These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123Next page
 

In Game Insurance

First post First post
Author
Dark Lord Trump
Infinite Point
Pandemic Horde
#21 - 2017-04-30 22:25:51 UTC
Ash Beldrulf wrote:
ISD Max Trix wrote:
EVE is a game of risk. Ship lost is part of that risk. If CCP fully reimburst you the full cost of your ship, then what is the point of the fight? Where is the risk? Empires in EVE have risen and falled based on risk.

As for the cost, The most important and most Golden of all rules in EVE is this, " Never Fly what you can not afford to lose."



The risk as you put it is the cost of all the modules and implants in the clone. I don't mind losing some ISK but lose more ISK then I can make in a month to one suicide ganker with full insurance on the ship, SUCKS! As a player that has been playing less then 70 days I can not afford to lose much and losing 2 ships in one day in High security space, SUCKS! All I want to see would be a closer pay out 90% of the market value of the ship, no matter what Tech Tier. I am losing money to suicide gankers with the best insurance in the game in High sec.

1. Suicide gankers get no insurance. Insurance is invalidated by CONCORD.
2. Maybe you shouldn't move more ISK than you can make in a month around then.

I'm going to build a big wall that will keep the Gallente out, and they're going to pay for it!

Ash Beldrulf
#22 - 2017-04-30 22:40:42 UTC
Dark Lord Trump wrote:
Ash Beldrulf wrote:
ISD Max Trix wrote:
EVE is a game of risk. Ship lost is part of that risk. If CCP fully reimburst you the full cost of your ship, then what is the point of the fight? Where is the risk? Empires in EVE have risen and falled based on risk.

As for the cost, The most important and most Golden of all rules in EVE is this, " Never Fly what you can not afford to lose."



The risk as you put it is the cost of all the modules and implants in the clone. I don't mind losing some ISK but lose more ISK then I can make in a month to one suicide ganker with full insurance on the ship, SUCKS! As a player that has been playing less then 70 days I can not afford to lose much and losing 2 ships in one day in High security space, SUCKS! All I want to see would be a closer pay out 90% of the market value of the ship, no matter what Tech Tier. I am losing money to suicide gankers with the best insurance in the game in High sec.

1. Suicide gankers get no insurance. Insurance is invalidated by CONCORD.
2. Maybe you shouldn't move more ISK than you can make in a month around then.



1. I was not the suicide gamker, I lost two 2 ships to suicide gankers in High sec.
2. I am trying to make Isk but with then 70 days in the game it is hard.

Axhind
Eternity INC.
Goonswarm Federation
#23 - 2017-05-01 00:31:21 UTC
Ash Beldrulf wrote:
Dark Lord Trump wrote:
Ash Beldrulf wrote:
ISD Max Trix wrote:
EVE is a game of risk. Ship lost is part of that risk. If CCP fully reimburst you the full cost of your ship, then what is the point of the fight? Where is the risk? Empires in EVE have risen and falled based on risk.

As for the cost, The most important and most Golden of all rules in EVE is this, " Never Fly what you can not afford to lose."



The risk as you put it is the cost of all the modules and implants in the clone. I don't mind losing some ISK but lose more ISK then I can make in a month to one suicide ganker with full insurance on the ship, SUCKS! As a player that has been playing less then 70 days I can not afford to lose much and losing 2 ships in one day in High security space, SUCKS! All I want to see would be a closer pay out 90% of the market value of the ship, no matter what Tech Tier. I am losing money to suicide gankers with the best insurance in the game in High sec.

1. Suicide gankers get no insurance. Insurance is invalidated by CONCORD.
2. Maybe you shouldn't move more ISK than you can make in a month around then.



1. I was not the suicide gamker, I lost two 2 ships to suicide gankers in High sec.
2. I am trying to make Isk but with then 70 days in the game it is hard.



