Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center

So if your employer cuts your pay, you work 2x the number of hours right?

So correct me if I am wrong here.

You put Rorqs on grid in Ascension, I have no issues there what so ever, as they should be on grid, you gave rorq pilots immense mining abilities to compensate for the risk/cost factor, again great no issues.

Slowly you are removing the great mining abilities, so now with this current patch, the Rorq has only a slightly better yield than 1 Hulk, oh but it boosts as well, big deal. Soon it will just be the same old Rorq as pre-ascension only on grid, so essentially will just be a 10b useless sitting duck.

A 10b-12b fitted rorq on grid that gives boosts and mines the same as 1 hulk, yep I see the logic

WTS Rorq, buying a hulk...costs less, gets into warp quicker....mines as good as a rorq for a fraction of the cost.

So much for the beast of a miner you boasted about in your Ascension expansion notes hey CCP.

Concerned for the eve economy, sounds more like concerned for the CCP wallet IMO!!

Poor mining goons…

I find it interesting that you guys don't take into consideration the very Cost of the ships, vs their income.

Day 1..

Colossal belt has ochre and a handfull of spod. Euro had 12 hours to clear it.

It's 8pm my time. Sure I could. Then play again at 1am.. because you know, I don't need sleep for work.

Mission accomplished. CCP demonstrates euro tz best tz.

Here's my two cent.

-,I,,

How about creating more incentive for peeps to blow each other up so demand catches up with supply?...

CCP wants to move the people to other systems????

CCP please ,what is the reason while miners go to some Systems with high SEcstatus??
Right..the miningyield

Please begin to play your own game.
I leave Eve a few Month ago and when i see this Patchnotes i think it was a good dicision.

Remove this ******* Secstatus and the people will move to other unbusy Systems from itself.


CCP....many People gives you a Tip... hear on it...play your own Game.

Patch the Rorqaul out of game...its have the same affects like your fu... bullshitpatches.

at last..... cooldown for Miningbelts.... LoL

I was on the understanding that this is a player led game and economy. The players don't want this , there are 35 pages on this forum that prove this .
Ccp need to concentrate on creating more pvp opportunities like reducing reinforcement timers on structures so the isk being made gets spent . Yes I'm a miner , yes I have a rorqual but I1 thing I never have is isk as I reinvest it all to bpo's. it would be better to make bigger ships slower to warp off so they can be killed . Carriers and supers are gone soon as intel spikes . Rorquals are stuck . Also make cynosure not work in anoms so it's all manual warp ins at random points so more ships are at risk .
Don't nerf the very things people like and enjoy doing

Heh, the irony.

And when an unbalanced ship appears, let it stay because of "player driven economy."

Yup, that is about a logical as a 3 year old.

Mostly what I remember about the early rorqual change threads is a lot of hilarious crying about how they're still not worth putting on grid, and never will be, and the rorqual is dead and will never be used again.




If that distinction is your definition of "player driven economy" then, spoiler alert: Eve has NEVER had a player driven economy.

There has never been a single moment in the lifespan of Eve where anything introduced to the economy via a faucet wasn't subject to the possibility of tweaking. The entire point was the astonishing number of people who don't seem to realize that, and are making moronic, "B...but the player driven economy!!1!" arguments now.

Ore compositions have been rebalanced. Tiericide included huge ship material rebalancing. Bounties have been adjusted before. Gun mining was killed. Drone minerals went away. The plex market has seen direct intervention before. That's just a tiny fraction of examples. Remember when ore anomalies didn't exist? I sure do.

But, whoa, a completely necessary Rorqual yield adjustment? That's just totally over the line! Clutch your pearls, and wring your hands, because NOW is the time to get precious about the player driven economy.



It's not about defending CCP, it's just that blaming them doesn't ******* matter. Sure, it's entirely their fault, and back when they had an economist, they seemed to be keenly aware that a bigger, badder mining yield ship - especially a capital-grade mining ship - wouldn't actually be a good thing. I agree with that sentiment.

Now, tell me how that has any impact on the necessity of continuing to manage the influx of new material. What, CCP ****** up so they should just say, "Well, guess we done goofed. We'll just have to let this train run right off the rails, now, because it simply won't do to upset a bunch of FOTM chasers by rebalancing things now that we realize we made a mistake. It was a good run while it lasted?"