These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

Referring to 'not enough being destroyed'

First post
Author
Jacques d'Orleans
#21 - 2017-04-23 00:26:26 UTC
Teros Hakomairos wrote:


This is your maximum pathetic level right?

I mean is there an ignorance level higher than yours?

Search for medical help pal.....

Typical PVP nonsence if there are no arguments left...the flaming begins.....it could not be what should not be.....

PVP and reality...two worlds collide..... :-)

sad....


You're talking about pathetic levels? You, the guy whose only contribution to the forum is salt, tears and bitterness. LMAO
You don't even have the balls to post with your main and then YOU dare to talk about pathetic?
You're talking about ignorance levels? You, the ingnorant whiner who wants to force his weakling playstyle upon us?
Seriously, dude?
It's pretty obvious, that you should seek some help and please, ffs, tell the doctor where the ganker hurt your feelings, scrub.
Do you know the proverb: "If it's too hot for you, don't go into the kitchen."?
Think about it, sissie, you might get the concept.
Piugattuk
Litla Sundlaugin
#22 - 2017-04-23 01:21:34 UTC
Jacques d'Orleans wrote:
Teros Hakomairos wrote:


This is your maximum pathetic level right?

I mean is there an ignorance level higher than yours?

Search for medical help pal.....

Typical PVP nonsence if there are no arguments left...the flaming begins.....it could not be what should not be.....

PVP and reality...two worlds collide..... :-)

sad....


You're talking about pathetic levels? You, the guy whose only contribution to the forum is salt, tears and bitterness. LMAO
You don't even have the balls to post with your main and then YOU dare to talk about pathetic?
You're talking about ignorance levels? You, the ingnorant whiner who wants to force his weakling playstyle upon us?
Seriously, dude?
It's pretty obvious, that you should seek some help and please, ffs, tell the doctor where the ganker hurt your feelings, scrub.
Do you know the proverb: "If it's too hot for you, don't go into the kitchen."?
Think about it, sissie, you might get the concept.



Peace brother, no need to get huffy, forum PVP is boring, what we need is ideals brought to the table, if the game is to your liking and no change for yourself is wanted post that, I believe I have well thought out ideals but post them up and get other points of view, if someone thinks its bad I ask why, many times you just get waffling of nonsense but sometimes you get a jem, it just amazes me how often forum PVP goes on rather then a good discussion, just makes me wonder about humans, why they choose as they tend to do, I still haven't read anything that make me think otherwise of the ideal, that being said I am going to start buying up goods with extra ISK and hold for later, fill orders from NPC's when I believe I can make some iskies, see how my buying effects the NPC market when I hold long term on them.
Eternus8lux8lucis
Guardians of the Gate
RAZOR Alliance
#23 - 2017-04-23 03:08:12 UTC
Piugattuk wrote:
Jacques d'Orleans wrote:
Teros Hakomairos wrote:


This is your maximum pathetic level right?

I mean is there an ignorance level higher than yours?

Search for medical help pal.....

Typical PVP nonsence if there are no arguments left...the flaming begins.....it could not be what should not be.....

PVP and reality...two worlds collide..... :-)

sad....


You're talking about pathetic levels? You, the guy whose only contribution to the forum is salt, tears and bitterness. LMAO
You don't even have the balls to post with your main and then YOU dare to talk about pathetic?
You're talking about ignorance levels? You, the ingnorant whiner who wants to force his weakling playstyle upon us?
Seriously, dude?
It's pretty obvious, that you should seek some help and please, ffs, tell the doctor where the ganker hurt your feelings, scrub.
Do you know the proverb: "If it's too hot for you, don't go into the kitchen."?
Think about it, sissie, you might get the concept.



Peace brother, no need to get huffy, forum PVP is boring, what we need is ideals brought to the table, if the game is to your liking and no change for yourself is wanted post that, I believe I have well thought out ideals but post them up and get other points of view, if someone thinks its bad I ask why, many times you just get waffling of nonsense but sometimes you get a jem, it just amazes me how often forum PVP goes on rather then a good discussion, just makes me wonder about humans, why they choose as they tend to do, I still haven't read anything that make me think otherwise of the ideal, that being said I am going to start buying up goods with extra ISK and hold for later, fill orders from NPC's when I believe I can make some iskies, see how my buying effects the NPC market when I hold long term on them.

