These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Referring to 'not enough being destroyed'

First post
Author
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#41 - 2017-04-24 22:35:19 UTC
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:



If I had those skills, I wouldn't even have started playing EVE Online... one of the hidden truths about EVE Online is that it provides a massive environment for people who don't socialyze, both literally and figuratively.

I might not be effective, but surely I jsut keep droning around. Because, in the deep of my heart, I think that the only reason why I am here in the world, is to provide a odd insight into any reality I focus my interest on it. That some thoughts will never be thought unless I think them.

Maybe you don't like the way I deliver my thoughts, but I dare you to find anything like them. Even when I am wrong. P


Well that much is true lol.

In our own ways, we are fighting the same virtual war, a war for PVE in a game centered heavily on pvp. You might not think I am because I will always tell people to accept the pvp nature of the game, but I am, I'm a cold blooded rat shootin M'Fer. That's why I responded in that thread about shipyards, because you and I both know that only a few people will care for PvPvE and we needed assurance that regular PVE is on their minds. It is.

But we have to do it the right way, CCP are reasonable folk and they do respond when we approach it right. I don't expect you and I will stay on the same page, just sayin lol.
Hal Morsh
Doomheim
#42 - 2017-04-24 23:56:47 UTC
Piugattuk wrote:
and players have said it before, they don't want NPC's meddling around in the player economy, and that is the problem there



It doesn't need the redundancy, worry about T3's being chopped for now as that's more important than the carbon.

Oh, I perfectly understand, Hal Morsh — a mission like this requires courage, skill, and heroism… qualities you are clearly lacking. Have you forgotten you're one of the bloody immortals!?

Indahmawar Fazmarai
#43 - 2017-04-25 06:44:19 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:



If I had those skills, I wouldn't even have started playing EVE Online... one of the hidden truths about EVE Online is that it provides a massive environment for people who don't socialyze, both literally and figuratively.

I might not be effective, but surely I jsut keep droning around. Because, in the deep of my heart, I think that the only reason why I am here in the world, is to provide a odd insight into any reality I focus my interest on it. That some thoughts will never be thought unless I think them.

Maybe you don't like the way I deliver my thoughts, but I dare you to find anything like them. Even when I am wrong. P


Well that much is true lol.

In our own ways, we are fighting the same virtual war, a war for PVE in a game centered heavily on pvp. You might not think I am because I will always tell people to accept the pvp nature of the game, but I am, I'm a cold blooded rat shootin M'Fer. That's why I responded in that thread about shipyards, because you and I both know that only a few people will care for PvPvE and we needed assurance that regular PVE is on their minds. It is.

But we have to do it the right way, CCP are reasonable folk and they do respond when we approach it right. I don't expect you and I will stay on the same page, just sayin lol.


I don't have a problem with the PvP nature of the game, just when it becomes the reason why I don't get any appealing PvE in 9 years.

It's been great that CCP Larrikin answered, but after all, I am a bittervet and I've been disappointed too many times. I think that the'yre developing an extremely complex tool which will be unusable for anything else than its current goal, but instead of agreeing to that, CCP will just shoehorn it on regular PvE because they've got a very expensive hammer and need nails to hit with it. Case in point, they developed mission building tools and delivered Burner missions instead of Level 4s.

I'll be delighted to be wrong and play EVE again because CCP got it right eventually, but chances are slim. All in all, they haven't asked anyone so as far as i know (and correct em if I am worng), CCP is developing new PvE without talking to PvE players.

I am sitll waiting for the PvE devblog CCP Affinity had to publish a few months after Vegas 2015... Roll
Salvos Rhoska
#44 - 2017-04-25 07:33:35 UTC
The Jita monolith and ease of material transport to and from it to the farthest reaches of space is a prominent underlying enabler of this.

Teros Hakomairos
Doomheim
#45 - 2017-04-25 10:38:16 UTC  |  Edited by: Teros Hakomairos
There is NO proof that a non PVP zone in high sec would change anything to the bad,simply because it was never tried before....there are just the suggestions of the people who don't WANT this change happen (PVP)

So HOW could someone call this suggestion "fact" and suspects it is not to be thrown back in his face.....?

