them, they will go further than you'd like.

I hope you think about that internally: how can you keep on encouraging the play-style you prefer while making sure people you encourage will know where your limits go. Because, unfortunately, what is self-evident to you will not be self-evident to everyone, and you have thousands of people in your organization and thousands more listening to what you say the game should be like. If you keep on encouraging a culture where there is competition about who can make someone cry the most, these things will happen again and again. It might not be your fault - obviously it is no one's fault in the end but the person's who makes the threat - but it is partly a result of the culture you encourage. And you cannot change the people, but you can change how you talk to them.
He also posted this in the other thread

Quote:
Disclaimer: I absolutely do not approve of threatening anyone in RL, not even "as a joke", and hope anyone who does anything like that gets permabanned immediately, I do not even approve of pointing and laughing at people in the game in order to make them bad in RL, and I do not approve of the recent Mittani-bashing threads that have popped up. Any behavior the sole purpose of which is to "harvest tears" (and those are always RL tears, no matter how much you say "it is just a game") is deplorable, regardless of target and how much they deserve it.

But that said, a Goon asking "Is this what Eve Online has degraded to?" is mind-boggling. You folks have tried for years to deliberately degrade EVE, to make it about pointing and laughing, and you have stepped across civil behavior lines repeatedly by e.g. circulating private evemail from people who appear RL hurt, even suicidal. How can you now be indignant that you have actually succeeded, and beyond what you hoped? Did you honestly think that if you encourage human beings to bring out the worst in themselves and go further and further in being tough assholes, you suddenly can stop the development when it suits you? Did you honestly think that when you feel that things are now assholish enough, people will telepathically notice and stop going further?

That's not how it works. If you encourage people to "ruin the game for you", "harvest tears", "make them ragequit", etc, it will become a competition in which someone will always go one step further. Maybe in your head there always was a limit to it. Maybe you believed that people knew what it was. But people are not like that. If you encourage them to be mean, they will be mean. And some day they might very well be meaner than you liked. "I never meant it to go this far" won't help then, if you never explicitly spoke of the limits or encouraged a culture where it was ok to admit that well, really, we are not such bad guys, I really did feel bad blowing up that ship.

As sad as it is, you lie in the bed you made.
Which he was trying to justify that Mittani deserves the threat against his wife because he leads the alliance which have done many bad INGAME stuff to pubbies.
Kalathia Eginald
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#4663 - 2012-03-31 12:44:34 UTC
Hamshoe wrote:
Ai Shun wrote:
Kalathia Eginald wrote:
Enough is enough now. Time to move onto something different.


They are not going to let it go. No matter that apologies have been made,...


"I was really drunk at the time" stops being a sincere apology at about age 16. It's an attempt at an excuse.


Regardless of whether we do or do not see the appology as sincere he has been sanctioned for his behaviour that is why a line now needs to be drawn under it. As it is all that is going to happen is that people are going round and round in circles even more than before.
Jaroslav Unwanted
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#4664 - 2012-03-31 13:07:07 UTC
As i see it. The whole show was under the stamp of "acting". You have had your presentation ready, you had your direction and you were doing it right.

The whole society which found it repulsive, or funny, or interesting .. is on their back as an receiving audience to form such opinions, and that is what it actually is. Just an opinion.

I dont blame some actors in an "psycho" movie for deliberately torturing small kids, why would i. So i dont blame you for saying what you said, why should i.

I found it ridiculous and that is my opinion.

See also internet anonymity,
I can make **** up too about how horrible i feel and that you runied my life. Why because i would assume that my self-pitty is contagious, but i found earlier on that my self-pitty is pathetic and i despite myself as an living creature with no future. Cool
Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient
Electus Matari
#4665 - 2012-03-31 13:32:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Elsebeth Rhiannon
Grant Wyberious wrote:
Which he was trying to justify that Mittani deserves the threat against his wife because he leads the alliance which have done many bad INGAME stuff to pubbies.

She. And no, I am not trying to justify the threat. It is a ******* criminal thing to do and I hope the guy who did it will go to court for it and that he (including all his alts, present and future) is already permabanned from the game. I don't care what Mittani did, nothing he could have done would justify it.

If you read other things I have written, you will also see that I strongly disapprove of the continuous Mittani-bashing threads that creep up. He did a stupid thing, yes, but there was an apology and there were official consequences and that's it, we should all leave him (and his family, though that should be obvious) alone and talk about whether there is something for the rest of us to learn from this.

