These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

NPC Hi Sec Blue Community

Author
Torin Corax
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#261 - 2017-03-10 16:52:49 UTC
Ima Wreckyou wrote:
Talking about science.

I wonder what happens if we put Amojin and Salvos in a thread together and close the door.

Endless, self perpetuating pseudo intellectual bs philosophy generation out of thin air!!

Step two would be to figure out how to create energy with that => planet secured!


Ok, just snorted my coffee out of my nose at this.Lol

@OP Honestly I wish you luck with this....However I would like to suggest that you allow players in player corps to join in. Just go full NPSI when operating in low sec and you may find you get a few more experienced FC's/ scout etc. joining in for the lols when things are quiet in their own corp chat.

If you really want to make it NPC corp only, then fair enough, your idea > your rules, but for something like this I'd say that being as inclusive as possible could be more fun.

Oh and Discord is an option for voice comms, although not sure of the chat limit at the moment. I've found it very easy to use.
Amojin
Doomheim
#262 - 2017-03-10 18:16:42 UTC
Aaron wrote:
I can see why the mods do what they do. I can also see the mods are hanging back a little on this thread. Amojin, please could you try to calm down and keep your replies on topic or I will ask the mod to delete all of your off topic posts and their replies. Don't waste your time here. Start a new thread in out of pod and talk about life and culture there.


I hadn't even seen that forum. The conversations actually do look a lot more interesting, there, after having read through a few of them. Thanks for the tip, Aaron.

I trust if people follow me around like stalkers and demand that I retaliate with the thing that most annoys them, as religion seems to do for Cade, it'll be A-Ok? Twisted

It's still a good idea you came up with. I'll totally be happy to take out my aggression in 'out of pod,' if that's the place you can say whatever you want and not be harassed by mods.
Cade Windstalker
#263 - 2017-03-10 20:43:35 UTC  |  Edited by: Cade Windstalker
Amojin wrote:
Aaron wrote:
I can see why the mods do what they do. I can also see the mods are hanging back a little on this thread. Amojin, please could you try to calm down and keep your replies on topic or I will ask the mod to delete all of your off topic posts and their replies. Don't waste your time here. Start a new thread in out of pod and talk about life and culture there.


I hadn't even seen that forum. The conversations actually do look a lot more interesting, there, after having read through a few of them. Thanks for the tip, Aaron.

I trust if people follow me around like stalkers and demand that I retaliate with the thing that most annoys them, as religion seems to do for Cade, it'll be A-Ok? Twisted

It's still a good idea you came up with. I'll totally be happy to take out my aggression in 'out of pod,' if that's the place you can say whatever you want and not be harassed by mods.


Out of Pod was the place you tried to call out a few of us from the first thread you derailed. Also, from the OoPD rules:

Quote:
3. Discussions about politics and religion not allowed, there are other websites with forums for these topics.


And no one is following you around. We're forum regulars, we're going to comment in threads on the parts of the forum we frequent whether you're in them or not. If you're throwing around BS you're likely to get corrected.

Aaron wrote:
I've had a few emails where people have said they want to be involved. At the moment its a concept. I feel the concept has been received well and I'm looking forward to starting this off. Please could any FC or group mission runner contact me and I will check you out and get your name on the mailing list for the community when it starts. Generally I'd like to adopt an easygoing vibe, its OK to get things wrong as this is part of the process of becoming good.

While I'm here is anyone aware of a cost effective team speak solution? I was thinking of hosting a ts3 on my very own pc. But I'd like a solution people can use in my absence. I'd like to start with 50 users.


You might have some luck if you just made it a loose federation of individuals that basically just share info about open war assist requests and take NPSI fleets out when that sort of content isn't available.

High Sec war-dec fights are an interesting flavor of PvP when both sides take things at all seriously, and even more so when one side is trying to pick off easy kills and the other side is more scattershot in their organization, as is often the case with high-sec wars.

Regarding voice coms. I'm personally quite a fan of Mumble, but you'd need some kind of dedicated hosting for that and that could be expensive, though I don't believe the program itself requires a licence the way TS3 does.

Discord is free in general I believe, but I'm not a huge fan of it and therefore not super familiar with it. Also it's not very secure from an intel perspective, so that might also be a concern.
Amojin
Doomheim
#264 - 2017-03-10 21:55:27 UTC  |  Edited by: Amojin
20:43, Cade, on your post... Was I late?

Check the timestamps:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=6867449#post6867449

Are you really so clever, coming up with this on your own, or are you, as usual, coming in after I admitted something, and acting like I was a liar, and you 'discovered' it, all on your own?

