These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

I'm Really Not Sure This Is The Game For Me Anymore.

Author
Nikodiemus
Ganja Clade
Shadow Cartel
#81 - 2012-03-14 23:47:46 UTC
Estrelita Nobunaga wrote:
I've been playing for nearly 3 years, and have 4 accounts now

I've lost between 50 and a hundred ships all together



Don't PVP a lot do you sir?
Herping yourDerp
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#82 - 2012-03-15 00:03:55 UTC
i would run missions in not super expensive boats, good isk and chances of being ganked are slim to none unless you let can flippers and ninja salvagers get under your skin
if you see one in your mission dock for say, 30 minutes or an hours then try again.
Roh Voleto
Doomheim
#83 - 2012-03-15 00:21:46 UTC
Estrelita Nobunaga wrote:
...and have 4 accounts now...


This game is not made for you. The circumstance that you consider your multi-boxing as something worth mentioning indicates that you would be better off playing a game made by a company who values their customers.
EnderCapitalG
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#84 - 2012-03-15 00:23:24 UTC
Roh Voleto wrote:
Estrelita Nobunaga wrote:
...and have 4 accounts now...


This game is not made for you. The circumstance that you consider your multi-boxing as something worth mentioning indicates that you would be better off playing a game made by a company who values their customers.


Look at this passive-aggressive badposting.
Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat
Working Stiffs
#85 - 2012-03-15 00:34:48 UTC
Everytime I see one of these threads I just /faceplam

Why is a 3 year vet with 4 accounts surprised when they are ganked in a system like Agal that is known for ganks, and has recently been publicized as having quite a few?

A few general suggestions:
* Drop the victim mentality. Everything bad that happens to you in EVE is your own fault.
* Don't AFK. This one thing will prevent the vast majority of losses.
* Use dscan constantly to spot incoming combat ships (set the range and filters appropriately).
* Use a Covetor and insure it.
* Fit defensively, or be prepared to pay for losses as a cost of mining.
* Use ECM drones. Don't use them on belt rats; just tank those, or let an Orca take care of them.
* Use a DST instead of an Industrial (the Minmatar Mastodon is second to only the Caldari Bustard for durability and cargo).
* Don't leave the hauler in the belt when it doesn't need to be.
* Spread the fleet out (use a Small Tractor Beam II on the hauler, heck, Orca are bonused for it).
* Overheat hardeners and warp out whenever suspicious, but don't expect to get away from someone already on grid.
* Keep moving if possible, preferably in a direction you can warp.
* Off-grid siege warfare and armor boosters might not help, but they can't hurt.
* Know the system. Check statistics and killmails. Recognize the regulars.
* Pay attention to the local pilot count and chat.
* Set known gankers to -5 so you can spot them easily. Check killboards too.
* Don't mine in a busy system.

If you get ganked:
* Never emo rage about it in local.
* Chat with the attacker in local if possible. Be polite, cordial, and complimentary, even if they trash-talk you.
* Laugh the loss off. It is only a replaceable ship. (Even implants are replaceable.)
* Set the attacker to -5 so you can spot them in the future.
* Move to another system.
Roh Voleto
Doomheim
#86 - 2012-03-15 01:10:11 UTC  |  Edited by: Roh Voleto
EnderCapitalG wrote:


Look at this passive-aggressive badposting.


I'd be all faux-understanding and compassionate instead, but then I would have to justify to myself why I still bother with this game.

I rather spew some passive bitter tonight, and very actively aggress you the next time we meet at a lowsec belt.


Edit: "I do", rather than "I would".
Edit 2: Some day I will learn when to use "then", and when to use "than".
Keen Fallsword
Skyway Patrol
#87 - 2012-03-15 01:19:38 UTC
Estrelita Nobunaga wrote:
I've been playing for nearly 3 years, and have 4 accounts now

I've lost between 50 and a hundred ships all together

Yesterday this character qualified for a Mackinaw, so I fitted one for her and she went ice mining in Agal with a Mammoth for hauling. She didn't even finish a cycle before the Mackinaw was gone and the Mammoth was at 80% armor

I guess I was lucky that Concord responded so quickly

I'm not sure that I've ever been ganked before, but, for some reason, this bothered me more than any other ship loss that I can remember

The other character involved was from 2005, and had a 2.1 Concord sec status. Probably had a lot of experience doing this kind of thing, because he/she/it was pretty slick

There are parts of this game that I enjoy. PvP isn't one of them. Especially not this type

So what options do I have? One week of kill rights. That's a big help for a miner. If I went looking for the ganker, what are the chances that I could catch up to him, and, if I did, I doubt that there would be a happy ending for me

So I'm not sure I'm going to keep playing. It seems to me that the game has changed since I started playing, and that the type of player that it attracts is changing, too. That part I blame on CCP. I think they have more control over the type of player the game attracts than most people think. But, let's face it. They do have to make a profit in order to support Hilmar's grand schemes

The question for me right now is: Do I want to try to keep playing the parts of the game that I like in spite of the quality of the other players

As I said. I really don't know. I do know that losing 4 more accounts is not going to have any noticeable effect on CCP, and that what I say in this is not going to have any effect on the players that I object to

This is the only public way that I have to express my dissatisfaction with the players and the trends I see. It's not the game. It's the players.



