These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Crime & Punishment

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

"Sanctuary" space

Author
Tuomas Arturi
Quality Assurance
Brotherhood of Spacers
#1 - 2012-03-27 20:28:08 UTC  |  Edited by: Tuomas Arturi
In light of all the 'new proposed' changes for high sec security, I'd like to throw an idea.


"Sanctuary" space -- This would work like advanced 1.0….. or be 1.1 space.

-All to those rules for safety apply that are being suggested
-It would occupy an area of 4-5 systems (sorta like a little cosmos space)
-Each race would have 1-2 zones of this
-New players would enter the game here
-New corps could get established
-New players could gain confidence with there eve skills
-No PvP (well, not without great sec. loss)

*Rewards for missioning would be low (but totally safe)
*Mining would be poor (but totally safe)
- limits on ship size
- limits Character skill points
- Agent level limits
Katja Faith
Doomheim
#2 - 2012-03-27 20:31:35 UTC
How about the game be renamed to "Ponies and Carebears In Space?"

Nice attempt at a troll, tho... 1/10
Vladimir McSquizzle
Squizzinators Inc
#3 - 2012-03-27 20:34:50 UTC
And all ships will leave pretty rainbow sparkly trails behind them...
Bernie Nator
Mathonian Industries
#4 - 2012-03-27 20:36:28 UTC
Vladimir McSquizzle wrote:
And all ships will leave pretty rainbow sparkly trails behind them...


Sounds good if we use our

IMAAAAAAAAGINAAAAAAATION!
Tuomas Arturi
Quality Assurance
Brotherhood of Spacers
#5 - 2012-03-27 20:41:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Tuomas Arturi
Well, I'm definitively part of the HtFU crowd.

In the end, CCP is going to cater to the "new paying players" who want something like what I proposed. My thoughts are if we don't come up with something good, we all (high sec. people) are going to have some crazy changes.
Lady Spank
Get Out Nasty Face
#6 - 2012-03-27 20:41:27 UTC
How about you stop being a noob in high sec and do something that requires competence.

(ಠ_ృ) ~ It Takes a Million Years to Become Diamonds So Lets Just Burn Like Coal Until the Sky's Black ~ (ಠ_ృ)

Tuomas Arturi
Quality Assurance
Brotherhood of Spacers
#7 - 2012-03-27 20:44:39 UTC
Lady Spank wrote:
How about you stop being a noob in high sec and do something that requires competence.


Glad you are here Lady..... solve the problem. Big smile
Jack Miton
Perkone
Caldari State
#8 - 2012-03-27 21:12:34 UTC
Lady Spank wrote:
How about you stop being a noob in high sec and do something that requires competence.


QFT.
pirate tears, best tears.

(i do agree that ccp are going to **** up highsec ganking but your corp needs to stop whining about it like little girls.)

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout

Gnaw LF
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#9 - 2012-03-27 21:57:51 UTC
Tuomas Arturi wrote:
In light of all the 'new proposed' changes for high sec security, I'd like to throw an idea.


"Sanctuary" space -- This would work like advanced 1.0….. or be 1.1 space.

-All to those rules for safety apply that are being suggested
-It would occupy an area of 4-5 systems (sorta like a little cosmos space)
-Each race would have 1-2 zones of this
-New players would enter the game here
-New corps could get established
-New players could gain confidence with there eve skills
-No PvP (well, not without great sec. loss)

*Rewards for missioning would be low (but totally safe)
*Mining would be poor (but totally safe)
- limits on ship size
- limits Character skill points
- Agent level limits




The Hugs and Kisses forum section is that way ------->>>>>
Gnaw LF
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#10 - 2012-03-27 21:59:51 UTC
Tuomas Arturi wrote:
Well, I'm definitively part of the HtFU crowd.

In the end, CCP is going to cater to the "new paying players" who want something like what I proposed. My thoughts are if we don't come up with something good, we all (high sec. people) are going to have some crazy changes.




