These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
123Next page
 

hi CCP why are you tearing down the sandbox re: scams

First post First post
Author
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#1 - 2012-02-24 03:21:34 UTC
Quote:
EVE System > Channel MOTD: Welcome to the recruitment channel. This channel is intended for those players looking to find a new corporation, as well as those looking to enlist new players. Other activities, such as non-recruitment discussion is not permitted. No scamming is allowed in this channel and this includes, but not limited to, using the recruitment channel as a platform to find or target players to scam. As per subject, we ask everyone to use their best judgment before contracting assets or ISK as part of corporation's recruitment process and any deals made or finalized outside this channel are done at your own risk and responsibility.An additional recruitment source is the Alliance and Corporation Recruitment Center section of the forums.


So what gives, why are you going down the road of prohibiting scams? I understand why character and timecode scams are not allowed, due to the fact that they involve the purchasing of services from CCP, but recruitment? Really? This rule is vague, it is selectively enforced and it goes completely against the spirit of the game. This rule also doesn't stop players from scouting out corporations to infiltrate and rob blind, it doesn't stop recruiters from looking for saps to recruit and gank - it is specifically targeted towards one type of scam. So I ask, why the double standard? Remove this rule.

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Petrus Blackshell
Rifterlings
#2 - 2012-02-24 03:34:22 UTC
I'm split. While I understand that protecting a channel that newbies are likely to use for recruitment makes sense, protecting people like the ones Andski described does not make sense. It's the difference between "newb" and "noob". The former deserves to be taught and welcomed to Eve. The latter deserves their ship taken away by explosion or scam.

Accidentally The Whole Frigate - For-newbies blog (currently on pause)

Nova Fox
Novafox Shipyards
#3 - 2012-02-24 04:01:55 UTC
Much more rewarding to let the fruit ripen before you reap them.

Dust 514's CPM 1 Iron Wolf Saber Eve mail me about Dust 514 issues.

Taedrin
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#4 - 2012-02-24 04:03:37 UTC
Because the recruitment channel is an official CCP moderated channel, and as such scamming is not tolerated there. Not to mention that the recruitment channel is part of the NPE, which is sacred to CCP.

Believe it or not, CCP does not actually endorse scamming. In fact, CCP's official policy on scamming is that it is undesirable, but not against the rules:

"TenTonHammer" wrote:

CCP is against scams and scam artists of this nature in-general, but so long as people abide by the EULA, funds or assets acquired through what one would term fraud and/or embezzlement in RL are within the context of the game at-large, and thus not actionable by CCP.


CCP was referring to the EIB scam here.
Andski
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#5 - 2012-02-24 04:06:20 UTC
Cyprus Black wrote:
Now see here, uh... Hair Face. The recruitment channel is intended for recruitment and although you Goons are notorious recruit scammers, you will have to find your own channel to scam in.


Jita local is intended for chat. So much for that!

Twitter: @EVEAndski

"It's easy to speak for the silent majority. They rarely object to what you put into their mouths."    - Abrazzar

Kelvan Hemanseh
Hole Exploitation Inc.
#6 - 2012-02-24 04:57:58 UTC
I'm pretty sure goons are one of the reasons why this game is interesting and hasn't stagnated to death yet. From starting huge 0.0 wars, pulling off amazing heists, causing huge market fluctuations, interdicting an entire market, etc. In case you all forget they we're one of the voices that saved the game when it nearly died because of too much focusing of space barbies. So maybe we should listen to them and ask CCP for some policy change or statement about this.
Grumpy Owly
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#7 - 2012-02-24 05:10:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Grumpy Owly
Kelvan Hemanseh wrote:
I'm pretty sure goons are one of the reasons why this game is interesting and hasn't stagnated to death yet. From starting huge 0.0 wars, pulling off amazing heists, causing huge market fluctuations, interdicting an entire market, etc. In case you all forget they we're one of the voices that saved the game when it nearly died because of too much focusing of space barbies. So maybe we should listen to them and ask CCP for some policy change or statement about this.