Humans tend to prefer destruction to construction. It takes, for them, less effort. But what they tend not to realize is that they are left with less in the final end, even of themselves in the self destructive state. And that to gain beyond that or ever takes construction again which is much more costly.

So much easier to walk around kicking over sand castles because you cant build your own anymore. Youve forgotten how and have broken your tools to do it with.Blink

Human nature is a funny thing.

Have you heard anything I've said?

You said it's all circling the drain, the whole universe. Right?

That's right.

Had to end sometime.

Cade Windstalker
#24 - 2017-04-23 06:35:15 UTC
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
Joseephus Rotineque wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
PvP may destroy about 1 trillion ISK per month, whereas lapsed accounts remove anything between 30 and 70 trillion ISK per month.


Do you have a source for this?


FAI, March 2017:

http://cdn1.eveonline.com/community/MER/Mar_2017/0_produced.vs.destroyed.png

Produced: ~4.53 trillion ISK
Destroyed: ~1.10 trillion ISK

http://cdn1.eveonline.com/community/MER/Mar_2017/0_produced.vs.destroyed.png

Active ISK delta: -5.1630 trillion ISK (this btw is the lowest ever)

Since March had a extremely low delta, let's look at February:

http://cdn1.eveonline.com/community/MER/Feb_2017/9a_sinksfaucets.png

Active ISK delta: -35.5999 trillion ISK

Or January:

http://cdn1.eveonline.com/community/MER/Jan_2017/9a_sinksfaucets.png

Active ISK delta: -60.7101 trillion ISK

Or before going F2P, say, October 2016:

http://content.eveonline.com/www/newssystem/media/70687/1/9a_sinksfaucets.png

Active ISK delta: -38.0956 trillion ISK

No matter when you look, there is A LOT more money lapsing out than the value of assets destroyed.

So the average asset in EVE is mined, manufactured, traded, stored and removed from economy when the account lapses/goes inactive. It only makes sense to assume that demand is driven by hoarders-quitters, not pewpewers. They want ship X, obtain it, never lose it, then they stop playing and ship X become invisible to EVE's ""production and destruction"" economy.


Your interpretation of those graphs is incorrect. The value destroyed line that's hovering around an average of 1T is *per day* not per month.

That means the value destroyed in March was around 40.3T. The total Active ISK delta for the game during that same time was 5.16T or roughly 1/8th of the ISK destroyed in the game.

The Active ISK delta in February was far larger, at over 35T, but the volume destroyed was still up around 38T, largely due to the shorter month than any real drop in destruction per day.
Jacques d'Orleans
#25 - 2017-04-23 11:12:17 UTC
Eternus8lux8lucis wrote:
Piugattuk wrote:
Jacques d'Orleans wrote:
Teros Hakomairos wrote:


This is your maximum pathetic level right?

I mean is there an ignorance level higher than yours?

Search for medical help pal.....

Typical PVP nonsence if there are no arguments left...the flaming begins.....it could not be what should not be.....

PVP and reality...two worlds collide..... :-)

sad....


You're talking about pathetic levels? You, the guy whose only contribution to the forum is salt, tears and bitterness. LMAO
You don't even have the balls to post with your main and then YOU dare to talk about pathetic?
You're talking about ignorance levels? You, the ingnorant whiner who wants to force his weakling playstyle upon us?
Seriously, dude?
It's pretty obvious, that you should seek some help and please, ffs, tell the doctor where the ganker hurt your feelings, scrub.
Do you know the proverb: "If it's too hot for you, don't go into the kitchen."?
Think about it, sissie, you might get the concept.



Peace brother, no need to get huffy, forum PVP is boring, what we need is ideals brought to the table, if the game is to your liking and no change for yourself is wanted post that, I believe I have well thought out ideals but post them up and get other points of view, if someone thinks its bad I ask why, many times you just get waffling of nonsense but sometimes you get a jem, it just amazes me how often forum PVP goes on rather then a good discussion, just makes me wonder about humans, why they choose as they tend to do, I still haven't read anything that make me think otherwise of the ideal, that being said I am going to start buying up goods with extra ISK and hold for later, fill orders from NPC's when I believe I can make some iskies, see how my buying effects the NPC market when I hold long term on them.

