These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page12
 

Incursion whiners..
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Calisto Fox
Doomheim
#21 - 2012-01-23 15:59:46 UTC
Proclus Diadochu wrote:


WTB '70b isk/month' moon...



Average paasive income from tech moon per month - 7b

Holding 10 moons = 70b

Was only an example you dipshit smartarse failure. Try harder.
Jafit McJafitson
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#22 - 2012-01-23 16:11:09 UTC  |  Edited by: Jafit McJafitson
Gerald Taric wrote:
Remajstor wrote:
high sec should be removed from the game...

No.

And i'm pretty sure you know why ...

(really not?: ... newbies for example ...)



Our newbies do alright

http://eveswarm.com/2012/01/player-spotlight-orion-winters/

http://eveswarm.com/2011/12/interview-with-'day-old'-hero-drinker/
Orion Guardian
#23 - 2012-01-24 13:54:02 UTC
Calisto Fox wrote:
Orion GUardian wrote:


The only Safety we have in Nullsec is the safety we make and provide ourselves! Highsec does not need that because your safety comes from NPCs and the only danger is stupidity.




And for your hard work you get:-

30/40% better payouts on incursions.
True sec systems with officer spawns.
Passive moon goo income of anywhere from 7-70b per month.
High quality plex's

ect ect..


Thats what you guys get that us in high sec dont.

It's like your complaining that your neighbor just bought a Ferrari with his life saving, the same car you bought out of your pocket change just because you could.

Really, you need to STFU trying to convince people Null is hard work and you guys deserve everything and everybody else deserves nothing.
You dont like the way i choose to play MY game? Deal with it or go biomass.



"For our hard work you get" yes.....

BUt we cannot farkm incrusions 23.5/7!
We cannot rat 23.5/7 like you can do missions
The moon income is spend on Sov and war efforts!

So in the end Highsec PvE nets you billions while nullsec PvE gives us hundreds of millions....

And I do not complain how you play your game I complained how utterly flawed the logic is the OP (and you now) use to assume nullsec would be so mich better and richer! If it is so great out here join us!
Garak Jakobs
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#24 - 2012-01-25 14:08:49 UTC  |  Edited by: Garak Jakobs
As stated previously I am an alt, my other toons live in 0.0 so I know what's going on. This is why I made this post.

0.0 for the most part is risk free on day to day activities.

The only risk comes when a cyno pops and all hell breaks loose. big fight many losses, fight over - rebuild.

When these fights are not happening its a simple case of running sites, ratting etc this is where there is zero risk.

Intel channels
Populated systems with blues

These 2 things alone make for quite a safe environment. Most 0.0 guys don't run about in shiney ships therefore the loss of a T1

Frigate
Cruiser
Battle cruiser
Battleship

Means nothing, Should you wander around in shiney ships solo and get killed, you create that risk yourself.

Even wormholes are far greater in risk than 0.0 by a loooong way because of no local and the fact your dependent on scanning to stay "safe" which term I use very loosely. Yet Wormholes don't get any love from CCP, melted nano drops nerfed to high heaven and C3s only solo-able in a long range pimped T3 [after the neut correction].

Yet It's 0.0 which gets all of Eves good stuff. If we are to really believe Risk equals reward it is indeed wormholes which should be the richest place in eve.
Chalmecatecuchtlz
The Scope
Gallente Federation
#25 - 2012-01-25 18:23:38 UTC
Calisto Fox wrote:
Proclus Diadochu wrote:


WTB '70b isk/month' moon...



Average paasive income from tech moon per month - 7b

Holding 10 moons = 70b

Was only an example you dipshit smartarse failure. Try harder.


Quite a noisy scrub alt. Calm down.. Just a game ;)

Proc 4 CSM16 Proc 4 CSM16 Proc 4 CSM16 Proc 4 CSM16 Proc 4 CSM16

Proc 4 CSM16 Proc 4 CSM16 Proc 4 CSM16 Proc 4 CSM16 Proc 4 CSM16
Nicolo da'Vicenza
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#26 - 2012-01-25 18:26:51 UTC  |  Edited by: Nicolo da'Vicenza
Garak Jakobs wrote:
As stated previously I am an alt, my other toons live in 0.0 so I know what's going on.

ahhahahahahahaha

Quote:
Even wormholes are far greater in risk than 0.0 by a loooong way because of no local

baaaaahahahahaha
Vaerah Vahrokha
Vahrokh Consulting
#27 - 2012-01-25 18:38:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Vaerah Vahrokha
Garak Jakobs wrote:
Allow me to repeat what I stated in the original post which I find funny on how nothing was said about because yall know I'm perfectly correct.