You're a pathetic fraud. You always have been, at least in your interactions with me on the forums. Maybe you should work on changing that instead of worrying about me?
Salvos Rhoska
#265 - 2017-03-10 22:34:09 UTC
Aarons idea can work.

Its not so much about herding cats, as it is about letting cats be cats, and that they have a platform for finding other cats to claw furniture with, and knock objects down off their perches.


Amojin
Doomheim
#266 - 2017-03-10 22:38:36 UTC
Well, Salvos, Aaron seems pretty adamant about multi-boxing.

I notice he was real quiet when I was attacking gankers multi-boxing, but when I evened the scales and attacked the greedy multi-boxing miners, too, oh hell, was Aaron mad.

Bias.

Aaron has an agenda. Bias always points to an agenda. We all have one, hell, my bias is clear, I flat out told you all what it was, months ago, and I've had the same one. My bias is towards those that don't have 6 game clients running.

His idea, sure, good idea, but for whom? I wasn't kidding in my other post when I said this is limited, now, due to mechanics, by your real life pocket book.

He who pays the most, wins.
Cade Windstalker
#267 - 2017-03-10 22:48:11 UTC
Amojin wrote:
20:43, Cade, on your post... Was I late?

Check the timestamps:
https://forums.eveonline.com/default.aspx?g=posts&m=6867449#post6867449

Are you really so clever, coming up with this on your own, or are you, as usual, coming in after I admitted something, and acting like I was a liar, and you 'discovered' it, all on your own?

You're a pathetic fraud. You always have been, at least in your interactions with me on the forums. Maybe you should work on changing that instead of worrying about me?


Didn't see that, like I said I'm not following you around, I just run into you in the sections of the forums that I frequent. That doesn't include OoPE. I saw your post and posted a helpful correction to something you were incorrect on, nothing more Big smile

Once again your assumption has missed the mark. Roll

Amojin wrote:
Well, Salvos, Aaron seems pretty adamant about multi-boxing.

I notice he was real quiet when I was attacking gankers multi-boxing, but when I evened the scales and attacked the greedy multi-boxing miners, too, oh hell, was Aaron mad.

Bias.

Aaron has an agenda. Bias always points to an agenda. We all have one, hell, my bias is clear, I flat out told you all what it was, months ago, and I've had the same one. My bias is towards those that don't have 6 game clients running.

His idea, sure, good idea, but for whom? I wasn't kidding in my other post when I said this is limited, now, due to mechanics, by your real life pocket book.

He who pays the most, wins.


Probably because he doesn't have a problem with multiboxing (like the majority of Eve players) and that isn't anywhere near the point of this thread...
Amojin
Doomheim
#268 - 2017-03-10 22:53:52 UTC
Cade Windstalker wrote:
Probably because he doesn't have a problem with multiboxing (like the majority of Eve players) and that isn't anywhere near the point of this thread...


Yes it is.

He's proposing an unorthodox corporate structure replacement. How the hell are you going to tell me that you can be unorthodox in one manner of game play, and shoot down anything else?

He wants a corp, but not a corp. How the hell is it fair to multibox on profit, mining, and whine when gankers use it, too?

And the miners will always win, since theirs is really not time critical. No matter how much the gankers try to win, they can't be on 24 hours every day.

Those of you using the Orca, the hauler, and the 5 man fleet of skiffs, are WORSE, for the game, than anything you have griped about.
Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#269 - 2017-03-10 22:59:46 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Aarons idea can work.

Its not so much about herding cats, as it is about letting cats be cats, and that they have a platform for finding other cats to claw furniture with, and knock objects down off their perches.




Hmmm, I think you've hit the nail on the head here. I was planning to adopt a patient and fun type of attitude toward this which I think is the best approach. This is also interesting because if we leave the corp mechanic and everything it entails behind, then that means we only have the ship we are in to lose. I think we will feel free because there is less weight on our shoulders without the corp mechanic.

I for one plan to limit my loss and fly t1 frigates and cruisers to begin with, hopefully we will get some good numbers so that our DPS output is optimal.

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#270 - 2017-03-10 23:11:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Aaron
Amojin wrote:
Cade Windstalker wrote:
Probably because he doesn't have a problem with multiboxing (like the majority of Eve players) and that isn't anywhere near the point of this thread...


Yes it is.

He's proposing an unorthodox corporate structure replacement. How the hell are you going to tell me that you can be unorthodox in one manner of game play, and shoot down anything else?

He wants a corp, but not a corp. How the hell is it fair to multibox on profit, mining, and whine when gankers use it, too?




