These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Wars

Author
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#121 - 2017-05-03 14:55:22 UTC
Ima Wreckyou wrote:

Are you gona Salvosch this thread now with your incoherent ramblings about linguistic stuff no one but you has a problem understanding?

EDIT:
eww, he already started


There comes a point where it's not even amusing anymore, there's something really wrong going on with all that.
Salvos Rhoska
#122 - 2017-05-03 15:02:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Jenn aSide wrote:
Ima Wreckyou wrote:

Are you gona Salvosch this thread now with your incoherent ramblings about linguistic stuff no one but you has a problem understanding?

EDIT:
eww, he already started


There comes a point where it's not even amusing anymore, there's something really wrong going on with all that.


Incompetence, incontinence and impotence are completely different terms.

Sorry if that offends your liberal understanding of language and expression, but its a fact.

There is nothing amusing about people misusing language, and then refusing to accept culpability for that.

Own up to your mistake.

Don't be emotionally upset when you are called on them, just admit it, correct yourself, and we can all move on.
Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#123 - 2017-05-03 15:03:54 UTC  |  Edited by: Aaron
Jenn aSide wrote:
Ima Wreckyou wrote:

Are you gona Salvosch this thread now with your incoherent ramblings about linguistic stuff no one but you has a problem understanding?

EDIT:
eww, he already started


There comes a point where it's not even amusing anymore, there's something really wrong going on with all that.



From google;

incompetent
adjective
1. not having or showing the necessary skills to do something successfully.

So, emotionally incompetent means one has difficulty keeping emotions in check.

You could say incontinent i guess, it can also mean lack of restraint..

so emotionally incontinent = lack of restraint when trying to deal with your emotions?

From Google;

incontinence
ɪnˈkɒntɪnəns/
noun
noun: incontinence
1.
lack of voluntary control over urination or defecation.
"causes of urinary incontinence"
2.
lack of self-restraint.
"the emotional incontinence of modern society"


Based on google definition, Salvos is also correct.

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#124 - 2017-05-03 15:21:13 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
There is nothing amusing about people misusing language

There is nothing amusing about people constantly derailing threads with their off-topic ramblings about stuff no one but you has a problem understanding. I don't even care what the exact definition is in your hand picked gramar book, it was absolutely clear to everyone except you what Jen was talking about if you are not completely linguistically incompetent.
Salvos Rhoska
#125 - 2017-05-03 15:26:57 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Ima Wreckyou wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
There is nothing amusing about people misusing language

There is nothing amusing about people constantly derailing threads with their off-topic ramblings about stuff no one but you has a problem understanding. I don't even care what the exact definition is in your hand picked gramar book, it was absolutely clear to everyone except you what Jen was talking about if you are not completely linguistically incompetent.


Pfftt.

What is "emotional incompetence" even supposed to mean?
And why apply it to EVE players?

This is a GAME, not a therapy group.
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#126 - 2017-05-03 15:27:56 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Ima Wreckyou wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
There is nothing amusing about people misusing language

There is nothing amusing about people constantly derailing threads with their off-topic ramblings about stuff no one but you has a problem understanding. I don't even care what the exact definition is in your hand picked gramar book, it was absolutely clear to everyone except you what Jen was talking about if you are not completely linguistically incompetent.


Pfftt.

What is "emotional incompetence" even supposed to mean?

Sorry I meant linguistically incontinent
Salvos Rhoska
#127 - 2017-05-03 15:31:32 UTC
Ima Wreckyou wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Ima Wreckyou wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
There is nothing amusing about people misusing language

There is nothing amusing about people constantly derailing threads with their off-topic ramblings about stuff no one but you has a problem understanding. I don't even care what the exact definition is in your hand picked gramar book, it was absolutely clear to everyone except you what Jen was talking about if you are not completely linguistically incompetent.


Pfftt.

What is "emotional incompetence" even supposed to mean?

Sorry I meant linguistically incontinent


Yes, she is linguistically incompetent.
Josef Djugashvilis
#128 - 2017-05-03 16:51:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Josef Djugashvilis
Hmm, I am never keen on folk picking on, or correcting other folks grammar or spelling.

