These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

MoonGoo

Author
Anthar Thebess
#1 - 2015-04-20 14:00:57 UTC
Every one is spaming here threads about strange investments so do I ! Lol
Tons of towers killed , sov changing hands , n3 selling their moongo deposits.
Prices will fall a bit and raise again to the levels no one witness before.
Fozzie sov will make tons of ships hulls burn every day that need urgent replacement.

I have no experience in industry , and have 1 mining tower.
?

Sabriz Adoudel
Move along there is nothing here
#2 - 2015-04-21 04:57:36 UTC
Don't read this thread, because here's a convenient distraction:

http://img1.wikia.nocookie.net/__cb20140519075925/thehungergames/images/8/84/Kitten-16219-1280x800.jpg

A kitten!

I support the New Order and CODE. alliance. www.minerbumping.com

Anthar Thebess
#3 - 2015-04-21 07:04:06 UTC
Heheheheehe :)
GankYou
9B30FF Labs
#4 - 2015-04-21 16:11:10 UTC
Ahhh, yes ze moonz minerals - fascinating topic. Smile

A little something on the little diamonds of Eveā„¢:

During the height of the BoB war the price of Dysprosium was very high due to almost complete destruction of production capacity in the Delve region. Immediately after, over a period of three months, as more new towers came online, prices fell around 14-17% from the peaks of the war, before selling off sharply in October of 2009 on the news that some Dyspro T2 production inputs would be reduced and redirected elsewhere, along with boost to Alchemy - making it possible to create the unrefined product of normal reaction involving Dysprosium, by substituting it with an R8 moon material at a 5x exchange rate vs. 20x previously.

Dyspro distribution: http://i.imgur.com/y7MZHqw.png?1

There may, or may not have been a cartel during the time leading up to 2009 Dominion update. Blink

Price had collapsed 95% over the course of the next three years, going as low as 10k ISK p/u, before showing signs of life, courtesy of Odyssey expansion launched Summer 2013, which introduced four new Composites, aimed at rebalancing R32/R64 overall demand. In the case of Dysprosium, it is the Nonlinear Metamaterials Composite advanced material - added as new requirement to some blueprints, such as the manufacturing of Scalar Capacitor Units - used in all Caldari T2 ships; Capital Scalar Capacitor Units & Capital Quantum Microprocessors, needed for the production of the Rhea Jump Freighter. Smile The three other Composites are all racially "linked" in a similar manner.

Oddysey also changed some T2 manufacturing inputs in favour of Dysprosium, and other R64s, which had been under-used, at the expense of Technetium.

The story with Technetium, is a story for another time. Blink

Dysprosium has since retraced 49% of the levels seen during the Second Great Eve War.

EvE is real. Big smile
u3pog
Ministerstvo na otbranata
Ore No More
#5 - 2015-05-09 07:13:24 UTC
Anthar Thebess wrote:
Every one is spaming here threads about strange investments so do I ! Lol
Tons of towers killed , sov changing hands , n3 selling their moongo deposits.
Prices will fall a bit and raise again to the levels no one witness before.
Fozzie sov will make tons of ships hulls burn every day that need urgent replacement.

I have no experience in industry , and have 1 mining tower.
?



Some of the moon minerals are already going down, or should I say returning to their average values, like the Cadmium.

We already saw a lot of changes to null sec alliances prior Carnyx in the o7 show, everyone is preparing. Production demands will increase once the destruction comes, however with the new mineral composition of null sec, most of the materials probably won't leave it. I wonder will the price spike reach mount EVErest this time.
GankYou
9B30FF Labs
#6 - 2015-05-09 18:12:40 UTC
u3pog wrote:
Anthar Thebess wrote:
Every one is spaming here threads about strange investments so do I ! Lol
Tons of towers killed , sov changing hands , n3 selling their moongo deposits.
Prices will fall a bit and raise again to the levels no one witness before.
Fozzie sov will make tons of ships hulls burn every day that need urgent replacement.

I have no experience in industry , and have 1 mining tower.
?



Some of the moon minerals are already going down, or should I say returning to their average values, like the Cadmium.


That's deflation is kicking in, as the ISBotter effects are being mitigated.

