These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

My Apology

First post First post
Author
ExhumeToConsume
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#1761 - 2012-03-27 13:23:23 UTC
bl4ckL0tus wrote:
well i feel like u showed ure true colours ... and beeing evil ingame as well in real life ... ppl can see u know and u can go sit in ure corner and not blame the alchool for ure behaviour. GET A REALITY PILL and realise what u done its not going to be repaired with a simple : i`m sorry. Get off any leadership position u dont deserve to be in one and realise what u`ve done. kk thx


1 Jesus went unto the mount of Olives.

2 And early in the morning he came again into the temple, and all the people came unto him; and he sat down, and taught them.

3 And the scribes and Pharisees brought unto him a woman taken in adultery; and when they had set her in the midst,

4 They say unto him, Master, this woman was taken in adultery, in the very act.

5 Now Moses in the law commanded us, that such should be stoned: but what sayest thou?

6 This they said, tempting him, that they might have to accuse him. But Jesus stooped down, and with [his] finger wrote on the ground, [as though he heard them not].

7 So when they continued asking him, he lifted up himself, and said unto them, He that is without sin among you, let him first cast a stone at her.

8 And again he stooped down, and wrote on the ground.

9 And they which heard [it], being convicted by [their own] conscience, went out one by one, beginning at the eldest, [even] unto the last: and Jesus was left alone, and the woman standing in the midst.

10 When Jesus had lifted up himself, and saw none but the woman, he said unto her, Woman, where are those thine accusers? hath no man condemned thee?

11 She said, No man, Lord. And Jesus said unto her, Neither do I condemn thee: go, and sin no more.
Kaivar Lancer
Doomheim
#1762 - 2012-03-27 13:24:11 UTC
Snow Axe wrote:
Kaivar Lancer wrote:
Mittani has single-handedly given Eve Online pariah status. I wonder how much this has cost CCP in terms of wasted PR dollars. The last thing Sony wants is to see major media linking Dust with online suicides and cyber-bullying. This would be the kiss of death to CCP.


Hey, if we're talking about stupid **** that won't ever happen, you know what else would be the kiss of death for CCP? A herd of elephants let loose in their office! Not just for the casualties, but for the structural damage!


You think CCP finds this funny? I don't know how much CCP budgeted for their PR, but if Mittani set back CCP's efforts by say $100k (a conservative estimate), that's somebody's job at CCP.
Kefka Wu
Shadow Legion X
Seriously Suspicious
#1763 - 2012-03-27 13:24:31 UTC
Best way to put it: differentiate between online character and real lfie please:

http://jestertrek.blogspot.de/2012/03/hats.html

Great written article about this situation
Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon
Goonswarm Federation
#1764 - 2012-03-27 13:25:33 UTC
I know contries where Goonswarm could actually be charged for building a criminal organisation and terrorism (true story)...and it is not the US....but nobody does it cause its a freaking game...

TunDraGon is recruiting! "Also, your boobs [:o] "   CCP Eterne, 2012 "When in doubt...make a diȼk joke." Robin Williams - RIP

RougeOperator
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#1765 - 2012-03-27 13:25:56 UTC
What makes me think the apology is just bull is that the goons are out in force doubling down on stupid in defense of cyber bullying.

The great leader says one thing, while the goons do another.

All that is left is he has to step down from the CSM totally now because of the actions of his goons at this point. Trying to spin the story has hurt him even more.

His follower ruined any chance for his apology to work as a get out of trouble card.


What he did is not a game.

**Space wizards are real, they can make 10058 votes vanish. "and for a moment i hurd 10k goons cry out, then silence" **

baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#1766 - 2012-03-27 13:29:45 UTC
Kaivar Lancer wrote:


You think CCP finds this funny? I don't know how much CCP budgeted for their PR, but if Mittani set back CCP's efforts by say $100k (a conservative estimate), that's somebody's job at CCP.


