These forums have been archived and are now read-only.

The new forums are live and can be found at https://forums.eveonline.com/

EVE General Discussion

 
  • Topic is locked indefinitely.
 

If CODE owns highsec...
Author
Previous Topic Next Topic
Thomas Lot
School of Applied Knowledge
Caldari State
#41 - 2017-03-01 17:10:07 UTC
CODE. does not own High-sec and anyone that believes that nonsense is an insignificant, naive child who needs to be fleeced.
Jagd Wilde
Pandemic Horde Inc.
Pandemic Horde
#42 - 2017-03-01 17:19:15 UTC
Hazel TuckerTS wrote:
YAWN..................code is dead...



Your sig would suggest otherwise. Big smile

Every alt I own has a red safety, this has brought my friends much laughter.
Bing Bangboom
DAMAG Safety Commission
#43 - 2017-03-01 19:02:17 UTC  |  Edited by: Bing Bangboom
Thomas Lot wrote:
CODE. does not own High-sec and anyone that believes that nonsense is an insignificant, naive child who needs to be fleeced.


Thomas!

The permit we sold you has expired and its time to reup. Just send the 10 million ISK like last time and I will issue a new one to put into your bio.

Highsec is worth fighting for.

By choosing to mine in New Order systems, highsec miners have agreed to follow the New Halaima Code of Conduct.  www.minerbumping.com
Sasha Nemtsov
Federal Navy Academy
Gallente Federation
#44 - 2017-03-01 21:44:42 UTC
In fact, the answer to the OP's 'question' is contained in the Code, in the FAQ section. I quote:

Q: Who are you? Anyone can claim to own a highsec system. I can say I own everything in EVE!

A: ...When a miner is bumped out of mining range, he no longer has the ability to mine--and he does not even get a share of the ore/ice he mined from earlier in the laser's cycle, when he was in range. Therefore, I can stop people from mining whenever I want. Since the miners want to mine ice, and since I alone decide whether or not they can, I command them. It's really that simple.


Q: HA HA I am mining ice right now, you can't stop me!

A: As Supreme Protector, some may expect me to doggedly enforce the rules at all times against all offenders. This is a misperception of my role. Aside from those who have purchased indulgences, I will bump whomever I choose, whenever I choose. Your mining operations are entirely at my mercy. If I feel like stopping you from mining, I will; if not, I won't.


The New Order governs Highsec in accordance with the Code. It's entirely up to our members whether or not they enact its provisions - and to what extent.

The Code will change your life; only you can
make that a good thing or a bad thing.

minerbumping

New Order Audio Archive

NEW! MinerBumping Video Vault
Hazel TuckerTS
Doomheim
#45 - 2017-03-01 23:45:48 UTC
Sasha Nemtsov wrote:
In fact, the answer to the OP's 'question' is contained in the Code, in the FAQ section. I quote:

Q: Who are you? Anyone can claim to own a highsec system. I can say I own everything in EVE!

A: ...When a miner is bumped out of mining range, he no longer has the ability to mine--and he does not even get a share of the ore/ice he mined from earlier in the laser's cycle, when he was in range. Therefore, I can stop people from mining whenever I want. Since the miners want to mine ice, and since I alone decide whether or not they can, I command them. It's really that simple.


Q: HA HA I am mining ice right now, you can't stop me!

A: As Supreme Protector, some may expect me to doggedly enforce the rules at all times against all offenders. This is a misperception of my role. Aside from those who have purchased indulgences, I will bump whomever I choose, whenever I choose. Your mining operations are entirely at my mercy. If I feel like stopping you from mining, I will; if not, I won't.


The New Order governs Highsec in accordance with the Code. It's entirely up to our members whether or not they enact its provisions - and to what extent.

The Code will change your life; only you can
make that a good thing or a bad thing.



SILENCE....code is dead...
No one wants to hear your bloated BS

kiss kiss bang bang
Kitsa
UnHoly C0nF3SSi0ns
#46 - 2017-03-02 01:51:30 UTC
I just want to say that I read the title and started laughing, and no, I am not in any way sorry or ashamed that I am not contributing to this thread.
Teros Hakomairos
Doomheim
#47 - 2017-03-02 10:33:36 UTC  |  Edited by: Teros Hakomairos
Thomas Lot wrote:
CODE. does not own High-sec and anyone that believes that nonsense is an insignificant, naive child who needs to be fleeced.


Right..the high sec is owend by states not terrorists.

Maybe CCP should teach this the hard way....

Spawning a navy fleet everwhere you enter space attacking you would really teach them this lesson....Cool
Salvos Rhoska
#48 - 2017-03-02 11:45:58 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
CODE never wins.
CONCORD wins, always.

>mfw beat everytime by NPC.

PvE v PvP <> Old School Exploration <> CODE Licenses <> CODE Special Agent
Dom Arkaral
Bannheim
Cuttlefish Collective
#49 - 2017-03-02 13:33:37 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
CODE never wins.
CONCORD wins, always.

>mfw beat everytime by NPC.

No one talks about npcs
Everyone talks about CODE. Blink

Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester.

