These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

NPC Hi Sec Blue Community

Author
Shiloh Templeton
Cheyenne HET Co
#181 - 2017-03-07 21:49:41 UTC
Kudo's for trying a new variation on your quest for community.

Good luck.
Nicolai Serkanner
Incredible.
Brave Collective
#182 - 2017-03-07 22:46:12 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Nicolai Serkanner wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Nicolai Serkanner wrote:
What has Hitler being Austrian to do with the historical fact of "Nazi Germany"?


A great deal.

But it is not relevant to this thread.

Return to topic, please, at least as relevant to EVE.


Please elaborate, and don't tell me he was born in Austria and founded the NSDAP. What is the relevance Amojin "hinted" at?

I didn't brought it up so I stay at this subject.


PM me this question if you wish.

Hitler is not relevant to the topic of this thread, or any of its evolution.


Look at your own posts ... how on-topic are they?
Ralph King-Griffin
New Eden Tech Support
#183 - 2017-03-07 23:52:35 UTC
salos, careful now.
Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#184 - 2017-03-08 00:43:39 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Aaron does, what Aaron does.

Content is content.

This time, I will help him, on this project.


There!! Thats it... the epic sci-fi vibration.

LOL, I've been reading everything posted on this thread and it is very interesting.

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Amojin
Doomheim
#185 - 2017-03-08 00:48:04 UTC  |  Edited by: Amojin
Aaron wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Aaron does, what Aaron does.

Content is content.

This time, I will help him, on this project.


There!! Thats it... the epic sci-fi vibration.

LOL, I've been reading everything posted on this thread and it is very interesting.



Aaron is not epic. There is no vibration. Avery Brooks? Yup. Epic. A vibration. Sci-fi.

Kate Mulgrew? Yup, second best, sci-fi.

William Shatner? Sure. Sci fi.

Etc, etc... Aaron the EVE player? Nah. A skilled hobbyist, maybe?
Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#186 - 2017-03-08 01:06:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Aaron
Jenn aSide wrote:
Ralph King-Griffin wrote:
Hakawai wrote:
Let see ...

... "nothing anyone does in EVE matters, no matter how good or bad it it. If you care about in-game events you're unsuited to play he game at all".

So either al the old-timers are actually zombies or bots? That would explain the problems with logic, but I don't think it explains the pleasure fun-vampires take in "collecting tears" - interfering on other players' enjoyment of the game.

And back on topic - if none of this matters at all, why are some people so eager to discourage OP from providing his suggested service? The only rationale I can see with the nay-saying side of this thread is that they believe the game isn't as dark, vicious, and unforgiving as we've now learned it really is, so the service he's proposing isn't necessary.

I wonder if it's the same people ...

I think you'll find I wished him luck


I did too. Commentary isn't discouragement, what Aaron is going to do isn't hurting anything. We're playing a game, as long as an action is within the Eula, then to each his own.

For my part I merely wonder why some people alway try to circumvent or avoid the more straight forward way of doing things in favor of ways that usually don't work and lead to a lot of frustration and wasted time. In other words, why all this herding of cats in NPC controlled spaces (Stain, High Sec)(rather than just forming a group, growing that group and taking Sov in null or claiming an out of the way wormhole?


Jenn, its all about perspective. In a 10 storey block of apartments the person living at the top will have a different perspective from the person living at the bottom. Not better or worse, but different. the person at the top may appreciate being able to see for miles and miles, while the person at the bottom appreciates seeing nature close up. Try to swap these people around and the person now at the bottom will wonder why he cant see for miles and the person now at the top will wonder where his trees and wildlife are.

Eve can seem like a part time job. I know there have been 24 hour battles for example, these people obviously take the game very seriously to be doing that.

my style of play is mostly role play where I try to address societies ill's by doing something that fights an oppressive regime. I know what effect the use of the wardec mecanic will have on the little guys game play, so I put on my cape and spring into action. Also this isnt about ignoring the corp mechanic its more about stepping back a little bit and giving yourself a break by going npc and simply avoiding the wardec mechanic all together for a period of time and then going back to a suitable corp.

I'm trying to create an Eve-Online-Light, you know like a beer that has less alcohol in it.

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#187 - 2017-03-08 01:16:03 UTC
Amojin wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
If people are doing that, IMO they'd be better off improving their real life situation (or seeking medication) than playing some video game.


Well, given my job, the medication thing is something I'm perfectly willing to hand out when the orders come down, but knowing the side effects of most pharmaceutical products manufactured these days, I'd pretty much have to be actually dying before I'd take anything but aspirin. So, that's out, and you really can't do anything about negative feelings about work, when your job is to be around injured and sick people all the time.

They're also not very good targets to let your mind switch rage onto, either. So, yeah, I can just log in and let something irritate me; human nature will take care of transferring that anger right away.