TRY a non PVP zone and we will all be delighted by the truth that NOTHING bad will happen and the world will continue spinning around the sun......
Yebo Lakatosh
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#46 - 2017-04-25 10:57:37 UTC
Teros Hakomairos wrote:
Who says that 2/3 of the "playerbase" wouldn't agree to a no pvp zone?
The fact that if I don't type in my opinion fast enough, 2-3 experienced player joins to say what I wanted to say, just usually in a more comprehensive and informed manner.

Have you ever had a similar feeling around here?

Elite F1 pilot since YC119, incarnate of honor, integrity and tidi.

Gimme Sake
State War Academy
Caldari State
#47 - 2017-04-25 11:01:40 UTC
Why do you mean by no pvp zone? Every aspect of Eve is pvp.

Even the forums.

"Never not blob!" ~ Plato

Yebo Lakatosh
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#48 - 2017-04-25 11:06:16 UTC
He means pew-pew. He won't percieve other aspects of PvP unless someone really thoroughly explains it.

Elite F1 pilot since YC119, incarnate of honor, integrity and tidi.

Jacques d'Orleans
#49 - 2017-04-25 11:11:45 UTC
Teros Hakomairos wrote:

And it will continue until some needed decisions are made by ccp.....

In the RIGHT direction.......



Your opinion of what direction this game should take =/= Usefull feedback.
Crying for changes to cater to your specific playstyle =/= Usefull feedback.
Your Opinons with out facts as backup =/= Usefull feedback.
You spreading salt and tears at the forum = 6 year old throwing a tantrum.

It's really as simple as that.
Cade Windstalker
#50 - 2017-04-25 13:01:37 UTC
Teros Hakomairos wrote:
There is NO proof that a non PVP zone in high sec would change anything to the bad,simply because it was never tried before....there are just the suggestions of the people who don't WANT this change happen (PVP)

So HOW could someone call this suggestion "fact" and suspects it is not to be thrown back in his face.....?

TRY a non PVP zone and we will all be delighted by the truth that NOTHING bad will happen and the world will continue spinning around the sun......


There's no proof that it would improve things either, and the vast majority of players in this game like its harsh and open nature, which you are looking to restrict.

As I said, the vast majority of people who quit the game do so for other reasons besides being blown up in High Sec. This is based off of the feedback given to CCP by the players and what little of that feedback they have shared with us.

"Why not" is not an argument in favor of something. If you don't have a better reason that "I want this, so why not do it?" you're going to be waiting until the heat death of the universe for anyone to even seriously consider your idea, let alone implement it.

You are asking for Eve to be something it is not. If you want a safe and PvP free MMO I hear there are other games like that.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#51 - 2017-04-25 13:10:02 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
Teros Hakomairos wrote:
There is NO proof that a non PVP zone in high sec would change anything to the bad,simply because it was never tried before....there are just the suggestions of the people who don't WANT this change happen (PVP)

So HOW could someone call this suggestion "fact" and suspects it is not to be thrown back in his face.....?

TRY a non PVP zone and we will all be delighted by the truth that NOTHING bad will happen and the world will continue spinning around the sun......


I don't need to jump off a building to know that the combination of Gravity and speed and concrete is bad for my health.

That said I'd LOVE to see a true non-pvp high sec enacted for, say, a few months. See, people who want a thing that other people don't want NEVER let og of the idea, because in their minds it works perfectly and has no downside. The only possible way to demonstrate reality to them is to actually implement the thing they think they want and let them watch it crash and burn.

Sooo many times over the last almost 10 years I've watched people on forums wish for something, and CCP would give it to them, and when the actual consequences of that thing (that the rest of us saw coming a mile away) slap them in the face, it's beautiful.

