These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Market Discussions

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Continuing the war on Market Bots!

Author
Fango Mango
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#1 - 2012-03-09 02:39:14 UTC
As a semi-experienced market trader, I've come into contact with what I believe are market bots on multiple occasions.

Market bots are a pain in the ass, and they get me annoyed at the game, and they are bringing down a wonderful part of the game. Sure there are strategies to trade against them, move them out of the market, or just move up, but I think the game would be better without them, or with less of them, or with them having less of an affect.

CCPs recent war on bots appears to have taken a chunk out of the Market bots for now, but what else can be done from a game play point of view to limit the advantage bots have over humans.

I have a couple of ideas, I'm sure you can point out the problems with my ideas and maybe even point out some better solutions.


My first idea is to limit the number of "trades" that a single account can make.


1) Flat out limit the number of Sell/Buy orders that can be placed/updated every day.
It would take 1 "trade point" to place OR UPDATE a market order.
It would NOT take a "trade point" to buy from sell orders or sell to buy orders.
You would be given X "trade points" per day based on a new skill.
At skill level 0 you get 10 trade points per day, at skill level 5 you get 60 trade points per day.
Trade points accumulate over time up to some limit (something like 500).

How this would affect the game . . .
* This would have no affect on the average EVE players market experience. They would always be at or near the trade point cap.
* Power market users would be forced to specialize in a couple markets or let more orders ride for longer periods of time.
* Bots would have much less of an advantage over human players.

I would not call myself primarily a "trader". I do have a market alt in all the hubs and update orders twice a day, but I rarely update a particular order more than 10x per day (I do often keep the jita alt online and update orders as I'm waiting for other things to happen).

There are lots of days when I make over 60 updates, but that's mainly because I am babysitting some orders in Jita (presumably against bots).

I think 420 updates/week is much much much more than I need, and would satisfy the needs of almost all EVE player.

I think that it would increase the profits of all the "real users". We can't update as often, but we will get more volume per update and be better able to compete across a large number of orders.

Please comment/roast as you see fit.

-FM
Jake Andarius
Andarius Trading Corp.
#2 - 2012-03-09 02:57:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Jake Andarius
I agree with your sentiment that CCPs war against trade bots is better for the EVE community. As a trader, I would also like to see CCP crack down on trade bots, because they are competitors that have an unfair advantage to a normal player.

Your solution seems appealing at first glance. Trade bots are able to continually update orders, so they would likely change orders many times more than most players would. However, there is a problem with your solution. It caps the number of trade changes that a player would like to do if they were willing to put in the time. You mention that 420 updates per week is much more than you could possibly use. I would infer from this that you are operating in slower moving markets and are more of a "swing trader" who benefits from market prices swinging upwards and down. I myself trade the margin between buy and sell prices. I made a quick calculation. When I am trading a good portion of the day (which is not infrequent for me when I am in the mood for playing EVE), I make about 1,000 market order updates a day. This has to do with my type of trading and my willingness to put in the time for making ISK. If your system were implement by CCP, it would completely prevent players like me (and I assure you that I am not the only one) from trading as much as we are willing to put in the time for.
Fango Mango
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#3 - 2012-03-09 03:19:50 UTC
Jake Andarius wrote:
I agree with your sentiment that CCPs war against trade bots is better for the EVE community. As a trader, I would also like to see CCP crack down on trade bots, because they are competitors that have an unfair advantage to a normal player.

Your solution seems appealing at first glance. Trade bots are able to continually update orders, so they would likely change orders many times more than most players would. However, there is a problem with your solution. It caps the number of trade changes that a player would like to do if they were willing to put in the time. You mention that 420 updates per week is much more than you could possibly use. I would infer from this that you are operating in slower moving markets and are more of a "swing trader" who benefits from market prices swinging upwards and down. I myself trade the margin between buy and sell prices. I made a quick calculation. When I am trading a good portion of the day (which is not infrequent for me when I am in the mood for playing EVE), I make about 1,000 market order updates a day. This has to do with my type of trading and my willingness to put in the time for making ISK. If your system were implement by CCP, it would completely prevent players like me (and I assure you that I am not the only one) from trading as much as we are willing to put in the time for.



Obviously its a trade off. Any change to any part of the game is going to help some players and hurt other players. I think that this change would make the game much better for the casual trader (A small subset of EVE players) at the expense of the hardcore traders(a much smaller subset of EVE). I can understand why anyone that has their personal gameplay style nerfed would be unhappy.

On the plus side . . .
You wouldn't need to make as many updates per day because your orders won't be constantly bashed by bots. Your sales volume/update would go up, but you would no longer have a massive advantage over the "casual trader".

Do you have an ideas about how we could limit the power of market bots without infringing on market game play?
Maybe you can request more "trade points" from a dev?
Maybe it cost a "trade point" each time you post in Jita local?

-FM
Kara Books
Deal with IT.
#4 - 2012-03-09 03:20:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Kara Books
I like your idea's on market regulation, Allot, but they are not clear.

When I read the Trade limit based on points, I understood it as something like this:

If Merchant A has 1.0M SP in trade skills, then he can modify orders 100 times per day
If Merchant B has 10M SP in Trade skills, then he can modify orders 1000 times per day.

From one point of view, This would increase paying customers, I.E. Increase the supply of PLEX, on the other hand, a Market bot, can be ordered to modify ONLY the 10 most profitable items that exist on the market, so 3 merchants on 1 account can still reak absolute HAVOK, as we saw just how Devistating the banned wave was on the Players interested on Market based PvP.

My Little 5 ISK
What we need is a Task force of trusted, Perhaps, Voted players to actually Police the markets, and simply have their reports investigated Very fast and seriously, a real player will be identified as a Fierce merchant, or Banned as a BOT, the goods PLEX, and otherwise highly demanded goods need be confiscated from all chars who, upon a 2nd ban, will donate into a "lottery" that only paying customers (people who Buy PLEX from CCP for real cash) can participate in, for free, for a chance to win some, or even all of the monthly confiscated goods, in theory, every one WILL be a winner, Including CCP.
Imagine, exciting a whole new market of potential customers, Gamblers and people who only buy into the lottery once the jackpot becomes to big!

I would volunteer up to 5 hours of my time, every month if honored with assisting with a such and noble cause!

On a side note, I JUST noticed, that forum Posts now save into "Drafts", this, is an epic new feature that, when it did not exist, you would basically write a long post, then click th eYellow post button, only to see everything you wrote, Gone, and unrecoverable.
AWESOME stuff, thanks again for making this game better.
Jake Andarius
Andarius Trading Corp.
#5 - 2012-03-09 03:41:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Jake Andarius
I do not think any system that caps market order updates would be a good idea. EVE has the most complex economy of any video game for a reason. EVE has a free market of raw materials that players work to extract. That free market is governed by the laws of economics. If traders see a profit to updating their orders a lot, then a certain percentage of traders will do that. Other players benefit because the aggressive trading drives down the margins between the buyers and the sellers. If CCP decided to limit trade, they would be interfering with their goose that lays golden eggs: the dynamic, player-driven market of EVE.

In my opinion, the issue of market bots is best solved by CCP. If CCP decides that they do not want trade bots in EVE, then they have an obligation and incentive to spend resources to remove trade bots from the game. Kara Books has one idea that I agree with completely:

Kara Books wrote:
What we need is a Task force of trusted, Perhaps, Voted players to actually Police the markets, and simply have their reports investigated Very fast and seriously, a real player will be identified as a Fierce merchant, or Banned as a BOT,


Traders have great incentive to report bots. If CCP is serious about banning bots, then I have no doubt that traders will begin selling or buying 1 unit to find out the name of a character they suspect to be a bot and reporting it to CCP. There is currently an ingame option to Report ISK Spammer. Correct me if I am wrong, but there is no simple way to report a suspected bot. In my opinion, the biggest thing that CCP could do to crack down on bots would be to introduce a quick option to Report Suspected Bot. Traders would immediately start reporting characters that update orders every 5 minutes, and CCP could investigate those flags through their own means to determine whether the character is a bot.
malaire
#6 - 2012-03-09 09:28:22 UTC
I still prefer to increase order modification fee. Discussion here: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=78351&find=unread

New to EVE? Don't forget to read: The Manual * The Wiki * The Career Options * and everything else

Dangra Mu'zgob
Parasitic Trading Systems
#7 - 2012-03-09 10:45:32 UTC
My 0.02 ISK:

both Fango Mango's and malaire's ideas are no-go for me - market regulation will kill important part of this complex game because player-driven economics is what makes EVE unique among other online games. Limiting order changes or raising modification fee would affect mainly human players - bot can still earn more isk using much faster decisions and better knowledge base than human brain can absorb/use, not mentioning that correctly written bot doesn't make mistakes and do not need to sleep/eat/...

Even when i respect Kara Books and her opinion, i strongly disagree also with her. Privileged, certified, fully-trusted or whatever named group of players should not substitute CCP's job.

From a database point of view there's certainly possibility to monitor and sort/display order-related data for each player. Even rapid-trading evil player should be easily distinguised from market bot. I believe that picking top 100 order-modifiers and watching them closely by CCP should solve this market-bot issue.


TL/DR: CCP, do your job properly.

Trading for living / living for trading.

Alt of Shangra Mu'zgob

Jurinak
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#8 - 2012-03-09 11:02:24 UTC  |  Edited by: Jurinak
I really like the Idea of "tradepoints" not only it limits the edge of the bot also against human players it is a good idea. I mean it is really boring to play the 0.01 war. That is not a fun part of the game it is more annoying then iceming or posshooting

And the 0.01 Isk war doesnt make Eve more complex that is nonsense
Shangra Mu'zgob
Parasitic Trading Systems
#9 - 2012-03-09 11:09:28 UTC
Jurinak wrote:
That is not a fun part of the game it is more annoying then iceming or posshooting


Please be carefull with defining what is/not is fun... not only 0.01isking but whole Market PvP is suprisingly very funny for me and i believe i'm not alone. If you want to limit my style of playing do you also accept only 1k rounds fired per day or 10k units of ore mined per day?


Trading for living / living for trading.
Jurinak
Deep Core Mining Inc.
Caldari State
#10 - 2012-03-09 11:15:31 UTC
ok that is really behind my horizon that someone really likes the 001 game Lol
Rengerel en Distel
#11 - 2012-03-09 12:24:01 UTC
Jurinak wrote:
ok that is really behind my horizon that someone really likes the 001 game Lol


i like the 001 game a lot more than people that raise it by 0.48 isk. if you're buying in bulk, why exactly do you want to give people more isk than you have to? it doesn't take any more time to increase your bid by 0.01 than it does 0.48, so why not keep profits for yourself?

In terms of bots though, CCP has the logs, all they'd need to do is set up the scripts to find the potential bots, then have the team look into them. They saw with the last bans, that 10 market bots were enough to really mess with the market, but is banning 10 bots worth the time to them? I'd guess not, or they'd do it.

With the increase in shiptoasting, the Report timer needs to be shortened.

Vincent Athena
Photosynth
#12 - 2012-03-09 16:37:27 UTC
In RL my broker gives me several free trades a year, then charges for an unlimited number of additional trades. Maybe that could be used in eve: The broker fee increases at some point.

The number of trades before some limit takes effect needs consideration. CCP most likely has data on how many order updates per day and per week are done by players and by the bots they have caught. Examination of that data may indicate there is a "sweet spot", a number of updates per day that would hamper very few players while still interfering with the bots.

Then again there may not be such a sweet spot. Many real players may be as active as the bots. In which case we need to look for other solutions.

Another question for CCP, if I get the chance.

P.S. the recent bot sweep did not seem to effect any of the stuff my trader deals in. Oh well.....

Know a Frozen fan? Check this out

Frozen fanfiction

Monty Kvaran
State War Academy
Caldari State
#13 - 2012-03-09 16:40:07 UTC
This change would render the marketing skill useless. The effective use of the marketing skill is to use region buy orders, and then resell what you get without moving it. The consequence is that you have a large number of sell orders for very small quantities. Being able to place sell orders for only 50 items a day would largely end the niche such traders fill. You would quickly find a reduction in local availability of all items, as traders are forced to stop selling small quantities in large numbers of stations.

Now if you just wanted to limit modifications, it wouldn't be an issue, but don't limit the number of sell orders a player can create per day (paying normal fees, not the reduced modification fee).
Lauren Hellfury
Super Happy Awesome Fun Times
#14 - 2012-03-09 16:48:35 UTC
BOTS! FAAAASANDS OF 'EM


You realise that CCP hit exactly 10 market bots in their recent purge?


There is already a limit on the number of sell orders you can create/modify within a minute. In fact it is easy to hit that limit with quick-selling crap.



Speaking as a bot myself (that's badly obsessive trader to you) I know that at least 3 of my characters have been reported for botting the market, in one case the character has been reported multiple times. People really need to take a more relaxed approach to this game because more often than not what you are doing is getting caught by a player that knows you are updating your orders as soon as the 5 minute timer expires.

Help rid New Eden of T2 BPOs: ** https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&t=62797 **The Full Pocket Aggro blog:  http://fullpocketaggro.blogspot.com/ **Now showing: **Margin Trading Scams

KrakizBad
Section 8.
#15 - 2012-03-09 17:25:20 UTC
To mirror Lauren, I easily do well over 1000 updates a day by a very large margin, and I too have been reported as a bot in my favorite market. Which was hilarious when the dude used the standard bot-dump tactic and I flipped all his stock.

Enthusiasm good, market regulation bad.
Raskor
Strategic Exploration and Development Corp
Silent Company
#16 - 2012-03-09 18:37:46 UTC
Fango Mango wrote:

I think 420 updates/week is much much much more than I need, and would satisfy the needs of almost all EVE player.


Maxed out at Tycoon 5, a player has 305 total order slots. Still think 420 updates a week is reasonable?

While I am not necessarily opposed to a limit on the number of updates per hour/day/week, that limit must scale with the number of orders a player has at their disposal (i.e. how much time they invested in the Trade line).
Fango Mango
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#17 - 2012-03-09 20:13:51 UTC
Thanks for all the good points made here by everyone. Please keep posting ideas and be polite!

Obviously the best solution would be for CCP to write a simple python script to identify bots and then deal with them manually.

Equally obviously, CCP is never going to bother doing this. They care about RMT bots and nothing else. I'm sure they'll catch the RMT market bots, but they have never shown any interest in dealing with non-RMT bots.

So is there some other solution to the market bot problem that "has a snowballs chance in hell of CCP implementing"?

As I've said before no solution is going to be perfect, but can we make an *improvement* to the game. Will you still need to make 1000 updates per day if you're not getting re-raised by bots? Will you make more ISK with less updates if the major hubs are not owned by bots? I don't know the answers to these questions, but I'm sure that one of the brilliant people here can come up with a solution that hurts bots and not human traders "too much".

My thoughts on other proposals.

* A group of GMs/dedicated citizens working to ban market bots. I don't think CCP will ever devote the resources for this. Also I'm not sure they should. It really is a minor issue considering all the other issues that devs/gm have to work on.

* Increase brokers fees to modify orders.
Once upon a time I thought this was the best solution. You can still make unlimited modifications to orders it just starts to cost more. The problem is that bots can just post very small orders that update as soon as they sell. This actually gives bots an advantage.