And yet login statstics do demonstrate that the game has stagnated.

There is a contra argument that EvE could be a more pleasurable experience for everyone should a larger majority of the playerbase be catered for. CSM interests seem to be taking a more focussed approach to simply ensure interests are being covered for a "select" set of individuals rather than looking at things in a more philanthropic way to generate more interest for a multitude of different playstyles which could perfectly co-exist side by side and without being an exclusion to each other.

As such there is quite an amount of distaste in the community as a result of Goon meta interest as a result whose to say it isnt having a detrimental effect? The added value Goons bring IG is fine as the boogeymen, criminal element, clowns, griefers whatever your preferred label, but we need to make the distinction here between IG antics and arguing about mechanics for selfish benefit.There are plenty of opportunites available to scammers IG.

However, as it's CCP who made the ruling fair enough, I'll let them give full details for the justification for them making the change.
Robbie Circus
Bang Boom Splat
#8 - 2012-02-24 05:17:07 UTC
Grumpy Owly wrote:


And yet login statstics do demonstrate that the game has stagnated.

change.


This is quite interesting do you have actual stats?
Kelvan Hemanseh
Hole Exploitation Inc.
#9 - 2012-02-24 05:23:39 UTC
To those that could not read his original post I tried to fix it but some things are beyond my help.

Grumpy Owly wrote:
Kelvan Hemanseh wrote:
I'm pretty sure goons are one of the reasons why this game is interesting and hasn't stagnated to death yet. From starting huge 0.0 wars, pulling off amazing heists, causing huge market fluctuations, interdicting an entire market, etc. In case you all forget they we're one of the voices that saved the game when it nearly died because of too much focusing of space barbies. So maybe we should listen to them and ask CCP for some policy change or statement about this.


And yet login statistics do demonstrate that the game has stagnated.

There is a counter argument that EvE could be a more pleasurable experience for everyone should a larger majority of the player base be catered for. CSM interests seem to be taking a more focused approach to simply ensure interests are being covered for a "select" set of individuals rather than looking at things in a more philanthropic way to generate more interest for a multitude of different play styles which could perfectly co-exist side by side and without being an exclusion to each other.

As such there is quite an amount of distaste in the community as a result of Goon meta interest as a result whose to say it isn't having a detrimental effect? The added value Goons bring in game is fine as the boogeymen, criminal element, clowns, griefers whatever your preferred label, but we need to make the distinction here between in game antics and arguing about mechanics for selfish benefit.There are plenty of opportunities available to scammers in game.

However, as it's CCP who made the ruling fair enough, I'll let them give full details for the justification for making them making the change.


Okay frankly everything you said there is basically BS, it was right when this character was started that Hilmar put out his SOS call as subscriptions plummeted and the average amount of logged in users was ~19,000. After the emergency summit in which the CSM (made up of 2 goons and others) helped revive the game. Since then subscriptions have been rising and the average amount of logged in users was ~30,000-40,000.

The CSM serves as a sanity filter to CCP, its purpose is to prevent horrible abominations like last summer. They basically revived the game so I have no idea why you hate them unless space barbies were a treasured thing of yours.

Also in case you didn't notice, goons do more things than make high sec miserable for a few stupid people. Look at 0.0 yes it exists, now look at that war going on. That huge war is another big draw to the game that you aren't giving them credit for. I'll give you that they are "bad guys" in this game but you cannot have "good guys" without bad guys. They serve a necessary part of this game and right now they are trying to act as a sanity filter against something being done probably out of laziness by CCP.

I can understand what CCP is trying to do as well, they want to address the horrible onslaught of stupid people petitioning being scammed. This isn't the right way to do that though this way creates more work and makes the game less of a sandbox.

