These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
12Next page
 

Project Discovery impossible?
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Zalixus Orici
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#1 - 2017-07-12 14:41:56 UTC
Lol maybe not possible, you can match 1 out of 20 sometimes by luck, but most of them are just like guessing game. Even when you get right, you actually don't. http://i.imgur.com/SqoAOjw.png . Not sure, if bugged or just very dumb project.
Netan MalDoran
Cathedral.
Shadow Cartel
#2 - 2017-07-12 19:15:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Netan MalDoran
It worked well on SISI cause we had a small amount of players actually trying, now that its on Tranquility its being flooded by players which are random clicking just for money without caring about accuracy which is messing up all of the data.

Update: Once you get through the first 50 or so samples, the data inaccuracy seems to have normalized.

"Your security status has been lowered." - Hell yeah it was!

Falcon's truth
Matthias Ancaladron
Imperial Shipment
Amarr Empire
#3 - 2017-07-12 19:34:47 UTC
The game was glitched yesterday in correctly labeling the first 100 or so samples with transits everywhere when the actual light graph had no transits present for most of the samples.

Baboo Yagu
#4 - 2017-07-12 19:59:56 UTC
Completely agree. I mean, just how the **** is anyone supposed to correctly identify this ****?

https://i.imgur.com/iyz7Wmv.png

Hello darkness, my old friend.
Lord Maghnus
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#5 - 2017-07-12 20:14:00 UTC
I suggest a review button be added so that we can take a better look after we transmit our inputs. Reviewing the consensus of other players, and the evaluation mode might help everyone better understand what we're looking for when we analyze the data. Once we transmit, it becomes locked and it's difficult to review so no effective way to learn from mistakes or other players inputs. Being able to learn from feedback will go a long way into making this effective.
Luna Le Fey
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#6 - 2017-07-12 21:36:48 UTC
Yea they really do need to sort this out, im up at rank 72 and I must have passed the point where all I get now are the really hard ones, the ones that are genuinely impossible to identify. I've only had like 1 or two that are somewhat obvious but even then, half of them are wrong.. look at this crap http://i.imgur.com/QS2mBkz.png apparently I'm wrong, it's freaking lower than the correct answer ffs
Shalua Rui
Rui Freelance Mining
#7 - 2017-07-12 21:41:15 UTC
Luna Le Fey wrote:
Yea they really do need to sort this out, im up at rank 72 and I must have passed the point where all I get now are the really hard ones, the ones that are genuinely impossible to identify. I've only had like 1 or two that are somewhat obvious but even then, half of them are wrong.. look at this crap http://i.imgur.com/QS2mBkz.png apparently I'm wrong, it's freaking lower than the correct answer ffs

I had the same when I started out yesterday... then suddenly everything went well 'tll rank 26, and now I get only junk again. I already lost 20% accuracy dropping me down to 60%.

"ginger forum goddess, space gypsy and stone nibbler extraordinaire!" Shalua Rui - CEO and founder of Rui Freelance Mining (RFLM)
Luna Le Fey
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#8 - 2017-07-12 21:45:50 UTC
I was sitting at 99% for ages, thought I was doing super well http://i.imgur.com/aQ76MaL.png but at the 65-70 rank its just all gone to ****
Baboo Yagu
#9 - 2017-07-12 23:35:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Baboo Yagu
How the **** do you people manage to get to such high ranks so quickly? I can't even get past rank 4, no matter how obvious the dips are it keeps on failing me because I didn't pick out some random section that looks exactly the same as the rest of the sample. Then most of the times I pick out the only dips in the sample it fails me and say they're a false positive.

It's a bloody joke is what it is.

Hello darkness, my old friend.
Galaxxis
The Regency
The Monarchy
#10 - 2017-07-12 23:56:56 UTC
It's not impossible, it's just a lot more challenging than the first Project Discovery. I'm an astrophysicist and have seen plenty of light curves, and even I can't figure out what in the hell they were thinking with a few of these. Sometimes one will fail because it just looked like noise, with one "maybe" signal if you squint really hard and stand on your head. And then they've gone and made an entire series of transits out of it. There are also some weird and blatantly obvious mistakes in some of the evaluation samples, which I'm sure most people have seen by now. To make it worse they've also just completely missed several transits in the evaluation samples! I just had one fail (and I wish I'd taken a screenshot) where it had one enormous transit, but then there was another much smaller transit with I think 6 or 7 relatively obvious signals that they missed. That's pretty **** poor if you ask me.

That being said, most of them do seem to have been done properly. Just keep at it and you should improve over time.
Spc One
The Chodak
Void Alliance
#11 - 2017-07-13 06:07:45 UTC
Also, how is this not correct ? Shocked

Image:
http://www.netsky.org/eve/AFailedPD13072017a1.png
Lord Maghnus
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#12 - 2017-07-13 06:26:48 UTC
Spc One, you're marking the trough of the stars rotation. It's very improbable the planets revolutions would exactly match the stars rotations.
Luna Le Fey
KarmaFleet
Goonswarm Federation
#13 - 2017-07-13 11:51:39 UTC
Spc One wrote:
Also, how is this not correct ? Shocked

Image:
http://www.netsky.org/eve/AFailedPD13072017a1.png


Thats a pulsating star, in the bottom right there are 4 options, one will be for pulsating stars
Lunati Key's
Galaxy In Flames
#14 - 2017-07-13 12:05:44 UTC
Zalixus Orici
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#15 - 2017-07-14 10:51:02 UTC
Seems, like they fixed it mostly, got to rank 43, around 65% accuracy.
Yueh Ferrda
Doomheim
#16 - 2017-07-14 12:30:30 UTC
Nothing fixed. Always random and no fullscreen for UI.
Photrius Pyrelius
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#17 - 2017-07-14 14:26:26 UTC
Yueh Ferrda wrote:
Nothing fixed. Always random and no fullscreen for UI.



Fullscreen would be nice. So would some manual y-axis zooming.
Vanessa Celtis
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#18 - 2017-07-14 19:42:36 UTC
Luna Le Fey wrote:
Spc One wrote:
Also, how is this not correct ? Shocked

Image:
http://www.netsky.org/eve/AFailedPD13072017a1.png


Thats a pulsating star, in the bottom right there are 4 options, one will be for pulsating stars



What are the crates giving above 75 ?
Blade Darth
Room for Improvement
Good Sax
#19 - 2017-07-14 19:53:29 UTC
Lunati Key's wrote:

https://puu.sh/wIuJ8/8de6ea7e14.png
https://puu.sh/wIuKl/497624ab74.png

1. Not sure wat happened here.
2. Someone forgot to de-trend. Or as you say it in french "extraile la compensa tentacle"

Omen Navy Issue Tutorial
Vanessa Celtis
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#20 - 2017-07-14 20:08:21 UTC
Blade Darth wrote:
Lunati Key's wrote:

https://puu.sh/wIuJ8/8de6ea7e14.png
https://puu.sh/wIuKl/497624ab74.png

1. Not sure wat happened here.
2. Someone forgot to de-trend. Or as you say it in french "extraile la compensa tentacle"


Nice French, where did you learn it?
12Next page