This is how it goes:
- Goons blowing a guys ship up does not make it ok for him to threaten with suicide in order to make them stop
- him threatening with suicide does not make it ok for goons to point and laugh, let alone for Mittani doing so in public
- Mittani doing so does not make it ok for other people to bash him in public any way they like
- Mittani's action or the bashing does not make it ok for someone to take it a step further and threaten his family.
In other words, "he started it" cannot justify escalation of RL hurt.

But if we create an environment where we admire people for making other people cry, even though we think everyone sane knows where the limit is, problem is that there's a lot of people in EVE who cannot be described by "sane". If hurting other people is seen as a glorious thing, some nutcase will step over the line. It is not our fault (it is his fault, obviously), but still the culture we create affects the chances of it happening. I think we all, including and especially the goons, need to back off from the celebration of making other people hurt, and start treating that only as an inevitable consequence ("acceptable collateral" so to speak) of spaceships exploding. If you see the difference? I am not suggesting we make EVE so that no one ever gets upset over it - because if we do, it will stop being fun. We have to openly accept that. But that's where it should, in my opinion, stop.

But to stress this again: only the person who made the threat is guilty of making it. He cannot justify it by blaming the culture or whatever. He's out of this discussion and he should stay there; by that action he has completely forfeited his right to say anything about this at all. He's not part of this community anymore, while both the tear-harvest-celebrating goons and us who oppose that are. We can have a discussion about this. He can **** off.
Asuri Kinnes
Perkone
Caldari State
#4666 - 2012-03-31 14:05:10 UTC
Elsebeth Rhiannon wrote:
But to stress this again: only the person who made the threat is guilty of making it. He cannot justify it by blaming the culture or whatever. He's out of this discussion and he should stay there; by that action he has completely forfeited his right to say anything about this at all. He's not part of this community anymore, while both the tear-harvest-celebrating goons and us who oppose that are. We can have a discussion about this. He can **** off.

RL threats should = no mercy.

I haven't kept up with this thread (who could?).

Anyone who threatens anyones family irl over this (or over this game) needs help.

Bob is the god of Wormholes.

That's all you need to know.

Zoo Ologist
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#4667 - 2012-03-31 14:18:07 UTC
Daylen Drazzi wrote:
Zoo Ologist, your violation of the Eve Online Terms of Service requires that I petition for your account to be banned. I expect CCP to take firm measures to protect The Mittani's personal information and make examples of every individual who violates the Terms of Service, regardless of intent.

"19. You may not communicate, post or publicize any subscriber’s personal information within the EVE Online game world or website."



Given that the person/character in question posted the same information in this thread's initial post I am sure CCP would love you to waste their time with a redundant petition. Or was that just a worse than average attempt at trolling?
Sophia Bomba
Perkone
Caldari State
#4668 - 2012-03-31 14:32:37 UTC
Hopefully next year the CSM will be able to hold their alcohol and not make the panel look like a complete joke.
MoyO zOlotse
State War Academy
Caldari State
#4669 - 2012-03-31 14:38:16 UTC
Smittens with himself is a real loser piece of work for bringing his real life wife into it.

What kind of man subjects his family to this community? This is just one big goon laugh.

These people are mentally sick and its a disservice to call them people. Now they are urging the non-apoligizing smug one to get a gun and go kill people?

Do you low life human garbage goons know no bounds?

Lets be honest everybody. This is all a game to the goons. None of it is real. Stage acting. Manufactered drama for internet lulz and bring the focus off of their stupidity.

Smuttens is so obsessed with the game hes energizing his troops as we speak. I dont know what much a bunch of rock head window lickers can do, but apparently they can do bad stuff in Jita.

To smittens withself and crew, just own up to your mistakes. You messed up. Not the guy you brought the hammer down on. Just shut up, sit down, and take your medicine like a good little boy.

You are just a terrible person for bring real life into this. But isnt that what being a goon is all about? Lieing, cheating, stealing, manipulating, laughing at the misery of others. Sounds like you are jealous goon who is jelly without his little toast.

Don't CSM what you can't afford to loser.

Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient
Electus Matari
#4670 - 2012-03-31 14:43:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Elsebeth Rhiannon
Quote:
Smittens with himself is a real loser piece of work for bringing his real life wife into it.
What kind of man subjects his family to this community?

What?!

FYI, I am someone's wife. So are a bunch of other players. To your real shock, there probably are someone's unmarried daughters in the game too.