Has anyone tried Valerian? It is a natural root extract that increases serotonin naturally with no side effects. A lack of serotonin can cause anger issues in people. Serotonin can deplete due to alcohol, drinking coffee, using drugs, stress. Other things tthat increase Serotonin are good diet, regular exercise.

Lack of vitamins and minerals can affect you too, there are multivits and minerals that relieve stress.




Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Amojin
Doomheim
#188 - 2017-03-08 01:19:37 UTC
Aaron wrote:
Amojin wrote:
Jenn aSide wrote:
If people are doing that, IMO they'd be better off improving their real life situation (or seeking medication) than playing some video game.


Well, given my job, the medication thing is something I'm perfectly willing to hand out when the orders come down, but knowing the side effects of most pharmaceutical products manufactured these days, I'd pretty much have to be actually dying before I'd take anything but aspirin. So, that's out, and you really can't do anything about negative feelings about work, when your job is to be around injured and sick people all the time.

They're also not very good targets to let your mind switch rage onto, either. So, yeah, I can just log in and let something irritate me; human nature will take care of transferring that anger right away.


Has anyone tried Valerian? It is a natural root extract that increases serotonin naturally with no side effects. A lack of serotonin can cause anger issues in people. Serotonin can deplete due to alcohol, drinking coffee, using drugs, stress. Other things tthat increase Serotonin are good diet, regular exercise.

Lack of vitamins and minerals can affect you too, there are multivits and minerals that relieve stress.



Yeah, that works, but it's not something you need a prescription for. I use it, and it's about as dangerous as aspirin. But most doctors are not gonna tell you, yo, take you some valerian root and an OTC 5mg of melatonin.

Why? No profit.
Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#189 - 2017-03-08 01:21:43 UTC  |  Edited by: Aaron
Amojin wrote:
Aaron wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
Aaron does, what Aaron does.

Content is content.

This time, I will help him, on this project.


There!! Thats it... the epic sci-fi vibration.

LOL, I've been reading everything posted on this thread and it is very interesting.



Aaron is not epic. There is no vibration. Avery Brooks? Yup. Epic. A vibration. Sci-fi.

Kate Mulgrew? Yup, second best, sci-fi.

William Shatner? Sure. Sci fi.

Etc, etc... Aaron the EVE player? Nah. A skilled hobbyist, maybe?


LOL, I wasnt saying I was epic, I was saying it seems Salvos has felt the vibration and seems ready to do something different. this is a common story within a sci-fi environment.

Edit: I like your style though. you listed some old skool veteran actors right there. Big smile

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Amojin
Doomheim
#190 - 2017-03-08 01:33:18 UTC
Old school? What the hell? Shocked

Sisko is not that old.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IjvYiSDJujA

Am I that old? No. No way. People still watch DS9, don't they? F*ck. Well, they should!
Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#191 - 2017-03-08 02:34:33 UTC  |  Edited by: Aaron
Amojin wrote:
Old school? What the hell? Shocked

Sisko is not that old.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IjvYiSDJujA

Am I that old? No. No way. People still watch DS9, don't they? F*ck. Well, they should!


Haha, nice, avery brooks is 68 years young. Big smile

and i only watch orange is the new black because Kate Mulgrew is in it.

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Ima Wreckyou
The Conference Elite
Safety.
#192 - 2017-03-08 14:39:25 UTC
Amojin wrote:
Old school? What the hell? Shocked

Sisko is not that old.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IjvYiSDJujA

Am I that old? No. No way. People still watch DS9, don't they? F*ck. Well, they should!

You know, the cool kids watched B5 anyway
Agondray
Avenger Mercenaries
VOID Intergalactic Forces
#193 - 2017-03-09 08:24:28 UTC
I am for this.

"Sarcasm is the Recourse of a weak mind." -Dr. Smith

Amojin
Doomheim
#194 - 2017-03-09 17:11:40 UTC
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Nerfing the ability to multi box would hurt the high end gank target more than it would hurt the gankers. It would remove the ability to use a webbing alt or scout, and would eliminate the possibility of having an exit cyno for jump freighters.

This is not something anyone wants. Multiboxing is fine.


Actually, it's not. It's permitted by CCP because it provides a lot of revenue. But the arguments on both sides, if you really stop to consider it, are stemming from this massive hole, this obscene gap of morality that's accepted by everyone.

People who mine typically have an Orca alt, a hauling alt, a multi-box team of miners if they're really into, etc, & so forth. This is counterbalanced by the gankers having scouts, specialized ecm alts, etc, etc.

