These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Suicide Tanking

Author
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#1 - 2012-03-30 00:27:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Ranger 1
Earlier today, we received a clarification on what the procedure should be if someone claims that they are contemplating suicide due to your actions (or other reasons for that matter) in game.

GM Harmonia clarification

To put it concisely, and please DO correct me if I am wrong, if someone mentions contemplating suicide in game you should immediately report the incident (and relay what was said via logs/EVE mails/or snapshots of the local window as appropriate) to CCP. In response CCP will immediately report the issue to the players local authorities so that they can take whatever action they feel is necessary to ensure the persons well being.

To me, this is the correct solution, but there was some resistance to the idea in the thread when I defended CCP's policy in this matter. For the record, this has always been CCP's policy.

If we report a claim of considering suicide in response to in game actions (or out of game actions for that matter) to CCP, and they forward this information to local authorities one of two things are accomplished.

1: If the person was serious, steps have been taken that will perhaps save their life. I can think of no finer result.

2: If the person was simply trying to play the pity card to guilt the other party into reimbursement or refraining from normal PVP in game (Suicide Tanking) , and has no true intention of taking his own life, he can explain that to the local authorities and it will be properly documented... thereby significantly reducing the chances of encountering this ploy again. This also has the side benefit of reducing false claims that ultimately make it more difficult for someone who is indeed experiencing severe depression to be believed when they attempt a cry for help.

For the sake of this discussion the form of this we are most likely to see (where a person mentions committing suicide for losing a ship or being about to lose a ship) we can refer to as Suicide Tanking.

I'm not entirely sure why some people have objected to this policy, but I support it fully.

What are your thoughts?

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#2 - 2012-03-30 00:29:48 UTC  |  Edited by: Doc Fury
Sounds appropriate to me, and CCP gets to cover their arse.


edit: LOL @ "Suicide Tanking"

If they go through with killing themselves I guess it's then called "Ghost Tanking"?

/I keed

There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.

Aranakas
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#3 - 2012-03-30 00:30:03 UTC
EVE: Suicide Hotline Online

Aranakas CEO of Green Anarchy Green vs Green

Doc Fury
Furious Enterprises
#4 - 2012-03-30 00:31:02 UTC
Stupid forums

There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.

Marduk Nibiru
Chaos Delivery Systems
#5 - 2012-03-30 00:35:27 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:

What are your thoughts?


I only think when I'm being paid to.
Skydell
Bad Girl Posse
#6 - 2012-03-30 00:39:02 UTC
Block works
Souvera Corvus
SPORADIC MOVEMENT
#7 - 2012-03-30 00:45:27 UTC
So basically you don't like what the GM said and have made a post encouraging people to **** up the petition/reporting system by way of protest thereby highlighting how injustly you think the Mittani has been treated and how ridiculous CCP are being.

Rather than torture yourself with this unduly, offer to deprive CCP of your hard-earned RL iskies and find another sandbox. Oh I know, you're being perfectly sincere..............

I say this as someone who thought the Mittani's apology genuine (he knows he's been a prick even if some of his disciples want to indulge in internet pedantry and logic somersaults) and that loss of the chairmanship was enough.

I haven't got an issue with the Mittani, he's a big boy, he'll get over it, the tortured bleating on his behalf is a bit ordinary though.


Darth Tickles
Doomheim
#8 - 2012-03-30 00:49:24 UTC
Any reference to self-harm over spaceships should result in a ban.
Nedes Betternaem
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#9 - 2012-03-30 00:54:07 UTC  |  Edited by: Nedes Betternaem
While this was amusing for a while I am going to go ahead and point out that parts of this community are truly disgusting. This thread for whatever reason just drove that reason home.

Edit: it was the title actually.

Luckily EvE Online is a great game.
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#10 - 2012-03-30 01:17:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Ranger 1
Souvera Corvus wrote:
So basically you don't like what the GM said and have made a post encouraging people to **** up the petition/reporting system by way of protest thereby highlighting how injustly you think the Mittani has been treated and how ridiculous CCP are being.

Rather than torture yourself with this unduly, offer to deprive CCP of your hard-earned RL iskies and find another sandbox. Oh I know, you're being perfectly sincere..............

I say this as someone who thought the Mittani's apology genuine (he knows he's been a prick even if some of his disciples want to indulge in internet pedantry and logic somersaults) and that loss of the chairmanship was enough.

I haven't got an issue with the Mittani, he's a big boy, he'll get over it, the tortured bleating on his behalf is a bit ordinary though.




If I didn't like the policy I would bluntly say so. I have absolutely no need for dancing around issues.

I am firmly in favor of this being the correct course of action, please feel free to check the referenced thread.

In truth, I don't blame you for your skepticism, there is a huge amount of trolling going on right now. I'll freely admit that if I think something is stupid I'll slap people around in a thread, but don't make a habit of not saying exactly what I mean.

I bring this up because some people objected to this policy for whatever reason, while others got a bit worried about the who, what, when and where's entailed.

I figured it was worth bringing up in it's own thread for discussion, and make it easier for folks who aren't sure what they the correct response is if faced with this situation.

