These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Missions & Complexes

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Omni-damage
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#1 - 2012-03-27 23:57:54 UTC
Until recently, I was under the impression that omni-damage was a special type of damage that would always base its net damage on your lowest resistance. But someone told me that sleeper missiles do EM and thermal damage, and that sleeper turrets do explosive and kinetic damage.

Can anyone explain sleeper and incursion Sansha damage to me in as much gritty detail as possible? Numbers, percentages, and calculations preferred. Thanks in advance!

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."
Caleidascope
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#2 - 2012-03-28 00:03:36 UTC
http://incursions.nexsoft.de/?mode=guide&sid=1

Life is short and dinner time is chancy

Eat dessert first!
mxzf
Shovel Bros
#3 - 2012-03-28 00:16:29 UTC
Omni-damage profile 25%, 25%, 25%, 25% (on average). There you go, mystery solved.
drdxie
#4 - 2012-03-28 00:17:33 UTC
Its the other way around, laser will do EM and thermal and missiles will do explosive kinetic. Have no idea where to get details of damage amounts though... but if you had made the subject Incursions... Ammzi would have sorted you out quickly P

Caldari Loving needed.. https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=1608277&#post1608277
Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#5 - 2012-03-28 01:59:39 UTC
Yeah, kin/therm on missiles, em/therm on guns.
It works out to 25% RAW damage in each damage type.

That said, you should focus on tanking em/therm more on small ships and kin/exp on large ships as a small sig radius reduces the damage taken from sleeper missiles a LOT.

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout
Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#6 - 2012-03-28 03:33:57 UTC
I've always been told that small ships aren't viable in sleeper sites, but if what you guys say is true then I can probably find some that are. Thanks for the input.

I've got some testing to do!

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."
Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#7 - 2012-03-28 05:24:01 UTC
small = T3

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout
Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#8 - 2012-03-28 05:37:04 UTC
Jack Miton wrote:
small = T3
We'll see. *gets assault ship*

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."
DarthNefarius
Minmatar Heavy Industries
#9 - 2012-03-28 19:41:17 UTC
While you really have to omni tank in incursions smaller ships need a lil more resists in the EM & thermal BS/BC's need resists a bit higher for Explosive/kinetic due to the banshie torps
An' then Chicken@little.com, he come scramblin outta the    Terminal room screaming "The system's crashing! The system's    crashing!" -Uncle RAMus, 'Tales for Cyberpsychotic Children'
Daniel Plain
Doomheim
#10 - 2012-03-28 21:04:02 UTC
Reaver Glitterstim wrote:
Jack Miton wrote:
small = T3
We'll see. *gets assault ship*

just don't pimp it too much; you'll probably lose it in your first C1 anom.

I should buy an Ishtar.
Reaver Glitterstim
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#11 - 2012-03-28 22:23:27 UTC
Daniel Plain wrote:
just don't pimp it too much; you'll probably lose it in your first C1 anom.
I can warp it out quickly if things get ugly.

FT Diomedes: "Reaver, sometimes I wonder what you are thinking when you sit down to post."

Frostys Virpio: "We have to give it to him that he does put more effort than the vast majority in his idea but damn does it sometime come out of nowhere."
Jack Miton
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#12 - 2012-03-28 23:19:58 UTC
you can run C1s fin in AFs.

There is no Bob.

Stuck In Here With Me:  http://sihwm.blogspot.com.au/

Down the Pipe:  http://feeds.feedburner.com/CloakyScout