Man you need to be smarter go to 0.0 there is many ice belts. Ice mining in 0.0 is almost 100% safe ! Geee... Join 0.0 ally and no more gankers. Everyone need fuel
Estrelita Nobunaga
Doomheim
#88 - 2012-03-15 01:21:19 UTC
Tau Cabalander wrote:



Tau. STFU. You have long outlived any usefulness you think you my have had.

I used to follow the 'Word of Tau' like the Bible.

I learned better.
Estrelita Nobunaga
Doomheim
#89 - 2012-03-15 01:25:49 UTC
Keen Fallsword wrote:


Man you need to be smarter go to 0.0 there is many ice belts. Ice mining in 0.0 is almost 100% safe ! Geee... Join 0.0 ally and no more gankers. Everyone need fuel


Dealt with that before, but I will say it again. The only person in 0.0 that you can trust is yourself, and I wouldn't be too sure about that.

There is nothing in 0.0 worth the trip. Even 1 way.
Ganagati
Perkone
Caldari State
#90 - 2012-03-15 01:28:18 UTC
0.0 really is the place to go. Highsec is well known for being more dangerous to miners and haulers than 0.0 ever could be. NAPs abound in 0.0. There is a TINY likelihood of a blue attacking you... but you have a better chance of getting suicide ganked 10x over in highsec.

0.0 is safer for mining. Go there. AFK mine to your <3's content. Keep a POS bookmarked for if someone enters the sector.

.

Vaal Erit
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#91 - 2012-03-15 01:28:27 UTC
Estrelita Nobunaga wrote:
Tau Cabalander wrote:



Tau. STFU. You have long outlived any usefulness you think you my have had.

I used to follow the 'Word of Tau' like the Bible.

I learned better.


Huh? You are insulting the best response in the thread? One of the few that gave really good information and helpful advice?

How about you GTFO. We don't need self-absorbed whiners that rage like little kids when they lose internet pixels and insult friendly people just trying to help. If the OP would quit EVE, the average playerbase IQ would go up a few notches.
Roh Voleto
Doomheim
#92 - 2012-03-15 01:37:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Roh Voleto
Estrelita Nobunaga wrote:

There is nothing in 0.0 worth the trip. Even 1 way.



Well, there are all those sweet, sweet solo interceptors and interdictors, and overconfident ratters, and ill-conceived home defence gangs.

And, of course, a bunch of awesome people who are really great to hang out with, if you happen to be a part of the right community.


Edit:
Estrelita Nobunaga wrote:
Tau Cabalander wrote:



Tau. STFU.


That's a great way to expose yourself as an *******, and excuse yourself from any reasonable discussion.
Jarod Leercap
On Three 125
#93 - 2012-03-15 02:04:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Jarod Leercap
Response to O

Sorry your vent hasn't met with as much sympathy as you might have hoped for, but some of your responses probably added fuel to that fire.

It's not fun to lose a shiny new ship quickly, but sometimes that's the luck of the draw. It's a bit of a bummer that the industrial path is generally less lucrative than others available in this game, but on balance this game does far better than many from the crafting aspect. It's a far cry from games where you actually devalue materials by crafting them. ;


On Recommendations for Miners

I know industry is an up-hill fight, and I know this has to be explained from time to time. However, I still have a hard time believing that the answer to a player who says, "Combat is less fun than mining," can be, "You should PVP more!" I could see, "You might like it better if you got into it more." However, some won't like combat better, and telling those players to get into combat is tantamount to telling them to do something more boring than mining. That's taking it too far! (Only half in jest I'm afraid.)


On the Appeal of Combat

The way I see it, a game can trend toward three main combat analogies:

Lottery Ticket: This is where you enter combat expecting to lose but hoping for the rare high of a good fight, or even a win. It's not that every fight is lopsided against you, but most are.

Poker: This is where you enter combat knowing that sometimes it will favor you and sometimes it won't, but on average it's pretty even.

Shooting Fish in a Barrel: This is where you enter combat knowing the fight is likely to be tilted your way. You'll have an occasional nasty surprise, but you'll meet your objective (which may not be profit) most of the time.

