These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

New Dev Blog: The 2012 Alliance Panel at Fanfest

First post
Author
Ganthrithor
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#21 - 2012-03-28 23:46:20 UTC  |  Edited by: Ganthrithor
What, is Sony running Fanfest now?

Word of advice: Fanfest owned, drinking, debauchery, wormhole-penetrating phalluses and all. Don't go all limp-ducked and Blizzardish on us, bros.
Ines Fy
#22 - 2012-03-28 23:46:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Ines Fy
Ugh
Anela Cistine
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#23 - 2012-03-28 23:46:30 UTC
CCP, will you also be censuring the moderator who allowed the supposedly EULA breaking activity to pass without comment? How about the employees who broadcast and rebroadcast the pannel without bleeping out the offending bits?
Yasuhiro Shoe
Perkone
Caldari State
#24 - 2012-03-28 23:46:54 UTC
Nope. You can't enforce maturity. That's not your job and it's arrogant of you to tell people otherwise.
This seems actually a case of taking away from Eve a large part of its unique appeal.
CCP really can't get along with Eve players after all. Oh well.
Saint Lazarus
Spiorad ag fanaiocht
#25 - 2012-03-28 23:47:40 UTC
Nicely written blog, all this Mittani BS aside (plz? pretty plz?) I hope everyone realizes it was an ISOLATED incident, yea theres alot of "frat house" behaviour, but so far we've all kept ourselves in check. Alot of drunkenness but alot of fun too, sharing a beer with a dev and them sharing jokes with us means the WORLD to the players!

If CCP have to tone Fanfest down after all this utter BS I'll be devestated. Its what makes CCP so awesome!!!
Zastrow
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#26 - 2012-03-28 23:49:11 UTC
Fanfest is a singularly unique event in all of gaming. It's the only event where players and devs can get together and be informal and tell jokes and really party together and have a ******* blast. Fanfest is great because of this party culture. If you try to "grow up" and make it another big lame marketing event, the magic will be gone.

Perhaps certain things shouldn't be live streamed. Ok that's definitely obvious. But don't ruin fanfest because of one mistake.
Ganthrithor
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#27 - 2012-03-28 23:52:38 UTC
Zastrow wrote:
Fanfest is a singularly unique event in all of gaming. It's the only event where players and devs can get together and be informal and tell jokes and really party together and have a ******* blast. Fanfest is great because of this party culture. If you try to "grow up" and make it another big lame marketing event, the magic will be gone.

Perhaps certain things shouldn't be live streamed. Ok that's definitely obvious. But don't ruin fanfest because of one mistake.


Hi5, spacebro.
Drake Jeffers
AirHogs
Hogs Collective
#28 - 2012-03-28 23:53:07 UTC
I honestly believe that the player that was hurt by this incident involving Mittani shouldn't change the rules of this game. I believe that calling him out in public on the alliance forum was wrong but trust me that the expression "go kill yourself" was in no means a serious statement and in no manner would hope someone would commit suicide over a game.

Mittani only meant that because of the trouble that the people that killed him may give him the victim may be very angry.

Killing himself would be an option but I sincerely hope that EVE is not that Important to him. So just keep in mind as we move forward that you built a game that advocates espionage and if you want to take out griefing other players you may want to look into removing the espionage deal as well.

Considering the thefts that have been done a single mining vessel or two is nothing. And you let that go on all the time.


Also I would like to say that as we go forward if you want people to not get trolled in this way then all you have to do is limit in-game pictures to HUD-less screen-shots and the like. Because in that way you're preventing anyone on the alliance panel from relaying information they got via spying to the whole community during their alliance panel.

Please take what I have said into account 2600 games of league of legends has made me very good at distinguishing a personal attack and just simple griefing and Mittani didn't mean harm he just incidentally caused it. And the idea of griefing should not be condemned because of that.
Mara Rinn
Cosmic Goo Convertor
#29 - 2012-03-28 23:54:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Mara Rinn
Li Malak wrote:
Your so-called 'Director for Marketing' should resign now, because CCP has ****** itself by banning The Mittani from CSM 7. You have disenfranchised over 10,000 accounts.