Several people here gave you advice on how to avoid getting ganked. Have you tried any of them? There are plenty of ways to avoid getting ganked but if you expect EVE to become zero impact from loss and inability to adapt you are going to wait for a very long time. Learn from your mistakes and use advice from more experienced players.
Ash Beldrulf
#24 - 2017-05-01 05:22:46 UTC
While i appreciate everyone replies and suggestion on how I need to change my play style or tips on how to be a target, that has nothing to do with with the in game insurance system. I do want to thank you all for showing me how the forum community works. I should have know better to come to the forum.
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#25 - 2017-05-01 08:33:58 UTC
Ash Beldrulf wrote:
While i appreciate everyone replies and suggestion on how I need to change my play style or tips on how to be a target, that has nothing to do with with the in game insurance system. I do want to thank you all for showing me how the forum community works. I should have know better to come to the forum.
Actually it does, if you adapt to the game you don't tend to claim on your insurance, hell most of us don't insure our ships at all, because we follow rule #1 of Eve.


In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Black Pedro
Mine.
#26 - 2017-05-01 08:39:34 UTC
Ash Beldrulf wrote:
While i appreciate everyone replies and suggestion on how I need to change my play style or tips on how to be a target, that has nothing to do with with the in game insurance system. I do want to thank you all for showing me how the forum community works. I should have know better to come to the forum.

The whole point of Eve involves that death and loss matter. This was explained several times to you above and why insurance is the way it is. Accordingly, Eve Online has never offered complete insurance for your ships and cargo and never will. We are all part of a shared universe and economy and fundamental to enabling that is the idea that loss is permanent and consequential.

Blaming the forums because you don't like the answer isn't very productive or even fair. Eve is the way it is and many players like the game play it offers. Your choice is either to accept and adapt to that game play, or take your leisure time elsewhere and find a game where you cannot lose stuff. Whining that you don't like the insurance system or, more generally, losing your stuff in Eve, is going to be as productive as whining that the sky is blue. It isn't going to change for you.

There are relatively easy ways for you keep your imaginary ships and imaginary assets safe in highsec, even for a new player, but you will have to learn and use them. The game is not going to change for you by buffing insurance so you don't have to worry about loss. Eve is a competitive game and as such isn't for everyone. I sympathize with new players learning what can be a punishing game, but losing stuff is very much a central, if not the central idea of the PvP sandbox game that is Eve Online. That risk of loss and vulnerability to the other players never goes away, and if you are not willing to accept that another player can outmanoeuvre you or capitalize on a mistake of yours and take your stuff, then this might not be the game for you.
Mara Pahrdi
The Order of Anoyia
#27 - 2017-05-01 11:09:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Mara Pahrdi
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:
Ash Beldrulf wrote:
While i appreciate everyone replies and suggestion on how I need to change my play style or tips on how to be a target, that has nothing to do with with the in game insurance system. I do want to thank you all for showing me how the forum community works. I should have know better to come to the forum.
Actually it does, if you adapt to the game you don't tend to claim on your insurance, hell most of us don't insure our ships at all, because we follow rule #1 of Eve.


This.In HS usually insurance is a waste of money so I just stopped using it. And if something goes boom, well, it's EVE.

Remove standings and insurance.

Salvos Rhoska
#28 - 2017-05-01 11:12:17 UTC
Zanar Skwigelf
HIgh Sec Care Bears
Brothers of Tangra
#29 - 2017-05-01 14:40:06 UTC
Insurance is not meant to be your piggy bank. That is PLEX.

Quote:
I do want to thank you all for showing me how the forum community works.


The forum community tends to frown on people that come here asking for free isk. The community is also interested in helping those that ask, and this thread is proof of that.

You admitted you are new, stating your problem is going bankrupt, and suggested that the insurance system needs to be tweaked so that you won't go bankrupt.

The community (correctly) pointed out that your problem is actually flying what you can't afford to lose, as well as not taking defensive measures to avoid the gank in the first place (dying an hour later in the same system to the same ganker isn't helping your cause here).

You keep trying to steer the conversation back towards insurance, but insurance isn't the problem, you dying is the problem.
Cade Windstalker
#30 - 2017-05-01 15:25:26 UTC
Ash Beldrulf wrote:
The risk as you put it is the cost of all the modules and implants in the clone. I don't mind losing some ISK but lose more ISK then I can make in a month to one suicide ganker with full insurance on the ship, SUCKS! As a player that has been playing less then 70 days I can not afford to lose much and losing 2 ships in one day in High security space, SUCKS! All I want to see would be a closer pay out 90% of the market value of the ship, no matter what Tech Tier. I am losing money to suicide gankers with the best insurance in the game in High sec.