Humans tend to prefer destruction to construction. It takes, for them, less effort. But what they tend not to realize is that they are left with less in the final end, even of themselves in the self destructive state. And that to gain beyond that or ever takes construction again which is much more costly.

So much easier to walk around kicking over sand castles because you cant build your own anymore. Youve forgotten how and have broken your tools to do it with.Blink

Human nature is a funny thing.


I've underlined the part I will refer to.

Yes, in some cases that is true, but otoh, how about kicking over other players sandcastle is a players way of building his sandcastle? What's wrong with that, Eternus8lux8lucis?
IMHO, there is nothing wrong with that.

The game gives us the tools to do so and as far as I'm concerned that's ok.
Don't get fooled by the ususal froum whiners spouting "make EvE securer, make EvE more casual, ganking is too much and so on and so forth", there are thousand of players who don't even read the forums and do what they want to do: Playing EvE and having fun, simple as that.

People like Teros, Infinity and all the other piles of salt and bitterness, are not the majority of EvE players, they are just a vocal minority that CCP has all to long catered to.
You find this type of player, let's name them "The Salt Gang" in every gaming forum, in every Gaming websites comment section.
Their only joy in life is making the other players life miserable with their permanent whining, bitching and moaning.
If EvE is so bad to them, why are they even here?
Why haven't they just got over it and left?
It is not that EvE would be the only MMO out there, there are dozens of others, like WoW, Black Desert, Aion, and many others.

The problem is that regardless of what these dudes would play, they still would come to the forums of the mentioned other games and whine about the game, because they made being salty and bitter their life style.
As I said before, there are thousands of other players, including me, who enjoy EvE as it is, might they be gankers, miners, PvP'ers, PvE'ers, Industrialists or just a few day old New Bros.
These are the people CCP should listen too and not a bunch of salty, bitter, pitty human beings.

Jacques d'Orleans
#26 - 2017-04-23 11:19:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Jacques d'Orleans
Piugattuk wrote:

Peace brother, no need to get huffy, forum PVP is boring, what we need is ideals brought to the table, if the game is to your liking and no change for yourself is wanted post that, I believe I have well thought out ideals but post them up and get other points of view, if someone thinks its bad I ask why, many times you just get waffling of nonsense but sometimes you get a jem, it just amazes me how often forum PVP goes on rather then a good discussion, just makes me wonder about humans, why they choose as they tend to do, I still haven't read anything that make me think otherwise of the ideal, that being said I am going to start buying up goods with extra ISK and hold for later, fill orders from NPC's when I believe I can make some iskies, see how my buying effects the NPC market when I hold long term on them.


Well, it's not people like you who are the problem, you and many others have posted well worded posts, with some of your point I can agree, with others not so much. I have no problem with that, perfectly fine with me.

The problem is, that as well worded a post may be, the Salt Gang woudl still jump on it to spout their bs about how mean the game is and how it should be done. They are not interested in making EvE better, they want EvE to be like they want it and to be quite frank, If CCP would have done everything these bunch of tosspots ever suggested EvE would be gone already for years.

They are not interested in a real discussion, the only thing they are interested in is spreading salt and bitterness all over the place. Just go and look the usual suspects posting history, just salt, tears and bitterness, nothing else.
Keno Skir
#27 - 2017-04-23 11:21:42 UTC
Teros Hakomairos wrote:
Eugene Kerner wrote:
Redundant thread. Pls close.

Redundant is only PVP in highsec.....

That's the reason people leave because they are ****** of by ganks and completely unnecessary fights they simply don't want or had ask for.....

There should be NO unwanted PVP in high so BAN it from high....

Or at least give everyone a non pvp flag that has to turned OFF to have pvp.

They moment some PVP freaks can't disturb your PVE sight on the game will be the moment players will begin to return just because they now can roam free as they like in high....

simple

and working.....


