These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The Mittani - A public complaint

First post First post
Author
Shogun Archer
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#101 - 2012-03-28 05:03:19 UTC
Space filibuster. Cool.

If you run into more than 2 a**holes in a day, you should probably look in the mirror.

RougeOperator
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#102 - 2012-03-28 05:08:55 UTC
SO MUCH TEXT IN THIS THREAD.

**Space wizards are real, they can make 10058 votes vanish. "and for a moment i hurd 10k goons cry out, then silence" **

Ricardo Aguti
Diagnosed Power Units
#103 - 2012-03-28 05:10:15 UTC
What is this crap?

edit: I haven't read anything in this thread
Serene Repose
#104 - 2012-03-28 05:11:51 UTC
If philosophy is a chain letter, and dialectic materialism is inevitable as soon as someone opens his mouth, then this diatribe has to be an attempt at combining them both. Though the vocabulary is enviable in a cloistered, scholastic sense, what it actually says didn't require the bandwidth the OP used to say it. I'm put in mind of "The Silver-Tongued Devil." This rant paints Mitt with the same brush it paints itself. Thus is the way with all disingenuous speech.

A simplified version would be: Mittani wants to do what he wants to do with the game.
The OP wants the same. Guess what? So do I.

To the unpracticed eye, it seems quite an indictment was unfurled.
Yet, to quote Capote, "That's not writing. That's typing."

If history has taught us anything, it has taught us that people of the sort the OP describes in tedious detail a.) Never last long, and b.) Never have a lasting influence. Were the OP as astute as his barrage of verbiage would have us believe, this would be obvious. Yet, upon close examination, the OP seems to reel-out more like a hoax than a J'accuse. Note the lack of specific accusation. Note also the left-handed way the OP alludes to endangering himself by being so forthcoming.

Nay. This manifesto (which is stretching things a bit, as it demands no specific action) has all the earmarks of a pro-Mitt ploy. I wouldn't be surprised to see the two of them sipping a beer and chuckling over how SERIOUSLY it was taken. As in all such cases, after all the words were spent, you'll get up in the morning and your day will be essentially the same as it was yesterday. The MITT won't have dragged you off in the dark, and the OP won't have any barricades set up for anyone to man. (There was this time in Munich though...when counter-propeganda was used to secure confidence in this certain someone...)

10/10 for all the typing. -11 for the sheer thinness of it all. (There's two kinds of transparancy, yah know.) -1/10

We must accommodate the idiocracy.

Pertuabo Enkidgan
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#105 - 2012-03-28 14:23:15 UTC
I have no idea what's going on in this thread.
CCP Phantom
C C P
C C P Alliance
#106 - 2012-03-28 14:30:33 UTC
Ranting is not allowed on our forums.

Thread locked.

CCP Phantom - Senior Community Developer