These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

Forum Index

EVE Forums » EVE Communication Center » EVE General Discussion » Confirmed from CCP and CSM

Topic is locked indefinitely.

Confirmed from CCP and CSM First post
Author

Previous Topic Next Topic

730
Brock Nelson Likes received: 730	#1 - 2012-01-22 03:38:20 UTC 2 Because of issues with Incursions, particularly with carebears making billions per day farming them, CCP have decided to suspend high-sec incursions until further notice or at least they come up with a solution so that people in highsec don't make more isk than those in null. Signature removed, CCP Phantom

Forcas armadas Brave Collective 1,019
Renan Ruivo Forcas armadas Brave Collective Likes received: 1,019	#2 - 2012-01-22 03:39:42 UTC At least have the decency to fabricate some fake-source. The world is a community of idiots doing a series of things until it explodes and we all die.

Sorry We're In Your Space Eh Seventh Sanctum. 120
Shad0wsFury Sorry We're In Your Space Eh Seventh Sanctum. Likes received: 120	#3 - 2012-01-22 03:39:58 UTC I predict massive tears 7.3/10

20
Buff Jesus Likes received: 20	#4 - 2012-01-22 03:40:43 UTC Oh Noes! New Favorite Eve Hobby: Bumping BS's with a Crow.


Brock Nelson Likes received: 730	#5 - 2012-01-22 03:41:01 UTC Renan Ruivo wrote: At least have the decency to fabricate some fake-source. I don't need to, its in the CSM minutes which everyone has read. Did you? Signature removed, CCP Phantom

Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation 2,014
Tyberius Franklin Federal Navy Academy Gallente Federation Likes received: 2,014	#6 - 2012-01-22 03:43:49 UTC Brock Nelson wrote: Renan Ruivo wrote: At least have the decency to fabricate some fake-source. I don't need to, its in the CSM minutes which everyone has read. Did you? Are you sure you did?

Furious Enterprises 8,745
Doc Fury Furious Enterprises Likes received: 8,745	#7 - 2012-01-22 03:44:13 UTC For anyone who is going to rage-quit over this, please consider contracting any tangible items or isk that will go unused after your exit to me, Doc Fury. ☼ There's a million angry citizens looking down their tubes..at me.


Brock Nelson Likes received: 730	#8 - 2012-01-22 03:44:38 UTC Tyberius Franklin wrote: Brock Nelson wrote: Renan Ruivo wrote: At least have the decency to fabricate some fake-source. I don't need to, its in the CSM minutes which everyone has read. Did you? Are you sure you did? No, I just read in between the lines Signature removed, CCP Phantom

Renan Ruivo

Forcas armadas

Brave Collective

Likes received: 1,019

#9 - 2012-01-22 03:49:47 UTC

Brock Nelson wrote:

Renan Ruivo wrote:

At least have the decency to fabricate some fake-source.

I don't need to, its in the CSM minutes which everyone has read. Did you?

I did, but to be honest i skipped the whole incursion discussion. Read the document while translating it to my alliance mates.. and since we don't give a rat's ass about incursions it seemed like wasted effort to read and translate that.

Same thing i did with the Wormholes, Factional Warfare and New Player Experience sections...

The world is a community of idiots doing a series of things until it explodes and we all die.

Tepir

Ministry of War

Amarr Empire

Likes received: 65

#10 - 2012-01-22 03:51:37 UTC | Edited by: Tepir

Brock Nelson wrote:

Because of issues with Incursions, particularly with carebears making billions per day farming them, CCP have decided to suspend high-sec incursions until further notice or at least they come up with a solution so that people in highsec don't make more isk than those in null.

i know a solution!!!!! I REALY DO!