The responsibility for the bad press is entirely down to you people. Most are not interested or don't see what all the fuss is about. Much worse is said in Jita local every hour of every day.
Kaivar Lancer
Doomheim
#1767 - 2012-03-27 13:30:16 UTC
Daviclond wrote:
Kaivar Lancer wrote:


You think CCP finds this funny? I don't know how much CCP budgeted for their PR, but if Mittani set back CCP's efforts by say $100k (a conservative estimate), that's somebody's job at CCP.


hahaha nothing will come of this


Have you ever run a business? One key to risk management is to reduce or remove your liabilities. Mittani is a liability. I can't think of any way that CCP can benefit from keeping Mittani CSM chief. Goons won't quit. They are hopelessly addicted to this game and have formed a symbiotic relationship with their Eve personas.
Lenrir Andven
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#1768 - 2012-03-27 13:30:40 UTC
Kara Roideater wrote:
Lenrir Andven wrote:


Pretty much. I am from the UK as well and the 'cyber-bullying' craze has really been picking up pace, with all that stuff about facebook and what not. That is why when I compare what is classed as 'cyber-bullying' to what we consider as 'griefing', then the grey line is really that much more grey. I wouldn't be surprised if the UK will ban all MMO's with the way they wish to 'protect' their children from anything 'wrong.'



Certainly some people have that view of griefing in general. But I think in this particular case the line is not so grey. The person was held up as a target in an out of game context and with the reason for the targeting being claims he made about his state of well-being outside the game. So both the platform used to target him and the reasons given were not game-based, although the methods proposed for targeting him were. But it is pretty clear that the possible upside of griefing him was meant to be that it would, hopefully, make him miserable in real life. Now, whilst that last goal might be a normal griefing goal, I think the RL context and platform amke this look like the game is actually incidental rather than central, such that considering it merely to be griefing someone in game misses out a lot of the details.


I understand what you mean, but what bothers me is the lack of information that we have received about this 'victim'. Other than the e-mail (which could of been forged) and his contact name, this all could of been an elaborate ruse, a stunt, in which Mittens wished to play out because, well let's be honest, they couldn't do another 'GSF history' session every single fanfest.

Now if it was true then yes, as you have stated, the upside to this would of been the intent to make his life miserable, I for one would understand that since I am, after all, a Goonie.

Now would I class what he stated as cyber-bullying? No, I wouldn't. In fact for what he said, it could of been a whole lot worse. He said a simple quip, a soundbyte, nothing more. When compared to far more 'elaborate' insults and quips, what he said was really not that bad. Short-sighted? Of course, though I doubt anyone would of expected this kind of backlash from what was said.

I think his apology is more than enough really, those that are asking for more is actually causing more harm than good.
ExhumeToConsume
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#1769 - 2012-03-27 13:32:35 UTC
RougeOperator wrote:
What makes me think the apology is just bull is that the goons are out in force doubling down on stupid in defense of cyber bullying.

The great leader says one thing, while the goons do another.

All that is left is he has to step down from the CSM totally now because of the actions of his goons at this point. Trying to spin the story has hurt him even more.

His follower ruined any chance for his apology to work as a get out of trouble card.


What he did is not a game.


You seem upset? Do you have anyone to talk to about your feelings? I wish to make amends for our incompetent a**hole of a CEO so I provide you with the following website to ensure your mental well-being.

http://www.samaritans.org/

fly safe m8 0707070707
baltec1
Bat Country
Pandemic Horde
#1770 - 2012-03-27 13:33:52 UTC
RougeOperator wrote:
What makes me think the apology is just bull is that the goons are out in force doubling down on stupid in defense of cyber bullying.

The great leader says one thing, while the goons do another.

All that is left is he has to step down from the CSM totally now because of the actions of his goons at this point. Trying to spin the story has hurt him even more.

His follower ruined any chance for his apology to work as a get out of trouble card.


What he did is not a game.


Just 2 hours ago I got told to go die in a fire in a fight. Is this bullying?
Solid Raiden
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#1771 - 2012-03-27 13:35:16 UTC
Kalathia Eginald wrote:
Solid Raiden wrote:
Real balls? It takes 5 minutes writing some meaningless words on a paper. Nothing more. Apologizing is just another way of manipulating people.

So after this, this and this, all of the sudden he is sorry and we should just accept it? Words are meaningless unless followed by actions.


