These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Warfare & Tactics

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

Wardec Responsibilities - A Practical Example

Author
Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#21 - 2011-09-25 22:46:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Poetic Stanziel
Double post (due to Eve Gate screwiness.)
The Apostle
Doomheim
#22 - 2011-09-25 22:53:49 UTC  |  Edited by: The Apostle
I've tried very hard to deduce from this well-written article that something is terribly wrong. What I saw was a bitter, "They didn't fight the way we wanted or expected" post.

In fact, I saw this whole post as nothing more than a personal blog post crying for some clicks. Do we REALLY need to bring these bitter and personal rants into this public forum?

Really. It's Eve. If no rules were broken, how people fight/not fight etc. is all part of the game. And more besides, war is not and never was "honorable".

"He who wins, wins."
The Apostle circa 2011

My advice, since empire antics seems not for you, take your crew into 0.0 for awhile. No war decs are neccessary so there's no costs involved. Goodfights are guaranteed.

Blog about THAT and I'll be happy to read all about 'em.

[i]Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo![/i]

Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#23 - 2011-09-25 22:57:16 UTC
The Apostle wrote:
I've tried very hard to deduce from this well-written article that something is terribly wrong. What I saw was a bitter, "They didn't fight the way we wanted or expected" post.

In fact, I saw this whole post as nothing more than a personal blog post crying for some clicks. Do we REALLY need to bring these bitter and personal rants into this public forum?

I find EVE University's hypocrisy interesting. Everything that went wrong in the RvB wardec is stuff that the Uni complains about all the time. Not too mention, the Uni wanted some real, yet when the wars turned all too real, they slammed the door on them.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#24 - 2011-09-25 23:02:09 UTC
Kelduum Revaan wrote:
- The "DecShield thing" was never declared an exploit
BS.
GM Nythanos wrote:
For #2, Using alt corps to increase the cost of wars against your corporation or alliance is prohibited.
…that is pretty much as declarative as it gets.
Kelduum Revaan wrote:
- I'm, not aware of CCP changing their policy for anything
If it is suddenly no longer prohibited to use alt corps to increase the cost of wars against your corporation, then they have changed their policy.
Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#25 - 2011-09-25 23:07:15 UTC
Tippia wrote:
Kelduum Revaan wrote:
- The "DecShield thing" was never declared an exploit
BS.
GM Nythanos wrote:
For #2, Using alt corps to increase the cost of wars against your corporation or alliance is prohibited.
…that is pretty much as declarative as it gets.
Kelduum Revaan wrote:
- I'm, not aware of CCP changing their policy for anything
If it is suddenly no longer prohibited to use alt corps to increase the cost of wars against your corporation, then they have changed their policy.

Kelduum twists the truth constantly (he's hoping no one had those links still.) His job is to put EVE University in a good light, to steer it well away from any controversy it has been or currently is involved in.

Don't let Kelduum fool you. He was involved with CCP in getting that policy changed, since it was a benefit for EVE University to have a decshield (and what is good for EVE University, is good for new player retention.) Kelduum is in contact with various CCP Devs and GMs rather frequently (he tends to brag about it in non-specific terms on Mumble quite a lot.)
Vin Hellsing
#26 - 2011-09-25 23:08:59 UTC
Kelduum Revaan wrote:
Oh, and actual tl;dr while I'm here:

E-UNI decs RvB and ADOPT, some people dec E-UNI. Much fun is had, with many many explosions and something like 30 billion ISK in total kills so far.

RvB, ADOPT and some others decide to bash the Uni POS to provoke a massive fight, but take ages to get organised, suggesting it has been cancelled, and E-UNI then takes the fleet and everyone they can get to go help Chribba instead.

POS gets bashed, not knowing what the intentions are, and unable to contact anyone, E-UNI retracts wars. POS is repaired back to 100% in 38 min, and >200 members get live class on POS mechanics.

After finding out what was going on, E-UNI still <3 RvB and ADOPT, despite them not letting us know what the intention was and taking ages to form their fleet, and will arrange more pew-pew with them later on.



I'm still annoyed that EVE Uni has no provisions or policies in place regarding people who are Hearing Impaired and therefore unable to participate in said 'live' classes. I'd appreciate it if you could talk to me about that sometime.
Mystic5hadow
Koku Uchu Industries
#27 - 2011-09-25 23:09:05 UTC
TL;DR - E-UNI got butthurt mad that we stomped on their POS a bit, so they retracted the war dec.
tgl3
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#28 - 2011-09-25 23:21:51 UTC
As the writer of one of the blog posts linked in this thread (HI MOM!), I'd like to just state that while Uni pulling the dec was a knee-jerk reaction, it was a suitable one. I fully agree with Poetic that it was a bit of a "oh **** what have we done pull the plug" kind of thing, but I can hardly blame Uni for it. A lot of corps would have done similar things and Uni simply had poor intel on the current ongoings and reacted appropriately, as Kelduum stated at the bottom of the first page of this thread.

