These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Jita Park Speakers Corner

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next pageLast page
 

Vote Issler Dainze, the only Female in the election without a doodle.

Author
Frying Doom
#1 - 2012-03-15 11:18:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Frying Doom
With women making up almost 50% of the worlds population and with only around 4% of the population of EVE female, it makes sense to have a Female on the CSM. With a female on the CSM it would probably increase the number of female players and would give CCP something to advertise.

This would create true newbies in the process and allowing CCP to gather in more money for the company. The new revenue for the company will allow it to fix all the problems of EVE. If we managed to double the population of EVE and double CCP's money, surely they could fix the game.

Issler Dainze for CSM7. It just makes sense.
Cause lets face it. It's a sausage fest out here.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Red Templar
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#2 - 2012-03-15 11:34:32 UTC
is she sexy?

If no, then there is no way that she is getting any of my votes.

[b]For Love. For Peace. For Honor.

For None of the Above.

For Pony![/b]

bardaq
Perkone
Caldari State
#3 - 2012-03-15 11:34:54 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
With women making up almost 50% of the worlds population and with only around 4% of the population of EVE female, it makes sense to have a Female on the CSM. With a female on the CSM it would probably increase the number of female players and would give CCP something to advertise.

This would create true newbies in the process and allowing CCP to gather in more money for the company. The new revenue for the company will allow it to fix all the problems of EVE. If we managed to double the population of EVE and double CCP's money, surely they could fix the game.

Issler Dainze for CSM7. It just makes sense.
Cause lets face it. It's a sausage fest out here.



78% of statistics are made up and your threat honestly makes no sence.

How would having a female as the CSM make more people come to the game? Do you henestly think people in the real world know about eve and what gender the CSM are?.
Frying Doom
#4 - 2012-03-15 11:41:31 UTC
I was unaware I made a threat.

This was why I said CCP should advertise the fact. Dont make me post a Wikipedia link.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Elanor Vega
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#5 - 2012-03-15 11:55:52 UTC
"As of 2011, the global sex ratio is approximately 1.01 males to 1 woman – the slightly higher number of men is possibly due to the gender imbalances evident in the Indian and Chinese populations."

from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_population
Andski
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#6 - 2012-03-15 12:02:32 UTC
So you're confirming your support for a pro-RMT candidate?

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Taiwanistan
#7 - 2012-03-15 12:08:14 UTC
so she happens to be a women and that's all she has going for her?
stop suicide bombing her campaign

TA on wis: "when we have a feature that is its own functional ecosystem of gameplay then hooks into the greater ecosystem of EVE as a whole, and it provides good replayability."

Frying Doom
#8 - 2012-03-15 12:08:26 UTC
bardaq wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
With women making up almost 50% of the worlds population and with only around 4% of the population of EVE female, it makes sense to have a Female on the CSM. With a female on the CSM it would probably increase the number of female players and would give CCP something to advertise.

This would create true newbies in the process and allowing CCP to gather in more money for the company. The new revenue for the company will allow it to fix all the problems of EVE. If we managed to double the population of EVE and double CCP's money, surely they could fix the game.

Issler Dainze for CSM7. It just makes sense.
Cause lets face it. It's a sausage fest out here.



78% of statistics are made up and your threat honestly makes no sence.

How would having a female as the CSM make more people come to the game? Do you henestly think people in the real world know about eve and what gender the CSM are?.



I'm sorry i just got what you consider a threat. Women in position's of Power.

I should have considered this possibility. Would you like me to add a disclaimer, like "Warning people who's masculinity is easily threatened sould Not read this post" ?