The Mittani made a mistake in resorting to Something Awful/Goonswarm subscriber-only style humour in a public forum. In your own cultural surrounds, his call to drive a player to suicide would be interpreted as the "up talking" it probably was: you'd have a chuckle, enjoy the schadenfreude of someone possibly committing suicide over words in an Internet spaceship game, and forget about the incident (possibly after moving to the system to entertain the fantasy of ganking the guy, then not following through because even Goons have some lines they won't cross). In the public environment, merely uttering the suggestion to harass someone who claims to be suicidal is crossing one of those lines that shouldn't have been crossed.

To be clear here: it does not matter one iota whether or not the target is actually suicidal or not. He might claim to be fine with the attention in public, while in private he's resenting it. He might have made the claim about how his life was a mess and was contemplating suicide simply to get a rise out of the gankers. You just don't know. This is why in the real world we take any hint of suicidal (or homicidal) tendencies seriously and offer help: we certainly don't make a joke about encouraging people to harass the target further, especially not in a forum attended by 3000 people who aren't present at the venue to be aware of the general atmosphere of the gathering. Some of us watching the feed would have just turned on the feed to watch the Alliance Panel during our lunch break at work, and be totally unaware of the general atmosphere of FanFest 2012 at that point in time.

On CCP's side of things, the usual way to handle unscripted "live" events is to delay the broadcast by about 7-8 seconds to allow the production crew time to hit the "OH ****" button. On a radio station, this might be a simple "BEEEP" to obscure the words being uttered, terminating the phone call, or playing the station's jingle. For FanFest this could be a few frames of "Trollface" or the serious-face Amarr guy from the promotional brochure with the words "CCP Advises that this live content is not suitable for broadcast". Or heck, why not use The Mittani, finger over his mouth ("Shh!") with the caption "Some things are better left unheard."

There are still null sec candidates and candidates sympathetic to Goonswarm (or at least to The Mittani) on CSM 7. You will not be "unrepresented", it's just that your favoured representative has disqualified himself from representing you. Goonswarm opinions will still shape the future of EVE Online and DUST 514. Vote for two candidates in the future, so you have backup when one self-destructs.

TL;DR: Your beef should be with Alex for trying to engage in a **** measuring contest in a live broadcast forum, not with CCP for taking the only action they can take for such a public violation of their TOS.
Reiisha
#30 - 2012-03-28 23:59:26 UTC
I wonder what the problem is here.

Mittens did a really stupid thing. He apoligized and is taking the punishment gracefully.

Why would he be entitled to immunity to such matters because he's CSM chairman? He should be even MORE responsible because of his position, not less, which is exactly the case right now.


The EVE community was always harsh, but joking about RL suicides? Whether true or false this is extremely bad form, especially if brought up at a public panel. I know empathy is not a skill many EVE players possess, but even then it's reprehensible to goad anyone into a suicide. I wonder whether people realize that this very action is actually punishable by law in some countries, though it shouldnt have to be to point out how wrong it is. I don't understand why everyone is rushing to defend the action, regardless of who perpetrated it.

If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all...

Aryth
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#31 - 2012-03-29 00:00:52 UTC
Ganthrithor wrote:
What, is Sony running Fanfest now?

Word of advice: Fanfest owned, drinking, debauchery, wormhole-penetrating phalluses and all. Don't go all limp-ducked and Blizzardish on us, bros.



Yes. CCP is kow-towing to someone else. They just sold out their biggest asset. The magical time that is Fanfest and the drunken party at the top of the world. (no one would come to that horrible country otherwise).

Sony is going to kill another game I loved.

Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal.

Creator of Burn Jita

Vile Rat: You're the greatest sociopath that has ever played eve.

Shandir
EVE University
Ivy League
#32 - 2012-03-29 00:03:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Shandir
A 30 day ban and removal from the CSM, for a first offense of this nature is an acceptable response. You made the right decision in the face of open Goon threats (as is shown in this thread).
EVE will grow as a result of this commitment to keeping the game's open nature *within the game* - taking it to RL isn't acceptable and I'm glad you agree.

10,000 people might be angry with you, but a significant portion of 290,000 people are happy.

(Just to check, he is removed from the CSM as per your CSM candidate rules, right? The dev blog does not actually say that that I could find)
Aryth
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#33 - 2012-03-29 00:06:18 UTC
Shandir wrote:
A 30 day ban and removal from the CSM, for a first offense of this nature is an acceptable response. You made the right decision in the face of open Goon threats (as is shown in this thread).
EVE will grow as a result of this commitment to keeping the game's open nature *within the game* - taking it to RL isn't acceptable and I'm glad you agree.

10,000 people might be angry with you, but a significant portion of 290,000 people are happy.