This is where you are 100% wrong Amojin, I do not want nor have I implied anything to do with an unorthodox corporate structure replacement. In fact I said the opposite where I respected the corp mechanic but felt the ROLE PLAY victims perhaps needed to step back from it for a period of time. I fully endorse joining a corp I just think that if you want to stay in hi sec you need to be well versed in lots of things..

Perhaps a group of guys may bond from this and create a corp..who knows...try to look at this as a simple platform for Eve where you can play Eve in a more relaxed manner while you sharpen your skills and decide your next corp move.

Amojin, Eve is GABOS (Game Ain't Based On Sympathy) nothing is fair here which is exactly the way I like it.

EDIT: oh and by the way...I coined the phrase GABOS..which is an indisputable fact. so if anyone wants to use it to sound cool in convos send me some isk.

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Scipio Artelius
Weaponised Vegemite
Flying Dangerous
#271 - 2017-03-10 23:21:21 UTC  |  Edited by: Scipio Artelius
Aaron wrote:
EDIT: oh and by the way...I coined the phrase GABOS..which is an indisputable fact.

Where have you been Aaron?

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=GABOS&defid=5834503

Were you ever in a Louis Theroux documentary? If so, r/eve may need a hero like you at the moment.
Amojin
Doomheim
#272 - 2017-03-10 23:22:51 UTC
Aaron wrote:
Amojin wrote:
Cade Windstalker wrote:
Probably because he doesn't have a problem with multiboxing (like the majority of Eve players) and that isn't anywhere near the point of this thread...


Yes it is.

He's proposing an unorthodox corporate structure replacement. How the hell are you going to tell me that you can be unorthodox in one manner of game play, and shoot down anything else?

He wants a corp, but not a corp. How the hell is it fair to multibox on profit, mining, and whine when gankers use it, too?




This is where you are 100% wrong Amojin, I do not want nor have I implied anything to do with an unorthodox corporate structure replacement. In fact I said the opposite where I respected the corp mechanic but felt the ROLE PLAY victims perhaps needed to step back from it for a period of time. I fully endorse joining a corp I just think that if you want to stay in hi sec you need to be well versed in lots of things..

Perhaps a group of guys may bond from this and create a corp..who knows...try to look at this as a simple platform for Eve where you can play Eve in a more relaxed manner while yousharpen your skills and decide your next corp move.

Amojin, Eve is GABOS (Game Ain't Based On Sympathy) nothing is fair here which is exactly the way I like it.



Saying that you want us to step back and that we need to be well versed in 'things' is pretty generic. If I bother to play this game in the future, it'll be as a new alpha, with a new name, since I just gave 1 player about 4B worth of BPO, and 6 other players another 12B, and am going to delete these toons. I'm tired of pay to play, and it's not gonna happen, anymore. Tell me, Aaron, for my new know nothing, has nothing toon, if I bother to make one, what's the point?

We both know damned good and well that a lot of people, on both sides of the fence, are making a ton of money, with multiboxing. Do we all need to do that? Is that what it takes?

Do I have to set up a bunch of free miners, set them with T2 miners in a venture, and plug away? Who does that help? It's boring as ****. Sure, I can get rich, but what's the point?

Do I need to let people fool me, play Ender again, and let them tell me, oh, no, you really need to kill this bastard?

If you're not offering an alternate corporate structure, then what are you doing?
Torin Corax
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#273 - 2017-03-10 23:22:59 UTC  |  Edited by: Torin Corax
Aaron wrote:


EDIT: oh and by the way...I coined the phrase GABOS™..which is an indisputable fact. so if anyone wants to use it to sound cool in convos send me some isk.


FYP Blink

Fly fast, Fight hard.
Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#274 - 2017-03-10 23:23:02 UTC
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Aaron wrote:
EDIT: oh and by the way...I coined the phrase GABOS..which is an indisputable fact.

Where have you been Aaron?

http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=GABOS&defid=5834503

Were you ever in a Louis Thereau documentary? If so, r/eve may need a hero like you at the moment.


Lies!!! I coined the phrase in 1987.

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Amojin
Doomheim
#275 - 2017-03-10 23:40:29 UTC
The bottom line is that you people are not happy even with paying to have 6 Client Interfaces open at once.

You need to beat down the poor. You do it in the belts, and you do it in the corps. Now you want to conscript the hopeless poor into a non-gankable ad-hoc money making enterprise.

