Player Features and Ideas Discussion

Mobile Warp Disruptors should be content generators, not tool for avoiding content.

Right now most of these are anchored in 0.0 on gates to prevent small pvp groups from moving fast trough space.

Devs gave us intreceptors but they won't survive long enough on rats fire when gang have to fly 200km+ to the gate and same distance on the other side of the gate.

My solution is simple: Mobile Warp Disruptors should use fuel, and has small fuelbay, for 1 max 2 hours. Or just explode after 1, 2 hours. Its fair for tactic pvp usage on grid, or setting up small camp.

You can still set up bubble on gate to your farming system, but not 50 like today.

What has Mobile Warp Disruptor to do with content? Today we have 2 oponents in sov war, Days with small local wars everywhere in galaxy are gone long ago. The only left content ganerate people from small gangs who roaming sov 0.0 systems, but current situation make this work really hard.

CCP changed rats agro (npc pirates should be more than happy that we want to kill thier Nemesis), added mjd. I hope devs don't chenged mind and this is still pvp game where small groups with high game skills can find something for theirself.

Fly Unsafe

Warp bubbles, dictors, and hictors all make your idea redundant.

I'm still trying to understand why the interceptors need survive 200km+ on each gate??? They can't be stopped by bubbles last I checked. Not to mention it's rare an interceptor can be hit by a gate rat. (Unless you are heading in a straight at or from them.) In a non inty gang you should be able to down quickly or tank the gate rats.

PS- Personally I think gate rats should shoot player structures in any case....

So you want to replace bubbles with HIC alts?

Ive been through hundreds of 0.0 jumps in the past few months... Ive very rarely run into these camps you speak of...

How about the next time you run into one of these ridiculous camps, you dont leeroy your way into the next system because you know you wont have fleet support?

Perhaps you should read your own posts before responding to constructive criticism.

Also perhaps if you put some thought into flying your interceptor you wouldnt have the problem YOU listed above.

Constructive criticism will be when you understand point of this topic. If you never saw 100 bubbles on gate 'defending' dead end pockets maybe you should roam sov 0.0 more often.

The Eve player base is extremely resistant to change, especially when you 'nerf' something like this.

It's an epidemic in some area's of Null where up to 3 systems before a mining or ratting system you have scout alts and 'walls' of these bubbles. So any attacker save for interceptors will never be able to even come close to a tackle or even seeing a ship not POS'd up or in a station.

Giving a time limit to Mobile Warp Disruptors makes sense in the highest caliber, nothing in the game gives such a boon with so little effort. The push towards activity vs stagnant gameplay farther supports this move. All the new combat or offensive deployables have a time limit, and so the natives of an area can set up hell camps just like now, they'll just actually have to work at it.

It'll also decrease dependency on bridging as conventional fleets may be able to move more quickly through some regions.

The only problem I see is that the wave of trolls and bitter vets cannot see the positives of the change and will focus on how the OP wants to 'make the game easier' or 'change fundamental game mechanics'. They will want the OP to HTFU or just play better... they need to wake up and see the momentum of the game is taking, in eve change is constant and this change is for the better.

It won't solve problem, once placed mobile warp disruptor can last forever without any action from players.

BUMP