Honestly, for a character who's not interested in being combat-centric or interested in a big corp, I think combat falls into the Lottery Ticket characterization. Some folks like playing the lottery, but I'm not one of them myself. If you're looking for lulz, you can gank as a treat (since it will often not pay for itself), and I'd characterize that as Shooting Fish in a Barrel (if you know what you're doing). However, if you're not the type to rain on someone's praise, you might prefer to steer clear of that.

My primary aversion to combat is that I just don't think I'm very likely to find the Poker game.
Roh Voleto
Doomheim
#94 - 2012-03-15 02:21:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Roh Voleto
"A mix of chess and poker" is how I describe EVE to RL friends. It's like chess in the sense that everybody involved knows the game. The book has been written 300 years ago, or it might as well have been. Yet, it is like poker in the sense that you have to know your opponent and still sometimes have no other choice than not to play at all, or give it all up to the luck of the draw.

EVE is simply not the game for you, if you can not accept that a loss is entirely your fault, while on the other hand there was nothing you could do to prevent it.
Tau Cabalander
Retirement Retreat
Working Stiffs
#95 - 2012-03-15 08:02:39 UTC
Shogun Archer
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#96 - 2012-03-15 08:06:36 UTC
Tau Cabalander wrote:



^ This guy is not to be trifled with :)

If you run into more than 2 a**holes in a day, you should probably look in the mirror.

Seb Seba
Garoun Investment Bank
Gallente Federation
#97 - 2012-03-15 08:37:14 UTC  |  Edited by: Seb Seba
Estrelita Nobunaga wrote:
Tau Cabalander wrote:



Tau. STFU. You have long outlived any usefulness you think you my have had.

I used to follow the 'Word of Tau' like the Bible.

I learned better.


Best response in this thread and you go like this?
You have no brain cells. Now unsubscirbe aleady and spare us your whiney QQ's.
Oh and nobody wants you items.
/whack-a-mole
Pheusia
Vanishing Point.
The Initiative.
#98 - 2012-03-15 09:10:37 UTC
Estrelita Nobunaga wrote:
Keen Fallsword wrote:


Man you need to be smarter go to 0.0 there is many ice belts. Ice mining in 0.0 is almost 100% safe ! Geee... Join 0.0 ally and no more gankers. Everyone need fuel


Dealt with that before, but I will say it again. The only person in 0.0 that you can trust is yourself, and I wouldn't be too sure about that.
There is nothing in 0.0 worth the trip. Even 1 way.



The thing about 0.0 is that you can't pretend that highlighted part isn't true. Your problem seems to be that you think it doesn't apply in hi-sec as well.
Jazzmyn
Dawn's LightP
#99 - 2012-03-15 10:58:52 UTC
Estrelita Nobunaga wrote:

There are parts of this game that I enjoy. PvP isn't one of them. Especially not this type


I dont like it either, suicide ganking hisec miners is silly, and in my books it isnt real pvp at all.

What i think CCP should do is to raise exhumers EHP, so suicide ganking would become more expensive or they could introduce new type of battlehulk equipped with some guns and heavier armor or some kind of automatic countermeasures AFK miners could use Big smile

I think its silly that u need so much skillpoints to get into Hulk in order to do some veldspar mining. This makes no sense at all if u compare it to much more profitable gas mining, that u can do in any ship. Hulks and macks are also redicilously pricey compared to their properties.

Fight ! Fight ! Never surrender, never surrender !

Khanh'rhh
Sparkle Motion.
#100 - 2012-03-15 11:05:34 UTC  |  Edited by: Khanh'rhh
Jazzmyn wrote:
Estrelita Nobunaga wrote:

There are parts of this game that I enjoy. PvP isn't one of them. Especially not this type


I dont like it either, suicide ganking hisec miners is silly, and in my books it isnt real pvp at all.

What i think CCP should do is to raise exhumers EHP, so suicide ganking would become more expensive or they could introduce new type of battlehulk equipped with some guns and heavier armor or some kind of automatic countermeasures AFK miners could use Big smile


If you actually sit down and play the game, your risk is actually quite low. It's going AFK that kills you. Never, ever, ever, should CCP ever introduce something that benefits people who are not actually playing the ******* game.

Jesus christ. Play the game, or don't. But don't ******* sit there like an entitled dipshit and complain that there should be a way of you defending yourself when you have decided to leave your 200mil asset in space and go do something else.

EDIT: you can get plated-cruiser like EHP from a hulk if you don't fit it like an idiot.

"Do not touch anything unnecessarily. Beware of pretty girls in dance halls and parks who may be spies, as well as bicycles, revolvers, uniforms, arms, dead horses, and men lying on roads -- they are not there accidentally." -Soviet infantry manual,