How much, Aaron, will you pay these people?
Torin Corax
Republic Military School
Minmatar Republic
#276 - 2017-03-11 00:01:24 UTC
Amojin wrote:
The bottom line is that you people are not happy even with paying to have 6 Client Interfaces open at once.

You need to beat down the poor. You do it in the belts, and you do it in the corps. Now you want to conscript the hopeless poor into a non-gankable ad-hoc money making enterprise.

How much, Aaron, will you pay these people?


Oh please....Roll

NPSI is fun. If Aaron wants to make the effort to organise, lead and die alongside fellow NPC corp players then more power to him. That's content creation in action.

Ever join a Bombers Bar roam? It's an absolute blast. Join enough of them and you start to see a little of the work that goes on behind the scenes to organize it. It is not a trivial amount of effort in order to provide an extremely enjoyable activity for (initially at least) complete strangers. Loot donation, and from time to time, voluntary donations, are a small price to pay for a whole lot of fun. I haven't seen Aaron ask for anything in return for this, did I miss something?

Honestly, not sure why the hate towards an idea that could potentially introduce new blood to PvP, and provide targets for the pirates already living in low secTwisted

Ships will burn on both sides, fun will be had on both sides. Don't fly what you can't afford to lose and no-one will have anything to cry about. Meet people, make friends, get awoxed by said "friends"...it's all good.

Whether or not it is successful remains to be seen. That would largely depend on those who end up running the fleets tbh, and how good they are at finding Good Fights™
Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#277 - 2017-03-11 00:09:20 UTC
Torin Corax wrote:
Amojin wrote:
The bottom line is that you people are not happy even with paying to have 6 Client Interfaces open at once.

You need to beat down the poor. You do it in the belts, and you do it in the corps. Now you want to conscript the hopeless poor into a non-gankable ad-hoc money making enterprise.

How much, Aaron, will you pay these people?


Oh please....Roll


I haven't seen Aaron ask for anything in return for this, did I miss something?



I'm looking for company, good fights and cool people to mission with. that's payment enough for me.

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

goudaMob
Royal Amarr Institute
Amarr Empire
#278 - 2017-03-11 00:14:50 UTC
A. A. Ron
Amojin
Doomheim
#279 - 2017-03-11 00:25:07 UTC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jyLmSAnoR6g

Let's call it a draw and walk away? Roll
Cade Windstalker
#280 - 2017-03-11 04:14:39 UTC
Aaron wrote:
I'm looking for company, good fights and cool people to mission with. that's payment enough for me.


If you want something like this to happen though you'd better be ready for a crap load of admin work, lol.

The amount of paperwork and logistics it takes to keep organizations in this game running is ridiculous. I'm honestly amazed some days.

Amojin wrote:
Yes it is.

He's proposing an unorthodox corporate structure replacement. How the hell are you going to tell me that you can be unorthodox in one manner of game play, and shoot down anything else?

He wants a corp, but not a corp. How the hell is it fair to multibox on profit, mining, and whine when gankers use it, too?

And the miners will always win, since theirs is really not time critical. No matter how much the gankers try to win, they can't be on 24 hours every day.

Those of you using the Orca, the hauler, and the 5 man fleet of skiffs, are WORSE, for the game, than anything you have griped about.


I'm not telling you anything of the sort, I'm saying that Aaron's idea and this thread have nothing to do with the topic of multiboxing. If you want to discuss that make another thread for it, but that's kinda been done to death at this point. A quick search around the forums will find you a half dozen threads easily on the topic rehashing the same old arguments on both sides of the fence.

Still has nothing to do with this thread though.

Also, FYI, there are quite a few non-corp organizations in this game. This isn't really a new concept, just a new use of the general idea. Bomber's Bar is one example, the various public Incursion groups are another, same with Spectre Fleet, and there are others that aren't coming to mind at the moment.

Amojin wrote:
The bottom line is that you people are not happy even with paying to have 6 Client Interfaces open at once.

You need to beat down the poor. You do it in the belts, and you do it in the corps. Now you want to conscript the hopeless poor into a non-gankable ad-hoc money making enterprise.

How much, Aaron, will you pay these people?


Um, no, the bottom line is that Multiboxing isn't the holy grail you seem to think it is, and that it has nothing to do with this thread... no one in this game owes you any money. If you play smart, invest some effort, and do your homework you can be as rich or as poor as you want in this game.

I know one guy whose wallet seems to yo-yo between like 2b and 100b every month or two and all of that's his own time, effort, and a bit of horse trading.

No one owes you anything in this game. Not because you're poor, not because your computer can only run 1 client, and not because you're good or bad at the game. If you're good you go out and make ISK, if you're not you don't.