These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

Intergalactic Summit

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

The Federal Frontier: A new Federation-focused Capsuleer news site

Author
Makoto Priano
Kirkinen-Arataka Transhuman Zenith Consulting Ltd.
Arataka Research Consortium
#161 - 2017-04-26 18:49:33 UTC
A simple media observer would know that context is key.

The context, in this case, is a new and strikingly partisan entrant into an existing fray with zero provable combat record, baseliner or capsuleer, and no history of involvement in political discussion, whose verbal ticks and other patterns correspond to a party who's known to use proxies heavily.

We use context and reputation to assess the validity of a person's claims, and the bias they take into a discussion.

The complete lack of context and reputation is actually highly unusual, especially among people so partisan, unless they are proxies or somehow otherwise involved with established parties.

Six years with no apparent reputation is, well, beyond merely unusual. It's frankly aberrant.

That said, admittedly, talk of sock puppets and proxies is distasteful in these forums, because it presumes a lack of independence or freedom of action that goes against the grain with most capsuleers. At the same time, it's an essential part of understanding the mess that is the Intergalactic Summit, and the cheap rhetorical ploys used by some to try to score points.

Itsukame-Zainou Hyperspatial Inquiries: exploring the edge of the known, advancing the state of the art. Would you like to know more?

Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#162 - 2017-04-26 18:51:04 UTC
Nai Arto wrote:
Fascinating. Perhaps you should have started there instead of the overwrought and oh so noble concern trolling on behalf of koyonoke plague victims.

The misuse of "Overshadows" in headline was obviously an amateur mistake, and deserved to be criticized as such. Instead you let your now admitted personal animus run amok.


What I admitted is that it's quite possibly a factor. It doesn't mean there was anything disingenuous about the criticism.

I don't lie very much, Mr. Arto. I don't bother much with trickery. And, I also don't pretend to fully know my own mind. Sometimes there's a lot more going on than I will easily admit to myself.

I want to understand myself. I want to understand others as well. I want to see. Sometimes, that means testing someone else's fabric of illusions. Illusions they want to show me; illusions they want to show themselves.

Sometimes I might say more than I should. But what I say, I normally mean.
Arrendis
TK Corp
#163 - 2017-04-26 19:35:49 UTC
Aria Jenneth wrote:
Mizhara Del'thul wrote:
It's not just that a lot is being said, but the things being said and what/who it's being said to and about. Of course I could be wrong but there's just so much smoke for there not to be a fire somewhere.


Here ... uh. What are you trying to track down, exactly, Miz? That Makoto Priano has an ego? ... I think she admitted as much a page or two back.

That I have an ego? ... Sure. Probably. Yeah.


Nah. Miz is just totally shocked to find out I'm arrogant. Totally. See? That's her shocked face. Or maybe it's her 'I'm gonna taser you' face. I mean, being tasered was pretty shocking.

Ohh! No, wait! That's her 'Red, get the hel off my galnet' face!
Nai Arto
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#164 - 2017-04-26 19:41:11 UTC
Makoto Priano wrote:
A simple media observer would know that context is key.


Unfortunately, you've put your strong analysis skills in service of a presumed conclusion that is incorrect.

Must you continue belaboring the issue? Or have you made your point?


Aria Jenneth wrote:

What I admitted is that it's quite possibly a factor. It doesn't mean there was anything disingenuous about the criticism.

I don't lie very much, Mr. Arto. I don't bother much with trickery. And, I also don't pretend to fully know my own mind. Sometimes there's a lot more going on than I will easily admit to myself.

I want to understand myself. I want to understand others as well. I want to see. Sometimes, that means testing someone else's fabric of illusions. Illusions they want to show me; illusions they want to show themselves.

Sometimes I might say more than I should. But what I say, I normally mean.


Well, then I hope this experience has been a useful side trip on your journey to self enlightenment. Perhaps your heathen insecurities would be further assuaged by a period of prayer and reflection?
Mizhara Del'thul
Kyn'aldrnari
#165 - 2017-04-26 19:45:37 UTC
No tasers. You're getting plugged directly into the mains at this point.

... now get off my galnet.
Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#166 - 2017-04-26 20:00:06 UTC  |  Edited by: Aria Jenneth
Nai Arto wrote:
Well, then I hope this experience has been a useful side trip on your journey to self enlightenment. Perhaps your heathen insecurities would be further assuaged by a period of prayer and reflection?


Uh ... I think I'm good for now, Mr. Arto. Thanks, though.