I think my favorite was "Dominion Sov". It went like this:

CCP: "We are going to make Dominion Sov and it will be great and open up null sec to small groups"

Goons: "It ain't gonna work like that"

Anti-Goons: "LULZ, Suck it Goons, you are going down"

Goons: "It ain't gonna work like that"

Anti-Goons: "You are just afraid of change"

Goons: "we are telling you, It ain't gonna work like that"

CCP: ok, here is Dominion SOV

Goons: "HA HA, now you are all our renters"

Anti-Goons Renters : "WTF!?!?! it wasn't supposed to be like this. no one could have seen this coming"

Goons: "Shut up and get back to Ratting, your rent is due tomorrow...pubbie"
ISD Fractal
ISD Community Communications Liaisons
ISD Alliance
#52 - 2017-04-25 13:50:42 UTC
Forum Rules of Conduct wrote:

5. Trolling is prohibited.

Trolling is a defined as a post that is deliberately designed for the purpose of angering and insulting other players in an attempt to incite retaliation or an emotional response. Posts of this nature are disruptive, often abusive, and do not contribute to the sense of community that CCP promote.
#

I have removed a post for violating the above rule.

ISD Fractal

Lieutenant

Community Communication Liaisons (CCLs)

Interstellar Services Department

Teros Hakomairos
Doomheim
#53 - 2017-04-25 15:46:19 UTC  |  Edited by: Teros Hakomairos
nice.....

No proof it does not work means -----> it will not work (in the world of PVP supporters).....and CCP let them believe they are right with this nonsense.....this has to stop......
Maybe CCP make themself believe this nonsense too because they don't want to change the "special thing about this game"....
But "this special thing about this game" is obsolete in 2017 because the players are leaving...THIS is called "proof"....
Someday even CCP will learn this simple fact...hopefully not too late....

A 180° turnaround to a no pvp high sec is needed or players continue to leave and soon there will be only alphas.....

bottom line....
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#54 - 2017-04-25 15:55:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
^^

One final time, THIS IS A PVP GAME, a non PvP zone doesn't belong here.

The game you're looking for has private instances and is called Elite Dangerous.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Cade Windstalker
#55 - 2017-04-25 16:55:49 UTC
Teros Hakomairos wrote:
nice.....

No proof it does not work means -----> it will not work (in the world of PVP supporters).....and CCP let them believe they are right with this nonsense.....this has to stop......
Maybe CCP make themself believe this nonsense too because they don't want to change the "special thing about this game"....
But "this special thing about this game" is obsolete in 2017 because the players are leaving...THIS is called "proof"....
Someday even CCP will learn this simple fact...hopefully not too late....

A 180° turnaround to a no pvp high sec is needed or players continue to leave and soon there will be only alphas.....

bottom line....


Lets see here....

You're making a bunch of unprovable claims about both the state of the game and the reason for that state.

You clearly haven't done enough research on this topic or you would know CCP's position on the matter. Namely, Eve is a PvP game if you absolutely don't want to PvP then go elsewhere, no where in this game is safe from PvP.

Just to lay this out fully:

Yes, PCU is dropping, seems to hold steady at or around a weekly average of 35k in recent years.

No, this does not mean the game is dying. CCP actually did *really* well last year, to the tune of record gross earnings from Eve and as a company in general.

The fact that PCU is sloping downwards in no way supports your idea of what High Sec should be like. You have no proof linking the two except whatever you have invented in your own mind.

The information we do have directly contradicts this belief of yours that the majority of players want this kind of change.

Does this somehow not make sense to you?
Teros Hakomairos
Doomheim
#56 - 2017-04-25 17:15:38 UTC  |  Edited by: Teros Hakomairos
Cade Windstalker wrote:
Teros Hakomairos wrote:
nice.....

No proof it does not work means -----> it will not work (in the world of PVP supporters).....and CCP let them believe they are right with this nonsense.....this has to stop......
Maybe CCP make themself believe this nonsense too because they don't want to change the "special thing about this game"....
But "this special thing about this game" is obsolete in 2017 because the players are leaving...THIS is called "proof"....
Someday even CCP will learn this simple fact...hopefully not too late....

A 180° turnaround to a no pvp high sec is needed or players continue to leave and soon there will be only alphas.....

bottom line....


Lets see here....

You're making a bunch of unprovable claims about both the state of the game and the reason for that state.

You clearly haven't done enough research on this topic or you would know CCP's position on the matter. Namely, Eve is a PvP game if you absolutely don't want to PvP then go elsewhere, no where in this game is safe from PvP.