Roll
Richard Aiel
The Merchants of War
#4671 - 2012-03-31 14:46:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Richard Aiel
Asuri Kinnes wrote:
Elsebeth Rhiannon wrote:
But to stress this again: only the person who made the threat is guilty of making it. He cannot justify it by blaming the culture or whatever. He's out of this discussion and he should stay there; by that action he has completely forfeited his right to say anything about this at all. He's not part of this community anymore, while both the tear-harvest-celebrating goons and us who oppose that are. We can have a discussion about this. He can **** off.

RL threats should = no mercy.

I haven't kept up with this thread (who could?).

Anyone who threatens anyones family irl over this (or over this game) needs help.


Or tries to get someone to commit suicide IRL

Hey I got a question, if he HAD done it, would Mittens have gotten a sixty day and get to brag he got his first IRL pod?

Cause thats the attitude I smell wafting off the bees.

Got another question, is he permabanned from the CSM or will he just be landslide voted into CSM8?

http://i144.photobucket.com/albums/r188/buddahcjcc/SOA-3-2.jpg

Daylen Drazzi
Perkone
Caldari State
#4672 - 2012-03-31 15:00:57 UTC
Richard Aiel wrote:
Got another question, is he permabanned from the CSM or will he just be landslide voted into CSM8?


We don't really have any plans at present for the next CSM, but rumor is that instead of having one person win in a landslide, we're going to run enough people to give us 3 or 4 representatives on CSM8 - at that point we pretty much control the CSM and the Chairman's spot when our allies get their representatives voted in as well. There are a ton of vote-buying schemes in the works, and if that doesn't pan out there's always pure intimidation and destruction - these seem to be the most popular ideas floated so far.
Sirion Fujiwara
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#4673 - 2012-03-31 15:50:55 UTC
Andramedae wrote:
Biggest load of BS this side of Jita.

You knew exactly what you were saying and using the drunks defence just proves that you are not the person you say you are. Not withstanding the ra-ra crowds and your own utterences, Mr Alex Gianturco, you have shown by your actions exactly what sort of person you in fact are - one that is much, much closer to your on screen persona than you would like people to think.

I sincerely hope that someone in the jurisdiction where you live lodges a formal complain against you with the bar association. It's horrible to think that someone in your position actively pushes for the suicide of someone in a public forum, irrespective of the circumstances, your personal situation nor the context.

I so hope they burn you a new one.


+1

What he did was absolutely premeditated (it was in the slide show that had been sent to CCP!), so all his excuses are just a rather weasly and pathetic attempt to wriggle out of this mess that his over-inflated ego has landed him in. Can't believe that sociopath was allowed to become a lawyer.

Alex - quit EVE and never come back! Better for everyone - not least yourself.
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#4674 - 2012-03-31 16:24:53 UTC
Daylen Drazzi wrote:
Richard Aiel wrote:
Got another question, is he permabanned from the CSM or will he just be landslide voted into CSM8?


We don't really have any plans at present for the next CSM, but rumor is that instead of having one person win in a landslide, we're going to run enough people to give us 3 or 4 representatives on CSM8 - at that point we pretty much control the CSM and the Chairman's spot when our allies get their representatives voted in as well. There are a ton of vote-buying schemes in the works, and if that doesn't pan out there's always pure intimidation and destruction - these seem to be the most popular ideas floated so far.

Care to elaborate on these vote-buying schemes?
Dyner
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#4675 - 2012-03-31 16:53:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Dyner
Sirion Fujiwara wrote:
Andramedae wrote:
Biggest load of BS this side of Jita.

You knew exactly what you were saying and using the drunks defence just proves that you are not the person you say you are. Not withstanding the ra-ra crowds and your own utterences, Mr Alex Gianturco, you have shown by your actions exactly what sort of person you in fact are - one that is much, much closer to your on screen persona than you would like people to think.

I sincerely hope that someone in the jurisdiction where you live lodges a formal complain against you with the bar association. It's horrible to think that someone in your position actively pushes for the suicide of someone in a public forum, irrespective of the circumstances, your personal situation nor the context.

I so hope they burn you a new one.


+1

What he did was absolutely premeditated (it was in the slide show that had been sent to CCP!), so all his excuses are just a rather weasly and pathetic attempt to wriggle out of this mess that his over-inflated ego has landed him in. Can't believe that sociopath was allowed to become a lawyer.