By the way, it's hard to find a proxy who'll admit to being a proxy, or a sock-puppeteer who'll admit to being one, so ... you and Mr. Syagrius both denying it? Doesn't mean a lot. It's not really evidence either way.

Another impression might develop with time.
Nai Arto
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#167 - 2017-04-26 20:03:39 UTC
Have you made your point yet? I think everyone who's reading this understood your accusation several pages ago.
Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#168 - 2017-04-26 20:10:34 UTC
Nai Arto wrote:
Have you made your point yet? I think everyone who's reading this understood your accusation several pages ago.


I did mention that I'm maybe just a little like Arrendis this way, Mr. Arto? Besides, you're giving more clues off all the time! Mr. Syagrius seems to think I jump from conclusion to conclusion; really it's more like I lean a little this way, or a little that way. You're helping me find a way towards understanding who I'm talking to, whether you're really Mr. Syagrius or not.

Why would I stop sparring with you when I'm getting so many little glimpses into the person that is Nai Arto? It's fun!
Charles Cambridge Schmidt
Nadire Security Consultants
Federation Peacekeepers
#169 - 2017-04-26 20:20:12 UTC
My favorite thing about this is just another breeding ground for the same handful of people to come in and spew huge pages and pages and pages of rhetoric between one another instead of anyone who actually enjoys the content to speak and comment on it, lest they be buried beneath ten hours of reading and high-chin sarcasm.

I don't see how this is surprising, or new, or very upsetting at all.

I don't care what you think, as long as it's about me.

Nai Arto
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#170 - 2017-04-26 20:22:24 UTC
By all means, let us debate on actual productive topics then. Whatever context of suspicion you felt was neccessary regarding my origin has been more than adequately established.
Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#171 - 2017-04-26 20:25:59 UTC
Nai Arto
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#172 - 2017-04-26 20:33:55 UTC
One way or another, all will be reunified when the Reclaiming is accomplished.
Jason Galente
University of Caille
Gallente Federation
#173 - 2017-04-26 20:38:19 UTC
Arrendis wrote:
James Syagrius wrote:
Careful, I suggested that and look what happened.


That suggests you know what happened. We all know that's impossible, though, because it would've required reading, which you don't do.


Can we end this obnoxious habit of assuming that someone who thinks very differently than us simply doesn't think? It's pretty obvious by the way one carries themselves if they're well-read or not. Let's not pretend that because we don't like someone, these indicators aren't there. It's childish.

Only the liberty of the individual assures the prosperity of the whole. And this foundation must be defended.

At any cost

Makoto Priano
Kirkinen-Arataka Transhuman Zenith Consulting Ltd.
Arataka Research Consortium
#174 - 2017-04-26 20:45:57 UTC
Mr. Galente, it's actually a jibe based on Syagrius calling Ms. Jenneth cynical, and then claiming he... didn't read what she had wrote? Or something to that effect?

And then he made a post about the usual suspects, and then made a post about how he was proven correct exactly 51 seconds after the first-- again, strongly suggesting he was either posturing for dramatic effect, or hadn't read the material he was commenting on.

Arrendis is, for better or worse, quite capable of raking someone over the coals for a rhetorical misstep.

Itsukame-Zainou Hyperspatial Inquiries: exploring the edge of the known, advancing the state of the art. Would you like to know more?

Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#175 - 2017-04-26 21:17:14 UTC
Nai Arto wrote:
One way or another, all will be reunified when the Reclaiming is accomplished.


See, now you're talking more like I'd usually expect from the Amarr. Only, also, you're now likely trying to allay a suspicion.

In any case, respectfully, I'll pass on debating the Reclaiming, sir. That one really is kind of a thorny issue for me, and it's a bit removed from, well, this entire thread, really.
Nai Arto
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#176 - 2017-04-26 21:43:55 UTC
Fair enough. It is the kind of topic that tends to be generally discomforting.

Perhaps our conversation should focus on the new article published today? I must say from a theological perspective this is the most interesting submission yet.
Julianus Soter
Blades of Liberty
#177 - 2017-04-26 22:33:23 UTC
New, from The Federal Frontier: The Soul and the Capsuleer, by Saint Michael's Soul. An essay on the Jovian Disease and how it relates to the Capsuleers.

Moira. Corporation CEO, Executor, Villore Accords, @Julianus_Soter https://zkillboard.com/alliance/99001634/

James Syagrius
Luminaire Sovereign Solutions
#178 - 2017-04-26 22:34:37 UTC  |  Edited by: James Syagrius
Makoto Priano wrote:
and then made a post about how he was proven correct exactly 51 seconds after the first
Or I read the remainder of the thread prior to making either post as I sometimes do. I am shocked your vaunted research skills missed that.