Ash Beldrulf wrote:
1. I was not the suicide gamker, I lost two 2 ships to suicide gankers in High sec.
2. I am trying to make Isk but with then 70 days in the game it is hard.


1. Welcome to Eve, the universe doesn't owe you anything.

2. Don't fly what you can't afford to lose. This means maybe not upgrading to the shiniest thing you can fit out right away if that's going to cost you all of your ISK to do so.

Insurance is there for mitigation, not to make it easy to replace losses. That's one of the reasons you get so much less out of insurance on T2 ships, you're paying a premium for a significant upgrade in performance

Also, looking at your recent losses, the Platinum Insurance more than covers the cost of the hulls you lost on those ships. In fact if you bought at the best price available in High Sec you would come out a million ahead, before the cost of buying the insurance in the first place at least.

Given that I'm really not sure what you're complaining about unless you massively over-paid for the hull and you expect the insurance to somehow take this into account, which would be a ridiculous thing to expect.
Jenn aSide
Worthless Carebears
The Initiative.
#31 - 2017-05-01 15:37:32 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
Ash Beldrulf wrote:


1. I was not the suicide gamker, I lost two 2 ships to suicide gankers in High sec.
2. I am trying to make Isk but with then 70 days in the game it is hard.



Knew it, welcome to high sec complaint thread number 4,612,492.

Next month makes 10 years I played EVE, and I've played off and on in high sec, and even now use high sec to move stuff around. My ganking 'bill' so far has been exactly 2 shuttles and one implant-less pod.

If you've lost 2 actual ships to ganks in 70 days it means 2 things: #1 you are doing something really really wrong and #2 you are failing to learn from your mistakes. Insurance is the least of your concerns, you shouldn't NEED insurance at all. Fix those 2 and you fix your overall enjoyment of the game.
Mara Pahrdi
The Order of Anoyia
#32 - 2017-05-01 16:03:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Mara Pahrdi
Ash Beldrulf wrote:
Dark Lord Trump wrote:
Ash Beldrulf wrote:
ISD Max Trix wrote:
EVE is a game of risk. Ship lost is part of that risk. If CCP fully reimburst you the full cost of your ship, then what is the point of the fight? Where is the risk? Empires in EVE have risen and falled based on risk.

As for the cost, The most important and most Golden of all rules in EVE is this, " Never Fly what you can not afford to lose."



The risk as you put it is the cost of all the modules and implants in the clone. I don't mind losing some ISK but lose more ISK then I can make in a month to one suicide ganker with full insurance on the ship, SUCKS! As a player that has been playing less then 70 days I can not afford to lose much and losing 2 ships in one day in High security space, SUCKS! All I want to see would be a closer pay out 90% of the market value of the ship, no matter what Tech Tier. I am losing money to suicide gankers with the best insurance in the game in High sec.

1. Suicide gankers get no insurance. Insurance is invalidated by CONCORD.
2. Maybe you shouldn't move more ISK than you can make in a month around then.



1. I was not the suicide gamker, I lost two 2 ships to suicide gankers in High sec.
2. I am trying to make Isk but with then 70 days in the game it is hard.


Just looked at your killboard. Don't fly retrievers until you know what you're doing. Switch to procurers instead and focus on training skills for a t2 shield tank.

Remove standings and insurance.

Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#33 - 2017-05-01 18:01:10 UTC
Mara Pahrdi wrote:
Ash Beldrulf wrote:
Dark Lord Trump wrote:
Ash Beldrulf wrote:
ISD Max Trix wrote:
EVE is a game of risk. Ship lost is part of that risk. If CCP fully reimburst you the full cost of your ship, then what is the point of the fight? Where is the risk? Empires in EVE have risen and falled based on risk.

As for the cost, The most important and most Golden of all rules in EVE is this, " Never Fly what you can not afford to lose."