I think it says more about the critic than it does the person making the mistake.

A sort of schoolyard one-upmanship really.

This is not a signature.

Keno Skir
#129 - 2017-05-03 17:49:09 UTC
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
Hmm, I am never keen on folk picking on, or correcting other folks grammar or spelling.

I think it says more about the critic than it does the person making the mistake.

A sort of schoolyard one-upmanship really.


It's all in how you view it. A schoolboy might see it as a competition, an adult should be thankful when somebody helps them correct an error in their education, such as spelling.

To be angry at someone for correcting you, is to show yourself to be more concerned with outward appearances than education, which is sad Cry
Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#130 - 2017-05-03 18:02:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Aaron
Keno Skir wrote:
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
Hmm, I am never keen on folk picking on, or correcting other folks grammar or spelling.

I think it says more about the critic than it does the person making the mistake.

A sort of schoolyard one-upmanship really.


It's all in how you view it. A schoolboy might see it as a competition, an adult should be thankful when somebody helps them correct an error in their education, such as spelling.

To be angry at someone for correcting you, is to show yourself to be more concerned with outward appearances than education, which is sad Cry


Hmm, no one seems to have seen my post earlier. In my opinion no correction was needed.

Salvos is also correct based on the google definition of the word incontinence. Sometimes words can have multiple meanings, if one chooses to ignore the other meanings of a word then people can get confused.

I used to get into these debates with my ex as she would choose to ignore the secondary and tertiary meanings of words like "accept".

examples on the word accept;

you can say "I accept your proposal" which means you want whats being offered.

or one can say "I accept he had a bad attitude" which means you're just acknowledging the situation for what it is, It does not mean you want the persons bad attitude.

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Keno Skir
#131 - 2017-05-03 18:54:46 UTC  |  Edited by: Keno Skir
Aaron wrote:
Keno Skir wrote:
Josef Djugashvilis wrote:
Hmm, I am never keen on folk picking on, or correcting other folks grammar or spelling.

I think it says more about the critic than it does the person making the mistake.

A sort of schoolyard one-upmanship really.


It's all in how you view it. A schoolboy might see it as a competition, an adult should be thankful when somebody helps them correct an error in their education, such as spelling.

To be angry at someone for correcting you, is to show yourself to be more concerned with outward appearances than education, which is sad Cry


Hmm, no one seems to have seen my post earlier. In my opinion no correction was needed.

Salvos is also correct based on the google definition of the word incontinence. Sometimes words can have multiple meanings, if one chooses to ignore the other meanings of a word then people can get confused.

I used to get into these debates with my ex as she would choose to ignore the secondary and tertiary meanings of words like "accept".

examples on the word accept;

you can say "I accept your proposal" which means you want whats being offered.

or one can say "I accept he had a bad attitude" which means you're just acknowledging the situation for what it is, It does not mean you want the persons bad attitude.


Oh i didn't really pay attention to what was being corrected, was just chiming in to defend good education. I didn't agree that correcting someone's spelling or grammar is "picking on" them.

EDIT : I happen to have a built in confusion over the spelling of Shield and inevitably bounce the I to different positions to see what looks right. If someone pointed it out every time i used it incorrectly i'd probably get it out of my system quicker..
DeMichael Crimson
Republic University
Minmatar Republic
#132 - 2017-05-03 20:39:21 UTC
Aaron wrote:
Ima Wreckyou wrote:
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Ima Wreckyou wrote:

I especially like how you always rush in your alts to like your own posts if you feel threatened. Did it hurt so much to hear the truth? Big smile

You couldn't be more wrong even if you tried. Unfortunately I don't have enough alts to match the numbers.

But hey, thanks for telling me how you meta-game the forums.

I just think it is quite pathetic to like your own posts because you think that reinforces your weak point. Don't bother to lie about it it's quite obvious. Not sure why you think this has something to do with meta-gaming.


I always give DMC likes. 4 so far in this thread alone.

Thanks Aaron,

There's about 10 different characters that gave likes to my various replies in this thread.