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Taiwanistan
#9 - 2012-03-15 12:14:58 UTC
vote for issler if you support this

Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:


As I've pointed out several times, social gameplay is the mother of emergent gameplay. It needs a minimal investment in infrastructure and can keep players amused like forever. Just hand out some tools and allow people use them. Organized gameplay is cool to have, NPC interaction is cool, but from a cost/profit POV there is nothing as effective as just let people interact through avatars. Throw in some "hologram" technology so they're not forced to be aboard the same station and ther you go. Now add some advantages to physically being there (I already suggested stuff like kissing, caressing, punching, slapping... or dancing, if CCP were up to a tough ball; i've been iterating on the dance concept and I am figuring ways so two players can syncronize their moves within EVE's 1 second server frames... I don't mean "hit dance emote, do silly moves", rather "press the right keys at the right time so the server is fed the right "combos" from both sides at the right time and plays the right animation... in my limited knowledge, nobody ever tried that online...)

Err, to the point, there are lots of things that can be done as tools for friendly social interaction. If someone wants avatar PvP, they may have it, as long as it is not shoved down the throat of every player. Stations are griefing free zones and should stay like that. The worst that can happen in a station is being scammed and that must stay like that.


Adaris wrote:
I would very much like if the short term focus for Incarna was on a three-fold approach:

- Avatar expression (emote system)
- Avatar customization (clothes, tattoos, hair styles, body elements etc)
- Avatar socializing (facilitating more avatars being in the same location as one another)


Customization, for the most part is stand-alone. Expression is tied to socializing though, so the issue with the graphical demands of having multiple avatars in the same location needs to be addressed. If we can get a system whereby the facility to invite a set amount of avatars to the same location is possible, then much has been achieved for future iteration.

I would talk about what type of environments and activities should follow these three themes, but that should be considered more long term, especially with just one Dev Team assigned right now.

I am unsure if the current team has the technical expertise to address the issues of having multiple avatars occupy the same CQs though, but perhaps the expansion of expression through emotes (likely through the chat system) could follow alongside the continued work on avatar customization.


[/quote]

TA on wis: "when we have a feature that is its own functional ecosystem of gameplay then hooks into the greater ecosystem of EVE as a whole, and it provides good replayability."

Frying Doom
#10 - 2012-03-15 12:32:46 UTC
Taiwanistan, what do the comments of two random people have to do with Issler Dainze? You seem to be grasping at straws.

You probably should have included The Mittani's comments

The Mittani wrote:

Yet Incarna is not something which we can ignore. Not only is it inevitable, it is a fundamental necessity if EVE is to achieve any status greater than that of an awkward niche MMO from a strange, sulfuric island where people eat sheep’s heads willingly and believe in elves.

Or at least Your candidates views on EVE's lack of female players.
The Mittani wrote:

The Gender Problem: It might be a ~bit~ hypocritical for a comically over-privileged white male such as myself to bring this up, but EVE has a serious gender problem. Where other MMOs have begun narrowing the gender gap significantly, EVE remains almost purely the province of neckbearded men. This is not a good thing, though you almost couldn’t hear that fact announced over the background misogyny of the playerbase - from the old bromides about EVE being ‘too hard for girls’ to the utter nonsense of ‘girls don’t like spaceships’. While it might be equally sexist of me to suggest this, my impression is that Incarna will bring more women into the playerbase. Not because it is ‘Space Barbies’ - and that willbe the line of the reactionary neckbeards, look out for it - but because of the introduction of a distinct ‘character’ in the avatar engine. For whatever reason, it seems that men are more willing than women to look past EVE’s spreadsheet problem and suffer through the learning curve, where many female gamers write the game off as a waste of time during the crash course.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Frying Doom
#11 - 2012-03-15 12:41:32 UTC
Andski wrote:
So you're confirming your support for a pro-RMT candidate?


I noticed you seem to Bring up that Issler is pro-RMT every time you can't seem to think of anything to say. I may believe a lot of things about some of the CSM candidates but I will not sink to the level of out right lies. Even what you bring up for evidence doesn't even state RMT in EVE.

My knowledge of other MMO's out there is very limited I will admit due to my love of EVE, but I'm sure there are games out there that you can trade real money for in-game goods and bonuses allowing you to be more powerful in-game if you are rich in Real Life and do it legally according to those games EULA's

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Elanor Vega
Native Freshfood
Minmatar Republic
#12 - 2012-03-15 13:30:38 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Andski wrote:
So you're confirming your support for a pro-RMT candidate?