The risk as you put it is the cost of all the modules and implants in the clone. I don't mind losing some ISK but lose more ISK then I can make in a month to one suicide ganker with full insurance on the ship, SUCKS! As a player that has been playing less then 70 days I can not afford to lose much and losing 2 ships in one day in High security space, SUCKS! All I want to see would be a closer pay out 90% of the market value of the ship, no matter what Tech Tier. I am losing money to suicide gankers with the best insurance in the game in High sec.

1. Suicide gankers get no insurance. Insurance is invalidated by CONCORD.
2. Maybe you shouldn't move more ISK than you can make in a month around then.



1. I was not the suicide gamker, I lost two 2 ships to suicide gankers in High sec.
2. I am trying to make Isk but with then 70 days in the game it is hard.


Just looked at your killboard. Don't fly retrievers until you know what you're doing. Switch to procurers instead and focus on training skills for a t2 shield tank.
This.

About the same price, massively harder to kill if fitted properly and has good offence for a mining ship. The downsides are a smaller ore hold so you're docking to unload more often and slightly less yield, upsides are that you probably won't be replacing it any time soon and you get to watch other people explode because they're flying retrievers.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Abstract Unknown
Doomheim
#34 - 2017-05-01 19:06:34 UTC
What I want to know is : How do Pend Insurance make any ISK at all?
Profit for an insurance company would depend on insured items not being lost, but everyone knows space is dangerous and you will lose your ship. To date I have cost Pend insurance 3,259,905 ISK; I'm sure this number would be much higher for older pilots. I find it amazing that anyone could ever exceed the 84 day contract and have to re-insure their hull.

The very fact that they pay even when you don't take out insurance is suspect.

I think it might be closer to a truth to say that Pend Insurance is subsidised by the various relevant factions to keep the wheels of industry in motion. The entities responsible for the ship and module industries have a vested interest in you being able to buy their products. They invest a fraction of their wealth in their customers, through Pend Insurance, to bolster future profits.
Chainsaw Plankton
FaDoyToy
#35 - 2017-05-01 19:53:33 UTC
insurance used to be static and at one point the payout was more than what the ships were worth. and that is why insurance is the way it is now. Also tying it to market value is a very bad idea as players can manipulate that far easier than the mineral market. It also adds a risk to using t2, t3, and faction ships.

Also if you look at the sink/faucet graph players spent 4T on insurance in March, and Pend paid out 7.465 T adding a bit over 3T isk to the economy. http://cdn1.eveonline.com/community/MER/Mar_2017/9a_sinksfaucets.png

The system lessens the sting of a loss but does not remove it, which is more or less how it should be

@ChainsawPlankto on twitter

Cade Windstalker
#36 - 2017-05-01 20:10:32 UTC
Abstract Unknown wrote:
What I want to know is : How do Pend Insurance make any ISK at all?
Profit for an insurance company would depend on insured items not being lost, but everyone knows space is dangerous and you will lose your ship. To date I have cost Pend insurance 3,259,905 ISK; I'm sure this number would be much higher for older pilots. I find it amazing that anyone could ever exceed the 84 day contract and have to re-insure their hull.

The very fact that they pay even when you don't take out insurance is suspect.

I think it might be closer to a truth to say that Pend Insurance is subsidised by the various relevant factions to keep the wheels of industry in motion. The entities responsible for the ship and module industries have a vested interest in you being able to buy their products. They invest a fraction of their wealth in their customers, through Pend Insurance, to bolster future profits.


I'm going to take a guess and say that they're subsidized by CONCORD or something similar.

Or maybe they're just really really bad at running an Insurance Company...
Joey Bags
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#37 - 2017-05-01 20:18:12 UTC
Ash Beldrulf wrote:
While i appreciate everyone replies and suggestion on how I need to change my play style or tips on how to be a target, that has nothing to do with with the in game insurance system. I do want to thank you all for showing me how the forum community works. I should have know better to come to the forum.