A virtual chaos of absolute overpowered insanity occurs, the multi-boxing miners making a ton of isk, and the multi-boxing gankers capitalizing on this. Risk is then detached, and distributed amongst several toons on both sides, with the net result being both of you employing a fleet of toons, and the combined resources being funneled back into whatever you consider your main to be.

As far as I'm concerned, you're both cheating scumbags, and the only reason you exist is because CCP allows this, and they allow it because they are getting paid. Just because something is allowed does not make it right. More importantly, it doesn't make it practical. It takes a small flaw, and magnifies it many times over, until this sort of anger on both sides simply erupts, and because the mechanic is now so overblown and powerful, limited only by your real life pocket-book, there is no end in sight.

Who really loses? The little people, that are sitting in their lone skiff, playing the game as designed, or the lone ganker, who makes the money from his ganking toon, playing the game as it was designed, those people not having 6 game clients open at a time. They lose, which makes sense from CCP's standpoint. They only paid once.

It's still wrong. Both of these camps need one hell of a smackdown. As fun as all that was, my lunch is gonna be over in 49 minutes, and I have a steak and baked potato to eat. Seeya next time. Roll
Aaron
Eternal Frontier
#195 - 2017-03-09 18:04:03 UTC  |  Edited by: Aaron
Amojin wrote:
Scipio Artelius wrote:
Nerfing the ability to multi box would hurt the high end gank target more than it would hurt the gankers. It would remove the ability to use a webbing alt or scout, and would eliminate the possibility of having an exit cyno for jump freighters.

This is not something anyone wants. Multiboxing is fine.


Actually, it's not. It's permitted by CCP because it provides a lot of revenue. But the arguments on both sides, if you really stop to consider it, are stemming from this massive hole, this obscene gap of morality that's accepted by everyone.

People who mine typically have an Orca alt, a hauling alt, a multi-box team of miners if they're really into, etc, & so forth. This is counterbalanced by the gankers having scouts, specialized ecm alts, etc, etc.

A virtual chaos of absolute overpowered insanity occurs, the multi-boxing miners making a ton of isk, and the multi-boxing gankers capitalizing on this. Risk is then detached, and distributed amongst several toons on both sides, with the net result being both of you employing a fleet of toons, and the combined resources being funneled back into whatever you consider your main to be.

As far as I'm concerned, you're both cheating scumbags, and the only reason you exist is because CCP allows this, and they allow it because they are getting paid. Just because something is allowed does not make it right. More importantly, it doesn't make it practical. It takes a small flaw, and magnifies it many times over, until this sort of anger on both sides simply erupts, and because the mechanic is now so overblown and powerful, limited only by your real life pocket-book, there is no end in sight.

Who really loses? The little people, that are sitting in their lone skiff, playing the game as designed, or the lone ganker, who makes the money from his ganking toon, playing the game as it was designed, those people not having 6 game clients open at a time. They lose, which makes sense from CCP's standpoint. They only paid once.

It's still wrong. Both of these camps need one hell of a smackdown. As fun as all that was, my lunch is gonna be over in 49 minutes, and I have a steak and baked potato to eat. Seeya next time. Roll


The ability to multibox is an accepted game mechanic. I'm not sure why you blame CCP for designing the game this way, it is obvious that most of us like the being able to get more than 1 subscription. The Eve customer base wanted more than 1 account and we got it.

The point of this thread is to show the pilots of Eve that game mechanics can be used to your advantage regardless of if you are a missioner, ganker, miner, pvp'er or wardec corp or ROLE-PLAY victim.

My goal is to carefully try to change the perception of some pilots by doing something to make Eve fun and adventurous.

I was on zkill and I saw that an old friend of mine had lost 2 Azbel's with a value of 10 billion, I figure it must have taken lots of time to grind for that money. I thought to myself why did he bother investing so much of his time/isk on these structures if he has no real way to defend it? I felt that he just walked into the wardec trap (remember ccp and their dangling carrot in front of all of us).

The guy who lost the Azbel's has the opinion that blue communities will never work. My opinion is that he was lead to believe corp/alliance was the way forward for him. A blue community would have helped defend his structures.

The only way I'd purchase an Azbel and associated structures is if I was within a corp of 300 pilots where I could easily have 50 pilots available to defend it any moment throughout the day. If I did not have that then I'd have no business owning such structures. I know some will disagree but we have to learn to stop throwing our isk at these wardeccers for them to get easy kills. We have to adopt an approach where the wardeccers actually stand to lose out if they wardec.

I'm trying to prompt something where the Eve pilots who are ROLE-PLAY victims can take a time out and have a serious look at what exactly they are doing in game.