MAKE WARP IN BEACON 40 KM FROM ACC GATE!! and like in missions even if you have fleet member on gate it self when you warp to him you will land on beacon. And still have to aproach those 40 km!!!! this would be for lowest sites... the harder the site is the less distance should be betwen wrp in beacon and warp in gate!!!

this way if those guys want to run vanguards only each time they will spend 10 minuts in aproaching the gate...
This way more people will do harder sites .....
This way will decrease isk per hour in High sec

dont do this with lowsec or 0.0 Incursions .

).0 and lowsec will automaticly become more isk profitable, pvp in Incursions 0.0 and lowsec will be untoched .

Its so simple and so smart!! hell yea im good!! no more newbs with 4 m sp and apoc navy that worth 10 b isk making more money than 0.0 and lowsec people

449
Atticus Fynch Likes received: 449	#11 - 2012-01-22 03:51:50 UTC \| Edited by: Atticus Fynch So where is it written that null sec is supposed to be more profitable than high sec? What happened to the whole sandbox idea? [b]★★★Cargo Pilots Unite!!!★★★ https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=668132&#post668132[/b]


Brock Nelson Likes received: 730	#12 - 2012-01-22 03:53:23 UTC \| Edited by: Brock Nelson Atticus Fynch wrote: So where is it written that low sec is supposed to be more profitable than high sec? I didn't say that. Besides it's an accepted convention that null is more profitable than highsec Signature removed, CCP Phantom

Tepir

Ministry of War

Amarr Empire

Likes received: 65

#13 - 2012-01-22 03:53:59 UTC

Atticus Fynch wrote:

So where is it written that low sec is supposed to be more profitable than high sec?

you will not have to aproach on every site 40 km ? and with it time spent on each site will be less than in high sec and you will make more isk ... ? simple math...

dont mention that ships now used in high sec dont have ab or mwds.... they are slow as hell... even legion with ab goes like 600 or 700 ... he need lots of time to travel 40 km... and logistic even more...


Renan Ruivo Forcas armadas Brave Collective Likes received: 1,019	#14 - 2012-01-22 03:57:12 UTC 1 Atticus Fynch wrote: So where is it written that null sec is supposed to be more profitable than high sec? On the End User License Agreement. Go read it. The world is a community of idiots doing a series of things until it explodes and we all die.

Minions LLC 312
Muestereate Minions LLC Likes received: 312	#15 - 2012-01-22 04:05:06 UTC 1 The view count on this thread kinda screams complacency toward the topic title. LOL

Serge Bastana

GWA Corp

Likes received: 647

#16 - 2012-01-22 04:26:35 UTC

Atticus Fynch wrote:

So where is it written that null sec is supposed to be more profitable than high sec? What happened to the whole sandbox idea?

Your sense of entitlement is showing, best tuck it in quick

WoW holds your hand until end game, and gives you a cookie whether you win or lose. EVE not only takes your cookie, but laughs at you for bringing one in the first place...

Gallente Federation Intelligence Service 99
Tres Farmer Gallente Federation Intelligence Service Likes received: 99	#17 - 2012-01-22 04:56:05 UTC 3 Brock Nelson wrote: Atticus Fynch wrote: So where is it written that low sec is supposed to be more profitable than high sec? I didn't say that. Besides it's an accepted convention that ~~null~~ more risk is more profitable than ~~highsec~~ less risk FYP

Republic Military School Minmatar Republic 34
Ettu Brute II Republic Military School Minmatar Republic Likes received: 34	#18 - 2012-01-22 06:28:03 UTC Brock Nelson wrote: Renan Ruivo wrote: At least have the decency to fabricate some fake-source. I don't need to, its in the CSM minutes which everyone has read. Did you? If everyone has read it I'm mystified as to why you felt the need to post it here.

Drunk Nights Good Fights 176
Tiberius Sunstealer Drunk Nights Good Fights Likes received: 176	#19 - 2012-01-22 06:33:23 UTC Atticus Fynch wrote: So where is it written that null sec is supposed to be more profitable than high sec? What happened to the whole sandbox idea? What is Risk vs. Reward?