Obviously Ima Wreckyou and Jenn aSide have their heads shoved so far up their neither regions they're not only blind as a bat but also twice as dumb as a doornail. The fact that all they can do is post vile sarcastic troll remarks with false accusations shows they suffer from a lack of self worth. Their only recourse is to demean and belittle everyone else in an attempt to compensate for their own inadequacies. Their constant posting of disgust and contempt towards others only proves that point.

If it wasn't so pathetic and comical I'd actually feel sorry for them.


DMC
Lord Harrowmont
Viziam
Amarr Empire
#133 - 2017-05-03 22:49:19 UTC
Cern Audeles wrote:
Hi,
I love this game but for one thing. The wars.
I am in a corp, it's new few veterans we mine explore do missions, but we keep having wars declared against us. They want paying up to a billion ISK to cancelled the wars, we lost half a bill in ships today.
So, I am downgrading to alpha, play casual, I love this game, but, i get a ship nice then get jumped by 4 ppl at one and destroyed, its not fun and even with insurance, a loss Sad


Stop feeding them kills. Problem solved.
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#134 - 2017-05-04 06:34:43 UTC
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Thanks Aaron,

There's about 10 different characters that gave likes to my various replies in this thread.

Obviously Ima Wreckyou and Jenn aSide have their heads shoved so far up their neither regions they're not only blind as a bat but also twice as dumb as a doornail. The fact that all they can do is post vile sarcastic troll remarks with false accusations shows they suffer from a lack of self worth. Their only recourse is to demean and belittle everyone else in an attempt to compensate for their own inadequacies. Their constant posting of disgust and contempt towards others only proves that point.

If it wasn't so pathetic and comical I'd actually feel sorry for them.


DMC


I also like some of DMC's posts and I concur with DMC on his definition of Ima Wreckyou and Jenn aSnide which is why his post above got another like from me.


In terms of wars, Aaron's suggestion is a good one and I would suggest that the OP have a look at this

In terms of the war itself the issue is simply that the aggressor is in a desperate search for something to shoot so they war dec anything that they see is active and hope that you go through the main pipes or go to the trade hubs or use the main mission hubs, all you do is train up alts to do that for you and you are golden, but like many things in this game it is a big negative to those who are new or more casual in that they have only one account.

Wars should be fought over a difference or an objective, but the thing is that the objective for most war deckers is to find something to blap even pods, shuttles and noob ships will do, that is the issue and their prey has no interest in that totally stale game play. In other words it is the players...

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Salvos Rhoska
#135 - 2017-05-04 06:53:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
Jenn aSide wrote:
Ima Wreckyou wrote:

Are you gona Salvosch this thread now with your incoherent ramblings about linguistic stuff no one but you has a problem understanding?

EDIT:
eww, he already started


There comes a point where it's not even amusing anymore, there's something really wrong going on with all that.


This is nonsense.

Teckos, Jonah, baltec1, you two, the thrice damned Tippia and any number of regulars are all famous for arguments over semantics/definitions on many occasions.

I agree its not amusing. Its not supposed to be.
But it is sometimes necessary.

In this case, you used the wrong term.
Just own up to it and move on.

I very often agree with DMC and Drac. Im not going to apologize for that. Its not a conspiracy. We just happen to share some similar perspectives. As to "liking", my browser doesnt even show the "like" button since a couple months now, and I cba to update it.

Its hypocritical for you to posture as if you guys dont give reach-around likes to each other all the time.

You brought up liking.
You made a huge noise about your own mistaken use of language when called out on it.
Just own up to it and let the thread return to topic.
Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#136 - 2017-05-04 06:55:11 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
DeMichael Crimson wrote:

There's about 10 different characters that gave likes to my various replies in this thread.

Obviously Ima Wreckyou and Jenn aSide have their heads shoved so far up their neither regions they're not only blind as a bat but also twice as dumb as a doornail. The fact that all they can do is post vile sarcastic troll remarks with false accusations shows they suffer from a lack of self worth. Their only recourse is to demean and belittle everyone else in an attempt to compensate for their own inadequacies. Their constant posting of disgust and contempt towards others only proves that point.