Also for ****s sake put some effort into your posts I'm tired of having to get a decoder ring out just to figure out what you're saying.
Grumpy Owly
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#10 - 2012-02-24 05:24:37 UTC  |  Edited by: Grumpy Owly
Robbie Circus wrote:
Grumpy Owly wrote:


And yet login statstics do demonstrate that the game has stagnated.

change.


This is quite interesting do you have actual stats?


Sure:

http://i.imgur.com/Td3ex.jpg

http://eve-offline.net/?server=tranquility

I dont see any significant growth pattern.
Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#11 - 2012-02-24 05:27:55 UTC
Grumpy Owly wrote:
And yet login statstics do demonstrate that the game has stagnated.


That has more to do with space pants and other poor decision making on CCP's part than anything we are doing. If CCP could point to an actual statistic that showed them that scamming was actually hurting the game they would change the EULA and put a stop to it. Everything else is just hot air.

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.

La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#12 - 2012-02-24 05:29:25 UTC  |  Edited by: La Nariz
Grumpy Owly wrote:
Robbie Circus wrote:
Grumpy Owly wrote:


And yet login statstics do demonstrate that the game has stagnated.

change.


This is quite interesting do you have actual stats?


Sure:

http://i.imgur.com/Td3ex.jpg

http://eve-offline.net/?server=tranquility

I dont see any significant growth pattern.


I can't see the second one for some reason but the first one doesn't include post-crucible. That information is way to dated to be applied to the current situation.

E: After getting that to load it shows a slight increase which further proves that you are completely wrong.

Also the one you really want, is the number of subscribed accounts, not logins.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

Grumpy Owly
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#13 - 2012-02-24 05:31:43 UTC
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Grumpy Owly wrote:
And yet login statstics do demonstrate that the game has stagnated.


That has more to do with space pants and other poor decision making on CCP's part than anything we are doing. If CCP could point to an actual statistic that showed them that scamming was actually hurting the game they would change the EULA and put a stop to it. Everything else is just hot air.


Ok fair enough so nothing to do with Goons, ok, so where is this amazing pull the Goons are demonstrating for the appeal to the game on the server graph, please point it out?
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#14 - 2012-02-24 05:33:02 UTC
Grumpy Owly wrote:
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Grumpy Owly wrote:
And yet login statstics do demonstrate that the game has stagnated.


That has more to do with space pants and other poor decision making on CCP's part than anything we are doing. If CCP could point to an actual statistic that showed them that scamming was actually hurting the game they would change the EULA and put a stop to it. Everything else is just hot air.


Ok fair enough so nothing to do with Goons, ok, so where is this amazing pull the Goons are demonstrating for the appeal to the game on the server graph, please point it out?


Tell you what, point to the part on the graph that's the people leaving the game over scamming. Don't present data then ask questions that have no relevance to the data.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

Ladie Harlot
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#15 - 2012-02-24 05:34:47 UTC
Grumpy Owly wrote:
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Grumpy Owly wrote:
And yet login statstics do demonstrate that the game has stagnated.


That has more to do with space pants and other poor decision making on CCP's part than anything we are doing. If CCP could point to an actual statistic that showed them that scamming was actually hurting the game they would change the EULA and put a stop to it. Everything else is just hot air.


Ok fair enough so nothing to do with Goons, ok, so where is this amazing pull the Goons are demonstrating for the appeal to the game on the server graph, please point it out?


Umm..."nothing to do with Goons" means we don't have an effect on the server graph. I don't think you know what you're asking for.

The artist formerly known as Ladie Scarlet.

Grumpy Owly
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#16 - 2012-02-24 05:35:42 UTC
La Nariz wrote:
Grumpy Owly wrote:
Robbie Circus wrote:
Grumpy Owly wrote:


And yet login statstics do demonstrate that the game has stagnated.

change.


This is quite interesting do you have actual stats?


Sure:

http://i.imgur.com/Td3ex.jpg

http://eve-offline.net/?server=tranquility

I dont see any significant growth pattern.


I can't see the second one for some reason but the first one doesn't include post-crucible. That information is way to dated to be applied to the current situation.