Personally, I had concerns that perhaps we'd be seeing Suicide Tanking become a standard practice in the wake of the latest round of controversy. Now I feel pretty confident that not only will this not become an issue, but in the instances where someone actually IS in a suicidal frame of mind they will get the help they need.

No hidden agenda, but again, I don't hold your skepticism against you.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#11 - 2012-03-30 01:24:13 UTC
Nedes Betternaem wrote:
While this was amusing for a while I am going to go ahead and point out that parts of this community are truly disgusting. This thread for whatever reason just drove that reason home.

Edit: it was the title actually.

Luckily EvE Online is a great game.


People who are seriously contemplating suicide and say so need help, and should get it. We as a community can help with that without sacrificing our ability to play the game. A quick petition in this circumstance is not too much to ask.

People who are guilty of Suicide Tanking, making false claims to evoke pity and gain advantage, need a deterrent... thus the title of this thread.

Yes, I wanted to bring attention to it, hence the title.
No, people honestly contemplating suicide are not Suicide Tanking.

But people who do pull this crap, and it is far more common than you would think, actually make it far harder for people to take the ones that actually need help seriously.

I suppose people who don't engage in frequent combat don't see this sort of thing very often (and that's not a slam against the large portion of the player base who do not) but for those of us that do or have in the past it crops up fairly frequently. Not as frequently as death threats mind you, but often enough.

Clarification is the purpose of the thread, and raising awareness of the proper and approved way to handle it.

If this still evokes disgust, you've missed the point.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Souvera Corvus
SPORADIC MOVEMENT
#12 - 2012-03-30 01:26:21 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:
Souvera Corvus wrote:
So basically you don't like what the GM said and have made a post encouraging people to **** up the petition/reporting system by way of protest thereby highlighting how injustly you think the Mittani has been treated and how ridiculous CCP are being.

Rather than torture yourself with this unduly, offer to deprive CCP of your hard-earned RL iskies and find another sandbox. Oh I know, you're being perfectly sincere..............

I say this as someone who thought the Mittani's apology genuine (he knows he's been a prick even if some of his disciples want to indulge in internet pedantry and logic somersaults) and that loss of the chairmanship was enough.

I haven't got an issue with the Mittani, he's a big boy, he'll get over it, the tortured bleating on his behalf is a bit ordinary though.




If I didn't like the policy I would bluntly say so. I have absolutely no need for dancing around issues.

I am firmly in favor of this being the correct course of action, please feel free to check the referenced thread.

In truth, I don't blame you for your skepticism, there is a huge amount of trolling going on right now. I'll freely admit that if I think something is stupid I'll slap people around in a thread, but don't make a habit of saying exactly what I mean.

I bring this up become some people objected to this policy for whatever reason, while others got a bit worried about the who, what, when and where's entailed.

I figured it was worth bringing up in it's own thread for discussion, and make it easier for folks who aren't sure what they the correct response is if faced with this situation.

Personally, I had concerns that perhaps we'd be seeing Suicide Tanking become a standard practice in the wake of the latest round of controversy. Now I feel pretty confident that not only will this not become an issue, but in the instances where someone actually IS in a suicidal frame of mind they will get the help they need.

No hidden agenda, but again, I don't hold your skepticism against you.


Well scepticism is almost obligatory these days.

In the event we're being serious for a second though, I'd imagine that CCP's action would depend on how such a threat was dealt with by the players concerned. Personally, if someone pulled a stunt like that, I'd probably wax lyrical about the fact its 'only pixels' whilst insisting that I was still going to blow them up and leave it at that. There's a limit to what I will be responsible for in a game when I have plenty to be responsible for outside of it; as we all do I'd suggest.

I won't encourage their suicide or make light of it but its hard for me, when cloaked by anonymity and shielded by a keyboard to actually do anymore than report it to CCP in the event I think they're being serioius.

From CCP's point of view, I suspect that players resorting to suicide tanking on a regular basis and it having been reported as such, will find that they're unable to play for very much longer.

I have to think though, that this will remain extremely rare.
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#13 - 2012-03-30 01:35:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Ranger 1
Souvera Corvus wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:
Souvera Corvus wrote:
So basically you don't like what the GM said and have made a post encouraging people to **** up the petition/reporting system by way of protest thereby highlighting how injustly you think the Mittani has been treated and how ridiculous CCP are being.

Rather than torture yourself with this unduly, offer to deprive CCP of your hard-earned RL iskies and find another sandbox. Oh I know, you're being perfectly sincere..............

I say this as someone who thought the Mittani's apology genuine (he knows he's been a prick even if some of his disciples want to indulge in internet pedantry and logic somersaults) and that loss of the chairmanship was enough.

I haven't got an issue with the Mittani, he's a big boy, he'll get over it, the tortured bleating on his behalf is a bit ordinary though.




If I didn't like the policy I would bluntly say so. I have absolutely no need for dancing around issues.

I am firmly in favor of this being the correct course of action, please feel free to check the referenced thread.

In truth, I don't blame you for your skepticism, there is a huge amount of trolling going on right now. I'll freely admit that if I think something is stupid I'll slap people around in a thread, but don't make a habit of saying exactly what I mean.