RvB and Adopt are both at fault too in that our expectations for a massive fleet brawl once the POS came out of reinforced were simply not conveyed to Uni in any way. Naturally, it's often a "bad move" to inform your enemy that you're planning something, so I think this is a bit of a "meh" issue.

Now, if we look at the other situations addressed in Poetics post we encounter the "Uni never going to RvB/Adopt" issue. I've semi-raged about this in my blog post linked further up in the thread and while I don't agree with the move (or lack thereof) what they did was reasonable considering the number of corporations at war with them. I'm not happy about it, but that doesn't make it less reasonable.

If anyone is looking for further reading into discussions surrounding the POS Bash night, RvB and Uni members have been talking here on the EVE Uni forums and, afaik, butthurt has been (mostly) resolved.

Was what Uni did "right"? In my opinion no, but their reasons and intentions were sound. Limited intel will never produce good results and this was such a case.

tl;dr I am pretty pissed that Uni did what they did, but I can now see the reasons behind it.

I will say that this whole week has given me some very interesting reading and that I really need to buy more popcorn for browsing forums.
Taedrin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#29 - 2011-09-25 23:33:51 UTC
Poetic Stanziel wrote:
Tippia wrote:
Kelduum Revaan wrote:
- The "DecShield thing" was never declared an exploit
BS.
GM Nythanos wrote:
For #2, Using alt corps to increase the cost of wars against your corporation or alliance is prohibited.
…that is pretty much as declarative as it gets.
Kelduum Revaan wrote:
- I'm, not aware of CCP changing their policy for anything
If it is suddenly no longer prohibited to use alt corps to increase the cost of wars against your corporation, then they have changed their policy.

Kelduum twists the truth constantly (he's hoping no one had those links still.) His job is to put EVE University in a good light, to steer it well away from any controversy it has been or currently is involved in.

Don't let Kelduum fool you. He was involved with CCP in getting that policy changed, since it was a benefit for EVE University to have a decshield (and what is good for EVE University, is good for new player retention.) Kelduum is in contact with various CCP Devs and GMs rather frequently (he tends to brag about it in non-specific terms on Mumble quite a lot.)


I'm sorry, but it seems to me that you are guilty of the exact same crime that you acuse Kelduum of here with regards to propaganda.


In EVE, anything goes.

This includes breaking any unwritten understanding about a POS being off limits, along with suddenly backing down from a war dec when the other side does something you don't like.

Now, as for the "dec shield" incident, I seem to recall that CCP was quite adamant that using alt corps to artificially inflate war dec costs was officially deemed an exploit. If CCP changed their policy with regards to this, I would be quite irate about this as it would be similar to CCP deciding that the Imune alliance isn't an exploit after all.
tgl3
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#30 - 2011-09-25 23:38:47 UTC
Taedrin wrote:


This includes breaking any unwritten understanding about a POS being off limits


The RvB leadership involved with the POS Bash were never informed that the POS was off limits. In fact it was our understanding it was put into DIckstar mode precisely because it was still fair game.
Kitty McKitty
In Praise Of Shadows
#31 - 2011-09-25 23:40:00 UTC
Fascinating

Haviing your portrait painted here helps INTAKI Disabled Children ♥

Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#32 - 2011-09-25 23:57:38 UTC
Taedrin wrote:
I'm sorry, but it seems to me that you are guilty of the exact same crime that you acuse Kelduum of here with regards to propaganda.

Of course. :) It's up to you to decide who's propaganda is closer to the truth. With respect to decshields, for instance, a number of people besides me, have already pointed out that Kel has been spinning complete b.s.,

EVE University is fascinating. I like pointing out their hypocrisy. I did it while I was a member and I do it while I'm not. My writing on EVE University has not changed much (the tone has become a tad more aggressive, perhaps.)
Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#33 - 2011-09-26 00:01:30 UTC
tgl3 wrote:
I fully agree with Poetic that it was a bit of a "oh **** what have we done pull the plug" kind of thing, but I can hardly blame Uni for it.