You are however contradicting yourself. If as you say "words are meaningless unless followed by actions" then the words that started this off are also meaningles unless he did hat he said others should do. It is a logical follow through from what you have said.


Contradicting? Point me to my words where I contradict myself.

I never said what he did was wrong. Mittani said it himself. So, he is admitting he was wrong, writing bunch of words, but hasn't yet accepted consequences of his actions.
RougeOperator
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#1772 - 2012-03-27 13:35:26 UTC
Lenrir Andven wrote:
Kara Roideater wrote:
Lenrir Andven wrote:


Pretty much. I am from the UK as well and the 'cyber-bullying' craze has really been picking up pace, with all that stuff about facebook and what not. That is why when I compare what is classed as 'cyber-bullying' to what we consider as 'griefing', then the grey line is really that much more grey. I wouldn't be surprised if the UK will ban all MMO's with the way they wish to 'protect' their children from anything 'wrong.'



Certainly some people have that view of griefing in general. But I think in this particular case the line is not so grey. The person was held up as a target in an out of game context and with the reason for the targeting being claims he made about his state of well-being outside the game. So both the platform used to target him and the reasons given were not game-based, although the methods proposed for targeting him were. But it is pretty clear that the possible upside of griefing him was meant to be that it would, hopefully, make him miserable in real life. Now, whilst that last goal might be a normal griefing goal, I think the RL context and platform amke this look like the game is actually incidental rather than central, such that considering it merely to be griefing someone in game misses out a lot of the details.


I understand what you mean, but what bothers me is the lack of information that we have received about this 'victim'. Other than the e-mail (which could of been forged) and his contact name, this all could of been an elaborate ruse, a stunt, in which Mittens wished to play out because, well let's be honest, they couldn't do another 'GSF history' session every single fanfest.

Now if it was true then yes, as you have stated, the upside to this would of been the intent to make his life miserable, I for one would understand that since I am, after all, a Goonie.

Now would I class what he stated as cyber-bullying? No, I wouldn't. In fact for what he said, it could of been a whole lot worse. He said a simple quip, a soundbyte, nothing more. When compared to far more 'elaborate' insults and quips, what he said was really not that bad. Short-sighted? Of course, though I doubt anyone would of expected this kind of backlash from what was said.

I think his apology is more than enough really, those that are asking for more is actually causing more harm than good.



Stop trying to spin this into being about just the victim. Its about every player and those that have yet to play the game that are yet to come.

Its a precedent setting moment. Its about the fact that if allowed to get away with it. What about the next person whom might not be stable enough to not be pushed to far.

Calling for the lynching of a person like the mittani did requires he step down from the CSM. A person that calls basically for the in real life death of another player should not represent the players.

You can sit there and spin spin spin the story as much as you want . Its not going to change that a company cannot have such a person seen as a representative of their game or the games players.

Goon culture needs to wake up and realize that this was too far. The line was crossed that should not be crossed.

**Space wizards are real, they can make 10058 votes vanish. "and for a moment i hurd 10k goons cry out, then silence" **

Strathcaron
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#1773 - 2012-03-27 13:36:45 UTC
Being CSM chariman is more than giving order to 8000 own alliance grunts. He needs to represent ALL players, including their ingame enemies. That kind of offenses, insults or acts, needs to be punished.

I dont like mittani, but i respect his faggotry on local, forums and jabber broadcasts. He can insult and harrass enemies.
BUT i cant respect a guy in RL that is representing the players, not the toons, and see how he say that bullshit about a guy. Doesnt matter if he hast 1 or 10k votes. We/You didnt vote mittani. Voted Alexander Gianturco, a guy who drunk, in public, on a live stream, said stuff that can be prosecuted at least in 26 european countries. And that guy pretends now represent the eve community in front CCP.

No way. This is not about the mittani, is about Alexander Gianturco and he MUST resign. An apollogy its fine for his own conscience, but that doesnt relieve of guilt. Next time, think about what are you going to say, think before what are you going to do.



RougeOperator
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#1774 - 2012-03-27 13:37:19 UTC
baltec1 wrote:
RougeOperator wrote:
What makes me think the apology is just bull is that the goons are out in force doubling down on stupid in defense of cyber bullying.