If it wasn't so pathetic and comical I'd actually feel sorry for them.


I also like some of DMC's posts and I concur with DMC on his definition of Ima Wreckyou and Jenn aSnide which is why his post above got another like from me.

Roll

Team alternate reality in full force.
Dracvlad
Taishi Combine
Astral Alliance
#137 - 2017-05-04 07:59:05 UTC
Ima Wreckyou wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
DeMichael Crimson wrote:

There's about 10 different characters that gave likes to my various replies in this thread.

Obviously Ima Wreckyou and Jenn aSide have their heads shoved so far up their neither regions they're not only blind as a bat but also twice as dumb as a doornail. The fact that all they can do is post vile sarcastic troll remarks with false accusations shows they suffer from a lack of self worth. Their only recourse is to demean and belittle everyone else in an attempt to compensate for their own inadequacies. Their constant posting of disgust and contempt towards others only proves that point.

If it wasn't so pathetic and comical I'd actually feel sorry for them.


I also like some of DMC's posts and I concur with DMC on his definition of Ima Wreckyou and Jenn aSnide which is why his post above got another like from me.

Roll

Team alternate reality in full force.


But you wrongly accused DMC of liking his own posts, bet you feel stupid now..., actually you don't, but you should...

When the going gets tough the Gankers get their CSM rep to change mechanics in their favour.

Blocked: Teckos Pech, Sonya Corvinus, baltec1, Shae Tadaruwa, Wander Prian, Daichi Yamato, Jonah Gravenstein, Merin Ryskin, Linus Gorp

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
The Conference
#138 - 2017-05-04 08:12:10 UTC
Dracvlad wrote:
But you wrongly accused DMC of liking his own posts, bet you feel stupid now..., actually you don't, but you should...

It's pretty obvious he liked his own posts. There where maybe 0-4 likes on the average posts of him. Except when he got really angry and annoyed he constantly had 7 right off the bat without you or Aaron or anyone else who would care about his toxic statements around in the thread. This is not the first thread this happened.

While it is pretty pathetic and shows how insecure he is it's also not really interesting. I just wanted to mention it because I think it is hilarious and then we could all forget about it again. But it seams he wants to talk a bit more about it by defending himself with an obvious lie.
Shae Tadaruwa
Science and Trade Institute
Caldari State
#139 - 2017-05-04 08:38:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Shae Tadaruwa
DeMichael Crimson wrote:
Obviously Ima Wreckyou and Jenn aSide have their heads shoved so far up their neither regions they're not only blind as a bat but also twice as dumb as a doornail.

There is an advantage to having their head shoved up their nether region as opposed to being a nether region.

They can always remove their head and are all fine.

You'll be an arse forever.

Dracvlad - "...Your intel is free intel, all you do is pay for it..." && "...If you warp on the same path as a cloaked ship, you'll make a bookmark at exactly the same spot as the cloaky camper..."

Mr Mieyli
Doomheim
#140 - 2017-05-04 10:03:19 UTC
Ima Wreckyou wrote:
Dracvlad wrote:
But you wrongly accused DMC of liking his own posts, bet you feel stupid now..., actually you don't, but you should...

It's pretty obvious he liked his own posts. There where maybe 0-4 likes on the average posts of him. Except when he got really angry and annoyed he constantly had 7 right off the bat without you or Aaron or anyone else who would care about his toxic statements around in the thread. This is not the first thread this happened.

While it is pretty pathetic and shows how insecure he is it's also not really interesting. I just wanted to mention it because I think it is hilarious and then we could all forget about it again. But it seams he wants to talk a bit more about it by defending himself with an obvious lie.


What is actually pathetic are these lame attempts at personal attacks, and what's pretty obvious is you won't address what he's saying but instead go for the cheap character headshot. You say there's some alternate reality going on in this thread, but really you're just seeing outside your own bubble.

This post brought to you by CCP's alpha forum alt initiative. Playing the eve forums has never come cheaper.