Like a stuck record. I find your total lack of minerals disturbing Pirate

I bet you think taking other players pieces in Chess should be banned to prevent all the sad faces on the other side of the board..
Teros Hakomairos
Doomheim
#28 - 2017-04-23 19:47:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Teros Hakomairos
Jacques d'Orleans wrote:
Piugattuk wrote:

Peace brother, no need to get huffy, forum PVP is boring, what we need is ideals brought to the table, if the game is to your liking and no change for yourself is wanted post that, I believe I have well thought out ideals but post them up and get other points of view, if someone thinks its bad I ask why, many times you just get waffling of nonsense but sometimes you get a jem, it just amazes me how often forum PVP goes on rather then a good discussion, just makes me wonder about humans, why they choose as they tend to do, I still haven't read anything that make me think otherwise of the ideal, that being said I am going to start buying up goods with extra ISK and hold for later, fill orders from NPC's when I believe I can make some iskies, see how my buying effects the NPC market when I hold long term on them.


Well, it's not people like you who are the problem, you and many others have posted well worded posts, with some of your point I can agree, with others not so much. I have no problem with that, perfectly fine with me.

The problem is, that as well worded a post may be, the Salt Gang woudl still jump on it to spout their bs about how mean the game is and how it should be done. They are not interested in making EvE better, they want EvE to be like they want it and to be quite frank, If CCP would have done everything these bunch of tosspots ever suggested EvE would be gone already for years.

They are not interested in a real discussion, the only thing they are interested in is spreading salt and bitterness all over the place. Just go and look the usual suspects posting history, just salt, tears and bitterness, nothing else.



Boy you are REALLY ignorant.....

The truth lies before you,it kicks you and you still pretend that you have no proof?

That's really sad.....

Game leavers that vote with their feet aren't enough so we create our own facts that fit in our world.....

I have no words for something like that.......
Teros Hakomairos
Doomheim
#29 - 2017-04-23 19:50:07 UTC
Keno Skir wrote:
Teros Hakomairos wrote:
Eugene Kerner wrote:
Redundant thread. Pls close.

Redundant is only PVP in highsec.....

That's the reason people leave because they are ****** of by ganks and completely unnecessary fights they simply don't want or had ask for.....

There should be NO unwanted PVP in high so BAN it from high....

Or at least give everyone a non pvp flag that has to turned OFF to have pvp.

They moment some PVP freaks can't disturb your PVE sight on the game will be the moment players will begin to return just because they now can roam free as they like in high....

simple

and working.....


Like a stuck record. I find your total lack of minerals disturbing Pirate

I bet you think taking other players pieces in Chess should be banned to prevent all the sad faces on the other side of the board..


And it will continue until some needed decisions are made by ccp.....

In the RIGHT direction.......
Cade Windstalker
#30 - 2017-04-23 21:53:03 UTC
Teros Hakomairos wrote:
Keno Skir wrote:
Teros Hakomairos wrote:
Redundant is only PVP in highsec.....

That's the reason people leave because they are ****** of by ganks and completely unnecessary fights they simply don't want or had ask for.....

There should be NO unwanted PVP in high so BAN it from high....

Or at least give everyone a non pvp flag that has to turned OFF to have pvp.

They moment some PVP freaks can't disturb your PVE sight on the game will be the moment players will begin to return just because they now can roam free as they like in high....

simple

and working.....


Like a stuck record. I find your total lack of minerals disturbing Pirate

I bet you think taking other players pieces in Chess should be banned to prevent all the sad faces on the other side of the board..


And it will continue until some needed decisions are made by ccp.....

In the RIGHT direction.......


Your assumptions are your own and not applicable to the wider playerbase.

CCP get feedback when people quit and have other metrics available as well. Less than 1% of account cancelations cite ship loss or player harassment as a reason for quitting, and only about 1% of players are ganked in their first 15 days. Those who are ganked are actually *less likely* to quit the game, per this video from Fanfest 2 years ago.

So yeah, you may feel that this is a big problem. The playerbase as a whole disagrees and there are stats to back this up.
Teros Hakomairos
Doomheim
#31 - 2017-04-24 11:06:43 UTC
Cade Windstalker wrote:
Teros Hakomairos wrote:
Keno Skir wrote:
Teros Hakomairos wrote:
Redundant is only PVP in highsec.....

That's the reason people leave because they are ****** of by ganks and completely unnecessary fights they simply don't want or had ask for.....

There should be NO unwanted PVP in high so BAN it from high....

Or at least give everyone a non pvp flag that has to turned OFF to have pvp.

They moment some PVP freaks can't disturb your PVE sight on the game will be the moment players will begin to return just because they now can roam free as they like in high....

simple

and working.....