The great leader says one thing, while the goons do another.

All that is left is he has to step down from the CSM totally now because of the actions of his goons at this point. Trying to spin the story has hurt him even more.

His follower ruined any chance for his apology to work as a get out of trouble card.


What he did is not a game.


Just 2 hours ago I got told to go die in a fire in a fight. Is this bullying?


Was this done out of game at a panel broadcast all over the world. Where the person doing the bullying is calling for your to DIE FOR REAL?




**Space wizards are real, they can make 10058 votes vanish. "and for a moment i hurd 10k goons cry out, then silence" **

Jouron
Hadon Shipping
#1775 - 2012-03-27 13:39:47 UTC
I'm sorry to see that this has happened.

I always regarded the Mittani as the first Digital statesman.

You know what this will lead too. When the media get ahold of this, people who take what we do for 'fun'(griefing) in game seriously will be baying for blood.

CCP will have to apologize, out right condemn the Mittani's actions and make it clear this wont happen again.

What is worse is they may permanently ban the Mittani as sacrificial offering to the PR gods.

All of which I wish would not have to happen but probably will.

A tragic end to an individual whose hand has shaped a great deal of our games player driven lore.
Im sorry mittens. But when they placed the laurel on your head they failed to whisper: "All glory is fleeting."

The only defense one can mount of the mittanis position is that no one should reveal that much intimate details of one's private life to any one in game. And this individual chose to. Either way the Mittani is no fool and should have kept this info on the inside of goonswarm. In other words he knew better and did this any ways.
Eugene Kerner
TunDraGon
Goonswarm Federation
#1776 - 2012-03-27 13:40:36 UTC
Strathcaron wrote:
Being CSM chariman is more than giving order to 8000 own alliance grunts. He needs to represent ALL players, including their ingame enemies. That kind of offenses, insults or acts, needs to be punished.

I dont like mittani, but i respect his faggotry on local, forums and jabber broadcasts. He can insult and harrass enemies.
BUT i cant respect a guy in RL that is representing the players, not the toons, and see how he say that bullshit about a guy. Doesnt matter if he hast 1 or 10k votes. We/You didnt vote mittani. Voted Alexander Gianturco, a guy who drunk, in public, on a live stream, said stuff that can be prosecuted at least in 26 european countries. And that guy pretends now represent the eve community in front CCP.

No way. This is not about the mittani, is about Alexander Gianturco and he MUST resign. An apollogy its fine for his own conscience, but that doesnt relieve of guilt. Next time, think about what are you going to say, think before what are you going to do.





He does not need to represent all...what do you think he is?? Some kind of elected politician? He represents the Goons and CFC and their interests in 0.0.
He was elected by them and only owes them. If some of his goals match yours you were free to vote for him as well.

TunDraGon is recruiting! "Also, your boobs [:o] "   CCP Eterne, 2012 "When in doubt...make a diȼk joke." Robin Williams - RIP

So Sensational
Ventures
#1777 - 2012-03-27 13:42:13 UTC
JTK Fotheringham wrote:
KFenn wrote:


He wasn't acting in an official capacity though. He was there as the leader of Goonswarm, a well established alliance of well-known douchebags.

Also, 10K votes. He'd likely be chair without the Goon vote.


Again, the issues not being understood. Mittens can't lay aside the "player elected representative" hat when he gets drunk at Fanfest. Whether he was acting "offically" or not is irrelevant.

The point is, he mounted an out-of-game attack on a player. And he did so to camera, at a CCP-run event.

10k votes doing get you a pass for being stupid. And 10k votes don't undo the bad press.

Every time there's a CSM story for the next year, this story will remain in paragraph 4 where they have a Mittens quote. So every time the CSM has a chance to do some good for the game, there'll be links to a story that will put off prospective players. Mittens can't stay as CSM chair, I doubt he can stay on the CSM.



What bad press? **** like this is what gets people playing EVE, this is the reason we're here, because it's a sandbox with risk and reward and the most vicious players of any online game.
Jade Constantine
Jericho Fraction
The Star Fraction
#1778 - 2012-03-27 13:42:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Jade Constantine
The reality is that people have been forced to resign from the CSM in the past for the mistakes they have made. Breaking NDA, unprofessional conduct, general bad behaviour etc etc. Its not unreasonable to hold the elected chair of the player council to a higher standard than other players, particularly when a part of his responsibility is to be the golden boy for the cameras and the gaming media at fanfest.