Agreed. I just find it annoying that they are trying to spin it into something where the blame for what happened falls squarely on RvB. I don't think you guys did a single thing wrong. You attacked the POS when it was advantageous to you guys. You were under no obligation to inform the Uni of the attack. If they couldn't leave Chribba's little nullsec system to head back to defend, then that is their problem.

Perhaps they shouldn't have thrown all their eggs into Chribba's basket and kept a fleet in reserve to guerilla attack your POS bashing, until the full fleet could return.
The Apostle
Doomheim
#34 - 2011-09-26 00:06:29 UTC
This topic has been moved to Eve-Uni forums.

[i]Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo![/i]

Taedrin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#35 - 2011-09-26 00:19:22 UTC
tgl3 wrote:
Taedrin wrote:


This includes breaking any unwritten understanding about a POS being off limits


The RvB leadership involved with the POS Bash were never informed that the POS was off limits. In fact it was our understanding it was put into DIckstar mode precisely because it was still fair game.


Hence the difficulties surrounding "unwritten understandings". I have no idea what sort of communication occurred between RvB and EVE Uni. IMO, unless there was an explicit communication forbidding the destruction of POS structures then RvB is in the 'moral' clear - at least as far as EVE morals go. Likewise, so long as there was no explicit communication promising that EVE Uni would never withdraw the dec, then EVE Uni is also in the clear.

Or in other words, the only thing I am upset about is the allegation of EVE Uni continuing to do their dec shield. I REALLY don't like it how changes in CCP policy are not made public knowledge. In fact, maybe I should start a thread complaining about CCP's lack of public communication regarding what is allowed and what isn't allowed.
Tippia
Sunshine and Lollipops
#36 - 2011-09-26 00:21:37 UTC
Taedrin wrote:
In fact, maybe I should start a thread complaining about CCP's lack of public communication regarding what is allowed and what isn't allowed.
Do it. Regardless of the details of this case, it's been needed for… oh… roughly forever or so.
Gregor Palter
#37 - 2011-09-26 02:26:36 UTC
Poetic StanzielD wrote:
on't let Kelduum fool you. He was involved with CCP in getting that policy changed, since it was a benefit for EVE University to have a decshield (and what is good for EVE University, is good for new player retention.) Kelduum is in contact with various CCP Devs and GMs rather frequently (he tends to brag about it in non-specific terms on Mumble quite a lot.)


Without being part of this whole mess, or even agreeing with the majority of what the OP has presented us, the bolded bit is truth.

Excuses are the refuge of the weak.

Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#38 - 2011-09-26 03:03:23 UTC
Kelduum Revaan wrote:
A recent EN24 story which fell for some trolling was attacked by him for accepting made up information and mis-quotes as truth.
There were no misquotes in that story, it was entirely made-up information. Whereas I'm actually quoting from your forums and Twitter.


Poetic Stanziel
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#39 - 2011-09-26 03:05:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Poetic Stanziel
Gregor Palter wrote:
Poetic StanzielD wrote:
on't let Kelduum fool you. He was involved with CCP in getting that policy changed, since it was a benefit for EVE University to have a decshield (and what is good for EVE University, is good for new player retention.) Kelduum is in contact with various CCP Devs and GMs rather frequently (he tends to brag about it in non-specific terms on Mumble quite a lot.)


Without being part of this whole mess, or even agreeing with the majority of what the OP has presented us, the bolded bit is truth.

He's said as much on Mumble. Again, he likes to brag to his students the level of contact he has with CCP. It is the standard (and historical) part of his "What is the Decshield?" speech on voice comms when a new player asks.
The Apostle
Doomheim
#40 - 2011-09-26 07:05:00 UTC
Quote:
Again, he likes to brag to his students the level of contact he has with CCP. It is the standard (and historical) part of his "What is the Decshield?" speech on voice comms when a new player asks.


Personally, I would expect Eve-Uni to have good comms with CCP. They do a great job of getting noobs into game and learning about it, they have a pretty decent wiki for anyone to use and they are run as a fairly professional outfit. Notwithstanding the time they have been around.

I also note the statement that "the decshield speech" is given "when a player asks"... Seems fair to me. That's usually the best time to talk.

And one thing for sure, "decshield" would be of benefit somewhat to Eve-Uni. Not to cost the enemy so much as it prevents 2-bit, 3 player corps from wasting everyone's time with mindless war-decs. Eve-Uni has a job to do.


My advice son. Move on. You will grow much stronger for this. Twisted

[i]Take an aspirin. If pain persists consult your local priest. WTB: An Austrian kangaroo![/i]

Previous page123Next page