These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

My Apology

First post First post
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#2341 - 2012-03-27 21:07:11 UTC
Marlona Sky wrote:
Seleene wrote:
OFFICIAL: The CSM are discussing recent events and will issue a public statement after a few days.


You mean wait a few days and see if the recent events is still a PR nightmare for CCP and all associated entities like the CSM? Because that is what you just said.

Mittani/Alex created a situation that leaves only two options for CCP:

1. Don't ban Alex and all his accounts thus sending the message to all players and the gaming community that CCP supports cyber bullying with the goal to get another player to kill themselves in real life.

2. Ban Alex and all his accounts sending a clear message that CCP does not tolerate cyber bullying with the intent to have someone kill themselves in real life.

That is the situation he created for himself and CCP. No one else did this. He has only himself to blame.

Everyone no matter what your angle is knows damn well that if it was some ordinary player who did this he would be in perma-ban hell right now. Why should Mittani receive this special treatment? Does being on the CSM now or the next term mean they are not held to the EULA like the rest of the players?


false dilemma LOL

how is it not surprising that your posting is so awful that you got banned from FHC of all places

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar
Retar Aveymone
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#2342 - 2012-03-27 21:07:48 UTC
Princess Bride wrote:
Because they're mad, brosef.

no they're not sorry you just seem like an easy target to mock because you're dumb but people don't realize you're literally too dumb

i mean no matter how much i insult a rock for being dumb its never going to learn or feel bad
Karim alRashid
Starboard.
#2343 - 2012-03-27 21:07:53 UTC
Still can't get a definitive answer

Is this so called "Kestrel" [1] player, who have allegedly blown the whistle to Eurogamer, a FinFleet alt or not ?

--
[1] may not be his in-game nick, information is from various news sites

Pain is weakness leaving the body http://www.youtube.com/user/AlRashidKarim/videos
esc shk
Okay Sax
#2344 - 2012-03-27 21:08:03 UTC
Marlona Sky wrote:
Seleene wrote:
OFFICIAL: The CSM are discussing recent events and will issue a public statement after a few days.


You mean wait a few days and see if the recent events is still a PR nightmare for CCP and all associated entities like the CSM? Because that is what you just said.

Mittani/Alex created a situation that leaves only two options for CCP:

1. Don't ban Alex and all his accounts thus sending the message to all players and the gaming community that CCP supports cyber bullying with the goal to get another player to kill themselves in real life.

2. Ban Alex and all his accounts sending a clear message that CCP does not tolerate cyber bullying with the intent to have someone kill themselves in real life.

That is the situation he created for himself and CCP. No one else did this. He has only himself to blame.

Everyone no matter what your angle is knows damn well that if it was some ordinary player who did this he would be in perma-ban hell right now. Why should Mittani receive this special treatment? Does being on the CSM now or the next term mean they are not held to the EULA like the rest of the players?



He didn't cyber bully anyone QuestionQuestionQuestion
Ice Fist
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#2345 - 2012-03-27 21:08:17 UTC
Princess Bride wrote:
Derrick Munroe wrote:
Vincent Athena wrote:
Everyone realizes that the presentation was made days, if not weeks prior to the event? This was not an off the cuff remark made while drunk, it was premeditated.


So why is CCP not at fault for allowing the slide to be presented in the first place?


Oh they are. If they ever post an apology thread of their own, I'll be sure to post in it. :)


This is pretty much the only remotely sensible thing you're posted this whole thread.
DaiTengu
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#2346 - 2012-03-27 21:08:36 UTC
Marlona Sky wrote:
Seleene wrote:
OFFICIAL: The CSM are discussing recent events and will issue a public statement after a few days.


You mean wait a few days and see if the recent events is still a PR nightmare for CCP and all associated entities like the CSM? Because that is what you just said.

Mittani/Alex created a situation that leaves only two options for CCP:

1. Don't ban Alex and all his accounts thus sending the message to all players and the gaming community that CCP supports cyber bullying with the goal to get another player to kill themselves in real life.

2. Ban Alex and all his accounts sending a clear message that CCP does not tolerate cyber bullying with the intent to have someone kill themselves in real life.