That Alexander Gianturco thought the alliance panel presentation he gave was a good idea in the first place shows a huge lack of judgement that even his wife on the SA forums is saying she advised him against it.

That his CCP handlers didn't raise an eyebrow at the content is surprising (but somewhat understandable) on the grounds that he probably built up some trust over the resolution of the monoclegate affair.

But what really kicks his reputation in the teeth is to get completely wasted on beer and ad-lib channel his sadistic game personna on stage and try for a bit of televised cyber-bullying in the full view of the gaming media at an event which was absolutely critical for CCP's ongoing recovery and future as a forward looking MMO universe.

This guy is (or was) a lawyer. A profession that requires a bit of class and professional ethics to be taken seriously. Now anyone who googles his name is going to see a chubby clown in a wizards hat mocking some unfortunate depressive player to the baying encouragement of other morons too wasted to stand up straight.

I do believe his apology is pretty earnest; because I'm sure as hell convinced he regrets what he did, because its the de facto suicide of his professional reputation and any credibility as a gaming pundit he's been building the last few years. From now till the end of his public presence he's going to be "the abusive wizard's hat drunken guy with the stupid chin beard" and held up as a posterboy for the nasty side of multiplayer gaming alongside the likes of Aris Bakhtanians and the sexism in fighting games scandal.

But earnest or not, he needs to go as CSM chair certainly. This guy cannot credibly represent the Eve player community in a year where Eve is on the path to recovery following a successful fanfest and planned integration of two gaming communities in the union of Eve and Dust514.

And the goons really need to get over themselves. 10,000 votes sure, but thats a fraction of the players of eve online, its not close to a majority of the total votes amongst the other councillers even.

I'm not one to advocate a permabanning or something really harsh over this. I think there is some shared responsibility that CCP hold for allowing the alliance panel to turn to a drunken mood. I think Alex probably did get swayed along to be nastier than he intended with the achohol-fuelled peer pressure and general egging by other speakers and members of the audience.

But whats undeniably the case is he didn't represent Eve online in the way the chairman of the CSM should be representing Eve online and he behaved in a way that dragged both CSM and Eve through the mud and did immense damage to the reputation of the game in the wider gaming media.

Nobody minds being seen as a player of that "really hardcore game" as a spacepilot in the "brutal and deadly universe of eve" as a player in the setting "where everyone is out to get you" etc etc. Eve players thrive on being seen as people that play games on hard mode and want to get back to that core gaming ethos that the CCP marketing guy was talking about in the final presentation.

But here's the thing. The message from Fanfest that CCP was trying its heart out to portray to anyone watching was that though we play hard and brutal in space in game, in our ships and in our wars and conflicts - out of game, when we come together at fanfest or at the pub or wherever, we're not actually psychopathic lunatics blood-drunk on cheap sadism and frat boy bullying.

Alexander Gianturco "the mittani" was about as far from that mesage as its possible to get. He showed in that drunken presentation at fanfest as he showed in the dismissive "deal with it" in the wake - that he really doesn't "get" the Eve Online that the rest of us do. That behind all the ruthless shennanigans in space we're actually players that have a shared camaraderie beyond our characters and when meeting each other at the game conventions its time to put aside the sterotypical evil villain masks and show the human face underneath.

On that stage Alexander showed he's forgotten how to remove his mask and he's lived the Mittani's heart of darkness a little too long and too closely and he's started supping on his on delusions and its a bit saddening to watch. He needs some help, I'm sure his wife will give him some good advise and he needs to take a bit of time away from the spotlight and see where his life goes from here.

But he is no longer a fitting representative for the Eve player community and the longer he takes to gather his courage and follow-through with the promised resignation the more harm he continues to do.