(Just to check, he is removed from the CSM as per your CSM candidate rules, right? The dev blog does not actually say that that I could find)


That isn't the big issue. The issue is, why is CCP changing Fanfest over a single incident in years of Fanfests. They are kneejerking as usual and dancing to the tune of a Sony. You do realize what Sony is going to do to EVE right?

Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal.

Creator of Burn Jita

Vile Rat: You're the greatest sociopath that has ever played eve.

Reiisha
#34 - 2012-03-29 00:08:13 UTC
Drake Jeffers wrote:
I honestly believe that the player that was hurt by this incident involving Mittani shouldn't change the rules of this game. I believe that calling him out in public on the alliance forum was wrong but trust me that the expression "go kill yourself" was in no means a serious statement and in no manner would hope someone would commit suicide over a game.

Mittani only meant that because of the trouble that the people that killed him may give him the victim may be very angry.

Killing himself would be an option but I sincerely hope that EVE is not that Important to him. So just keep in mind as we move forward that you built a game that advocates espionage and if you want to take out griefing other players you may want to look into removing the espionage deal as well.


Just a note, just because someone 'didn't mean it seriously' doesn't mean the victim knows or realizes that, or takes it that way.

"I didn't really mean it" comes up in courts WAY more often than you would think. Regardless of the intent, the result is what matters and sadly, people like to think that nothing they do has consequences because they don't want to feel any guilt or responsibility.

Anything you say in cases like this has to be thought out carefully. Just because you 'don't mean it' doesn't mean the victim knows that.

If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all...

Reiisha
#35 - 2012-03-29 00:09:22 UTC  |  Edited by: Reiisha
Aryth wrote:
Shandir wrote:
A 30 day ban and removal from the CSM, for a first offense of this nature is an acceptable response. You made the right decision in the face of open Goon threats (as is shown in this thread).
EVE will grow as a result of this commitment to keeping the game's open nature *within the game* - taking it to RL isn't acceptable and I'm glad you agree.

10,000 people might be angry with you, but a significant portion of 290,000 people are happy.

(Just to check, he is removed from the CSM as per your CSM candidate rules, right? The dev blog does not actually say that that I could find)


That isn't the big issue. The issue is, why is CCP changing Fanfest over a single incident in years of Fanfests. They are kneejerking as usual and dancing to the tune of a Sony. You do realize what Sony is going to do to EVE right?


Let me guess, wearing a tin foil hat?

You do realize that if Mittens didn't say those few sentences in a live broadcast none of this would have happened?

If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all...

Diamonica Norya
Pro Synergy
#36 - 2012-03-29 00:10:29 UTC
I recall "The Mittani" himself said in the everadio interview prior to the CSM7 election that players threatening to unsub is a display of weakness and withdrawals. I don't know, but his fellow alliance + friends are doing exactly what he said he'd not do.
Aryth
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#37 - 2012-03-29 00:13:33 UTC
Reiisha wrote:
Aryth wrote:
Shandir wrote:
A 30 day ban and removal from the CSM, for a first offense of this nature is an acceptable response. You made the right decision in the face of open Goon threats (as is shown in this thread).
EVE will grow as a result of this commitment to keeping the game's open nature *within the game* - taking it to RL isn't acceptable and I'm glad you agree.

10,000 people might be angry with you, but a significant portion of 290,000 people are happy.

(Just to check, he is removed from the CSM as per your CSM candidate rules, right? The dev blog does not actually say that that I could find)


That isn't the big issue. The issue is, why is CCP changing Fanfest over a single incident in years of Fanfests. They are kneejerking as usual and dancing to the tune of a Sony. You do realize what Sony is going to do to EVE right?


Let me guess, wearing a tin foil hat?

You do realize that if Mittens didn't say those few sentences in a live broadcast none of this would have happened?


He apologized, fell on his sword, and resigned.

Note, this is all after a presentation where NO ONE in attendance, including all of CCP said a word. CCP obviously didn't consider this worthy of any attention until someone batphoned them.

Leader of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal.

Creator of Burn Jita

Vile Rat: You're the greatest sociopath that has ever played eve.

domino 8
League of Extraordinary Ratters
#38 - 2012-03-29 00:15:15 UTC
Can I just ask who in CCP okayed the presentation which used a private message from a guy talking about his divorce and feeling suicidal as comedic material?