E: After getting that to load it shows a slight increase which further proves that you are completely wrong.

Also the one you really want, is the number of subscribed accounts, not logins.


Sorry i dont see it, all I see from the long term graph (which is up to date) is a downard trend to a virtual flat line, there is no serious growth trend to account for and please attribute it to Goons playstyle.
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#17 - 2012-02-24 05:37:20 UTC
Grumpy Owly wrote:
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Grumpy Owly wrote:
And yet login statstics do demonstrate that the game has stagnated.


That has more to do with space pants and other poor decision making on CCP's part than anything we are doing. If CCP could point to an actual statistic that showed them that scamming was actually hurting the game they would change the EULA and put a stop to it. Everything else is just hot air.


Ok fair enough so nothing to do with Goons, ok, so where is this amazing pull the Goons are demonstrating for the appeal to the game on the server graph, please point it out?



Also your character was created way before the worst of it back in summer 2011. So you really don't have a clue how bad it actually was and couldn't possibly have a true perception of stagnation in this game.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

Grumpy Owly
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#18 - 2012-02-24 05:37:27 UTC
La Nariz wrote:
Grumpy Owly wrote:
Ladie Harlot wrote:
Grumpy Owly wrote:
And yet login statstics do demonstrate that the game has stagnated.


That has more to do with space pants and other poor decision making on CCP's part than anything we are doing. If CCP could point to an actual statistic that showed them that scamming was actually hurting the game they would change the EULA and put a stop to it. Everything else is just hot air.


Ok fair enough so nothing to do with Goons, ok, so where is this amazing pull the Goons are demonstrating for the appeal to the game on the server graph, please point it out?


Tell you what, point to the part on the graph that's the people leaving the game over scamming. Don't present data then ask questions that have no relevance to the data.


Sorry if someone is making the claim that the Goons playstyle is an improvement to server numbers they have to prove it.
La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#19 - 2012-02-24 05:38:24 UTC
Grumpy Owly wrote:
La Nariz wrote:
Grumpy Owly wrote:
Robbie Circus wrote:
Grumpy Owly wrote:


And yet login statstics do demonstrate that the game has stagnated.

change.


This is quite interesting do you have actual stats?


Sure:

http://i.imgur.com/Td3ex.jpg

http://eve-offline.net/?server=tranquility

I dont see any significant growth pattern.


I can't see the second one for some reason but the first one doesn't include post-crucible. That information is way to dated to be applied to the current situation.

E: After getting that to load it shows a slight increase which further proves that you are completely wrong.

Also the one you really want, is the number of subscribed accounts, not logins.


Sorry i dont see it, all I see from the long term graph (which is up to date) is a downard trend to a virtual flat line, there is no serious growth trend to account for and please attribute it to Goons playstyle.


Where is this graph now, link it for me? It certainly is not one of the two you linked, the first one is not even current and the server login graphs show a very slight increase.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

La Nariz
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2012-02-24 05:42:04 UTC  |  Edited by: La Nariz
I have some proof that scamming is a draw to the game, take a look at this article from the New York Times.

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/06/15/business/15views.html

Right there word of mouth advertising for the game and a draw to it.

A good quote from that article: "But the word from Reykjavik isn’t likely to comfort Ebank’s depositors. Eve’s creators at CCP — which employs its own economist and philosopher — take a laissez-faire approach, leaving most such matters to the game’s users to sort out."

Grumpy Owly wrote:
Sorry if someone is making the claim that the Goons playstyle is an improvement to server numbers they have to prove it.


Funny by that logic you should have to prove all of your points which you haven't and can't. I don't have access to CCP's internal server statistics or I would bother with showing you the raw data. I sure as hell am not going to use out dated or off subject data to flail around trying to prove my point while frothing at the mouth in an angry seizure.

This post was loving crafted by a member of the Official GoonWaffe recruitment team. Improve the forums, support this idea: https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&find=unread&t=345133

123Next page