The True Knowledge is that nothing matters that does not matter to you, might does make right and power makes freedom

Banden Lokemir
Black Void Forges
#1779 - 2012-03-27 13:44:59 UTC
I like the part where everyone gets super outraged at the guy for encouraging harrasment of other players and taking him for serious while he was wearing a wizards hat and drinking jägerbombs.

I personally danced around naked and dickslapped a guy on the hand this new years from excessive intake of Jägermeister so I feel his pain.

I watched the alliance panel and all I saw was a bunch of drunk dudes being asshats, exactly what I would expect from a video of an alliance panel.

All this stuff is just flaring because Goons and The mittani attract a lot of hate. Really what did you expect? If it was anyone else, I hardly think it would even raise an eyebrow.

But do keep it up, the more you get fired up about this **** the faster it gets into mainstream media and inflated to Public Outraged stage number one and we all know the mainstream media likes to take shots at the video gaming industry for **** that is plainly not its responsability.
Lenrir Andven
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#1780 - 2012-03-27 13:45:22 UTC
RougeOperator wrote:
Lenrir Andven wrote:
Kara Roideater wrote:
Lenrir Andven wrote:


Pretty much. I am from the UK as well and the 'cyber-bullying' craze has really been picking up pace, with all that stuff about facebook and what not. That is why when I compare what is classed as 'cyber-bullying' to what we consider as 'griefing', then the grey line is really that much more grey. I wouldn't be surprised if the UK will ban all MMO's with the way they wish to 'protect' their children from anything 'wrong.'



Certainly some people have that view of griefing in general. But I think in this particular case the line is not so grey. The person was held up as a target in an out of game context and with the reason for the targeting being claims he made about his state of well-being outside the game. So both the platform used to target him and the reasons given were not game-based, although the methods proposed for targeting him were. But it is pretty clear that the possible upside of griefing him was meant to be that it would, hopefully, make him miserable in real life. Now, whilst that last goal might be a normal griefing goal, I think the RL context and platform amke this look like the game is actually incidental rather than central, such that considering it merely to be griefing someone in game misses out a lot of the details.


I understand what you mean, but what bothers me is the lack of information that we have received about this 'victim'. Other than the e-mail (which could of been forged) and his contact name, this all could of been an elaborate ruse, a stunt, in which Mittens wished to play out because, well let's be honest, they couldn't do another 'GSF history' session every single fanfest.

Now if it was true then yes, as you have stated, the upside to this would of been the intent to make his life miserable, I for one would understand that since I am, after all, a Goonie.

Now would I class what he stated as cyber-bullying? No, I wouldn't. In fact for what he said, it could of been a whole lot worse. He said a simple quip, a soundbyte, nothing more. When compared to far more 'elaborate' insults and quips, what he said was really not that bad. Short-sighted? Of course, though I doubt anyone would of expected this kind of backlash from what was said.

I think his apology is more than enough really, those that are asking for more is actually causing more harm than good.



Stop trying to spin this into being about just the victim. Its about every player and those that have yet to play the game that are yet to come.

Its a precedent setting moment. Its about the fact that if allowed to get away with it. What about the next person whom might not be stable enough to not be pushed to far.

Calling for the lynching of a person like the mittani did requires he step down from the CSM. A person that calls basically for the in real life death of another player should not represent the players.

You can sit there and spin spin spin the story as much as you want . Its not going to change that a company cannot have such a person seen as a representative of their game or the games players.

Goon culture needs to wake up and realize that this was too far. The line was crossed that should not be crossed.


The game is already perceived as a ruthless culture, so this does nothing but temper this fact. It's hardly ground-breaking really.

Like I already stated somewhere down the line, it is no one's fault that the victims of those whose ship was turned into dust is mentally unstable. Who could of known? Unless you know the guy in RL you can only get information through whatever they tell you.


Also Mittani, in no way, called for his death. He just told people to message him, give him a 'holla'. It isn't too hard to read what he meant. He is a bit mad, yes, but he is not one of these terrorists preaching death to all 'infidels.'


Also calling us the spin doctors, that's pretty amusing. The folks that are spinning this out of control is the bleeding heart liberals who think anything which may be deemed as 'politically incorrect' is grounds for protest and anger.

Goon culture is well and truly awake, it is currently giggling at the absurdity of this witch hunt.