That is the situation he created for himself and CCP. No one else did this. He has only himself to blame.

Everyone no matter what your angle is knows damn well that if it was some ordinary player who did this he would be in perma-ban hell right now. Why should Mittani receive this special treatment? Does being on the CSM now or the next term mean they are not held to the EULA like the rest of the players?


Reading your posts is driving me to suicide. I demand that CCP bans you.
de4deye
Terra Nova Innovations
Sedition.
#2347 - 2012-03-27 21:08:38 UTC
Time to go, Mittens.
GallowsCalibrator
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#2348 - 2012-03-27 21:09:29 UTC
Marlona Sky wrote:
Seleene wrote:
OFFICIAL: The CSM are discussing recent events and will issue a public statement after a few days.


You mean wait a few days and see if the recent events is still a PR nightmare for CCP and all associated entities like the CSM? Because that is what you just said.

Mittani/Alex created a situation that leaves only two options for CCP:

1. Don't ban Alex and all his accounts thus sending the message to all players and the gaming community that CCP supports cyber bullying with the goal to get another player to kill themselves in real life.

2. Ban Alex and all his accounts sending a clear message that CCP does not tolerate cyber bullying with the intent to have someone kill themselves in real life.

That is the situation he created for himself and CCP. No one else did this. He has only himself to blame.

Everyone no matter what your angle is knows damn well that if it was some ordinary player who did this he would be in perma-ban hell right now. Why should Mittani receive this special treatment? Does being on the CSM now or the next term mean they are not held to the EULA like the rest of the players?


3. Realise that the company and people involved are being cautious for a reason, probably involving the fact that it's not a black and white situation.

OH GOD WHY DOES ANDSKI BEAT ME TO EVERY POST
NightmareX
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#2349 - 2012-03-27 21:09:43 UTC
Andski wrote:
Marlona Sky wrote:
Seleene wrote:
OFFICIAL: The CSM are discussing recent events and will issue a public statement after a few days.


You mean wait a few days and see if the recent events is still a PR nightmare for CCP and all associated entities like the CSM? Because that is what you just said.

Mittani/Alex created a situation that leaves only two options for CCP:

1. Don't ban Alex and all his accounts thus sending the message to all players and the gaming community that CCP supports cyber bullying with the goal to get another player to kill themselves in real life.

2. Ban Alex and all his accounts sending a clear message that CCP does not tolerate cyber bullying with the intent to have someone kill themselves in real life.

That is the situation he created for himself and CCP. No one else did this. He has only himself to blame.

Everyone no matter what your angle is knows damn well that if it was some ordinary player who did this he would be in perma-ban hell right now. Why should Mittani receive this special treatment? Does being on the CSM now or the next term mean they are not held to the EULA like the rest of the players?


false dilemma LOL

how is it not surprising that your posting is so awful that you got banned from FHC of all places

LOL, someone is for sure out of arguments when you have to start talking about other things as an excuse.

Here is a list of my current EVE / PVP videos:

1: Asteroid Madness

2: Clash of the Empires

3: Suddenly Spaceships fighting in Tama
esc shk
Okay Sax
#2350 - 2012-03-27 21:09:45 UTC
de4deye wrote:
Time to go, Mittens.



Hows replacing those titans going son?
esc shk
Okay Sax
#2351 - 2012-03-27 21:10:05 UTC
threadpoopan.
Magnus Orin
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#2352 - 2012-03-27 21:10:19 UTC
RougeOperator wrote:
Andrea Roche wrote:
wow goon PR machine is in full swing Shocked



Yes they the Goons have decided they are PRO Cyber bullying, and pro driving people to suicide through harassment.

Its really very disturbing they are defending it. You should have seen some of the posts they made before they were purged by mods.


Calling what The Mittani did 'cyber-bullying' trivializes real cyber-bullying.

You are the scum of the internet.
I Love Boobies
All Hail Boobies
#2353 - 2012-03-27 21:10:21 UTC
I think he only apologized for the likes he would get from his cronies. Blink
esc shk
Okay Sax
#2354 - 2012-03-27 21:10:47 UTC
I agree with myself as the second gunman
Kallynda Nai
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#2355 - 2012-03-27 21:10:50 UTC
Princess Bride wrote:
Derrick Munroe wrote:
Vincent Athena wrote:
Everyone realizes that the presentation was made days, if not weeks prior to the event? This was not an off the cuff remark made while drunk, it was premeditated.


