These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Assembly Hall

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

[proposal] Delete Titans
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Tiger's Spirit
Templars of the Shadows
#41 - 2012-03-20 16:38:45 UTC
Tiger's Spirit wrote:
India99 wrote:
Tiger's Spirit wrote:
[quote=India99][quote=Tiger's Spirit]

Tipical damage control.
My language is the main problem, not the PL's RMT supcap transfer from MM.


your questionable reading skills might actually be the reason why you think PL has to RMT at all. Have you checked the Technetium prices recently?


Because i know, who sold those ships for to PL and Raiden.
Maybe it's time to check for the CCP those titans, how they transfered without ISK and without build to new proprietors.


Everyone feel the silence of PL crying girls after this post ? :D
paik
H A V O C
Fraternity.
#42 - 2012-03-20 16:53:34 UTC
Sith8 wrote:
Bahahaha .... so because your shiny I-WIN button is being nerfed it should be deleted from the game altogether?

Don´t be such a douche Manny and go back to playing Eve the hard way like most of us do.



Sith8 the Greyscale changes nothing really other than the fact that Titans wont blap roaming gangs. In fleet fights titans will still be blapping happily which makes the change pointless. However what the change does accomplish is it lowers the priority for CCP allowing Titan re-design to fall down into the backlog. Pushing real development further away this is not speculation its how CCP does things.


So rather than a pointless nerf that nobody is happy with just delete Titans. CCP when they have time can then reinvent them and introduce them again properly. This solution everyone wins instead of the current status quo where everyone losses and then we wait ~18 months for CCP to get back to the subject. CCP has other things they are working on in Inferno and obviously a re-design of Titans is not on the table . Clearly thats what predicated this bandaid nerf except its a bad bandaid as it doesnt actually achieve the goals of the nerf.


I mean you realize were talking about CCP here correct? In regard to the comment you made directed at me. I have fun fighting in Eve in no matter what ship class. My alliance has some new fleet concepts that makes fighting with titans seem boring.


SOLVE THE PROBLEM INSTEAD OF BANDAIDS
Sith8
Blank-Space
Northern Coalition.
#43 - 2012-03-20 18:07:24 UTC
paik wrote:
Sith8 wrote:
Bahahaha .... so because your shiny I-WIN button is being nerfed it should be deleted from the game altogether?

Don´t be such a douche Manny and go back to playing Eve the hard way like most of us do.



Sith8 the Greyscale changes nothing really other than the fact that Titans wont blap roaming gangs. In fleet fights titans will still be blapping happily which makes the change pointless. However what the change does accomplish is it lowers the priority for CCP allowing Titan re-design to fall down into the backlog. Pushing real development further away this is not speculation its how CCP does things.


So rather than a pointless nerf that nobody is happy with just delete Titans. CCP when they have time can then reinvent them and introduce them again properly. This solution everyone wins instead of the current status quo where everyone losses and then we wait ~18 months for CCP to get back to the subject. CCP has other things they are working on in Inferno and obviously a re-design of Titans is not on the table . Clearly thats what predicated this bandaid nerf except its a bad bandaid as it doesnt actually achieve the goals of the nerf.


I mean you realize were talking about CCP here correct? In regard to the comment you made directed at me. I have fun fighting in Eve in no matter what ship class. My alliance has some new fleet concepts that makes fighting with titans seem boring.


SOLVE THE PROBLEM INSTEAD OF BANDAIDS


I and most people I know are p. darn happy with the nerf and do not agree with you that it´s pointless, on the contrary.
Perhaps that´s the complete opposite to Pee L.
But I´ll give you that no one does crying better than you guys, or at least you are the first to demand that a whole ship class with all class specific modules and skills to be deleted from the game because you can´t play with it like you used to.

Deal with it Pee L.
:smug:
Smiling Menace
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#44 - 2012-03-21 14:58:54 UTC
This is cross-posting from the Ship & Modules forum about the Titan nerf and CCP doesn't like that.

Not like PL would bend the rules/mechanics to suit themselves. Roll
Joyelle
SludgeSlingers
#45 - 2012-03-21 18:18:33 UTC
Scatim Helicon wrote:
I've got a better idea, why don't CCP just make large fleets of titans extremely undesirable, as they should have been all along.

That way the self entitled little crybabies that fly them will make a vast mountain of hilarious spergy rant threads which the rest of us can take great pleasure in, then unsub, and the titans will be effectively removed from the game, without the massive influx of minerals caused by ship recycling, or the rampant FOTM-chasing that a skillpoint re-allocation would lead to.

Seems like a win-win-win to me.

It doesn't make the slightest sense no matter how you look at it because limiting the amount of titans in a fleet or in a system will still result in an ultimatum. It's either you get as much titans into the system first or create multiple fleets. You can also decide to engage with 300 alpha maels...get owned, then proceed to whine on you tube. P
Argyle Jones
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#46 - 2012-03-22 00:09:25 UTC
paik wrote:
mxzf wrote:
I see what you did there.

Posting in a stealth "give me my ISK and SP back because you're nerfing Titans to no longer be solo-pwn-mobiles" thread.



Yeah pretty much as the ship since its inception was based around its tenacity and devastating offensive capability as well as logistical support. Taking away a role that was the driving force for majority of players that sought them out and skilled directly for them is unfair actually highly unfair. Instead do the sensible should have been done years ago and remove them and introduce something better.


I'm afraid that's not very likely to happen. CCP has never given anything back when they nerfed, and they shouldn't start now, just because titans are involved.

I remember spending billions of ISK on a super sexy nano machariel, training all lvl 5 navigation skills, etc, just so I could be the coolest and fastest nano pilot out there, then cameth the nano-nerf and suddenly my expensive ship, modules and high-grade snake set were worth one tenth of their previous value. It's the cost we pay for humping the bandwagon.

So, take your nerf just like everybody else, adapt to the new situation and add a +1 to your bittervet status.

/Yargle
wolftkilla
Trust Doesn't Rust
Goonswarm Federation
#47 - 2012-03-22 13:38:43 UTC
+1
The Hamilton
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#48 - 2012-03-22 17:30:15 UTC
Here's a thought. If you don't want em. Don't make em. Sort of an alliance peace treaty for all null sec alliances. As an extra bonus CCP would be astounded. If you can't do this then how can you justify deleting them.

Just cos people can make mustard gas doesn't mean they all use it.
Previous page123