EVE General Discussion

Atypical arrogance from this idiot and even more funny when considering he couldn't pour water out of a boot with instructions on the heel.

But then he could never be considered as an opinionated control freak I suppose?

Reverse psychology correction therapy exert XBY-14

---

As to sensible suggestion to the topic it might be interesting to see some ethical dilemma questions aswell as the listed topical material. I personally consider that although valid, its too debilitating to simply stick to current issues only, as the idea of CSM is to propose uinque ideas and express themselves with solutions to issues in the playerbase. So whilst its important to be aware of the current picture it is more vital to understand a person's view to EvE.

That I realise may not be an easy ask to simply place into a questinairre, which is why I might be skeptical to its benefit. I'd prefer like others to see the campaigners manifesto in a holistic manner than pandering to individual opinionated limitations. After all if you want someone to be able to think out of the box, surely better to not place them in one to begin with?

* Allowing SP Respec, aside cases where skills are removed from the game, would be decremental to the game.

theres a whole lot of personal butthert spilling out in that post

PvE (ratting, missions, incursions, anomalies) is too predictable.

High-sec PvE is, in its current state, tipped towards too high of a reward for little risk.

The GM team is in need of more transparency.

Supercapital ships are becoming exceedingly common.

Sovereignty mechanics are in serious need of work.

Nullsec should continue to be a major focus for the development team.

"Flavor of the month" fleet/gang compositions are indicative of poor game design.

.

This is EVE. What you are asking is impossible to accomplish. For example: Beer? One word, yet so many different interpretations.

I'll give it a go anyway

- Nullsec is of greater importance than Lowsec or Highsec
- Lowsec is of greater importance than Nullsec or Highsec
- Highsec is of greater importance than Lowsec or Nullsec

- Tech 3 ships should be better developed
- We need more Tech 3 ships in game
- I would like to see the introduction of Tech 3 modules

- Iteration is important
- Iteration of existing in space features should be a priority
- Iteration of existing Incarna features should be a priority
- Iteration on all levels is important

- Ships need to be buffed, except for Super-Caps and Titans
- Buffing Lower Tier Tech 1 Ships should be a priority
- Selectively nerfing ships is needed to help balance the game
- We should nerf all ships of a non-industrial variety
- Buffing Capitals and Sub-Caps would help to balance Super-Caps

- Moons need to be accessible everywhere
- Moons should only be accessible in Nullsec
- Moons should be accessible in both Lowsec and Nulsec

- CCP are good developers and I respect them and what they have accomplished in developing EVE

- Wormholes are too secure
- Wormhole mechanics need a change
- We need more ways to disrupt Wormhole activity as players
- Wormholes are too inaccessible

- Incursions need greater iteration and balance
- Incursion payouts need to be fixed
- Incursion should pay everybody that runs them and not just a select few.

- Griefing is too prevalent in EVE
- Mechanics in EVE make it to easy to gank players in Highsec
- Ganking and Griefing in EVE suffers little or no consequence to the players participating in it
- PvP should be less consensual

- Morals have no place in EVE

- DirectX 10 and 11 should be available for EVE players to enhance game quality

- Industry as a whole needs iteration and development
- Only certain aspects of Industry are important
- More forms of Industry should be available to the playerbase

- Changes to the game UI and graphics are not needed, and development should be focused elsewhere

- There should be more options to save and export/import settings in the game
- We need the ability to save and export/import Fleet configurations and settings
- It should be possible to save specific wardrobe outfits so character customization isn't required all the time
- More tabs on the overview would be nice

- Cloaking is too safe and should be changed, or a counter should be introduced
- AFK cloaking is a hindrance to my and others gameplay
- When cloaked, you should be completely invulnerable

- Price is not important when determining how powerful a ship should be
- All ships should have the ability to defend themselves based on how costly they are

- Lowsec needs iteration and new features
- Highsec needs iteration and new features
- Nullsec needs iteration and new features
- Faction Warfare needs iteration and new features

- Security levels in EVE should shift and change over time
- Borders between sovereign territory in Highsec and Lowsec should shift and change dynamically
- We should be able to influence the change of security levels in a system directly and intentionally as individuals
- Player actions should bring about changes to security levels over time
- Player actions should have a direct influence on Faction NPC control of sovereignity in Highsec and Lowsec
- Player actions should have a direct influence on NPC sovereignity in Nullsec

- Players should be able to choose to start play as a pirate faction, provided they have a veteran account in the game
- Pirate NPC Factions should not be available to players

- If I had an interest in Incarna, I would say it should directly reflect the security level of systems and have PvP available
- If I had an interest in Incarna, I would say that it should focus on Social interactions
- If I had an interest in Incarna, I would say that it should allow multiple forms of interaction between Dust 514 and EVE
- If I had an interest in Incarna, I would say it should eventually allow players to travel between space and planets
- I have no interest in Incarna

- EVE should be 100% PvP, and we should do away with Concord and Security levels in systems all-together
- There needs to be more solo content available
- There needs to be more group activities available
- Solo players are unwelcome in EVE, and should find another game
- All players are welcome in EVE as it adds to the diversity of the playerbase

Well, there's a few

If this is your youtube channel (which is the only reason to link me to such a pointless video with 35 views) then I'd like to inform you that your portfolio of 3d and graphic design is almost as terrible as your posting.

I need incarna now!
Super caps are not over powered enough!
Blobbing must be made useless
yay for passive income
death to scammers
Occupancy should remain seperate from Sovereignty ->allow occupancy in hisec / renting low sec outposts at cost of being in FW
death to griefers
add more pvp content
expand on pve
incursions are not hard enough
death to wh towers
more nex store items! -> top hats, lingerie, full body tattoos

This, my friends, is pure genius...and why I'm voting for Skippermonkey for CSM

How about a statement that says, "Eve should provide additional tools (more resistant ships or defensive devices/modules) to industrial players to assist with defense against PvPers"

Right now, the industrial players simply log out since it's the easiest way to avoid risking an industrial ship. I say that there should be a log off timer where a ship will stay put but in return give the industrial players something that can give them a somewhat fighting chance. The biggest issue is that without using alts, not many folks want to sit around and babysit a mining op for hours on end.