Like a stuck record. I find your total lack of minerals disturbing Pirate

I bet you think taking other players pieces in Chess should be banned to prevent all the sad faces on the other side of the board..


And it will continue until some needed decisions are made by ccp.....

In the RIGHT direction.......


Your assumptions are your own and not applicable to the wider playerbase.

CCP get feedback when people quit and have other metrics available as well. Less than 1% of account cancelations cite ship loss or player harassment as a reason for quitting, and only about 1% of players are ganked in their first 15 days. Those who are ganked are actually *less likely* to quit the game, per this video from Fanfest 2 years ago.

So yeah, you may feel that this is a big problem. The playerbase as a whole disagrees and there are stats to back this up.


the playerbase disagrees? you mean those who quit and are no longer "playerbase" do not count because they are no longer part of the "playerbase"?

well...this is creative....
Yebo Lakatosh
Brutor Tribe
Minmatar Republic
#32 - 2017-04-24 11:22:00 UTC  |  Edited by: Yebo Lakatosh
Teros Hakomairos wrote:
the playerbase disagrees? you mean those who quit and are no longer "playerbase" do not count because they are no longer part of the "playerbase"?
Nope, he just quoted the only data we have from the guys who quit. Besides one or two individuals who decide to whine a lot before leaving - like you seem to be -, but they hardly count as a representative sample.

The active playerbase is just an added bonus. You can hear their voice along these forums.

Elite F1 pilot since YC119, incarnate of honor, integrity and tidi.

Indahmawar Fazmarai
#33 - 2017-04-24 13:46:24 UTC
Cade Windstalker wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
Joseephus Rotineque wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
PvP may destroy about 1 trillion ISK per month, whereas lapsed accounts remove anything between 30 and 70 trillion ISK per month.


Do you have a source for this?


FAI, March 2017:

http://cdn1.eveonline.com/community/MER/Mar_2017/0_produced.vs.destroyed.png

Produced: ~4.53 trillion ISK
Destroyed: ~1.10 trillion ISK

http://cdn1.eveonline.com/community/MER/Mar_2017/0_produced.vs.destroyed.png

Active ISK delta: -5.1630 trillion ISK (this btw is the lowest ever)

Since March had a extremely low delta, let's look at February:

http://cdn1.eveonline.com/community/MER/Feb_2017/9a_sinksfaucets.png

Active ISK delta: -35.5999 trillion ISK

Or January:

http://cdn1.eveonline.com/community/MER/Jan_2017/9a_sinksfaucets.png

Active ISK delta: -60.7101 trillion ISK

Or before going F2P, say, October 2016:

http://content.eveonline.com/www/newssystem/media/70687/1/9a_sinksfaucets.png

Active ISK delta: -38.0956 trillion ISK

No matter when you look, there is A LOT more money lapsing out than the value of assets destroyed.

So the average asset in EVE is mined, manufactured, traded, stored and removed from economy when the account lapses/goes inactive. It only makes sense to assume that demand is driven by hoarders-quitters, not pewpewers. They want ship X, obtain it, never lose it, then they stop playing and ship X become invisible to EVE's ""production and destruction"" economy.


Your interpretation of those graphs is incorrect. The value destroyed line that's hovering around an average of 1T is *per day* not per month.

That means the value destroyed in March was around 40.3T. The total Active ISK delta for the game during that same time was 5.16T or roughly 1/8th of the ISK destroyed in the game.

The Active ISK delta in February was far larger, at over 35T, but the volume destroyed was still up around 38T, largely due to the shorter month than any real drop in destruction per day.


OK, I see it now. I've checked the csv file and it's what you said, the daily values hover around one (American) trillion. Thus I've been wrong for a good amount of months... Sad
Jenn aSide
Soul Machines
The Initiative.
#34 - 2017-04-24 14:06:13 UTC  |  Edited by: Jenn aSide
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
Cade Windstalker wrote:


Your interpretation of those graphs is incorrect. The value destroyed line that's hovering around an average of 1T is *per day* not per month.

That means the value destroyed in March was around 40.3T. The total Active ISK delta for the game during that same time was 5.16T or roughly 1/8th of the ISK destroyed in the game.