Check the price of HACs, Recons or anything else that couldn't be artificially-generated with ISBotting, and you'll see 70-100% increase since the year 2011-YC113. Smile
Elizabeth Norn
Nornir Research
Nornir Empire
#7 - 2015-05-09 19:55:21 UTC
GankYou wrote:


That's deflation is kicking in, as the ISBotter effects are being mitigated.

Check the price of HACs, Recons or anything else that couldn't be artificially-generated with ISBotting, and you'll see 70-100% increase since the year 2011-YC113. Smile


http://www.teacher-stamps.co.uk/image/cache/data/X12055_working_out-500x500.jpg
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#8 - 2015-05-10 00:04:15 UTC
Elizabeth Norn wrote:
GankYou wrote:
That's deflation is kicking in, as the ISBotter effects are being mitigated.

Check the price of HACs, Recons or anything else that couldn't be artificially-generated with ISBotting, and you'll see 70-100% increase since the year 2011-YC113. Smile
http://www.teacher-stamps.co.uk/image/cache/data/X12055_working_out-500x500.jpg
Who needs working out when you've got butthurt and guesswork to rely on? This guys swings between "ISBoxers made too much ISK and caused inflation!" and "ISBoxers brought in too many minerals and caused deflation!". Turns out he's only been playing a couple of months, doesn't realise that other factors exist and can be safely ignored.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

GankYou
9B30FF Labs
#9 - 2015-05-10 01:51:44 UTC  |  Edited by: GankYou
Elizabeth Norn wrote:
GankYou wrote:


That's deflation is kicking in, as the ISBotter effects are being mitigated.

Check the price of HACs, Recons or anything else that couldn't be artificially-generated with ISBotting, and you'll see 70-100% increase since the year 2011-YC113. Smile


http://www.teacher-stamps.co.uk/image/cache/data/X12055_working_out-500x500.jpg


Look up any HAC, Recon or almost any other T2 since late YC113-2011. Smile

The economy could take it, so it was milked for all its worth by holders of resources, which could not be artificially ballooned with ISBotter. Smile

You can account for the HAC rebalance, and Ishtar's God-like update in the year 2013-YC115, Sept, of course. Smile
Zahara Cody
Imperial Corrections Service.
#10 - 2015-05-10 04:08:26 UTC
If my a** had a name and could talk, it'd be GankYou.

Hating is free, that's why poor people do it the best.

GankYou
9B30FF Labs
#11 - 2015-05-10 04:37:36 UTC
Economic matters are not for amateurs, stick to reselling T2 BPOs at 13 times the yearly profits, Zahara. Blink
Sabriz Adoudel
Move along there is nothing here
#12 - 2015-05-10 07:13:13 UTC
I love reading arguments like this.

Thank you Lucas, GankYou and Zahara for the entertainment.

I support the New Order and CODE. alliance. www.minerbumping.com

GankYou
9B30FF Labs
#13 - 2015-05-10 07:24:03 UTC
Any time .

If you want real drama and passions, head over to the "Update regarding Multiboxing and input automation" thread in GD - has some economic bits from Page 210 onward. Blink
Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#14 - 2015-05-10 08:15:34 UTC
Lucas Kell wrote:
Elizabeth Norn wrote:
GankYou wrote:
That's deflation is kicking in, as the ISBotter effects are being mitigated.

Check the price of HACs, Recons or anything else that couldn't be artificially-generated with ISBotting, and you'll see 70-100% increase since the year 2011-YC113. Smile
http://www.teacher-stamps.co.uk/image/cache/data/X12055_working_out-500x500.jpg
Who needs working out when you've got butthurt and guesswork to rely on? This guys swings between "ISBoxers made too much ISK and caused inflation!" and "ISBoxers brought in too many minerals and caused deflation!". Turns out he's only been playing a couple of months, doesn't realise that other factors exist and can be safely ignored.


You can have prices in general rising, inflation, with prices going down in a specific sector.

Anyone with a basic familiarity of mathematics would realize this. Roll

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#15 - 2015-05-10 13:27:56 UTC
Teckos Pech wrote:
Lucas Kell wrote:
Elizabeth Norn wrote:
GankYou wrote:
That's deflation is kicking in, as the ISBotter effects are being mitigated.