The main school of thought here is Risk Vs Reward. I ask you, what risk is there in 0.0 when surrounded by a large alliance quite willing to hot drop a Tengu with supers?

How risky can 0.0 be when you have Intel channels? you know what's coming system before they reach you. Therefore I ask again where is this so called uber risk that demands 0.0 to have all of eve goodies?

Would anyone like to answer this?



Easy, get to 0.0 (if you manage to get there) and then try this no risk by yourself.

After that you'll know you don't need to "answer" such questions.


Edit: you proclaim you are in 0.0.

Give proof or GTFO. "Toons" used in posting is automatic -1/10 anyway.

EvE Online portal | EvE markets tutorials
Remajstor
BALKAN EXPRESS
Shadow Cartel
#28 - 2012-01-25 22:16:54 UTC
Valei Khurelem wrote:
Remajstor wrote:
high sec should be removed from the game...


So that the entire game becomes a cesspit of gate campers and thousands of players sitting in stations too scared to go out because they know they'll immediately lose their ships and not be able to make anymore ISK?

GTFO.


If you are afraid to play, go play tetris...

and

ps: gtfo
Garak Jakobs
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#29 - 2012-01-26 19:44:22 UTC
Vaerah Vahrokha wrote:
Garak Jakobs wrote:
Allow me to repeat what I stated in the original post which I find funny on how nothing was said about because yall know I'm perfectly correct.

The main school of thought here is Risk Vs Reward. I ask you, what risk is there in 0.0 when surrounded by a large alliance quite willing to hot drop a Tengu with supers?

How risky can 0.0 be when you have Intel channels? you know what's coming system before they reach you. Therefore I ask again where is this so called uber risk that demands 0.0 to have all of eve goodies?

Would anyone like to answer this?



Easy, get to 0.0 (if you manage to get there) and then try this no risk by yourself.

After that you'll know you don't need to "answer" such questions.


Edit: you proclaim you are in 0.0.

Give proof or GTFO. "Toons" used in posting is automatic -1/10 anyway.


My 2 main characters live in 0.0, I do not have to give you proof of any kind. They live there and that's that.

0.0 is mostly risk free, you people need to grasp that protected by your huge alliances. 1 red comes in system and 30 people in fleet start searching.....lol and yeah thats you :)

How is 0.0 more risk than wormholes? If you took local away from 0.0 then you might be heading in that direction but with local you see a red and dock/cloak your safe.

In a WH you don't get such opportunity at all before a fleet lands on you.
Valei Khurelem
#30 - 2012-01-27 06:09:28 UTC  |  Edited by: Valei Khurelem
Quote:

0.0 is mostly risk free, you people need to grasp that protected by your huge alliances. 1 red comes in system and 30 people in fleet start searching.....lol and yeah thats you :)


What's this? I thought EVE was supposed to be a risk vs reward game, all of a sudden you're telling me it's near enough risk free to fly in 0.0? You know I wouldn't mind people like you if there was some ******* consistency in your arguments as opposed to just making it up as you go along to make it seem like we're just whiners rather than people with legitimate concerns about the game.

The least you could do is accurately describe EVE game mechanics so you don't look like an out of touch fool who hasn't at least tried making an alt. and just randomly fly to 0.0 for the hell of it.

"don't get us wrong, we don't want to screw new players, on the contrary. The core problem here is that tech 1 frigates and cruisers should be appealing enough to be viable platforms in both PvE and PvP."   - CCP Ytterbium
Surfin's PlunderBunny
Sebiestor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#31 - 2012-01-27 06:16:29 UTC
Make way for the Drama Llama!!!!

"Little ginger moron" ~David Hasselhoff 

Want to see what Surf is training or how little isk Surf has?  http://eveboard.com/pilot/Surfin%27s_PlunderBunny
Previous page12