The Active ISK delta in February was far larger, at over 35T, but the volume destroyed was still up around 38T, largely due to the shorter month than any real drop in destruction per day.


OK, I see it now. I've checked the csv file and it's what you said, the daily values hover around one (American) trillion. Thus I've been wrong for a good amount of months...Forever, pretty much every time I've typed anything since the beginning of the interwebs, probably even longer than thatSad


Fixed that for you Twisted

More seriously, it is a sign of maturity that you can admit you got that wrong. I'm not trying to be mean but I'll tell you the same thing I told old Dinsdale Piranha (like you, he was prone to hystrionics and was alwyas bad mouthing CCP, the people he NEEDED to listen to him): It's not your overall message that is flawed, it's the fact that you are so terrible at delivering that message that hurts you.

Just like in the Blood Raider Shipyard thread, if I were CCP I wouldn't listen to you either, especially that constant droning on about how PVE players somehow pay all their salaries (it's as bad as when people tell cops "my taxes pay your salary", yea, that's a surefire way to get me on your side and doing what you think needs to be done...).

If you want people (like other PVE players , and CCP itself) to listen, develop better communication skills that build relationships rather than generate dislike.
Cade Windstalker
#35 - 2017-04-24 15:49:00 UTC
Teros Hakomairos wrote:
the playerbase disagrees? you mean those who quit and are no longer "playerbase" do not count because they are no longer part of the "playerbase"?

well...this is creative....


Nope, I'm including those players when I talk about "the wider playerbase". Based on what we know objectively less than 1% of people quit the game as a result of ganking or similar activities.

Claiming otherwise, especially with no evidence, is just demonstrating ignorance.




Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
OK, I see it now. I've checked the csv file and it's what you said, the daily values hover around one (American) trillion. Thus I've been wrong for a good amount of months... Sad


No worries, thanks for being big enough to admit that you're wrong in a polite way :)

I also agree with what Jenn aSide is saying, though I would perhaps have phrased it differently.

Speaking generally rather than at you specifically, the mistake a huge number of people on these forums and in the community as a whole make is starting and ending their argument at "OMG you idiot, how could you do this, staaaaahp!" and wondering why that fails utterly to convince anyone of anything. As a rule evidence based arguments work far better than assuming someone is an idiot and then treating them as such.

Your argument was good, your interpretation of the data was just incorrect. :Pirate

Overall though good discussion, we need more people like you around the forums! Big smile
Teros Hakomairos
Doomheim
#36 - 2017-04-24 20:24:36 UTC
Yebo Lakatosh wrote:
Teros Hakomairos wrote:
the playerbase disagrees? you mean those who quit and are no longer "playerbase" do not count because they are no longer part of the "playerbase"?
Nope, he just quoted the only data we have from the guys who quit. Besides one or two individuals who decide to whine a lot before leaving - like you seem to be -, but they hardly count as a representative sample.

The active playerbase is just an added bonus. You can hear their voice along these forums.


You mean we have no data from the actual playerbase but PVP is SURE that THEIR view of the game is the majority.....

Again....very creative handeling of the reality.....

Who says that 2/3 of the "playerbase" wouldn't agree to a no pvp zone?

Just because some PVP guys with a strange hobby SAY that EVE is a PVP game EVERYWHERE and has to stay this way or esle the whole EVE ecomomy will collapse does not mean the majority thinks the same and this is true....

I call this alternative PVP facts.....
Indahmawar Fazmarai
#37 - 2017-04-24 20:46:52 UTC  |  Edited by: Indahmawar Fazmarai
Cade Windstalker wrote:
Teros Hakomairos wrote:
the playerbase disagrees? you mean those who quit and are no longer "playerbase" do not count because they are no longer part of the "playerbase"?

well...this is creative....


Nope, I'm including those players when I talk about "the wider playerbase". Based on what we know objectively less than 1% of people quit the game as a result of ganking or similar activities.

Claiming otherwise, especially with no evidence, is just demonstrating ignorance.




Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
OK, I see it now. I've checked the csv file and it's what you said, the daily values hover around one (American) trillion. Thus I've been wrong for a good amount of months... Sad


No worries, thanks for being big enough to admit that you're wrong in a polite way :)

I also agree with what Jenn aSide is saying, though I would perhaps have phrased it differently.