However unfortunate the mittani's comments where (and lets face it they were) CCP obviously allowed the topic to get past their own internal censor. CCP did this undoubtedly knowing it was going to be used to ridicule that player.

It would be very interesting to know why they thought showing a player talking about suicide was something that could be used as a comedy prop.

You really don't seem to be taking responsibly for it at all, if you had veto'd the slide it wouldn't have even come up on the panel.

Perma-ban mittani I don't really care, but your position seems to me remarkably disingenuous given that it was CCP that allowed the material on the panel, allowed the panellists to be drunk (it seems you actually encouraged it) and choose to have a live global broadcast with no time delay - or at least didn't seem to have a competent producer to knew to filter it. If you were a broadcaster it would be you as the producer not the broadcaster that would be held to account.

You really seem to have given someone the sh*t end of the stick and now appear to be admonishing them for have dirty hands.

Punish him, whatever, but at least acknowledge that it was CCPs fault the topic was even on the agenda in the first place.

Udonor
Doomheim
#39 - 2012-03-29 00:17:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Udonor
As always PR events like this tend to take problems and themselves over seriously. Internet corps which seldom interact with the public face to face even more so. Then there the bandwagon activist types searching for vicarious personal power by suggesting things need to raised to a higher level yet.


However...

CCP may have a suicide "hotline" program for players internally but it certainly is not well advertised for players to report someone. And its 99% players who first recognize possible issue via directly interacting with those players with problems.

*** If CCP is serious about getting involved with players who may have issues that EVE is making worse --- then they need to add a chat link similar to "Report ISK spammers". Probably need to let players input 1-10 as to degree of suicide or rage-aholic behavior. (1- more depressed than seems good for a person, 2- nobody would miss me, 3 - I have thought suicide over as a solution, 5 - seriously considering it, 7 - I have set a date, 9 - later today 10 - doing it now) ***

Thus players could call for CCP hotline people to monitor a person's convo for a while. Probably send chat to log for efficiency and track multiple reports over time. Then CCP could take appropriate steps if needed: like referencing to incident to closest local community suicide prevention. Obviously clear abuse of the flagging system would be like frivolous use of ISK spamming flag.

Sure if its an online friend or corpmate, players will spend some time themselves trying to prop things up. But most of us aren't therapists. And I for one certainly don't log to hold the hands of total strangers. Plus I have seen people use "suicide talk" as another particularly distracting scam mechanism in EVE (no big surprise there).

So CCP if you really want to step up -- do so in a more substantial way than just making your PR events squeaky PC clean. LOL - there would probably be a good news story that might even cross outside the dedicated gaming community in doing so.
Reiisha
#40 - 2012-03-29 00:20:42 UTC
Aryth wrote:
Reiisha wrote:
Aryth wrote:
Shandir wrote:
A 30 day ban and removal from the CSM, for a first offense of this nature is an acceptable response. You made the right decision in the face of open Goon threats (as is shown in this thread).
EVE will grow as a result of this commitment to keeping the game's open nature *within the game* - taking it to RL isn't acceptable and I'm glad you agree.

10,000 people might be angry with you, but a significant portion of 290,000 people are happy.

(Just to check, he is removed from the CSM as per your CSM candidate rules, right? The dev blog does not actually say that that I could find)


That isn't the big issue. The issue is, why is CCP changing Fanfest over a single incident in years of Fanfests. They are kneejerking as usual and dancing to the tune of a Sony. You do realize what Sony is going to do to EVE right?


Let me guess, wearing a tin foil hat?

You do realize that if Mittens didn't say those few sentences in a live broadcast none of this would have happened?


He apologized, fell on his sword, and resigned.

Note, this is all after a presentation where NO ONE in attendance, including all of CCP said a word. CCP obviously didn't consider this worthy of any attention until someone batphoned them.


The people at CCP present there are getting an earful of this aswell at the moment, be sure of that.

Don't forget that they're humans aswell. Maybe they shared a similar opinion to yours at the moment and are being pointed to the facts about it right now. Just because you're in a corporation doens't mean you can't make mistakes, whatever you do. This kind of thing has never happened before and i'm sure the guys present at the presentation were not sure what to do about it at the time, it's only natural that this, as a learning experience, has not been handled properly initially.


Mittens is free to run for CSM again next time as far as i know. At that point everyone has learned from this and is ready to continue on with their lives. Continuing to rub salt in the wound might be the Goonswarm way but right now it's not helping anyone, least of all yourself.

If you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all...