Makoto Priano wrote:
Arrendis is, for better or worse, quite capable of raking someone over the coals for a rhetorical misstep.
Actually that isn't what she is doing. She is confirming your erroneous assumption. Which by current logic means you are actually one and the same person, and thus everything you or she says should be ignored as irrelevant. After all, you both tend to say in a paragraph what could be accomplished with a nod.
Aria Jenneth
Societas Imperialis Sceptri Coronaeque
Khimi Harar
#179 - 2017-04-26 22:37:20 UTC
Nai Arto wrote:
Fair enough. It is the kind of topic that tends to be generally discomforting.

Perhaps our conversation should focus on the new article published today? I must say from a theological perspective this is the most interesting submission yet.

Well, it would be, although the concept of the soul it discusses is one that comes from neither of our traditions. Although, the question of whether souls reincarnate is a little less important than what the article's really saying, which is to suggest that we're damaging ourselves with repeated copying and driving ourselves into despair and eventual self-destruction. It's not a new idea, but I'd find it a lot more persuasive if I thought that it was really the cloning that is the problem.

The state of my mind, and soul, is kind of a major concern for me. In a very real way, it's why I'm in the Empire to begin with.

I clone pretty regularly. Not emergency medical cloning so much; that's only happened a couple times, but jump-cloning, which turns out to be more like emergency cloning than I thought (they don't actually preserve our old bodies; we get our brains burned out by the scan, per usual. It's just they salvage the implants). If the article's thesis is correct, I should be kind of on a downward spiral as long as this continues, or at the very least the cloning itself should be a corrosive influence interfering with any efforts I might be making to heal or grow as a person.

I don't ... actually think that's the heart of it, though. If I had to name a single factor that's been a kind of dark influence in my life, I think it's a more traditional soul-eroding problem: we tend to have a pretty casual familiarity with other people's deaths.

We're a warrior caste; those of us who don't kill supply those who do. Unlike more traditional warrior castes, of course, we don't die. The people around us do, though, and it happens pretty often. Sometimes it's because we kill them; sometimes it's because we get them killed. It's something nearly as inherent to us as the clone.

Even if you only live, and die, once, being responsible for a hundred thousand deaths would kind of eat at your spirit. That applies whether you believe in "spirits" or not. Call it your mental state; call it your soul; it doesn't really matter: mass murder is hard on atheists, too.

It's part of our job, to be weapons. It's hard to get away from it completely. We find different ways to cope. My friend Alizabeth approaches the whole thing in a very soldierly way: she gets to know her people, develops camaraderie and trust. Feels responsible for what becomes of them.

I think that would drive me insane. ... I'm not good at keeping everything professional, or just accepting responsibility if someone I considered a friend is gone from this world forever. I, instead, accept it as my role, but, I depersonalize it. I treat my crews like cells in my body: living, vital, with needs that play strongly into how they perform when I need them to, but ... not as friends or comrades. More as part of myself. Components in the ship I inhabit.

It's not a perfect solution. I approach it impersonally, but that doesn't make me any less a killer. And it's not like I have strong beliefs that I consider to justify the deaths I've caused-- but at the same time I do still accept my role as necessary.

If I let it, I think that's the dynamic that would kill my soul. That's the wound I'm kind of trying to heal, even if I know I'll probably never be quite okay.

So ... I think, it doesn't have to be the copying. Even without cloning, why would anyone expect an entire caste of mass killers to be spiritually and/or psychologically healthy people?
Arrendis
TK Corp
#180 - 2017-04-26 23:33:43 UTC
Jason Galente wrote:

Can we end this obnoxious habit of assuming that someone who thinks very differently than us simply doesn't think? It's pretty obvious by the way one carries themselves if they're well-read or not. Let's not pretend that because we don't like someone, these indicators aren't there. It's childish.


Actually, Jason, I'm just throwing back in his face his own earlier statement that when things get 'wordy', he ignores them and doesn't read it, because he's easily distracted.

See, if he says he doesn't read when people start actually talking at length, and then comes back and asserts he knows what's been said in a long-conversation he would've needed to read... then I'm gonna be my normal jerk self to the inconsistent dillweed who wants his own statements to be taken at face value while expressly contradicting himself and demonstration that they shouldn't be. You know?

It's got nothing to do with thinking differently than I do. It's all about saying something stupid and dismissive so he can be a jerk to someone, and then having his own words wrapped around his neck and twisted, hard.