Broadcast 4 Reps -- YOU ARE NOT ALONE, EVER

Instigator of the First ISD Thunderdome

CCL Loyalist
Wolfgang Jannesen
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#50 - 2017-03-02 13:44:50 UTC
There's no difference between CODE. and any other suicide gankers taking out ventures. 'We own Highsec' doesn't mean anything if your EHP is high enough.
Dom Arkaral
Bannheim
Cuttlefish Collective
#51 - 2017-03-02 13:48:28 UTC
Wolfgang Jannesen wrote:
There's no difference between CODE. and any other suicide gankers taking out ventures. 'We own Highsec' doesn't mean anything if your EHP is high enough.

No ehp is high enough lol
That kind of thinking gets you killed Cool

Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester.

Broadcast 4 Reps -- YOU ARE NOT ALONE, EVER

Instigator of the First ISD Thunderdome

CCL Loyalist
Wolfgang Jannesen
Imperial Academy
Amarr Empire
#52 - 2017-03-02 13:50:16 UTC
Dom Arkaral wrote:
Wolfgang Jannesen wrote:
There's no difference between CODE. and any other suicide gankers taking out ventures. 'We own Highsec' doesn't mean anything if your EHP is high enough.

No ehp is high enough lol
That kind of thinking gets you killed Cool


Like mosquitos against my windshield, break your disappointed parent's hopes against my hull.
Dom Arkaral
Bannheim
Cuttlefish Collective
#53 - 2017-03-02 13:51:40 UTC  |  Edited by: Dom Arkaral
Whoops double post
And literally no ehp is high enough
No matter what you fit...
if we want you dead, you'll end up dead, and possibly crying because I told you no ehp was high enough Roll

Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester.

Broadcast 4 Reps -- YOU ARE NOT ALONE, EVER

Instigator of the First ISD Thunderdome

CCL Loyalist
Salvos Rhoska
#54 - 2017-03-02 14:44:41 UTC  |  Edited by: Salvos Rhoska
CONCORD always wins.
CODE always loses.

Whether suicide ganking is PvP or PvE, or both, or something else entirely, is an intriguing topic.

PvE v PvP <> Old School Exploration <> CODE Licenses <> CODE Special Agent
Dom Arkaral
Bannheim
Cuttlefish Collective
#55 - 2017-03-02 14:50:08 UTC
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
CONCORD always wins.
CODE always loses.

Whether suicide ganking is PvP or PvE, or both, or something else entirely, is an intriguing topic.

Why would CODE. lose if the only objective is content?

People cry, we win
People try to shoot us, we win
People tank, we win

Any action by players against us is a victory...
NPCs are irrelevant as gankers go out knowing they're only coming back in a pod Blink

Tear Gatherer. Quebecker. Has no Honer. Salt Harvester.

Broadcast 4 Reps -- YOU ARE NOT ALONE, EVER

Instigator of the First ISD Thunderdome

CCL Loyalist
Ijon-Tichy
Ze One Man Show
#56 - 2017-03-02 14:59:18 UTC  |  Edited by: Ijon-Tichy
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
CONCORD always wins.
CODE always loses.

Whether suicide ganking is PvP or PvE, or both, or something else entirely, is an intriguing topic.


You and your sig make them win all the time, make them relevant. That makes me wonder if you are more the Don Quijote or the Agent Provocateur kind of poster. Only way to get rid of things like CODE. would be to ignore them collectively until they get bored and move on to something else. And we both know that is not ganna happen. More like people make it to easy for them to carry on. No matter how stupid the provocation is, there are always more than enough players going all crazy about it.
Keno Skir
#57 - 2017-03-02 15:31:45 UTC
Ijon-Tichy wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
CONCORD always wins.
CODE always loses.

Whether suicide ganking is PvP or PvE, or both, or something else entirely, is an intriguing topic.


You and your sig make them win all the time, make them relevant. That makes me wonder if you are more the Don Quijote or the Agent Provocateur kind of poster. Only way to get rid of things like CODE. would be to ignore them collectively until they get bored and move on to something else. And we both know that is not ganna happen. More like people make it to easy for them to carry on. No matter how stupid the provocation is, there are always more than enough players going all crazy about it.


Wow everything's super cereal now... Pirate

Black Lanterns Blog <- Read my ramblings -.-

250,000 Bonus SP when you start an Alpha Clone HERE <---
Ijon-Tichy
Ze One Man Show
#58 - 2017-03-02 15:34:49 UTC
Keno Skir wrote:


Wow everything's super cereal now... Pirate
You made me google a meme...
Frostys Virpio
State War Academy
Caldari State
#59 - 2017-03-02 15:43:16 UTC
CODE never owned high-sec and barring major game changes, never will either. The game does not really let you own that part of space.

On the other hand, they do enforce their rules over it to some extend with some degree of success which is probably higher than most group did before. They reach most of their stated objectives as long as they don't overshoot.
Hazel TuckerTS
Doomheim
#60 - 2017-03-02 16:16:19 UTC
Dom Arkaral wrote:
Salvos Rhoska wrote:
CONCORD always wins.
CODE always loses.

Whether suicide ganking is PvP or PvE, or both, or something else entirely, is an intriguing topic.

Why would CODE. lose if the only objective is content?

People cry, we win
People try to shoot us, we win
People tank, we win

Any action by players against us is a victory...
NPCs are irrelevant as gankers go out knowing they're only coming back in a pod Blink



Give up already....code is dead no one cares to hear your bloated drivel.

kiss kiss bang bang