The forums are what the forums are. However you can still glean some helpful advise under all the snarkieness.
Insurance is horrible. It is designed to be for reasons already stated. I stopped insuring my ships when I learned how not to lose them so easily. If the Hurricane is proving to be too much for you to lose, step down to the Stabber, Rupture or Bellicose (all fine ships, BTW). Work on skills that benefit all your ship types and they will translate into the Hurricane when you re ready for it (and can afford it). I lost my first battleship within about 20 minutes after buying it because I didn't have the skills for the modules to fly it safely. Now I honestly forget to insure my ships when I KNOW they are going on a one way trip.
In all honesty you need to figure out what you did wrong in losing those 2 ships and change tactics. Yes, I know I said what you did wrong because you know there are suicide gankers out there and you did not change things up to mitigate that risk. That's EvE in a nutshell.

You can pick your friends and you can pick your nose but you can't pick your friends nose. Unless you podded them...and collected their corpse.

March rabbit
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#38 - 2017-05-02 06:41:45 UTC
Agondray wrote:
Steve Ronuken wrote:
Because loss is important in Eve.

That's a key design goal. If you can lose a ship without blinking, because it will be refunded, then what's the point? Why would you get the shakes? Where's the meaning?

Death is a serious business.


and this is the why more people avoid pvp or any combat than goes leaping full leeroy without worry.

This is just two kinds of pvp-games. One with meaning of wins and losses and one without it. Both have rights to exist.

The Mittani: "the inappropriate drunked joke"

Shawn en Tilavine
Aliastra
Gallente Federation
#39 - 2017-05-02 19:44:44 UTC  |  Edited by: Shawn en Tilavine
As a Newbro with roughly the same time in service as the OP, and a kill/killed record of about 2/15, I'll just say that I have a bit of a different perspective regarding insurance. I have a couple of ships that I insure, as I use them frequently and know the likelihood of losing them is higher. But when I buy insurance, in my mind, I sort of disassociate it from the ship. It's more a separate investment, and a guaranteed one at that. As an example, my Vexor costs me a little over 2 mil ISK to insure (platinum) and pays out close to 10 mil ISK when I get it blown up. So that 2 mil ISK expenditure results in a 400% ROI. Not too shabby. Now sure, it cost me more than that to replace the ship and its' modules, but that ship also generated 10's of millions in ISK while I was using it. The moral here is, a good savings plan early on is your best bet to replace those losses. This takes us back to the old Golden Standard; "don't fly what you can't afford to lose," which I would amend to read "don't fly what you can't afford to replace."

One final point is that while insurance won't cover the cost of a ship you bought, it will more than cover a ship you built yourself. My first Vexor cost me a grand total of 450,000 ISK for a single run BP and about 6 hours of mining the necessary ores. So when I got jumped at the gate in Ami on the way back from Amarr, and my Vexor was sent to the "The Great Scrap Metal Continuum," my killers were rewarded with a drop worth about 14 mil ISK and I made near 10 mil ISK.

So really, it's all in how you choose to look at it. You are going to get killed in New Eden, whether you like it or not. And it will never be at a convenient time, I promise you. Embrace that fact. While I'm not a "victim blamer," I can certainly point out a mistake that I made every single time I've been killed. And with a couple of exceptions, I've not made the same mistake twice. Learn from failure and revel in the journey to "git gud."

Respectfully Submitted.

"The world ain't fair, there is no Santa Claus, and not everyone gets a F'n trophy just for showing up. Welcome to the real world. Welcome to Eve."

Teckos Pech
Hogyoku
Goonswarm Federation
#40 - 2017-05-02 22:56:05 UTC
Ash Beldrulf wrote:
I think for 25% insurance premium for the ore value of the ship is POOP! The insurance should be the market average for the ship and not the mineral average price like it is now. I don't mind the insurance not covering the modules because insurance fraud would be over the top. I would like to be able to buy another ship at the same price that my destroyed ship cost with the insurance pay out. I as far as I am concerned that 25% insurance premium needs to cover 100% market value, even if it is a tech II ship.


No insurance anywhere works like this. You always have a premium and a deductible to deter moral hazard.

"The curious task of economics is to demonstrate to men how little they really know about what they imagine they can design."--Friedrich August von Hayek

8 Golden Rules for EVE Online

Previous page123Next page