I bring this up become some people objected to this policy for whatever reason, while others got a bit worried about the who, what, when and where's entailed.

I figured it was worth bringing up in it's own thread for discussion, and make it easier for folks who aren't sure what they the correct response is if faced with this situation.

Personally, I had concerns that perhaps we'd be seeing Suicide Tanking become a standard practice in the wake of the latest round of controversy. Now I feel pretty confident that not only will this not become an issue, but in the instances where someone actually IS in a suicidal frame of mind they will get the help they need.

No hidden agenda, but again, I don't hold your skepticism against you.


Well scepticism is almost obligatory these days.

In the event we're being serious for a second though, I'd imagine that CCP's action would depend on how such a threat was dealt with by the players concerned. Personally, if someone pulled a stunt like that, I'd probably wax lyrical about the fact its 'only pixels' whilst insisting that I was still going to blow them up and leave it at that. There's a limit to what I will be responsible for in a game when I have plenty to be responsible for outside of it; as we all do I'd suggest.

I won't encourage their suicide or make light of it but its hard for me, when cloaked by anonymity and shielded by a keyboard to actually do anymore than report it to CCP in the event I think they're being serioius.

From CCP's point of view, I suspect that players resorting to suicide tanking on a regular basis and it having been reported as such, will find that they're unable to play for very much longer.

I have to think though, that this will remain extremely rare.


It's more common than you would think, you'll find several recordings on YouTube or EVE files or archived on various corp forums outlining tales of depression and the like due to misfortunes occurring to them in game.

A brief glance at the forums today will show you dozens of amusing examples of this, do you really think we won't see an increase in frequency in game?

It doesn't really matter how frequently it occurs though, so long as people know what they are supposed to do if/when it does occur.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Nedes Betternaem
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#14 - 2012-03-30 01:36:00 UTC
Ranger 1 wrote:
Nedes Betternaem wrote:
While this was amusing for a while I am going to go ahead and point out that parts of this community are truly disgusting. This thread for whatever reason just drove that reason home.

Edit: it was the title actually.

Luckily EvE Online is a great game.


People who are seriously contemplating suicide and say so need help, and should get it. We as a community can help with that without sacrificing our ability to play the game. A quick petition in this circumstance is not too much to ask.

People who are guilty of Suicide Tanking, making false claims to evoke pity and gain advantage, need a deterrent... thus the title of this thread.

Yes, I wanted to bring attention to it, hence the title.
No, people honestly contemplating suicide are not Suicide Tanking.

But people who do pull this crap, and it is far more common than you would think, actually make it far harder for people to take the ones that actually need help seriously.

I suppose people who don't engage in frequent combat don't see this sort of thing very often (and that's not a slam against the large portion of the player base who do not) but for those of us that do or have in the past it crops up fairly frequently. Not as frequently as death threats mind you, but often enough.

Clarification is the purpose of the thread, and raising awareness of the proper and approved way to handle it.

If this still evokes disgust, you've missed the point.

I actually agree with you after reading the entire first post. The title is just... a bit off color.
Aranakas
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#15 - 2012-03-30 01:37:22 UTC
We need a hidden abooboo forum accessible only to people with a sec status of 5 and with at least 1 exhumer loss on their killboard. They come here to discuss how sad they are and such.

Aranakas CEO of Green Anarchy Green vs Green

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#16 - 2012-03-30 01:37:45 UTC
Darth Tickles wrote:
Any reference to self-harm over spaceships should result in a ban.


I can't agree with that, although I can see why you would say that. While many would deserve it, the occasional person that is actually serious doesn't really need that sort of stress added to whatever is bugging them already. Best not to punish them for actually speaking up, even if it is in an unlikely place.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#17 - 2012-03-30 01:42:13 UTC
Nedes Betternaem wrote:
Ranger 1 wrote:
Nedes Betternaem wrote:
While this was amusing for a while I am going to go ahead and point out that parts of this community are truly disgusting. This thread for whatever reason just drove that reason home.

Edit: it was the title actually.

Luckily EvE Online is a great game.


People who are seriously contemplating suicide and say so need help, and should get it. We as a community can help with that without sacrificing our ability to play the game. A quick petition in this circumstance is not too much to ask.

People who are guilty of Suicide Tanking, making false claims to evoke pity and gain advantage, need a deterrent... thus the title of this thread.

Yes, I wanted to bring attention to it, hence the title.
No, people honestly contemplating suicide are not Suicide Tanking.

But people who do pull this crap, and it is far more common than you would think, actually make it far harder for people to take the ones that actually need help seriously.

I suppose people who don't engage in frequent combat don't see this sort of thing very often (and that's not a slam against the large portion of the player base who do not) but for those of us that do or have in the past it crops up fairly frequently. Not as frequently as death threats mind you, but often enough.

Clarification is the purpose of the thread, and raising awareness of the proper and approved way to handle it.

If this still evokes disgust, you've missed the point.

I actually agree with you after reading the entire first post. The title is just... a bit off color.


No worries, thanks for going back and reading through it.

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.