Alex - quit EVE and never come back! Better for everyone - not least yourself.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7Ki91U-mBE
1:02:00

When does Mittens mention his name? Oh that's right, during the "Q&A". Not once is the dude's character name stated before that.

So, ya, "CCP knew!" To that I say...WATCH THE ******* VIDEO. It was after the slide show that the name was revealed, NOT DURING.


//Edit

And for the untold number of times. He doesn't use the "i was drunk" excuse.


--But, I suppose it's more fun to smudge up the facts so it's more sensational. Roll
Sirion Fujiwara
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#4676 - 2012-03-31 17:01:57 UTC
Dyner wrote:
Sirion Fujiwara wrote:
Andramedae wrote:
Biggest load of BS this side of Jita.

You knew exactly what you were saying and using the drunks defence just proves that you are not the person you say you are. Not withstanding the ra-ra crowds and your own utterences, Mr Alex Gianturco, you have shown by your actions exactly what sort of person you in fact are - one that is much, much closer to your on screen persona than you would like people to think.

I sincerely hope that someone in the jurisdiction where you live lodges a formal complain against you with the bar association. It's horrible to think that someone in your position actively pushes for the suicide of someone in a public forum, irrespective of the circumstances, your personal situation nor the context.

I so hope they burn you a new one.


+1

What he did was absolutely premeditated (it was in the slide show that had been sent to CCP!), so all his excuses are just a rather weasly and pathetic attempt to wriggle out of this mess that his over-inflated ego has landed him in. Can't believe that sociopath was allowed to become a lawyer.

Alex - quit EVE and never come back! Better for everyone - not least yourself.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E7Ki91U-mBE
1:02:00

When does Mittens mention his name? Oh that's right, during the "Q&A". Not once is the dude's character name stated before that.

So, ya, "CCP knew!" To that I say...WATCH THE ******* VIDEO. It was after the slide show that the name was revealed, NOT DURING.


//Edit

And for the untold number of times. He doesn't use the "i was drunk" excuse.


--But, I suppose it's more fun to smudge up the facts so it's more sensational. Roll


Dude, your nose is so brown it is embarrassing Shocked
Look at the image he posted on his blog. 'nuf said...
Here!

He is obviously (and rather pathetically) trying to use his little causality chain to imply that "it was alchohol's fault".
What a joke this guy is!
Dyner
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#4677 - 2012-03-31 17:26:13 UTC
Sirion Fujiwara wrote:


Dude, your nose is so brown it is embarrassing Shocked
Look at the image he posted on his blog. 'nuf said...
Here!

He is obviously (and rather pathetically) trying to use his little causality chain to imply that "it was alchohol's fault".
What a joke this guy is!



Oh, I see, because someone other than Mittens posts that Mittens breached the EULA due to alcohol, it's automatically Mitten's claiming booze made him do it.


┌─┐
┴─┴
ಠ_ರೃ*huff huff* Hmmm, Quite *huff huff*
Richard Aiel
The Merchants of War
#4678 - 2012-03-31 18:00:33 UTC
Daylen Drazzi wrote:
Richard Aiel wrote:
Got another question, is he permabanned from the CSM or will he just be landslide voted into CSM8?


We don't really have any plans at present for the next CSM, but rumor is that instead of having one person win in a landslide, we're going to run enough people to give us 3 or 4 representatives on CSM8 - at that point we pretty much control the CSM and the Chairman's spot when our allies get their representatives voted in as well. There are a ton of vote-buying schemes in the works, and if that doesn't pan out there's always pure intimidation and destruction - these seem to be the most popular ideas floated so far.


Hell in thaqt case run every chair. Its not like you guys dont have enough total votes to own the whole thing. And its not like CCP listens to the whiners about stuff like that, though the forum tears from a full Goon CSM would be amazing

http://i144.photobucket.com/albums/r188/buddahcjcc/SOA-3-2.jpg

Elsebeth Rhiannon
Gradient
Electus Matari
#4679 - 2012-03-31 18:07:48 UTC
Richard Aiel wrote:
Got another question, is he permabanned from the CSM or will he just be landslide voted into CSM8?

"As per our policies, this candidate may be eligible to run at a later date subject to candidacy review." (The devblog about the CCP resolution.)

So they did not really take a stance yet, they just said he can put himself up for the review.
Sir Marksalot
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#4680 - 2012-03-31 18:08:41 UTC
so many very very angry alts~