So why is CCP not at fault for allowing the slide to be presented in the first place?


Oh they are. If they ever post an apology thread of their own, I'll be sure to post in it. :)


Holy ****, your blog is awful.
Ice Fist
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#2356 - 2012-03-27 21:11:17 UTC
esc shk wrote:
de4deye wrote:
Time to go, Mittens.



Hows replacing those titans going son?


Not well. Not enough faction gyrostabs on the market.
de4deye
Terra Nova Innovations
Sedition.
#2357 - 2012-03-27 21:11:21 UTC
ABLOO BLOO BLOO Sad
Kalathia Eginald
Pator Tech School
Minmatar Republic
#2358 - 2012-03-27 21:11:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Kalathia Eginald
Marlona Sky wrote:
You mean wait a few days and see if the recent events is still a PR nightmare for CCP and all associated entities like the CSM? Because that is what you just said.

Mittani/Alex created a situation that leaves only two options for CCP:

1. Don't ban Alex and all his accounts thus sending the message to all players and the gaming community that CCP supports cyber bullying with the goal to get another player to kill themselves in real life.

2. Ban Alex and all his accounts sending a clear message that CCP does not tolerate cyber bullying with the intent to have someone kill themselves in real life.

That is the situation he created for himself and CCP. No one else did this. He has only himself to blame.

Everyone no matter what your angle is knows damn well that if it was some ordinary player who did this he would be in perma-ban hell right now. Why should Mittani receive this special treatment? Does being on the CSM now or the next term mean they are not held to the EULA like the rest of the players?


Discussion after a cool down is better than a knee jerk reaction. Knee jerk reactions tend to be the worst mistakes. Much the same about knee jerk laws and changes to game rules.

1 and 2 both. If he has broken any rules then he should be sanctioned, if he has not then he should not be that is the simple fact of the matter.

I have read through the EULA and in my opinion it does not apply here. However we have no idea what people who are CSM and people as speakers at the event have to sign upto. Those are what will be used to decide if he is to be sanctioned, not yours, mine or anyone elese opinions on whether he broke the rules or not.
esc shk
Okay Sax
#2359 - 2012-03-27 21:11:25 UTC
Kallynda Nai wrote:
Princess Bride wrote:
Derrick Munroe wrote:
Vincent Athena wrote:
Everyone realizes that the presentation was made days, if not weeks prior to the event? This was not an off the cuff remark made while drunk, it was premeditated.


So why is CCP not at fault for allowing the slide to be presented in the first place?


Oh they are. If they ever post an apology thread of their own, I'll be sure to post in it. :)


Holy ****, your blog is awful.



Not empty quoting
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#2360 - 2012-03-27 21:11:27 UTC
NightmareX wrote:
Andski wrote:
Marlona Sky wrote:
Seleene wrote:
OFFICIAL: The CSM are discussing recent events and will issue a public statement after a few days.


You mean wait a few days and see if the recent events is still a PR nightmare for CCP and all associated entities like the CSM? Because that is what you just said.

Mittani/Alex created a situation that leaves only two options for CCP:

1. Don't ban Alex and all his accounts thus sending the message to all players and the gaming community that CCP supports cyber bullying with the goal to get another player to kill themselves in real life.

2. Ban Alex and all his accounts sending a clear message that CCP does not tolerate cyber bullying with the intent to have someone kill themselves in real life.

That is the situation he created for himself and CCP. No one else did this. He has only himself to blame.

Everyone no matter what your angle is knows damn well that if it was some ordinary player who did this he would be in perma-ban hell right now. Why should Mittani receive this special treatment? Does being on the CSM now or the next term mean they are not held to the EULA like the rest of the players?


false dilemma LOL

how is it not surprising that your posting is so awful that you got banned from FHC of all places

LOL, someone is for sure out of arguments when you have to start talking about other things as an excuse.


i pointed out that he's falling back on the badposting fallacy that is the false dilemma

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar