These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

SHIP SPINNING RETURNS! Really? Now We Move Backwards?

First post
Author
Alissa Solette
Emergency Exit
#41 - 2011-09-21 12:16:47 UTC
CCP Manifest wrote:
I have not read this thread, and for that I apologize. However, I thought it more important to jump in immediately and clarify that ship spinning actually means that we will all start moving in circles again--either clockwise or counterclockwise depending on the preference of the pilot.


How much AUR will this feature cost? Also, will we be able to buy a monthly flat rate or will it be pay-as-you-spin?

Would be funny if it wasn't so sad.
Miilla
Hulkageddon Orphanage
#42 - 2011-09-21 12:34:48 UTC
Talking of flat , so is your avatar :)
Tyrnaeg en Varche
#43 - 2011-09-21 13:58:30 UTC
Grey Stormshadow wrote:
Congrats OP. You're the 1st person I add to my forum block list.
That is reward from the brilliance of that highly intelligent post you made :)

Oh, you should try that more, very handy to quickly browse through threads :)
Herping yourDerp
Tribal Liberation Force
Minmatar Republic
#44 - 2011-09-21 15:21:29 UTC
forcing CQ was moving eve backwards.... this is a step in the right direction.
either way, post with your main, trolls trolling
Ranger 1
Ranger Corp
Vae. Victis.
#45 - 2011-09-21 17:18:38 UTC
Alissa Solette wrote:
CCP Manifest wrote:
I have not read this thread, and for that I apologize. However, I thought it more important to jump in immediately and clarify that ship spinning actually means that we will all start moving in circles again--either clockwise or counterclockwise depending on the preference of the pilot.


How much AUR will this feature cost? Also, will we be able to buy a monthly flat rate or will it be pay-as-you-spin?

Would be funny if it wasn't so sad.


Much like your post.

(Badoom ching)

View the latest EVE Online developments and other game related news and gameplay by visiting Ranger 1 Presents: Virtual Realms.

Satav
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#46 - 2011-09-21 17:42:58 UTC
Phizban wrote:
CQ wah. Ship spinning, wah. NEX wah.

Lets move the game backwards by re-adopting past iterations. Let us embrace the past, and let EVE stagnate. No change, only the same reliable unchanging predictable experience.

Now CCP can simply re-introduce the CQ / Ship Spin Hanger option and call it new content. Weeeeee!

So now the winter expansion suffers. Lets bring back previous AB and MWD and NANO specs. Lets bring back wrecks that can not be salvaged by anyone, and get back to the old RIG prices.

Oh, also, bring back the times when Dreads cost LESS than Carriers.

Finally, I would like all my ISK refunded from all my losses, in the past.





HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAAHAHAHAHAHAHA! *gasps for air* HAHAHAHAHAHA

I knew it. All this input of wanting ship spinning back and now we are hearing that "eve is moving backwards and becoming stagnate"

lol. can anyone say STFU? lol. seriously. CCP can't satisfy all your wants and desires. The best pc game companies can't. So why don't we focus on the important stuff and tackle the small stuff when we can.

Sheesh ******* children these days huh?

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

"250 Hellcats inbound sir! They have us outmanned and outgunned. What are we going to do?" "catnip of course......."
Vertisce Soritenshi
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#47 - 2011-09-21 18:42:23 UTC  |  Edited by: Vertisce Soritenshi
Albetta wrote:
Man your stupid


Oh the irony...his stupid what?

"You are" = You're

I think that's what, third grade English right there?

To the OP:

They aren't taking anything away from EvE. They are just adding back the ship spinning portion that was originally removed and giving us a button to make accessing CQ optional. Just like everybody with any common sense was saying when Incarna released.

How is this moving backwards? If anything this is moving forward.

Bounties for all! https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=2279821#post2279821

Igualmentedos
Perkone
Caldari State
#48 - 2011-09-21 18:45:24 UTC
Albetta wrote:
Man your stupid


It's, "you're." Which is fine and all idc tbh, but come on you just called him stupid.
Zofe Stormcaller
Black Horse Corporation
#49 - 2011-09-21 20:38:02 UTC
OP needs to get bent. Getting CQ implented in the way the community wanted instead of the dumbass way it was is going forward. Lets just see if it actually gets implemented somewhat close to the dev blog
The D1ngo
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#50 - 2011-09-21 20:59:44 UTC
Phizban wrote:
CQ wah. Ship spinning, wah. NEX wah.

Lets move the game backwards by re-adopting past iterations. Let us embrace the past, and let EVE stagnate. No change, only the same reliable unchanging predictable experience.

Now CCP can simply re-introduce the CQ / Ship Spin Hanger option and call it new content. Weeeeee!

So now the winter expansion suffers. Lets bring back previous AB and MWD and NANO specs. Lets bring back wrecks that can not be salvaged by anyone, and get back to the old RIG prices.

Oh, also, bring back the times when Dreads cost LESS than Carriers.

Finally, I would like all my ISK refunded from all my losses, in the past.






If only we would roll back to before you "rolled" your toon... Roll
Soi Mala
Whacky Waving Inflatable Flailing Arm Tubemen
#51 - 2011-09-22 14:46:31 UTC
Phizban wrote:
CQ wah. Ship spinning, wah. NEX wah.

Lets move the game backwards by re-adopting past iterations. Let us embrace the past, and let EVE stagnate. No change, only the same reliable unchanging predictable experience.

Now CCP can simply re-introduce the CQ / Ship Spin Hanger option and call it new content. Weeeeee!

So now the winter expansion suffers. Lets bring back previous AB and MWD and NANO specs. Lets bring back wrecks that can not be salvaged by anyone, and get back to the old RIG prices.

Oh, also, bring back the times when Dreads cost LESS than Carriers.

Finally, I would like all my ISK refunded from all my losses, in the past.



We should spend decades/centuries designing methods to interface directly with ships, enabling the pilots to control the systems via their own nervous system. Man and machine interwoven, sacrificing their previous lives for the honour of becoming a capsuleer. They gain fame, riches, and immortality, all in exchange for their dedication, for their imprisonment in the war machine.

That doesn't sound very fun, so lets just roll that back, and have him jump out of that interface every time he docks, so he can prance around and show of his new sunglasses.

Get a grip you ******* ******.

Bloodpetal
Tir Capital Management Group
#52 - 2011-09-22 15:53:50 UTC
Miilla wrote:
I DEMAND WE HAVE SHIP FLIPPING!


I want to flip my ship UP AND DOWN not just clockwise and anticlockwise



Thanks for showing the OP how to troll Millia - a shining example for all of us.

His attempt was a disgrace really.


Lol

Where I am.

Azelor Delaria
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#53 - 2011-09-22 16:05:34 UTC
OP, I would like you to do the following, in this order:

1.) Get a potato.
2.) Wrap it in tin foil.
3.) Put said potato-wrapped-in-tin-foil into your pocket.
4.) Die in a fire, that way the world is rid of your stupidity and I get a baked potato! \o/
jason hill
Caldari Provisions
Caldari State
#54 - 2011-09-22 16:10:04 UTC
I think the OP forgot to take his med`s and is currently suffering from a stupidity leak !
Mr Kidd
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#55 - 2011-09-22 17:46:40 UTC
Phizban wrote:
CQ wah. Ship spinning, wah. NEX wah.

Lets move the game backwards by re-adopting past iterations. Let us embrace the past, and let EVE stagnate. No change, only the same reliable unchanging predictable experience.

Now CCP can simply re-introduce the CQ / Ship Spin Hanger option and call it new content. Weeeeee!

So now the winter expansion suffers. Lets bring back previous AB and MWD and NANO specs. Lets bring back wrecks that can not be salvaged by anyone, and get back to the old RIG prices.

Oh, also, bring back the times when Dreads cost LESS than Carriers.

Finally, I would like all my ISK refunded from all my losses, in the past.





Unlike my troll brothers and sisturs I'm going to attempt to broach your concerns seriously.

Reintroducing ship spinning is not a move backwards. In fact, having to load CQ, get out of your ship and walk somewhere for tasks as simple as adding more ammo to your cargo bay or turning in missions or unloading/loading ore or buying/selling or any other numbers of actions requiring repetitive docking/undocking is an impediment to the game. Sir, you will get tired of having to wait for CQ to load everytime you do one of these things. The good news is you will still have that option. So, moving backwards? No. I would guess that CCP realized that having to spend 30s to dock, 30s to load CQ and however long to walk down the hall to your agent's office everytime you want to turn in/get a mission would be needlessly laborious and a detriment to game play. IDK. But that would be my guess.

Or, another way to look it is that they realized that for the vast majority of their players who can't afford +$5,000 rigs of bleeding edge technology that WiS is ultimately going to be a performance fiasco when more than one character and one room are involved in the rendering and that it might be best to give everyone the option of turning that sh&t off. IDK?

Don't ban me, bro!

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#56 - 2011-09-22 18:17:09 UTC
Confirming OP is either a troll or as dumb as a brick, probably the latter to be brutally honest


Miilla wrote:


Do not mock Elite, EVER.



Quoting Miillia, & actually agreeing... Damn it.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Previous page123