Speaking generally rather than at you specifically, the mistake a huge number of people on these forums and in the community as a whole make is starting and ending their argument at "OMG you idiot, how could you do this, staaaaahp!" and wondering why that fails utterly to convince anyone of anything. As a rule evidence based arguments work far better than assuming someone is an idiot and then treating them as such.

Your argument was good, your interpretation of the data was just incorrect. :Pirate

Overall though good discussion, we need more people like you around the forums! Big smile


I was kinda mixed about the meaning of "trillion" and "30 days average". I was thinking of trillion as in 10^15 ISK, not 10^12, so intuitively it made sense that "over 30 days", that was the destruction/production.

It comes to prove I am not a numbers person, but I found very thought provoking if lapsed accounts outweighted destruction as, all in all, the excess production must go somehwere, doesn't it?

My position boils down to something very simple. I thought I was a freak for playing PvE, and discovered that that was wrong, as once you scratch the veil of silence (something as simple as asking in the right place, i.e, the old Spanish language chat channel), PvErs are literally everywhere, but CCP's attention is certainly not on PvErs.

"Hey, who here plays PvE? Do you know how to convo? Convo me!"

And some people just answered, and they talked about a EVE as real as everything you know, but which is never talked about. EVE according to people who never talk about EVE, who don't know what's the CSM and in on case I met a guy who didn't knew that CCP was the company developing EVE Online, although he had three active accounts.

I think that CCP would act different if they knew of this EVE. And maybe then I would benefit from that different acting.

Maybe I'm totally wrong and CCP know to the last decimal who is leaving the game and why and are struggling to keep everybody abaord as they follow a vision of what EVE should be, so all in all nothign I do or say changes anything.

But then, if I had to give up fighting impossible fights, I would kill myself for any of a thousand better reasons than a videogame... Roll
Indahmawar Fazmarai
#38 - 2017-04-24 21:14:16 UTC
Jenn aSide wrote:
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
Cade Windstalker wrote:


Your interpretation of those graphs is incorrect. The value destroyed line that's hovering around an average of 1T is *per day* not per month.

That means the value destroyed in March was around 40.3T. The total Active ISK delta for the game during that same time was 5.16T or roughly 1/8th of the ISK destroyed in the game.

The Active ISK delta in February was far larger, at over 35T, but the volume destroyed was still up around 38T, largely due to the shorter month than any real drop in destruction per day.


OK, I see it now. I've checked the csv file and it's what you said, the daily values hover around one (American) trillion. Thus I've been wrong for a good amount of months...Forever, pretty much every time I've typed anything since the beginning of the interwebs, probably even longer than thatSad


Fixed that for you Twisted

More seriously, it is a sign of maturity that you can admit you got that wrong. I'm not trying to be mean but I'll tell you the same thing I told old Dinsdale Piranha (like you, he was prone to hystrionics and was alwyas bad mouthing CCP, the people he NEEDED to listen to him): It's not your overall message that is flawed, it's the fact that you are so terrible at delivering that message that hurts you.

Just like in the Blood Raider Shipyard thread, if I were CCP I wouldn't listen to you either, especially that constant droning on about how PVE players somehow pay all their salaries (it's as bad as when people tell cops "my taxes pay your salary", yea, that's a surefire way to get me on your side and doing what you think needs to be done...).

If you want people (like other PVE players , and CCP itself) to listen, develop better communication skills that build relationships rather than generate dislike.


If I had those skills, I wouldn't even have started playing EVE Online... one of the hidden truths about EVE Online is that it provides a massive environment for people who don't socialyze, both literally and figuratively.

I might not be effective, but surely I jsut keep droning around. Because, in the deep of my heart, I think that the only reason why I am here in the world, is to provide a odd insight into any reality I focus my interest on it. That some thoughts will never be thought unless I think them.

Maybe you don't like the way I deliver my thoughts, but I dare you to find anything like them. Even when I am wrong. P
Jonah Gravenstein
Machiavellian Space Bastards
#39 - 2017-04-24 21:27:45 UTC  |  Edited by: Jonah Gravenstein
Teros Hakomairos wrote:
Who says that 2/3 of the "playerbase" wouldn't agree to a no pvp zone?
It's a PvP game, a no PvP zone has no place in a PvP game.