Check the price of HACs, Recons or anything else that couldn't be artificially-generated with ISBotting, and you'll see 70-100% increase since the year 2011-YC113. Smile
http://www.teacher-stamps.co.uk/image/cache/data/X12055_working_out-500x500.jpg
Who needs working out when you've got butthurt and guesswork to rely on? This guys swings between "ISBoxers made too much ISK and caused inflation!" and "ISBoxers brought in too many minerals and caused deflation!". Turns out he's only been playing a couple of months, doesn't realise that other factors exist and can be safely ignored.
You can have prices in general rising, inflation, with prices going down in a specific sector.

Anyone with a basic familiarity of mathematics would realize this. Roll
Indeed you can, not sure why that's relevant in context, but when prices do rise the reason generally isn't "because ISBoxers did it". I know you like to pretty much follow me around disagreeing with me, but are you honestly going to sit there, straight-faced, and tell us that you think ISBoxer is/was the main reason that prices fluctuate?

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

GankYou
9B30FF Labs
#16 - 2015-05-10 13:29:44 UTC
Because you can't milk the moon for more than 100 * 24 * 30 = 72,000 units per material type per month, Lucas. Smile
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#17 - 2015-05-10 13:39:24 UTC
GankYou wrote:
Because you can't milk the moon for more than 100 * 24 * 30 = 72,000 units per material type per month, Lucas. Smile
And that is relevant why? That still does not mean that ISBoxer is responsible for price changes. You seem to be of this opinion that ISBoxer existed, and a price changed, therefore ISBoxer was the cause.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

GankYou
9B30FF Labs
#18 - 2015-05-10 13:42:59 UTC
Because of the artificial leveraged income per 1 player, which did not match the resource acquisition, apart from Tech 1 ores and minerals, nor did it match Universal consumption - the most important part of it all. Smile

We had this discussion in the appropriate thread. Blink
Lucas Kell
Solitude Trading
S.N.O.T.
#19 - 2015-05-10 13:58:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Lucas Kell
GankYou wrote:
Because of the artificial leveraged income per 1 player, which did not match the resource acquisition, apart from Tech 1 ores and minerals, nor did it match Universal consumption - the most important part of it all. Smile

We had this discussion in the appropriate thread. Blink
But this is still just your repeating yourself about material acquisition for 1 player. 1 player getting 10b the amount and 10 players getting 1b each makes absolutely no difference, so it's irrelevant how many physical players are on the end of it. And it still doesn't explain why you think ISBoxer is the reason for all price increases.

Edit: Honestly, you're clearly never going to get it. You overestimate the use of ISBoxer which you seem to be shockingly butthurt about, underestimate the volume of ISK coming in from other sources and you clearly aren't aware that CCP patch EVE with changes that effect the economy. What's hilarious is how smug you are about how amazingly right you think you are and that's pretty much what keeps me posting lol.

The Indecisive Noob - EVE fan blog.

Wholesale Trading - The new bulk trading mailing list.

GankYou
9B30FF Labs
#20 - 2015-05-10 14:34:16 UTC  |  Edited by: GankYou
Lucas Kell wrote:
GankYou wrote:
Because of the artificial leveraged income per 1 player, which did not match the resource acquisition, apart from Tech 1 ores and minerals, nor did it match Universal consumption - the most important part of it all. Smile

We had this discussion in the appropriate thread. Blink
But this is still just your repeating yourself about material acquisition for 1 player. 1 player getting 10b the amount and 10 players getting 1b each makes absolutely no difference, so it's irrelevant how many physical players are on the end of it.


You see, the thing is, that there were and still are no additional 10 players to get this dank ISK, or resources for that matter. Instead, you have one player, which most certainly exists with all of his accounts to his private legal RL entity/natural person, creating 19, 20, 50 artificial entities, which again, are not there if you're looking for a player equivalent, and printing ISK in effect. The. People. Are. Not. There. To. Match. It. However hard one looks, even in emulating the naked ISK income levels as a collective. Smile

This discussion is off topic for this thread, though it does relate to the topic of resource acquisition, which could not be spawned on demand by ISBotter groups. Smile

All this dank ISK floating in the economy right now, I am almost ashamed to cap it myself. Blink

But it will filter out, it'll bleed out of the system in a few months to a year, with a few (pleasant) surprises coming down the road.

We'll be back to Re-Building Eve for the Second Decade.

So It Has Been - So It Will Be So.
12Next page