* Limit number of market placement/adjustments.
I threw out a number of 60/day, but that's just pulled from a hat. Maybe it should be 10/day or 1000/day. If you make the number to small, it hurts human traders too much, if you make it too big you don't affect the bots. No solution is going to be perfect, but I'd like something better than the situation in Jita today . . .



Dangra Mu'zgob wrote:
My 0.02 ISK:

both Fango Mango's and malaire's ideas are no-go for me - market regulation will kill important part of this complex game because player-driven economics is what makes EVE unique among other online games. Limiting order changes or raising modification fee would affect mainly human players - bot can still earn more isk using much faster decisions and better knowledge base than human brain can absorb/use, not mentioning that correctly written bot doesn't make mistakes and do not need to sleep/eat/...


I disagree. I think the main advantage the bots have over humans is that can monitor and update many more orders than a human and can do that 23/7. If you remove the the ability to make an unlimited number of changes they are much worse at playing the eve market than a (smart) human.



Monty Kvaran wrote:
This change would render the marketing skill useless. The effective use of the marketing skill is to use region buy orders, and then resell what you get without moving it. The consequence is that you have a large number of sell orders for very small quantities. Being able to place sell orders for only 50 items a day would largely end the niche such traders fill. You would quickly find a reduction in local availability of all items, as traders are forced to stop selling small quantities in large numbers of stations.

Now if you just wanted to limit modifications, it wouldn't be an issue, but don't limit the number of sell orders a player can create per day (paying normal fees, not the reduced modification fee).



How often do you need to update those regional buy and sell orders? My regional buy/sells get updated maybe once per week, often much less. Again maybe 60/trades per day is too low. What is a better number that would be comfortable for a human to make, but limit a bot working a major trade hub 23/7?



-FM
Takemikazuki
Celrydreahad
#18 - 2012-03-10 04:05:19 UTC
Meh, if you want to combat bots - try doing that without ideas that relies on strange and hampering regulations of the market.

0Lona 0ltor
Adeptio Gloriae
#19 - 2012-03-10 09:16:03 UTC
CCP could easily deploy client based monitoring to combat bots so a random snoop can determine if any programs are running alongside eve which are supect. No reason why anyone should refuse this unless they are botting. So why do they not implement this security, which is used heavily in the online poker world? Bots do not harm CCP profit so they have little care of it.

It's completely short sighted of CCP to sit and say Botters buy PLEX so it's ok. If they removed bots the real player subscription would increasce and allow the game to grow and evolve securing a brighter future for the company. Sadly CCP don't see past this months PLEX subscription which is evident with their constant publishing of user logins after every patch or content update.
Q Chief
Digital Research - Omega Protocol
#20 - 2012-03-10 21:47:21 UTC
Well first off, you are just a bitter noob

Now all the haters are going to jump up and say I condone the use of bots. My response is, why of course I support the advancement of all forms of technology use. If there is no adequate enforcement of a soft rule then humans are going abuse it. This is CCP's responsibility to deal with, not the player base. Pure, plain and simple. Don't like it, then quit

Here is the kicker. You are all bitter because you are terrible at this game. Your excuse is 'well someone is botting so I can't win!' and as a result you want CCP to do something about it. The problem is that they can't fix your stupidity so anything they do will be futile. That is why they do nothing - you, and others like you, are just dumb cattle that provide content for the rest of us who can figure out how to the play the game.

So I am not going to tell you how to use these so called 'bots' to your advantage but it is there. Those in the know how - it is just like all other market trading activities, the best traders don't share their info or all you nupties will just copy and then the gig is up

Harden up or go back to wow you stupid noob. That goes for the rest of you noobs who can't figure it out as well. It's pathertic everytime we get a wave of ex-WoW players who think they can change things they don't like by just mass complaining.
12Next page