Quote:
Just because some PVP guys with a strange hobby SAY that EVE is a PVP game EVERYWHERE
Actually it's CCP, not us, that say that Eve is a PvP game and that nowhere in the game is immune to PvP.

Quote:
and has to stay this way or esle the whole EVE ecomomy will collapse does not mean the majority thinks the same and this is true....
CCP are unlikely to change a successful formula that has kept Eve alive longer than the majority of MMO's just to satisfy people who would be better off playing a game more suited to their delicate sensibilities, and who probably wouldn't stay for long anyway.

Quote:
I call this alternative PVP facts.....
Call it what you like, at least it's not bullshit.

In the beginning there was nothing, which exploded.

New Player FAQ

Feyd's Survival Pack

Cade Windstalker
#40 - 2017-04-24 21:56:32 UTC
Teros Hakomairos wrote:
You mean we have no data from the actual playerbase but PVP is SURE that THEIR view of the game is the majority.....

Again....very creative handeling of the reality.....

Who says that 2/3 of the "playerbase" wouldn't agree to a no pvp zone?

Just because some PVP guys with a strange hobby SAY that EVE is a PVP game EVERYWHERE and has to stay this way or esle the whole EVE ecomomy will collapse does not mean the majority thinks the same and this is true....

I call this alternative PVP facts.....


Again, no, CCP have data what little they've shared with us says that less than 1% of people who quit do so because of a gank, harassment, or similar activities in High Sec or otherwise.

You have literally no data to support your assertions that the majority agrees with you, and CCP have flat out said they disagree with you.

The only 'alternative facts' here belong to the guy making erroneous claims about what the playerbase as a whole does or does not want with nothing to back it up. (Hint: That's you)

Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote:
I was kinda mixed about the meaning of "trillion" and "30 days average". I was thinking of trillion as in 10^15 ISK, not 10^12, so intuitively it made sense that "over 30 days", that was the destruction/production.

It comes to prove I am not a numbers person, but I found very thought provoking if lapsed accounts outweighted destruction as, all in all, the excess production must go somehwere, doesn't it?

My position boils down to something very simple. I thought I was a freak for playing PvE, and discovered that that was wrong, as once you scratch the veil of silence (something as simple as asking in the right place, i.e, the old Spanish language chat channel), PvErs are literally everywhere, but CCP's attention is certainly not on PvErs.

"Hey, who here plays PvE? Do you know how to convo? Convo me!"

And some people just answered, and they talked about a EVE as real as everything you know, but which is never talked about. EVE according to people who never talk about EVE, who don't know what's the CSM and in on case I met a guy who didn't knew that CCP was the company developing EVE Online, although he had three active accounts.

I think that CCP would act different if they knew of this EVE. And maybe then I would benefit from that different acting.

Maybe I'm totally wrong and CCP know to the last decimal who is leaving the game and why and are struggling to keep everybody abaord as they follow a vision of what EVE should be, so all in all nothign I do or say changes anything.

But then, if I had to give up fighting impossible fights, I would kill myself for any of a thousand better reasons than a videogame... Roll


No worries, I get what you mean. I doubt CCP Quant considered alternative numerical notation systems when he was doing up the MER.

I don't agree that CCP is ignoring PvE though. The major feature for the next expansion is literally a PvE feature and it has tons of potential to expand PvE content in Eve explosively once they get the new AI system working. The problem with iterating on PvE is precisely that so many people do it, have invested so much time and effort into it, and that improving the PvE experience is inherently expensive because AI is hard and not everyone wants the same things.

I don't think CCP is under any misapprehension about how accurate their data on the game is, but they can only work with what they're told, and someone who doesn't give feedback and doesn't participate at all in the wider game community isn't going to have their voice heard if they refuse to speak up. That's not CCP's fault it's just a fact.

I think CCP is aware that these people exist, and has tried to keep them in mind, but there's only so much they can do for someone like that or should do for them.

Also as to the notion that Eve is slowly dying, it's really not. All games show a drop in playerbase over time as the rate of new replacing the old eventually drops and the average player numbers follow. Eve hit that point a long time ago, but it's remained a fairly healthy game environment. People who are very very invested in the game just don't understand that people are going to drift off and play other games, sometimes for years at a time, and there's nothing CCP can realistically do to stop them.