These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Assembly Hall

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Close assembly hall forum
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
JitaPriceChecker2
Doomheim
#1 - 2012-03-22 16:24:37 UTC
Its useless Mitani dont even read it nor probably rest of the CSM

Features and Ideas is there ---->
mxzf
Shovel Bros
#2 - 2012-03-22 16:54:59 UTC
The CSM doesn't read F&I either I'm pretty sure. What really needs to happen is for AH to be strongly moderated and only ideas that have received strong support in F&I already be allowed in here. That way the CSM and CCP alike could look here for actual good ideas, rather than it being full of stupid/troll ideas.
Drake Draconis
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#3 - 2012-03-22 17:02:59 UTC
JitaPriceChecker2 wrote:
Its useless Mitani dont even read it nor probably rest of the CSM

Features and Ideas is there ---->


Right after your permabanned.

================ STOP THE EVEMAIL SPAM! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=78152
Grumpy Owly
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#4 - 2012-03-22 17:19:26 UTC  |  Edited by: Grumpy Owly
-1, don't let the CSM write their own constitution.

This should be a CCP and/or a player debate discussion and possibly a referendum in order to change.

Or perhaps find a more suitable system that doesn't simply expunge player involvement.

Bounty Hunting - Soon (™): Retribution (Winter 2012)

It's just criminal - Smuggling
Blatant Forum Alt
Doomheim
#5 - 2012-03-22 20:22:09 UTC
Assembly Hall is just a second F&I - full of idea men spouting useless crap, and trolls taking the **** of the crap.
Drake Draconis
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#6 - 2012-03-22 20:34:34 UTC
Blatant Forum Alt wrote:
Assembly Hall is just a second F&I - full of idea men spouting useless crap, and trolls taking the **** of the crap.


Kettle...meet Pot....Pot....meet Kettle.

================ STOP THE EVEMAIL SPAM! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=78152
Adunh Slavy
#7 - 2012-03-22 22:09:15 UTC
AH and FI combined, with the supported option might be useful.

What might be helpful as well is some player moderation to reduce the trolls and derails. Player ability to help moderate has been exposed in the corp forums. Shouldn't bee too big a deal to expose that functionality to a wider scope. Perhaps players can 'elect' moderators and/or it could be an ISD position.

Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.  - William Pitt
Drake Draconis
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#8 - 2012-03-22 22:46:25 UTC  |  Edited by: Drake Draconis
Adunh Slavy wrote:
AH and FI combined, with the supported option might be useful.

What might be helpful as well is some player moderation to reduce the trolls and derails. Player ability to help moderate has been exposed in the corp forums. Shouldn't bee too big a deal to expose that functionality to a wider scope. Perhaps players can 'elect' moderators and/or it could be an ISD position.


Agreed...admidtedly I'd likely get slapped around...i'm brutually honest...and granted I could/have/may come across as troll...but I do call im as I see im...some times people just refuse to take it....and throw it back.


Well..the way I see it...I'd expect to be/get told off for making those kinds of "proposals"....so yeah.

================ STOP THE EVEMAIL SPAM! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=78152
Blatant Forum Alt
Doomheim
#9 - 2012-03-23 09:21:56 UTC
In fairness, I only troll crap ideas, if an idea is actually decent I leave it alone or contribute constructively. Trolls should be allowed to tell moronic idea men they are morons.
Brom MkLeith
Epsilon Inc
#10 - 2012-03-23 17:54:51 UTC
Adunh Slavy wrote:
AH and FI combined, with the supported option might be useful.

What might be helpful as well is some player moderation to reduce the trolls and derails. Player ability to help moderate has been exposed in the corp forums. Shouldn't bee too big a deal to expose that functionality to a wider scope. Perhaps players can 'elect' moderators and/or it could be an ISD position.


"Player" elected moderators would just lead to more trolls and propaganda flag wavers telling us what we can and can not discuss. The people who immediately flame anything that doesn't promote blowing up your ship and killing you speak the loudest and most often. Regrettably, the greater masses of players want to quietly play the game. They don't want to have to jump up and down flaming everything they don't agree with.
Tikktokk Tokkzikk
V0LTA
OnlyFleets.
#11 - 2012-03-23 19:31:53 UTC
Should be a rule that only FI threads with X amount of likes should be allowed here (must be a link to the original thread as proof).
mxzf
Shovel Bros
#12 - 2012-03-23 19:40:52 UTC
Tikktokk Tokkzikk wrote:
Should be a rule that only FI threads with X amount of likes should be allowed here (must be a link to the original thread as proof).


Yep, this suggestion was brought up a bit ago on F&I. However it died the death of "nothing to argue about, therefore it fell down into the depths of the forum" that all good threads suffer from.
Macon Chalaise
VNM Biological Survey Corps
#13 - 2012-03-23 23:36:28 UTC
mxzf wrote:
Tikktokk Tokkzikk wrote:
Should be a rule that only FI threads with X amount of likes should be allowed here (must be a link to the original thread as proof).


Yep, this suggestion was brought up a bit ago on F&I. However it died the death of "nothing to argue about, therefore it fell down into the depths of the forum" that all good threads suffer from.


Indeed. I am sure there is an ISD that could handle the move but what is the price of admission to the Assembly Hall?

100 likes seems too low and 500 hundred too high and of course the more replies there are of any kind, the more the "likes" of a particular thread can be artificially inflated by a smaller group.

A one vote/account poll would seem to be a more reasonable idea.

Here's to fire. Not the fast and furious kind that burns down shacks and shanties, but the slow, seductive kind that takes down pants and panties - Irish Toast
Drake Draconis
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#14 - 2012-03-23 23:45:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Drake Draconis
Macon Chalaise wrote:
mxzf wrote:
Tikktokk Tokkzikk wrote:
Should be a rule that only FI threads with X amount of likes should be allowed here (must be a link to the original thread as proof).


Yep, this suggestion was brought up a bit ago on F&I. However it died the death of "nothing to argue about, therefore it fell down into the depths of the forum" that all good threads suffer from.


Indeed. I am sure there is an ISD that could handle the move but what is the price of admission to the Assembly Hall?

100 likes seems too low and 500 hundred too high and of course the more replies there are of any kind, the more the "likes" of a particular thread can be artificially inflated by a smaller group.

A one vote/account poll would seem to be a more reasonable idea.


Likes are #### in terms of worth. (They mean something to me in a sense but not as a measure of whether I'm allowed to post or not..more like a appluase/golf clap to me)

Its nothing more than an kudos system....oh sure....everyone likes it.... (pun intended) but its only just that...a "like"

Likes can be faked...overwhelmed..bypassed..abused.

All you need is goonswarm mobbing you with likes and anyone can get in.

Not gonna work.

================ STOP THE EVEMAIL SPAM! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=78152