Fear no one, live life, be free, accept the truth, do not judge others, defend yourself, fight hard till the end, meditate on problems and be prosperous. Things to exist by. -- RAIN Arthie

Amojin
Doomheim
#196 - 2017-03-09 21:11:37 UTC
Aaron wrote:
Amojin wrote:
[quote=Scipio Artelius]Nerfing the ability to multi box would hurt the high end gank target more than it would hurt the gankers. It would remove the ability to use a webbing alt or scout, and would eliminate the possibility of having an exit cyno for jump freighters.

This is not something anyone wants. Multiboxing is fine.


Actually, it's not. It's permitted by CCP because it provides a lot of revenue. But the arguments on both sides, if you really stop to consider it, are stemming from this massive hole, this obscene gap of morality that's accepted by everyone.


I said, in the very post you are responding to, that it'a accepted by everyone, didn't I? But, don't forget, you're talking to the person who also says that since most people are stupid, AND evil, it's a horrible combination, which means the majority is nearly always wrong...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYJ88MHPyF8

'I took that, and since I was curious, I wondered if people would even take the first step. If I start the fight, for them, as if that's necessary, since it's not, except as a bit or moral aid, would they fight?

If one of their members were being attacked, would they respond, as the type of community you want to make? They won't. I've tried this in game and been blown to hell while the sheep sat and watched. Without doing the simple thing of targetting an already viable target and hitting 'F.'

They won't. No point, Mark O'helm says. The Germans have this sorta thing, they just sit there, feeling guilty about WW2, and they just lay down and die. So I tried it on other groups, tossing in a combat ship and saying, help me help you.

Nope. Not gonna happen.

****. Need to do something. Finish this later.

Amojin
Doomheim
#197 - 2017-03-09 21:23:55 UTC  |  Edited by: Amojin
Oh, my goodness. He's afebrile! That's sorta what we expected. Anyway... Back to the bs, or well, the other bs.

One thing I don't think you mutli-boxers really consider is that the power is linear. It's code. If you're stopped, so will everyone else be...

What's the problem, then?
Cade Windstalker
#198 - 2017-03-09 21:26:25 UTC
Amojin wrote:
I said, in the very post you are responding to, that it'a accepted by everyone, didn't I? But, don't forget, you're talking to the person who also says that since most people are stupid, AND evil, it's a horrible combination, which means the majority is nearly always wrong...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uYJ88MHPyF8

'I took that, and since I was curious, I wondered if people would even take the first step. If I start the fight, for them, as if that's necessary, since it's not, except as a bit or moral aid, would they fight?

If one of their members were being attacked, would they respond, as the type of community you want to make? They won't. I've tried this in game and been blown to hell while the sheep sat and watched. Without doing the simple thing of targetting an already viable target and hitting 'F.'


It's really kind of mind-boggling that you keep posting stuff like this, that is among other things massively pessimistic, and yet you keep doing it.

Brings to mind a quote about a definition of insanity...

Just because you've tried something and it didn't work, especially if it's community organizing given your personality and self-admitted aversion to power and responsibility, that doesn't mean it *can't* work. This game has seen blue communities before, it'll probably see more of them again. Some have worked better than others.
Amojin
Doomheim
#199 - 2017-03-09 21:30:15 UTC  |  Edited by: Amojin
Oh, my goodness, little Cade is disagreeing with me?!

Oh, no. I better give up! How dare I persist? Have your mind boggled, then, Cade. I'm tired of the crap of multiple accounts. It's very cleary an evil beyond belief.

We were right in 1992, when we said, NO, hell no, you cannot have more than 1 account. Yeah, I'm gonna rub that in. We were right. Letting you have a host of 'toons,' to play with, is a mistake.

Look at all the angst. The miners have them, and then the gankers do, and the pocket-books keep getting pulled out, and more and more and more, is thrown at each other, and who really wins, at the end of the day?

CCP.
Cade Windstalker
#200 - 2017-03-09 21:31:25 UTC
Amojin wrote:
One thing I don't think you mutli-boxers really consider is that the power is linerar. It's code. If you're stopped, so will everyone else be...

What's the problem, then?


Because the cost to benefit of prohibitions on multiboxing is not linear across play-styles and regions. Some people and players would be almost unaffected, others would be wiped out entirely.

This game has grown up with multi-boxing as a part of its framework and it's pretty much an assumed quantity both for CCP and the players. CCP should, and for the most part has, avoided designing mechanics that outright require multiboxing, but quite a few playstyles heavily benefit from it, and the ability to run multiple clients is something CCP actively supports with the launcher and the minimum system specs for the client.

Removing it at this stage would be a pretty drastic change that would be felt across the entire game. It's all well and good for you or others to go "well good, it's a bad system" but that's overly simplistic and narrow minded. Multi-boxing isn't inherently good or bad, and its removal wouldn't be either. What it would be is a drastic change, and generally speaking in MMOs those are to be avoided if at all possible, especially without a very solid reasoning and empirical evidence to back it up.