Just to lay this out fully:

Yes, PCU is dropping, seems to hold steady at or around a weekly average of 35k in recent years.

No, this does not mean the game is dying. CCP actually did *really* well last year, to the tune of record gross earnings from Eve and as a company in general.

The fact that PCU is sloping downwards in no way supports your idea of what High Sec should be like. You have no proof linking the two except whatever you have invented in your own mind.

The information we do have directly contradicts this belief of yours that the majority of players want this kind of change.

Does this somehow not make sense to you?


And all this....text....melts into a "mimimi i don't want to try this because it would change everything in tbis game so we shouldn't even try it because change is bad" post......

no proof means proof that nothing has to be changed or even tried....conclusion made.....

And "eve did well" just in alpha accounts.....this caculation is flawed from the very start...the REAL trend is an downward one......

PLEASE accept this simple fact......

And don't dam ideas that would solve the problem,even if they only solve parts of the problem......
Fish Hunter
Center for Advanced Studies
Gallente Federation
#57 - 2017-04-25 17:23:16 UTC
Teros Hakomairos wrote:
There is NO proof that a non PVP zone in high sec would change anything to the bad,simply because it was never tried before....there are just the suggestions of the people who don't WANT this change happen (PVP)

So HOW could someone call this suggestion "fact" and suspects it is not to be thrown back in his face.....?

TRY a non PVP zone and we will all be delighted by the truth that NOTHING bad will happen and the world will continue spinning around the sun......


There actually is proof and it is all over people's killboards. Thousands of ships are blown up each day to suicide ganks in highsec. This destroys an astounding amount of stuff every day most of which players produce. You can't just take a huge chunk of demand out of a player economy and not expect consequences.
Cade Windstalker
#58 - 2017-04-25 17:39:34 UTC
Teros Hakomairos wrote:
And all this....text....melts into a "mimimi i don't want to try this because it would change everything in tbis game so we shouldn't even try it because change is bad" post......

no proof means proof that nothing has to be changed or even tried....conclusion made.....

And "eve did well" just in alpha accounts.....this caculation is flawed from the very start...the REAL trend is an downward one......

PLEASE accept this simple fact......

And don't dam ideas that would solve the problem,even if they only solve parts of the problem......


Ah the good old "I can't refute your argument so I'm going to insult you in a juvenile manner" approach to debate...

Can't really think of any time that's actually worked.

And yeah, you kinda do need proof that a change will be desirable and/or good for the game for a change to be made. If you don't have it you can post until your fingers fall off, nothing is going to happen.

You seem to be under the impression that the people on this forum are the ones you're arguing against. That is not the case, what you need to do is present an argument that is convincing to CCP, which you have so far failed to do. You've insulted other players, CCP, and made a lot of baseless assertions, but none of that is going to convince anyone, let alone the devs.

Also when I say "Eve did well" I'm talking about their financials, not the spike in PCU from alpha accounts being added. A quick google search for "Eve Online propels CCP Games Profits" should get you the relevant articles.

So yeah, please come up with a better argument, or at least admit you don't know what you're talking about, rather than just slinging insults in response to people pointing out the gaping holes in your logic.
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#59 - 2017-04-25 18:09:10 UTC
I don't really see the need to keep arguing with this guy, we all know it's silly. But I admit, people like this are interesting, they come of a game that is known for certain things and hate it, but here they stay. It would be like if you hated Dragons but keep plaiyng a game called "Yepp, pretty much just Dragons Online".

The rest of us know how important PVP is even if we aren't personally PVP freaks, it gives the game danger and thus value. A game where you can't lose anything isn't a game, it's masturbation.
Teros Hakomairos
Doomheim
#60 - 2017-04-25 19:53:02 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
I don't really see the need to keep arguing with this guy, we all know it's silly. But I admit, people like this are interesting, they come of a game that is known for certain things and hate it, but here they stay. It would be like if you hated Dragons but keep plaiyng a game called "Yepp, pretty much just Dragons Online".

The rest of us know how important PVP is even if we aren't personally PVP freaks, it gives the game danger and thus value. A game where you can't lose anything isn't a game, it's masturbation.


Well "the rest of you" is wrong and this is a fact.....