Those crazy changes can be summed up as "More PvP". Imagine that.
Evil Market
Zombie Space Pirates
#11 - 2012-03-27 23:41:11 UTC
The interesting thing is, this is not so far from what is suggested... just tweaked a little bit and moved to a select few systems rather than all of high sec...


think about that... This is a idea to give a way of having that not happen to all of high sec, yet still appealing to the crowed that apparently cant handle being killed.
Tarryn Nightstorm
Hellstar Towing and Recovery
#12 - 2012-03-27 23:55:18 UTC
Evil Market wrote:
The interesting thing is, this is not so far from what is suggested... just tweaked a little bit and moved to a select few systems rather than all of high sec...


think about that... This is a idea to give a way of having that not happen to all of high sec, yet still appealing to the crowed that apparently cant handle being killed.


Indeed...But given the increasing carebear mentality I've been seeing of late, watch those systems get up to 1500+ in local from day one!

[/cynicism]

Star Wars: the Old Republic may not be EVE. But I'll take the sound of dual blaster-pistols over "NURVV CLAOKING NAOW!!!11oneone!!" any day of the week.

Tuomas Arturi
Quality Assurance
Brotherhood of Spacers
#13 - 2012-03-28 01:28:23 UTC
Tarryn Nightstorm wrote:
Evil Market wrote:
The interesting thing is, this is not so far from what is suggested... just tweaked a little bit and moved to a select few systems rather than all of high sec...


think about that... This is a idea to give a way of having that not happen to all of high sec, yet still appealing to the crowed that apparently cant handle being killed.


Indeed...But given the increasing carebear mentality I've been seeing of late, watch those systems get up to 1500+ in local from day one!

[/cynicism]




Im becoming cynical myself. While I am part of the HtFU crowd, I think CCP is moving away from the cool 'sandbox idea' that got me into the game in the first place and CCP currently is moving away from the ‘eve is hard’ tuff universe. These proposals I'm listing, I really don't like them, but see them as a tourniquet to keep high sec. tolerable.
Skippermonkey
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#14 - 2012-03-28 03:02:21 UTC
Tuomas, i am dissapoint

COME AT ME BRO

I'LL JUST BE DOCKED IN THIS STATION

Florestan Bronstein
Ministry of War
Amarr Empire
#15 - 2012-03-28 08:46:15 UTC
I, too, miss Shattrath and Dalaran.
Plaude Pollard
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#16 - 2012-03-28 09:44:06 UTC
We already have this. It's called "Rookie Systems". Way to suggest something we already have. If you attack a player in a Rookie System, you can get banned, regardless of how old your victim is. Just look up Rookie System Griefing.

New to EVE? Want to learn? The Crimson Cartel will train you in the fields of _**your **_choice. Mainly active in EU afternoons and evenings. Contact me for more info.

Misanth
RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE
#17 - 2012-03-28 11:08:32 UTC
Why is this in C&P..

AFK-cloaking in a system near you.

Tuomas Arturi
Quality Assurance
Brotherhood of Spacers
#18 - 2012-03-28 14:55:35 UTC
Skippermonkey wrote:
Tuomas, i am dissapoint



Me too. Ugh ..... Skip you have a better answer? Before the CCP begins to code all of Eve to rainbowland?
I Accidentally YourShip
Ronin ONE
Ronins
#19 - 2012-03-28 15:00:44 UTC
Katja Faith wrote:
How about the game be renamed to "Ponies and Carebears In Space?"


Don't be associating ponies with carebears. Ponies > carebears, any day of the week.

Vladimir McSquizzle wrote:
And all ships will leave pretty rainbow sparkly trails behind them...



I would sell my family for a rainbow trail.
Miranda
Eternal Profiteers Empire
#20 - 2012-03-28 17:15:03 UTC
They could just as easily make the sec standing acutaly mean something in this game. As the factions have acepted concord policeing so they just need to tweek it a bit more so that the gates do not function for negative sec status.

Bring back in the black market tradeing skills so the -sec status people can buy through a npc corp agent the stuff they want in high sec but at an increased cost.

Personaly id like to see stations refuse docking to negative standing players but still let them run around.

ps bring on the trolls, i fully expect this to get flamed but they cant come up with proper replys so they have to whine.
123Next page