I noticed you seem to Bring up that Issler is pro-RMT every time you can't seem to think of anything to say. I may believe a lot of things about some of the CSM candidates but I will not sink to the level of out right lies. Even what you bring up for evidence doesn't even state RMT in EVE.

My knowledge of other MMO's out there is very limited I will admit due to my love of EVE, but I'm sure there are games out there that you can trade real money for in-game goods and bonuses allowing you to be more powerful in-game if you are rich in Real Life and do it legally according to those games EULA's


Don't bother...

Goons got list of things that they can write from their all mighty leader and they do not need brain, just copy-paste.
Well... that's why goons are goons.
Weaselior
GoonWaffe
Goonswarm Federation
#13 - 2012-03-15 13:34:48 UTC
run a better female candidate next time

Head of the Goonswarm Economic Warfare Cabal Pubbie Management and Exploitation Division.

Frying Doom
#14 - 2012-03-15 13:37:57 UTC
Weaselior wrote:
run a better female candidate next time

Not sure what the Goonsheep think would be a better female candidate? Someone who never argues with Mittens maybe?

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Taiwanistan
#15 - 2012-03-15 13:49:31 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Weaselior wrote:
run a better female candidate next time

Not sure what the Goonsheep think would be a better female candidate? Someone who never argues with Mittens maybe?

dude you are getting creepy issler do you think he is creepy?

TA on wis: "when we have a feature that is its own functional ecosystem of gameplay then hooks into the greater ecosystem of EVE as a whole, and it provides good replayability."

Frying Doom
#16 - 2012-03-15 14:02:31 UTC
Taiwanistan wrote:
Frying Doom wrote:
Weaselior wrote:
run a better female candidate next time

Not sure what the Goonsheep think would be a better female candidate? Someone who never argues with Mittens maybe?

dude you are getting creepy issler do you think he is creepy?

Sorry I forgot creepy is only a Goonswarm ability. My apologies I withdraw the "creepy" post.

"creepy" is a registered trademark of gooswarm inc. Any infringement on this ability will be met with the all the force Goonswarm can offer in the form of pointless posting about matters of no importance.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Red Templar
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#17 - 2012-03-15 14:08:20 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Weaselior wrote:
run a better female candidate next time

Not sure what the Goonsheep think would be a better female candidate? Someone who never argues with Mittens maybe?

CSM has absolutely nothing to do with gender. If you want a female poster girl, you should just suggest that to CCP. They will run some sort of Miss Eve contest and put her pictures on website and make her ambassador of peace and advertise NEX panties using her avatar and whatever to attract more females to the game.

But CSM has a strict role, its all about merit and ability. If candidate is good enough and can convince enough people to vote, they do not care if they have boobs or dongs.

I would also suggest playing some asian crappy mmo like Perfect World. I hear they have plenty of girls there. You will be happy there.

[b]For Love. For Peace. For Honor.

For None of the Above.

For Pony![/b]

Frying Doom
#18 - 2012-03-15 14:12:02 UTC
Red Templar wrote:
But CSM has a strict role, its all about merit and ability.


Merit and Ability? Please explain The Mittani's presence on the CSM then.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Frying Doom
#19 - 2012-03-15 14:13:35 UTC
Reserved for Red Templar's rant.

Any spelling, grammatical and punctuation errors are because frankly, I don't care!!

Red Templar
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#20 - 2012-03-15 14:20:27 UTC
Frying Doom wrote:
Red Templar wrote:
But CSM has a strict role, its all about merit and ability.


Merit and Ability? Please explain The Mittani's presence on the CSM then.

Im not even going to try. As i said, its all about convincing people to vote. With words and actions. Not having female genitalia.
What you are doing is insult to female players in online games. Keep it up.

[b]For Love. For Peace. For Honor.

For None of the Above.

For Pony![/b]

123Next pageLast page