These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE Information Portal

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
Previous page123
 

Dev blog: The Advancing World of Upwell Structures

First post First post
Author
Echo Mande
#41 - 2017-03-25 23:29:15 UTC
Fish Hunter wrote:
Notifications of Structure services offlining and unanchoring & reinforced would be nice. I can undock and see these things but notifications would be nice.

And to make this nicer it would be great if there was an entry on the structure profile, just like docking and other rights, where the administrator can put who (persons, corps, alliances) gets sent (annoyed with) these messages. Preferably by type (anchor, unanchor, out of fuel, attacked/reinforced) but one entry will do in a pinch. A 'corp' default wouldn't be good for corps with multiple structures admin'd by different people.
twoflower Secret
Federation Star Invention
#42 - 2017-03-28 08:04:43 UTC
Hi

Can you please look into fuel costs of the Citadels, a alarmingly growing number of Citadels in hi-sec (no experiences in low/null-sec) is not fueled and thus necessary services are not available. In the region I travel more than 50% of the citadels seems not fuelled at all.

Giving the fuel costs Citadels seems like a big money pit for most smaller corporations (<10 member). Low or no tax to attract customers for a refinery does not make it any better for the competition.

Please do a count of how much of the cited 7800 corps have one or more Citadels with only the free services running (repair/insurance/storage/offices).

Posted this concern in the Refinery thread as well.
Serenta Mystra
N'tech
#43 - 2017-03-29 18:56:45 UTC
Changes Needed:

I) Assets need to be more visible in Structures. This includes marketable actions, BP runs (remotely).. Oh and search.

II) Buoy Structures: Can't be renamed, no 'life time' anchoring, aka permanent, or can be tethered to a near structure (if same corp).
- Little wish here, nav buoys for a market structure: undock buoy for when the structure's undock sucks for a gate's direction.

III) Fatigue system; I'm sick of structures anchoring, being public for 2 weeks, then can't pay fuel, so services go offline, finally structure goes private. MAKE THESE STRUCTURES DECAY IF ABANDONED! plz?
- 7 day decommissioning is a little excessive, is there no way to to speed this up if the structure is private?
- More incentive to clean up your Ass-house trash. Clean-up Hisec plz.

IV) FOR **** SAKE! Give us control on WHAT'S ON TELLY!
- Srsly ****'d up. . . Sitting in your structure and see your enemies' ad, dafuq!

V) The materials needed for the rigs are insane, they need a reduction, Fortizar t2 rigs for example are currently the HULL ITSELF again, isk wise.
- Salvaging was suppose to be a 'side-project' anyway! With these numbers, we need a rorqual equivalent salvager!
- Even TVP don't consider salvaging worthwhile. . . rather grind TPPH's lol. . .

VI) Some automated defences is advised, single gun maybe? hero fighter 'hovers' around regardless of control.

VII) Now, I know I'll get some flak from this but: DON'T REMOVE P.O.S. EVER! KEEP'EM! k?
- Dickstar-POS ~1b, can hold off 30-40 ppl
- ASS-house ~1b, can't handle 5 logi ships.. ?!?!?
h4kun4
Gang Bang Pandas
#44 - 2017-03-31 00:35:39 UTC
[quote=Serenta Mystra]Changes Needed:

I) Assets need to be more visible in Structures. This includes marketable actions, BP runs (remotely).. Oh and search.

agreed

V) The materials needed for the rigs are insane, they need a reduction, Fortizar t2 rigs for example are currently the HULL ITSELF again, isk wise.
- Salvaging was suppose to be a 'side-project' anyway! With these numbers, we need a rorqual equivalent salvager!
- Even TVP don't consider salvaging worthwhile. . . rather grind TPPH's lol. . .

T2 rigs are always that expensive, surely when it goes in the 20 bil ranges it its insaen, but try to fit a regular BS or cruiser with t2 rigs under hull price, HF and GL
Sylvia Kildare
Flux Divinity
#45 - 2017-04-01 01:28:33 UTC
twoflower Secret wrote:
Hi

Can you please look into fuel costs of the Citadels, a alarmingly growing number of Citadels in hi-sec (no experiences in low/null-sec) is not fueled and thus necessary services are not available. In the region I travel more than 50% of the citadels seems not fuelled at all.

Giving the fuel costs Citadels seems like a big money pit for most smaller corporations (<10 member). Low or no tax to attract customers for a refinery does not make it any better for the competition.

Please do a count of how much of the cited 7800 corps have one or more Citadels with only the free services running (repair/insurance/storage/offices).

Posted this concern in the Refinery thread as well.


I mean, in a stationless system, a public astrahus with only the free services is still very handy. tether/rep, dock/rep, refit without needing to have brought a mobile depot along, etc.

But yes, the amount of structures that don't have a reproc or clone bay onlined is quite striking as of late. We're nearing 1 year of astrahus spam in highsec and some corps that put one or more up seem to have grown bored with their toys.
Gabriel Karade
Body Count Inc.
Pandemic Legion
#46 - 2017-04-01 12:39:11 UTC
wait for it..... wait..... Big smile

War Machine: http://www.eveonline.com/ingameboard.asp?a=topic&threadID=386293

Kueyen
Angharradh's Aegis
#47 - 2017-04-07 21:16:46 UTC
Echo Mande wrote:
What I would really really like to have on all Upwell structures is a biography page editable by the structure administrator.

The hideous titles a lot of structures have ought to be on a bio page and could be done a lot better there. Likewise a lot of things currently on a structure owner's corp description page don't really belong there.

Congratz on finally getting this feature request noticed, and on camera @ Fanfest no less!

Until all are free...

Previous page123